Cormac Lackman

@H0und0fG0d The point isn't for the kid to learn how to add 8+9. The point is for the kid to learn how to break down math problems into simpler problems that can be added together. This way the kid can solve larger problems that he hasn't just memorized.

@onlineinsane Just teach the kid how to add nine onto eight. I didn't need to get out connect four to figure this out as a kid

@The_Sublimatory @the_hoch @AlexGodofsky

@the_hoch @AlexGodofsky If it’s an analogy to Iran, we *would* deserve to be bombed and complying with the demands of the bombers would be the right course of action.

If missiles were dropping on US cities the two factions in US politics would be "we should bomb them into the stone age" and "we should exterminate their entire country".

@MichaelSte91480 @pflakes3 @TonyPetrucelli3 @Ihartitz If you dive at his knees he's going to slam your face into the dirt as he blows past you. They run that drill at the high school level, any half decent DE isn't getting cut without some good trickery from the OT

@pflakes3 @TonyPetrucelli3 @Ihartitz If you go for his knees he’s jumping over you

Myles Garrett trips over your corpse at least once

@THEDavidMarcus @The_Phinstones I mean we have all yelled that at Tannehill as he sat in the pocket holding the ball way too long.

@The_Phinstones I dunno how old he is, but I can promise none of us Dolphins fans from 2001-2026 ever demanded more passing with the quarterbacks we have had.

Accurate 🤣🤣🤣

@Ian_Fisch @IsThisA3DModel LSPs and TreeSitter are perfectly good for finding sections of code you need. Claude can't load your entire project into context it will just grep keywords based off your prompt. You can do that yourself.

@IsThisA3DModel Gen AI is rightfully mocked, but refusing to use Claude or Codex on a complicated codebase is just inefficient. If nothing else, you can use it to quickly find a section of code you’re looking for. Much much better than existing search methods.

bro just fired all his competent employees

@momndad2boys Looks like a very clear foul

@mopatton_sports Looks like a foul on the gray team to me.

So I didn’t get to post this during the game because the game was moving faster than the internet, but this was a ‘held ball’ with 30 seconds left in Loretto/East Nashville … I don’t know that I’ve ever seen that ‘tie-up’ result in a held ball …

@momndad2boys @ben1_benson Looks like he's exaggerating his footwork. Probably working on something specific making it look awkward. This is what spring practice is for

@ben1_benson He can work on his footwork and route running because they are slow and sloppy. That’s why spring practice and off season program is important.

This the worse I’ve seen at 18 year old move ever

@PatriotJoeDaily They use like 12 angles to track the 3d image of the ball in space. This is talking about where they position the "strike zone" in that space. They chose the midpoint of the plate even though that's not what the rule is because it gave them the results they liked the best.

@rationalyankee Newbee here. Why can’t they use the front view along with a synchronized side view to “see” the 3D position of the ball? Maybe would require a higher speed side camera but it should work pretty well.

The rulebook defines the strike zone as a 3D volume. Any part of the ball crossing any part of that space is a strike. ABS uses a 2D plane at the plate’s midpoint. MLB tested the literal rulebook version first. The 3D zone produced inconsistent calls on breaking balls. Evaluating at the front edge turned slow curveballs that bounced in the dirt into called strikes. The midpoint plane was chosen because it tracked closest to how umpires have been calling the zone in practice for decades. The legitimate criticism here is that the rulebook was never updated to match what the system actually does. That’s a real process failure. But calling it a technical limitation implies they couldn’t get it right. They tested it, didn’t like what it produced and made a deliberate choice.

@therealmudddawg Who's call is this? The covering official watched the shooter land clean and the defender blow by, then turned to see the shot go in, then sees the shooter on the ground when he turns back. Can guess what happened but didnt see it. I don't officiate basketball so I'm curious.

@Krisplashed Exactly. I tell young HS officials at camps: watch for the 1st one call it, don't be a chump and only call the 2nd one. Protect a player from non-basketball crap so they don't feel the need to stand up for themselves which usually ends with a fight.

Hot take: This fight doesn’t happen if the official calls the foul that happened right in front of him. He doesn’t. Pippen Jr gets mad and gets it back in blood.

@chrischin333 Tbf he didn't actually see it. He watches the shooter land clean, turns to see if the shot went in, turns back to see dude on the ground. That gesture you see looks more like "what happened?" than "play on". Watch where his eyes are

@Krisplashed Tired of refs not doing their job. The ref seen it even made a gesture like play on which is wild. Pippen should not of even gotten a foul after all that. Get the first person.

@noahdarling_ Sure you can... You could have another RBI on a 4th at bat and have 13 RBIs.

Fun fact. It is impossible to hit three grand slams without recording 12 RBI

@DeadLights27 1inch slug would be pretty destructive

@RealBookerScott An ice storm is the only time when 1 inch will actually be destructive

300,000 in Tennessee without power. This is Nashville.

@_PersonMcHuman_ @LoudestFrost @titotore9w9q9qq @COUNTBUX @spicebae_ What danger? He's got a life jacket on

watch who you have kids by bc wtf you mean you took your time getting our child out of a dirty lake while he's screaming for you to help him???

@KalahadF @DFauxy There's absolutely an objective standard... It's a pretty stupid standard but it clearly exists. One was falling to the ground as part of the act of catching. The other caught it with his feet in the ground and tucked it while being tackled.

@DFauxy There is no objective standard at that point. That "feels" like a catch and the other doesn't is the defense. Subjective calls based on feelings will always lead to this situation when they decide a game and the NFL has very involved gambling partners.

He has two feet down with possession, doesn’t make a third act, doesn’t survive the ground with the ball in his hands. Should’ve been a turnover based on what I’ve been told a thousand times over the last 24 hours!

@TJLang70 Because the RB has possession before going to the ground, the WR hasn't established possession yet.

The more I watch it, the more I’m leaning towards this being a catch by Cooks. Knee/hip/shoulder down before the ball is ripped away. If you can’t rip the ball away from the RB after he hits the ground, why can you do it to a WR? I’m genuinely torn on this one.

@BillerVan @salisberrysteak Completely different plays... Rogers had possession and then was going to the ground, Cooks was going to the ground while trying to establish possession.

@salisberrysteak Not when it’s ending a season. VP of Replay said the exact opposite on a similar play. That’s a problem.

We get it. You’ve gotta cover. No way you can possibly say otherwise and keep your job.

@CaptPantalones He didn't even think he caught it in the moment. He laid there mad at himself for losing the ball.

Anyone with half a functioning football brain knows you caught it.

@MattEdwards Just say you don't know what possession is... It's okay

Brandin Cooks has the possession and his knee is down. I can’t believe how quickly they called that a pick.

@hailmarysportss Do you know what possession is? Especially as it relates to a receiver falling to the ground in the process of attempting to catch a pass?

Don’t you love when a receiver has possession, hits the ground, and then gets the ball taken away for an INT? Wait…

@SamMonsonNFL Impossible to tell here because you're looking at a still frame.

I think the more relevant Q is how does Cooks NOT have possession/control here, like Steratore was adamant was the case. He CLEARLY had possession and control, the only question was did he have it for long enough. Not sure why he was persisting in acting like he never had it.