Creepr 🍎

@SSRI_Kozer Jaden McNeil

Destiny claimed Nick Fuentes is faking his superchats.😂Last year Destiny was saying Nick Fuentes gets ~500 real viewers a stream. Has anyone seethed more than Steven Bonnell about Nick's success?? 😂

Yes, H-1B is a "federal program." But that doesn't mean a Governor can't do anything about it. Here's exactly what I'd do as Florida Governor to effectively end the H-1B scam and protect our workers, especially recent grads. 1. Use state contracts as leverage. There are 100,000 companies in Florida that rely on state contracts. As Governor, I'd mandate that any company receiving a state contract cannot use H-1B labor in Florida. Simple choice: do you want access to the billions Florida spends on everything from software to construction, *or* do you want to keep firing qualified Floridians for cheaper foreign workers? You can't have both. You can guess which choice companies like Amazon, Accenture, and FedEx will make. 2. Fine H-1Bs into oblivion. President Trump supports a $100,000 fine per H-1B worker imported. I'd double that in Florida and make it annual. The H-1B program is not being used to hire the world's "best and brightest scientists and engineers." 72% of H-1B visas go to entry-level positions. Companies are importing cheap foreign labor from India for jobs like accounting, IT tech support, and financial analysis. There are 7-Eleven locations in Florida that have imported H-1B workers from India while Americans are desperate for work and relying on taxpayer-funded welfare to survive. Congress created the H-1B program in 1990 under the Immigration Act. I wish Congress would end it, but I'm not holding my breath. As Governor, I'll never throw in the towel because something is a "federal issue." I'll use state contracts and annual fines to compel companies to ditch the H-1B scam and hire American workers again so they can earn a living, get married, start a family, and buy a home.

@MomKrill @hasen_95dx @JadeAtrophis No, you’re making the error by saying it doubles the likelihood. I don’t know how many times I have to say this, but saying it improves your odds is a leap in logic. This implies the degree itself is what’s desirable, but that isn’t necessarily true. It’s correlation vs causation

@CreeperVendetta @hasen_95dx @JadeAtrophis You're still not understanding how statistics function. You keep changing what I said by using terms that are not synonymous with what I stated. Which is probably also why you're misunderstanding it as a correlation statement when it is not. x.com/i/grok/share/d…

Why do women think having a job makes them more desirable It doesn't If anything it's generally the opposite

@MomKrill @hasen_95dx @JadeAtrophis Meant to say “women with college degrees got married at twice the rate.” Regardless, by saying your odds increase with a college degree, you’re again implying the college degree ITSELF is desirable. It could be a multitude of other factors, which won’t be gained with a degree.

The first statement is wrong though "twice as much" and "doubles likelihood" aren't actually synonymous. It's not a multiplicative effect, it's an increase in odds. Your odds increasing in a category doesn't mean you're causing a specific outcome. Ex: you're more likely to have a car accident if you're driving, that doesn't mean you'll necessarily experience any accidents.

@MomKrill @hasen_95dx @JadeAtrophis Saying “women with college degrees got married twice as much” is not the same as saying “obtaining a college degree doubles your chances of getting married.” The second implies the degree itself is desirable, which is not proven by the data. It’s a correlation.

@CreeperVendetta @hasen_95dx @JadeAtrophis That's literally just the current data. People who obtain 4 year degrees have double the likelihood of getting married. I'm making no argument about causation at all, just stating the current data.

@MomKrill @hasen_95dx @JadeAtrophis This is a correlative argument, because you’re making it sound like a woman could obtain a college degree and double her chances of getting married. That’s not necessarily true.

@CreeperVendetta @hasen_95dx @JadeAtrophis Sure, but I'm not even making a correlative argument. I'm saying that the "men don't like women with college degrees, they only care how attractive a woman is" does not match marriage data. If your theory is contrary to observable reality then you need a new theory.

@MomKrill @hasen_95dx @JadeAtrophis Have you never heard "correlation does not equal causation" before in your life?

And yet theory doesn't seem to reflect reality. Obtaining a college degree doubles the likelihood that someone will get married, and the more education they have to lower their divorce rate is. So clearly while men may not consciously select for education/career in women, they're not proposing to or staying with lower education women.

