Consolata W.N

Today in court @ehdande was ordered to surrender the Alma to the Liquidator the Official Receiever within 7 days @Ndonglaw043 . Ur friend is being sorted bit by bit . Creditors must get their money back

@miamoreazure @ehdande @Ndonglaw043 We must get our money back. He can delay all he wants, 17th. July init!!!!!

@miamoreazure @ehdande @Ndonglaw043 It is boiling nicely mos mos. 1 day at a time. However creditors are on their way to the bank soonest countdown 17 th July.

@miamoreazure @ehdande @Ndonglaw043 Interesting thing is @ehdande has grown so old all of a sudden and lost weight greatly. He is almost walking with a staff. The ground is sliding so fast. In seven days, his drinking straw (Alma) will be snuffed. What a great joy it will be. The tether end is nigh

@miamoreazure @ehdande @Ndonglaw043 @cytonnasset @MwangoCapital @Ndonglaw043 this ur friend @ehdande stole from @BritamEA , then went on to steal from @CytonnInvest and @cytonnasset creditors and running AKIN TO FRAUD SPVs. He thinks yeye tu ndio amebeba akili, wengine wamebeba uji. Sasa anakulishwa ujinga yake✌🏿@kenyajudiciary @BRS_Kenya

@miamoreazure @ehdande @Ndonglaw043 Huyu @ehdande hakufunzwa na babake kuwa SHERIA NI MSUMENO, HUKATA MBELE NA NYUMA; Nae huyu wakili wake @Ndonglaw043 ni kama hakumshauri ipasavyo. Sasa @ehdande amebaki na ASIYEFUNZWA NA MAMAYE HUFUNZWA NA ULIMWENGU na DAWA YA DENI NI KULIPA.........@cytonnasset @MwangoCapital

@miamoreazure @CytonnInvest @ehdande @DanN_Mugendi @liznkukuu @jgnasser @FBIDirectorKash @foundersbattlle @jsckenya @CBKKenya @BRS_Kenya @AGDorcas_Oduor @FBI @FBIDirectorKash @ntvkenya @AdamskeyD @lawsocietykenya @DCI_Kenya @AllianceAHS @cytonnasset @USEmbassyKenya @BuzzroomKenya @WorldBankAfrica @pw_njeri @she_weru @AHSOBC @DCI_Kenya @CMAKenya @Kenyajudiciary

@miamoreazure @CytonnInvest @ehdande @DanN_Mugendi the 1st, @liznkukuu the 32nd, @jgnasser , I have a ask. You work/worked at @CytonnInvest , did you pay for these houses? 🤔 if you did, why didn't your CEO @ehdande repay the bank loan and the creditors? Alafu, mumehama, ama mnangoja auctioneers? @FBIDirectorKash

This @CytonnInvest @ehdande filing exposes a familiar pattern. Same cluster of names. Same litigation cycle. Same objective — delay liquidation. Over 100 “interested parties” in a single insolvency matter is not participation. It is process flooding. The Official Receiver is carrying out a court-sanctioned verification and asset realisation process. Then a Certificate of Urgency is filed to challenge that very process. The aim is obvious: • Disrupt verification • Recast claims • Interrupt realisation • Buy time This is not strategy. It is procedural obstruction. The courts have already made clear findings on the structure, the flow of funds, and the legitimacy of liquidation. Repetition does not change that. Insolvency proceedings are not defeated by volume or urgency filings. Court orders are not optional. @Kenyajudiciary @jsckenya At some point, this pattern must be addressed for what it is — abuse of process. Creditors are watching. The record is clear.

@miamoreazure @CytonnInvest @ehdande The buffoon will never give up BUT, but the long arm of the law will catch up with him. You can run, but you will never hide. Justice will be served, regardless of your headless chicken runs! We must get our hard-earned money back. You must pay what you attempted to steal!

@ehdande @jsckenya Listen, Im not wanted for bribing judges or stealing investor cash. What you did to your reputation is purely on you. You must live the life you choose!

@ehdande @jsckenya When crooks like you claim someone has integrity, it does raise an eyebrow.

@_Keffa Educate this guy who pretends to know everything

Proof of ownership for real estate is a certificate of title, certificate of lease or a sectional title. Proof of payment (even in full) does not constitute ownership. Technically, therefore, the land and all development on that LR No. is under OR.

@ehdande @CytonnInvest why havent you posted this ????? @MwangoCapital look at this 🤔

@miamoreazure @ehdande @CytonnInvest @MwangoCapital Stuck at "you join by paying", yet you paid for the property and you have no ownership, he hasn't paid the bank it's loan, he hasn't paid investors, yaani @ehdande is just strangling the homeowners while saying relax, you won't die😬 @Kenyajudiciary @CBKKenya @FBIDirectorKash

@ehdande @CytonnInvest This is not a land titling dispute. It is a liquidation enforcement issue. Once the court ordered surrender of titles, the only legally cognizable question is compliance — not academic arguments about Section 33 of the Lands Act. Disobedience of a court order does not become lawful by rebranding it as a jurisdictional debate.” Bloody rubbish The strategy is classic: Reframe: Insolvency enforcement → into → land law technicality Objective: Delay compliance Create jurisdictional confusion Avoid surrender of control over assets This mirrors the broader pattern of @ehdande @CytonnInvest fraudsters already documented: Serial applications Procedural diversion Substance avoidance @Kenyajudiciary @jsckenya

@ehdande fraudster per excellence . Shameless bandit of @CytonnInvest There’s a growing attempt to recast a straightforward insolvency enforcement issue as a complex land law controversy. That framing is legally untenable. On 24 November 2024, the Insolvency Court issued a clear order: surrender the titles within 7 days. That order has not been set aside, varied, or stayed. In law, that is the end of the matter on liability. Compliance is not optional. What we are dealing with is not “titling” under Section 33 of the Lands Act. It is asset recovery in liquidation. Under the Insolvency Act, the Official Receiver (as liquidator) is mandated to take custody and control of all assets of the estate, including documents of title. Any person holding such property is under a legal duty to deliver it up. Titles in this context are not being created, allocated, or regularised. They are existing assets of an insolvent estate, subject to a court-supervised recovery process. Invoking Section 33 is therefore a category error — it governs allocation of public land, not enforcement of insolvency orders. Equally misplaced is the jurisdiction argument. The test is simple: what is the dominant issue? Here, it is the recovery and preservation of assets for creditors within a liquidation framework. That squarely falls within the jurisdiction of the High Court exercising its insolvency mandate. This is not a dispute over competing land rights requiring adjudication by the Environment and Land Court. More fundamentally, the rule of law is clear: court orders are binding until set aside. Disagreement with an order does not entitle a party to ignore it. The proper recourse is appeal or review — not defiance. Statements such as “titles are not mandazi” may play well rhetorically, but they have no legal consequence. Non-compliance in the face of a valid order engages the law on contempt, with attendant personal liability. What we are seeing is a familiar litigation tactic: reframe a compliance obligation as a jurisdictional or procedural controversy to buy time and retain control over assets. Courts have repeatedly cautioned against such manoeuvres. The position is straightforward: • There is a valid court order directing surrender of titles • The titles constitute assets of the insolvent estate • The duty to comply is immediate and enforceable • Failure to comply is not a legal argument — it is contempt This is not a debate about land law theory. It is a test of whether court orders will be obeyed in an insolvency process designed to protect creditors. Rebranding enforcement as a “novel legal issue” does not change the law. It only delays its application.

E63/E64 of 2021 CYTONN HIGHYIELD SOLUTIONS V OFFICE OF OFFICIAL RECEIEVER The Alma, Ruaka — What @ehdande Edwin Dande Is NOT Telling The Unit Buyers. 1/ I am a Creditor. Case Nos. E63/E64 of 2021 — CPN CHYS Liquidation. I was in court. It is a fact that CIMP/CHYS/CPN LLP management continued operating after administration orders. Read carefully below. 2/ SBM Bank holds a registered charge over The Alma, Ruaka. Perfected. On the register. It ranks above every sale agreement signed by every unit buyer. This is not opinion. This is the Land Registration Act. 3/ CPN CHYS Liquidation holds a KES 3.4 billion+ claim on the same asset. Upheld by the High Court. Upheld again by the Court of Appeal — November 2025. It is not going away. It is not a conspiracy. It is a judgment. 4/ Not one unit buyer at The Alma perfected title. Not one transfer was registered. Unregistered interests do not defeat a registered charge. The April 30th verification deadline does not alter this hierarchy. Not by one position. The unit buyers have nothing to show their purchases apart from some green colored receipts. 5/ The insolvency waterfall is not negotiable: ▪ Liquidation costs ▪ Secured creditors — SBM Bank ▪ Preferential creditors ▪ Unsecured creditors — CPN CHYS Liquidation ▪ Unregistered unit buyers — LAST No WhatsApp group strategy changes this order. 6/ Tonight, Edwin Harold Dayan Dande is inside unit buyer WhatsApp groups telling 301 buyers that the @BRS_Kenya Official Receiver and the @Kenyajudiciary @jsckenya Judiciary are colluding against their property interests. Let that sink in. 7/ This is the same man who: ▪ Sold 301 units plus another undeveloped 176 units over land he went ahead and charged to SBM Bank debt now at 1.4 billion ▪ Raised KES 11 billion through CHYS from 4,000+ investors ▪ Raised KES 3.6 billion through CPN from 886 investors ▪ Controlled virtually all SPVs as principal partner simultaneously ▪ Continued dealing with assets after court administration orders ▪ Deployed armed guards to block court-appointed liquidators from accessing The Alma ▪ Allocated himself 35 apartments at The Alma — paying not a single cent. His patners own another 40 or so apartments of which they were commuting board allowances to purchase the same, absolutely laughable. 8/ Thirty-five apartments. Zero consideration. While Kenyans paid with their savings, their pensions, their children’s school fees. He now wants those same buyers to form a human shield between him and the Official Receiver. The audacity is breathtaking. The legal exposure is total. 9/ What Dande is engineering in that WhatsApp group is not strategy. It is obstruction. He is: ▪ Discrediting the OR to delay asset realisation ▪ Discrediting the Judiciary to undermine court orders ▪ Corralling buyers under his coordination to prevent independent legal action ▪ Buying time — past April 30th — while the clock runs on investor recovery 10/ To every unit buyer in that group: The man running your “team strategy” designed the structure that left you with no perfected title, over charged land, inside a KES 14+ billion insolvency. Get independent legal advice. File your proof of purchase directly with the OR. Do not let him use you as cover. Not twice. 11/ To @BRS_Kenya the Official Receiver: The noise about judicial and OR conspiracy is manufactured. It is a delay tactic by a man with 35 unearned apartments and a KES 14 billion hole. The court has spoken twice. Realise the assets. Protect the creditors. 12/ To @KenyaJudiciary and @JSCKenya: The integrity of Kenya’s insolvency framework is being publicly attacked by a party subject to active liquidation orders — upheld at appellate level. The institution deserves a public reaffirmation that the rule of law, not WhatsApp group strategy, governs property rights in Kenya. This matter is too large and too public to be left unanswered. @NationAfrica @StandardKenya @NAssemblyKE @Senate_KE @AGOfficeKenya @DCI_Kenya @MwangoCapital

@BD_Africa You cannot apologise over loss.You take liability.