


"The analysis appeared designed to retrospectively justify an outcome that had already been decided." rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/…
crambosley
130 posts




"The analysis appeared designed to retrospectively justify an outcome that had already been decided." rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/…

Hoo boy, this is a bad idea. Objectively this is such a conservative and dated approach to ways of working that will backfire on the public service and we the public will pay the price Let me give you the reasons it’s not a good idea 🧵 rnz.co.nz/news/political…


So-called experts aren’t on our side. The opposition sure as heck ain’t on our side. And even some centre-right politicians are missing in action. But a majority of New Zealanders support the Treaty Principles Bill 👇 treaty.nz





Doubts over the depth and rigour of Sir Bill English’s review of public housing agency Kāinga Ora are heightened by scathing confidential feedback over errors, omissions and using unverified hearsay. #Echobox=1716930292-1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">newsroom.co.nz/2024/05/29/mal…










Not a Labour fan, and they had some big problems (refusing to tax effectively), but this is insane framing. Is Labour in power and I missed it somehow?











