Comm

@sesamebirds You think the people who complained watched Zeta Gundam?

i cant believe how some people believe that hathaway is in the wrong for doing terrorism and yet they didn’t have a problem when they were watching the aeug in zeta

Yujiro manifesting through the monitor to fucking kill me after I drop his winrate bellow 50%

@VEK_45 That aint true, they work full time to cry on the fourms when Anti Air gets buffed

aaaah battlefield and pilots been jobless faggots, a timeless classic

Most anime "fans" nowadays only "likes" anime because it is currently popular and don't want to feel left out. They don't want to engage and integrate into established otaku culture, they want to police it instead. When they caught glimpses of non-mainstream shows, they got weirded out because anime in general wasn't actually made for them. So they post contents on Youtube, Reddit, Tiktok, and Twitter about wanting anime to be changed and cater more to their taste. They force themselves to enjoy something that, deep down, they actually don't like. This whole thing resulted in performative anime fans, people who claim to be fans, yet consistently complain every show outside of their beloved single genre having common anime tropes. Hell, they sometimes don't even like the anime aspect in the shows they actually watched.

I think the whole “problematic medias” debate boils down to the fact that many of you guys are letting 15 year olds tell you what to think

This mindset is exactly what destroyed western media BTW. It's this desire for "deconstruction" that gave us pure doomer slop where everything is a joke, no sincerity whatsoever and nothing to achieve. I'M LOOKING AT YOU, WHO WATCHES THE BOYS!

I also have to ask, it'd be a huge favor if you could repost these patch announcements. The more people I can get in on these patches, the better. The more people that order, means more patches funded. Thank you all for your support.

FEED ME RICK DOMS

This image is evergreen

ABSOLUTELY NOT—

There's a reason other companies are trying so desperately to have Steam labeled as a monopoly

If being anti-data center is China first call me Chairman Mao.

California lawmakers took a big step for video game players on May 14, 2026. A group in the state Assembly voted to advance bill AB 1921, meaning the full Assembly will now vote on it soon. The bill, named the Protect Our Games Act, was introduced by Assemblymember Chris Ward. It sets clear rules for video game companies that sell games connected to online servers. If it becomes law, it would apply only to new games sold after January 1, 2027. >Before shutting down servers, companies must notify players at least 60 days in advance. >They must then provide one of three options: -an offline version playable forever -a free patch allowing play without the company’s servers -or a full refund. Many companies currently shut down servers and make paid games unplayable. This bill aims to stop that. The Stop Killing Games campaign supported the bill, while the Entertainment Software Association opposed it, arguing the rules would hurt new game development. The opposition failed in the committee vote.

Texas has “4 of the top 10” biggest cities in the country and yet doesn’t have high speed rail that looks like this:

the spirit of twomad moving to fortnite next update

This has sparked a lot of dumb taco discourse that’s exposing all the Yankee Republican influencers as the wannabe Texans they are

@IncroyableSauce If Cowboy Bebop had a live action adaptation I bet it would be faithful to the source material! And oh man if there was a Halo TV series too!

Adaptations so bad the entire fandom does “There is no war in Ba Sing Se” style propaganda to erase its existence from public consciousness is so hilarious😭😭😭and commendable

The video game industry is lobbying against Stop Killing Games California is considering a new law called AB 1921, also known as the Protect Our Games Act. If passed, the bill would apply to paid digital games sold after January 1, 2027. It requires that if a company shuts down the online services needed to play the game normally, it must give players 60 days' notice and either release a patch so the game can still be played or offer buyers a full refund. The bill does not require companies to keep servers running forever. It simply prevents them from making a game unplayable without warning or a solution for those who already paid for it. The Entertainment Software Association, the main group representing video game companies in the United States, is lobbying against the bill. Their arguments are basically the usual ones: >games are licensed, not owned >online services are complicated >third-party licenses expire >security risks exist >this could be hard or expensive to enforce Supporters of the bill, including the Stop Killing Games campaign, say this is basic customer protection because when you buy a game, it should not suddenly stop working with no remedy. The bill gives companies clear options and applies only to future games. A hearing is scheduled for this Thursday in the California Assembly Appropriations Committee. If you are part of an organization in the United States, especially in California, you can submit a letter of support to the committee. This is an important step for better rights for players who buy digital games.

this game was made to be enjoyed soley by boring out of touch white millennials who couldnt accept they had a privileged upbringing so they wanna pretend they were a generation of rebels

@chillywilly214 Because they dont merge correctly or politely, they fly up, skip the line and EXPECT to be let in, its entitled behavior and its obnoxious.