Cos

@PressSec I didn't vote for digital ID

New White House App Delivers Unparalleled Access to the Trump Administration whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/…

@econliberties Just make it illegal for them to spy on us, and sell our data. Everything else is just a band-aid.

NEW: Today, Colorado passed HB26-1210 — banning surveillance pricing in the state! “Instead of competing on price or quality, companies are using algorithms and personal surveillance data to determine how much they can extract from each individual. Colorado is stepping in to restore honest competition," says @Pat_Garofalo in our statement.

1. Force AIPAC to register as a foreign agent 2. Publish all AIPAC's financial records on the Internet 3. Publicize every payment AIPAC ever made to any American politician 4. Publish every email or text message ever sent between AIPAC and any American politician.

@LouisAnslow In the US it's the right

Anti-tech- authoritarianism is revealing how quickly seemingly benign centre left world view can turn dangerous fast.

@Shady80KW @SenBlumenthal Oh now there is code 🤣

@Cosmic_Scr @SenBlumenthal Thinking this has anything to do with publicly available code is pretty fucking dumb and shows a lack of understanding of this entire issue. Read some books before coming back to the table. Enjoy!

THREAD: Having helped lead the state Attorney Generals in successfully suing Big Tobacco, I’m struck by similarities to winning legal strategies against Big Tech. 1/

@Shady80KW @SenBlumenthal I might as well tell you that face book is made of magic incantations. You might even believe it.

@Shady80KW @SenBlumenthal I'll just leave it at this. You're kind of retarded so I don't believe anyone could explain it in a way that you could understand. You don't even understand basic things like how Facebook is literally code. If your on a browser you could even hit F12 to see some of the code.

I would have preferred a robot over the horrid feminist she-beast teachers I had growing up. Make them only teach the facts, and this will work. Try and make them insert ideology into the lessons and it will fail. It's just that simple.

@matteopelleg Nah

People are so confused about this tweet, so let me elaborate. Yes, AI will eventually create art that is as good or even better than humans. But, humans will not care for it, beside an initial curiosity, because art is not about art. It’s about the humans who created it and their stories. Art it’s an exploration of human limits. Humans are fundamentally not interested in what other species do, think or feel. How many people watch AI play chess?

@nikitabier Not seeing third world opinions from obvious scammers about western politics would make it much better. I hope you guys reconsider and limit their payments to views from their regions.

The Internet was a mistake

@Shady80KW @SenBlumenthal If asbestos were a software product made up of code(speech) produced by engineers it would be speech. It's obviously not it's. I suggest you do some research on the 1st amendment and what it protects. Gov can't compel an engineer to insert code(speech) into a platform.

@Cosmic_Scr @SenBlumenthal An ingredient list doesn’t make raw asbestos protected speech. It doesn’t make cigarettes expected speech l. Not does it make a social media platform protected speech. No one’s trying to suppress your illogical posts - that’s free speech!

@Shady80KW @SenBlumenthal An ingredient LIST is literal speech The words on the package are speech Yes asbestos is not speech Congratulations now you finally understand that cigs are not speech, and social media is. 👏👏👏 I'm so proud of you 😂

@Cosmic_Scr @SenBlumenthal An ingredient list isn’t speech. Raw Asbestos fibers comes in a bag with words on it. There’s an ingredient list that’s followed before it’s packaged. Asbestos fibers in a bag isn’t speech.

@Shady80KW @SenBlumenthal Your a little slow, so I hope this helps!

@Cosmic_Scr @SenBlumenthal There you go, you’re starting to get it— The platform is *for* speech but it is not speech itself. Read that to yourself a few times.

@Shady80KW @SenBlumenthal The engineering process involves code, speech, and the platform is for speech. It's speech...

@Cosmic_Scr @SenBlumenthal *Platform* is not speech. Important to understand the nuance here. That is why this case was able to be brought in the first place and why this got around Section 230 immunity. This is not about Facebook posts or content. This is about how Facebook as a platform was engineered

@Shady80KW @SenBlumenthal 1. Defective(your opinion) speech is still speech 2. Defective(your opinion) speech is still speech 3. Compelled is not free speech You can cry about all you want, but the 1st Amendment protects speech. If you have a problem move to third world country.

@Cosmic_Scr @SenBlumenthal 1. The platform is the defectively designed product. That’s what they were sued. Not for Facebook posts. 2. Code = the defective design. Engineering addiction is not protected. 3. Concealing harm to users is not speech.

@Shady80KW @SenBlumenthal 1. It's a platform where people speak 2. The platform is software, and code is speech 3. The company also has the right to speak It's speech...

@Cosmic_Scr @SenBlumenthal Facebook isn’t speech either. It’s a platform.

If you have to ask permission it was never a right in the first place, it was a privilege they can revoke.

White men are a minority and are discriminated against openly with zero recourse

@FiveEyeTea @ReclaimTheNetHQ

@Cosmic_Scr @ReclaimTheNetHQ

Ohio is taking another run at age verification for adult sites. The first law didn't work because adult platforms found a loophole. So they rewrote it. Another state pushing for showing IDs to access online platforms.