SunMan2
2.7K posts



@_Balut_Penoy_ He is so angry... Why would you be angry at people trying to squeeze a gdc? He must be very scared of losing everything... I hope he loses EVERYTHING WHEN GDC SQUEEZE.


(Reposting) Irony at its finest: I filed a Section 192 petition after multiple MMTLP/MMAT FOIA requests were dumped onto the SEC’s “complex track”—a queue that delays even starting review for up to 36 months. The entire point of the petition? If a FOIA gets buried on the complex track, the data should be automatically preserved. Instead, here’s what actually happens: That same 36-month delay magically matches a 36-month data retention window… after which the information is destroyed. So let’s get this straight— 36 months before they even look at your request and 36 months before the data disappears. Coincidence? Or a system designed so the clock runs out before accountability even begins.

Could the SEC be any more obvious about wiping out MMTLP trading records? They say it takes 36 months to even begin reviewing some “complex” MMTLP/MMAT FOIA requests. So is anyone surprised the SEC now wants to delete trading data after 3 years — knowing it includes the exact MMTLP/MMAT CAT data those FOIAs are asking for?? @kimkep4796 @palikaras @whisskier @bleedblue18 @busybrands @JunkSavvy

Calling it a “leak” from me in @Giftsonglass space when it’s already in a tweet is wild. It’s public. The $MMTLP letter is in legal review — nothing new here. 🇺🇸







It wasn't an April Fool's prank. It was the 💣💣💣 no one saw coming... #FOIA 3 years ago today...THEY KNEW!!! #FINRAFraud The FOIA documents reveal extensive communications between senior FINRA officials and their SEC counterparts concerning issues with MMTLP trading. They knew there was a problem for more than a year and FAILED to protect investors. Key findings include: 💥Fourteen months prior to FINRA’s U3 trading halt, three FINRA committees—Market Operations, OTC Corporate Actions Team, and Market Fraud Team—were in active dialogue with SEC representatives re: MMTLP....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥On December 2, 2022, a conversation took place between FINRA’s OTC Corporate Actions Team and an SEC representative regarding the proposed Meta/NBH spin-out transaction.....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥On December 5, 2022, just one day before FINRA issued the first of two corporate actions, Sam Draddy noted that the “MMAT/MMTLP matter” had caught the attention of his Fraud Team and others, mentioning discussions with FINRA’s General Counsel and suspicions of fraud involving the two issuers, with “bluesheeting” already underway. They went forward with the corporate action despite RULE 6490.....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥Draddy, along with Boyle and Gibbons, arranged a Zoom meeting with SEC counterparts to discuss further....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥On December 11, 2022, at 6:38 p.m. on a Sunday, FINRA CEO Robert W. Cook contacted an SEC official regarding a flood of shareholder complaints about the trading halt, some containing alleged threats (no evidence or law enforcement reporting evidence has been provided), prompting him to send his staff to work remotely while offering to brief his contact.....and they still FAIL to protect investors. 💥Concurrently, Stephanie Dumont, FINRA’s Executive Vice President of Market Regulation and Transparency Services, emailed an SEC contact to schedule an urgent meeting the next morning to discuss the MMTLP situation and the recent halt, copying Racquel Russell on the correspondence.....and still FAIL to protect investors. THEY KNEW. And for the first time, we no longer had to speculate...WE KNEW!!! Following this release and the public outcry, sources claim @SECGov held an emergency meeting to stop FOIA releases. The MMTLP Army did not receive another meaninful FOIA for over a year. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING???#Coincidence WE...ARE...NOT...GOIN...AWAY!!! #Relentless TRCH MMAT MMTLP

$MMTLP Good morning, @FINRA It was more of a burden to scour the internet to find “threats from shareholders” on social media (ignoring the 100’s of thousands of posts asking for transparency and accountability) than it is for you to provide data you are responsible for collecting and overseeing. What was your process for validating that these people are shareholders? If you performed any validation at ALL, it was infinitely more burdensome than it is turn over the data and communications you already maintain. Ironically, the data you refuse to turn over to would aid your shareholder validation process. 🤓





Canaccord Genuity Group Inc. has agreed to pay a little over $100 million in a settlement reached with three U.S. financial regulators for "willful violations" of anti-money laundering laws. bit.ly/4b4LGjm


Based upon this exchange, the @SECGov reached-out to my office to inform me that this is currently under investigation. I proudly joined my colleagues in demanding MMTLP transparency back in 2023 and I thank the Trump admin–SEC for fighting to ensure that this issue is resolved. We will continue to monitor the situation.
