Connor Stevens retweetledi
Connor Stevens
2.1K posts

Connor Stevens retweetledi

Anyone care to explain how this global power control structure happened to organically originate from the benevolent hearts of governing angels?
City of London
MI6
District of Columbia
CIA
Federal Reserve
USAID
55,000 NGOs
And then, further explain how these
Unelected
Unaccountable
Unauthorized
Unconstitutional
Unforgivable
Godless, tyrannical assholes would have ever voluntarily ended their bloodlust campaign to steal, kill and destroy all of humanity
Unless our U.S. Military led an intervention to Save the World?
I’ll wait.
@POTUS @DeptofWar @WhiteHouse @USTreasury @USSpaceForce @USArmy @USNavy @usairforce @USMC @USCG

English
Connor Stevens retweetledi

I oppose any laws requiring cars to have technology that shuts them down if the driver is drunk. The reason I oppose them is that I utterly reject the moral logic on which they are based.
The moral logic for these laws is that they will kill some innocent people, but they will save more people than they kill. Sure, there will be the person who was drugged by someone trying to harm them and whose car doesn't let them flee, and there will be the person who is trying to rush an injured person to the hospital whose demeanor will cause their car not to work. But there will be lots more people who tried to drive drunk who will be stopped. And innocent people they would have crashed into will be saved.
But we don't get to actually kill innocent people to save other people. Suppose there was a doctor would save a dozen of innocent people every year because he's the best doctor there is, but in exchange he demands the right to kill one innocent person every year who would otherwise have lived. We would be moral monsters if we hired such a doctor. We don't get to play god like that.
This law will actively kill some innocent people every year. We shouldn't pass laws that actively kill innocent people, even to save a greater number of other innocent people.
English
Connor Stevens retweetledi
Connor Stevens retweetledi

If this does not bother you, just remember if you have ever been drunk even once a police officer could have done this to you.
Police The Police 2.0@PoliceThePolic1
🚨 Cop Smashes Drunk Man's Head into the Ground for No Reason, Knocking Him Out Yes he was drunk, yes he could barely stand. But does mean he should receive state sponsored brain damage and headache that lasts a week? 🤬🤬 📍Huntington, WV
English
Connor Stevens retweetledi

@Acquired_Savant The CFTC is late! We've been mapping trades timed to policy signals across 16,238 congressional transactions. Same pattern every time: the trade happens before the announcement. The structure shows it. The filings confirm it. Different branch, same game.
English
Connor Stevens retweetledi
Connor Stevens retweetledi
Connor Stevens retweetledi
Connor Stevens retweetledi
Connor Stevens retweetledi

Here it is: CONFIRMED
This is,
Georgia Secretary of State, Rat Raffensperger in the morning hours of Nov 4th 2020.
CONFIRMING TRUMP WON THE STATE OF GEORGIA just hours before the United States government was overthrown.
“We have about 2% left to go, as you can see where we are right now, it will not change the outcome.”
In fact he doubles down after getting reprimanded,
“We don’t guess, what we do is report.”
In other words,
If 100% of the 2% remaining votes went to Joe Biden, Donald J Trump still won the State of Georgia.
Now, DECERTIFY THE ATROCITY CONGRESS CERTIFIED ON JAN 6th.
English
Connor Stevens retweetledi

My new paper on the physics of demons:
🔖 Entropic Parasites: Demonic Entities in the Nested Condensate Model of the Quantum Vacuum
scalarphysics.com/Montalk_(2026)…

English
Connor Stevens retweetledi
Connor Stevens retweetledi

Attention pedophiles:
Now, according to our new state law in Florida, if you rape a child you will be put to death. Keep your hands off our children.
Thank you to the Florida legislature and @GovRonDeSantis for getting this done.
English
Connor Stevens retweetledi
Connor Stevens retweetledi
Connor Stevens retweetledi
Connor Stevens retweetledi

Short Answer; No. Here is why 👇
Xaman is claiming to be non-custodial in order to skirt MiCA and their CASP DNB/AFM requirements under Dutch Law.
Using the seeds of users without explicit authorization (which is not given) to sign payment transactions to themselves constitutes CASP (Crypto-Asset Service Provider) under MiCA. If they are 'breaking even' as Wieste claims, the £2.85m fine alone could end them.
Why this triggers MiCA CASP requirements
MiCA (Regulation (EU) 2023/1114) defines custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients one of the core crypto-asset services listed in Article 3(1)(16)(a)) as:
“the safekeeping or **controlling, on behalf of clients**, of crypto-assets or of the means of access to such crypto-assets, where applicable in the form of private cryptographic keys.”
Control is the key legal test: it exists where the provider has the practical capacity to move or dispose of the assets **without the end-user’s involvement, approval, or participation** (e.g., unilateral ability to trigger a blockchain transaction).
- **Signing transactions with the user’s seed on their behalf** → This directly means the provider has access to and uses the private key/seed. In a true non-custodial wallet, the seed never leaves the user’s device, and signing only happens locally after the user explicitly confirms/approves *EACH* transaction in the app. Although the Xaman user approves 'a' transaction, two transactions take place, one of which the user did not sign and Xaman has exercised the seed to execute the transaction.
- **Without an explicit signature/confirmation from the user** → This removes user control. The provider can act unilaterally → this meets the “controlling … on behalf of clients” threshold.
- **Sending payments to themselves** (i.e., to addresses controlled by Xaman/XRPL Labs) → This is the provider exercising that control over the user’s assets, which is the hallmark of a custodial relationship even if done *with or without* consent.
Recital 83 of MiCA explicitly states:
“Hardware or software providers of **non-custodial wallets should not fall within the scope of this Regulation**.” This carve-out only applies when the user retains sole control of the keys and must authorize *every* transaction. Once the provider can sign and move funds without that, the carve-out disappears.
Xaman is providing
**clear CASP services**, such as:
- Execution of orders on behalf of clients.
- Transfer of crypto-assets on behalf of clients.
Any entity providing even one of these services in the EU (or targeting EU users) must be authorized as a CASP by a national competent authority, with full MiCA compliance (capital requirements, client asset segregation, governance, custody policy, insurance, etc.). Unauthorized provision is prohibited.
As a point of fact, Xaman is not MiCA compliant. What they are doing is illegal in their registered jurisdiction.
They'll die due to bad business practices all on their own, but I wouldn't blame any XRP Ledger user for seeking damages through official channels. You would be within your rights and the law to do so.
De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) — Complaints about financial institutions/crypto providers: dnb.nl/en/contact/rep…
Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) — Complaints about financial/crypto services, transparency, or conduct: afm.nl/en/consumenten…
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) — Complaints about personal data/privacy breaches (e.g., related to seeds/keys): autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/en/submitting-…
Dutch Police (Politie) — Report suspected fraud, theft, or cybercrime (online reporting available for some types like internet fraud): politie.nl/en/information…
European Consumer Centre (ECC) Netherlands — For cross-border EU consumer complaints (if applicable): eccnederland.nl/en
Michael Smith@Mikl1960XRP
@Acquired_Savant Is this even legal for Xaman
English
Connor Stevens retweetledi
Connor Stevens retweetledi

Shhh, try not to notice you're getting robbed. #WeitseGate hates when people notice.
👻 Footloose 👻@ft_loose
Who knew @XamanWallet was consolidating all their "service fees" on to Kraken to get dumped? 🤔 My estimation based off 1 week of data is that Xaman is collecting 25-30,000 XRP per week from their fee scheme. Every few hours that XRP is transferred to @krakenfx. More below.👇
English