@HamThinker @GothEntKrys @3rdeyefry @blacknredtext @Epicartworks Not even one tenth the pain of a manlet truecel

@CreeperVendetta @GothEntKrys @3rdeyefry @blacknredtext @Epicartworks Bro my cousin is 6'8 at 34 and one his spinal discs are literally breaking down not even 20 years

Submission from @epicartworks

@Enheduannako @j_fishback You’re admitting in your own point that America was a Christian nation, otherwise there’d be no religious laws to “shed.” The federal government in that time was a distant authority and rarely interfered with the states as it does now. What was the purpose of the bill of rights?

@CreeperVendetta @j_fishback That’s circular: states were America, states had religious laws, therefore Christian nation. But states were shedding religious laws for decades. You’re using the federal structure built to limit religious authority as proof of Christian nationhood. But it’s the opposite

@Enheduannako @j_fishback No, you make the fundamental mistake of considering America as merely the federal government. For all of early American history, states were more influential by far. They WERE America, and the federal government specifically allowed them to have religious laws.

@CreeperVendetta @j_fishback You are conflating the existence of Christianity and Christians in the U.S. as meaning the U.S. is a Christian country and founded upon Christianity- the point of James’ that I was refuting.

@Enheduannako @j_fishback x.com/creepervendett…

@CreeperVendetta @j_fishback Read Madison’s Memorial and Remonstrance, Permoli v. New Orleans (1845), and the Establishment Clause existed precisely to prevent the federal government from doing what those states were doing. They didn’t want to continue religious governance but systematically dismantle it.

@Enheduannako @j_fishback 1. Even after that point there were still many religious laws such as blasphemy laws, which continued into the 20th century. So your point is moot. 2. My point was proven, because even according to you, literal state religions persisted for over half a century after the founding

@CreeperVendetta @j_fishback Are you aware that Jefferson’s 1786 Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom rejected state religious coercion & Madison used it as a blueprint for the 1st A. By 1833, even Massachusetts had disestablished its official church. It was a purposeful move away from state religion.

@Enheduannako @j_fishback Then what is your point? Because what you cited refers only to the federal government. The states themselves- that being the real America in essence- were all Christian.

@CreeperVendetta @j_fishback You are assuming things I never said. I never said that diff states didn’t have religious requirements. Please look at what I actually wrote & stop tacking on your additional assumptions. Not all states had blasphemy laws- some did If you’re a U.S. citizen- it is our history.

@Enheduannako @j_fishback I'd ask you to do the same. All states had laws on religion, and MA/CT/NH literally had official state religions. NC, SC, MD, DE, NJ, GA, and PA required all officeholders to be Christian. All states had blasphemy and Sabbath laws. You don't know anything about "our" history

@CreeperVendetta @j_fishback I truly implore you to please familiarize yourself with our history.

I want to have sons so I can teach them to be amoral beasts of prey who see other people only as tools to be used and discarded. Daughters will be raised on moe anime, will never marry, and will remain with me until my death, when they will be burned alive on my funeral pyre.

.@ByronDonalds, you coming tonight? 9:30pm.

@Enheduannako @j_fishback Only because they wanted to preserve the right of the states to enforce their own religion

@j_fishback Treaty of Tripoli (written under Washington and signed under Adams) states very plainly that the United States was “not in any sense found on the Christian religion.” Additionally, Fauci didn’t close churches. He did not have that power.

@GothEntKrys @3rdeyefry @blacknredtext @Epicartworks Better 50 years as a chad, then a whole life as a chud

@3rdeyefry @blacknredtext @Epicartworks Eh too a degree. The more past 6'4 ya get the more fucked your health and joints become, sayin this as a 6'10 Ent, probably be closer to 7' if i fixed my back.

@Antunes1 If you don’t know who I am, then maybe your best course would be to tread lightly…

@Based_Mr_L Did you even read what he said ? The clip is literally corroborated here

Hello hello you stupid dumbass groyper npc x.com/i/status/20491…

Nick Fuentes' opinions every 3 weeks be like: