Zloy_Yezh

Take notes for the final phase of this bull market 1/ Don’t DCA in. Dollar-cost-averaging works early in a cycle. At the end, time is against you. If you’re late, you need conviction bets. 2/ DCA out. On the way up, scale out. Don’t dream about selling the exact top — nobody times it perfectly. Secure wins instead. 3/ Focus on winners. Cut dead weight. Don’t waste emotional energy on bags that never recovered. Winners compound. Losers drain you. 4/ Don’t lock tokens. Staking rewards look good until your tokens are stuck while the bull ends. Flexibility is worth far more than a few extra percent of yield. Liquidity is freedom. 5/ Rotate less. This late in the game, chasing every narrative leads to overtrading. Sit on your hands. You can’t catch them all. Accept missing some. 6/ This is a marathon, not a sprint. The people who make life-changing gains are the ones who preserve capital into the next cycle. Survive first. Wealth is built over multiple cycles. 7/ Don’t baghold exit coins. When it’s time to leave, don’t wait for tokens that “didn’t pump yet.” Some coins never pump again. Hope is not a strategy. 8/ Cash out regularly. Don’t wait for “the big exit.” Take profits steadily. Build trust with your bank — you’ll need them for bigger moves outside of crypto. 9/ Concentrate your bets. Over-diversification kills upside. A 100x on $5 won’t change your life. Position sizing matters. Focus on high-conviction plays. 10/ Remember volatility. Near the top, swings are violent. Don’t let green candles make you greedy or red candles shake you out. Stick to your plan. 11/ Narratives move fast. AI, gaming, RWA, memecoins — narratives rotate weekly. Don’t chase them all. Stick to a few strong themes and ride them with discipline. 12/ Think outside crypto. Use this cycle to set up for the next phase of your life. Real estate, businesses, equities — crypto should fund your future, not be your only future. 13/ Know when enough is enough. Greed kills more than fear. Have a number where you’ll say “I made it” and commit to it. 14/ This isn’t your last shot. Cycles repeat. If you miss this one, there will be another. Stay liquid, stay disciplined, stay alive. 15/ The bull makes you rich. The bear keeps you rich. Don’t blow it all just because the market feels invincible right now. Discipline is more powerful than luck. Let’s make the best out of it🫡

#НовыйАватар

The $ZORA token airdrop is a prime example of total injustice in Web3. 🔵 Instead of fairly rewarding active users, the @Zora team: 1️⃣ Sent nearly the entire drop to their own wallets 2️⃣ Gave pennies to regular users who spent real money minting and growing the ecosystem 3️⃣ Promised automatic distribution before the listing, but:   – At first, for 2.5 hours, they were selling the tokens themselves on the exchange at a good price. – only then quietly opened the claim portal 4️⃣ Promoted "referral activity", then banned the most active users for it! ℹ️ I’m just one example: – I created dozens of collections – Brought in thousands of referrals – My links generated millions of mints 💰 My wallet was showing an allocation of 34 million $ZORA in the checker. Even after the so-called “30x reduction,” I should’ve received over 1 million tokens. Instead, I got banned and received zero. Not because of a bug — but simply for being too active. And there are many more like me. 🚨 The dev team you should remember forever as scammers: 🚩 @js_horne 🚩 @dg_goens 🚩 @tbtstl 🚩 @slavakim 🚩 @stevejang 🏦 I honestly can’t understand how top funds like @cbventures, @HaunVentures, @KindredVenturesinves ted $60 million in this team. Do you seriously not care that you gave your money to scammers who did everything to deceive their community? By funding this mess, you’ve stained your own reputations. You’ve helped bring this scam to life! 🛂 The @Zora team is yet another example of a fraudulent Web3 project that @SECGov should definitely investigate. These are the kinds of people who belong in prison. It’s because of teams like this that fraud continues to thrive in crypto. ⛔️ Zora didn’t reward the community. They exploited it. This isn’t a mistake. It’s their model. Maximum for themselves — minimum for the people. ⛔️ Zora is not Web3. It’s a centralized scam disguised as decentralization. ‼️ Our mission now is to destroy this scam: 👉 Sell every NFT you ever minted on Zora 👉 Withdraw all your funds from their ecosystem 👉 Forget this scam forever — but never forget the developers who created it. 🔃 Spread the word. Retweet this. Share your losses in the comments 👇 #zorascam #ScamAlert #scam

New Nft on MONAD TESTNET ⛓️🐸 🔗 Free Mint: nerzo.xyz/monad To Get MONAD Role 👇 RT 🔁 & Comment Address💬

Today we're thrilled to unveil Fantasy Top V2! 🎉 This release comes alongside the announcement of our $4.25M seed fundraise, led by @dragonfly_xyz, with the follow-on support from @ManifoldTrading.

🧐L2 tokens need a utility! Another voting token won't work! Who is next in line? Looks like it's @LineaBuild and here's what they should look at. @ethereumJoseph, @rojotek should draw the right conclusions from the @Scroll_ZKP airdrop that left no chance for $SCR token growth in the short term after listing. The team should implement a maximum bar on airdrop if they plan to distribute it and not let whales take 2/3 of the distribution theblock.co/post/322255/wh…. This is how decentralization is broken and puts serious pressure on the token price, which is what we saw with the $SCR token distribution and its market price after listing. 9 days before the listing, anticipating all the problems that happened I gave advice on decentralization, but it was not heard. Other than that, @Consensys can break the trend of the declining FDV of every new L2 on the market. At a minimum you don't need to come out with a token in 2024 to do so. Calmly allocate points after November 25. And wait for a good bull market. Otherwise Linea will be just another L2 meme that all Twitter will be buzzing about, but no one will buy it! Instead of rushing to release the token, the team would be better off focusing on the utility of the token. One voting function is not enough! All of L2 needs $ETH and can easily do without the native network token, it simply has no utility. That's a problem! But Linea has a trump card in the form of Metamask Card integration, which no other L2 solution on the market has. MetaMask Card will work on Linea's network. This means that card users will need to use this network and store their funds in this blockchain. But the problem is that $ETH will be used to pay commissions. The native token of the network again gets nothing from this trump card! But this can be fixed! Linea could introduce incentives for paying for gas in the native token and award some points for that. These points can then be allocated to further airdrops or rewards, converting the points into a token. It's like paying a commission on a stock exchange with a discounted token. Try to motivate your audience to use the native token instead of $ETH for commissions. It will be good for the holders, and for the users, who will be motivated to buy the token to get benefits, and not to forget about the project immediately after #airdrop. That is, make like @Starknet and @zksync an abstraction so that gas can be paid for with both native tokens and $ETH. But incentivize to use your token specifically for this task! Then all the huge Metamask audience who will buy cards will regularly buy the native token of the network to pay for gas when their USDT, USDC and wETH are automatically converted to dollars in the #Linea network. It is possible to go further and improve the idea by thinking through the combustion mechanisms. Which would make the token deflationary in the long run. For example, for the accumulated points that will be accumulated by users for using the native token as gas, the project could not distribute the drop to users, but simply burn its equivalent. And do so with some periodicity, on which to provide for a share of tokenomics in the treasury. Someone has to break the inefficiency of L2 tokens. Whoever is first will lead this segment. Linea is well positioned to do just that! Let's face it, which L2s continue to be used? The ones that didn't offend users during allocation, i.e. Arbitrum and @Optimism with some of its Superchains (@base) defillama.com/chains/Rollup. All L2's are now cheap today after the Dencun update to @ethereum. User can easily forget forever the Chain that offended him as it has many alternatives. Will use the same cheap @arbitrum and that's it. Fall in love with the user, attract and encourage their attention! If you are making another L2 to offload teams and funds about retail, it's better to just stay out of the market! @simonhmorris @matthieubouchau @VitalikButerin @ConsensysAudits @MetaMask @MetaMaskDev Colleagues on the shop floor, help spread the information: @CC2Ventures @cryppinfluence @0xNonceSense @info_insightful @cryptotrader85 @heycape_ @Shivfreespirit @monkeybiz0z @NoahWeb3_ @calebsol @cryptojack @chainyoda @WuBlockchain @gluk64 @frogmonkee @Ozhar @Yogi13031997 @stonecoldpat0 @TrustlessState @Caneleo55 @heycape_ @0x_Lens @Andrey_10gwei

@coinmetrika @Scroll_ZKP Присоединяюсь

5) The goal is not to denigrate the project @Scroll_ZKP. But to draw attention to the fact that for whales there was already a dedicated Launchpool on Binance, where the limits per user per hour were very high. Hourly Hard Cap per User: 97,395 SCR in BNB pool 17,187 SCR in FDUSD pool binance.com/en/support/ann… The team can still make things nice, introduce airdrop limits per wallet, so that tokens are distributed decentralized to users, rather than concentrated on wallets with hundreds of thousands or millions of marks. After all, we have seen what distribution to whales leads to on the example of $EIGEN, when in the first day 5M tokens were sold from the drop by one recipient. Read more here x.com/coinmetrika/st…. If you offend retail, there will be a lot of FUD. Which we wouldn't want, as we believe in the project @Scroll_ZKP and in @sandypeng, @yezhang1998 @CC2Ventures @cryppinfluence @0xNonceSense @info_insightful @cryptotrader85 @heycape_ @Shivfreespirit @monkeybiz0z @NoahWeb3_ @calebsol @cryptojack @chainyoda @WuBlockchain @gluk64 @frogmonkee @Ozhar @Yogi13031997 @stonecoldpat0 @TrustlessState @Caneleo55 @heycape_ @0x_Lens

👩‍⚖️ Scroll. The Wrong Turn Recently the @Scroll_ZKP team announced details of airdrop scroll.io/blog/scr-token. And I think it's not a fair giveaway without even seeing the details. I'll try to justify my opinion below and would be happy if @sandypeng and @yezhang1998 reply how they see the situation. 1) Ordinary users have been raising the TVL project defillama.com/chain/Scroll for a year, mintering endless Scroll Canvas badges, spending money on commissions online. I repeat for a whole year. And the project allocates 7% of the issue for them. At the same time there is an announcement of Launchpool on Binance, where 5.5% is allocated in just 2 days. What is this? Are the project's own users less of a priority than Binance users? It would be fair to reduce the share for Binance and increase the share on airdrop 1. A year and two days is a big difference. 7% and 5.5% agree not that significant.... It's understandable that it will be forgotten over time, as with many drops. But in the perspective of 6-12 months it will be in the memory of retail and will have a negative impact on the token. 2) The idea of announcing an open snapshot date of 19 Oct 2024 looks really bad. Who is it for. So that big capital can bring in a large amount of funds in the remaining 11 days and farm all the brands, completely shifting the entire brand distribution? That's exactly what it looks like! Usually a project rewards early users over late users. And in this case, it rewards the large wallet who will start liquidity, get a large drop, and withdraw liquidity in less than 2 weeks. This is the end of all benefits for the project from such a user. We know what such whales usually do with drops. Let me remind you, according to @ArkhamIntel analytics, Justin Sun received $8.75M from Eigenlayer x.com/ArkhamIntel/st…. And sold over 2M tokens in the first 24 hours after receiving the airdrop. If other sources are to be believed, his airdrop was even larger (5.75M $EIGEN tokens according to exchange data bitrue.com/ru/blog/justin…) and the sale brought in $21.66M and raised questions about its potential impact on $EIGEN market trajectory. 3) Special attention should be paid to the one-sided change of vesting for early investors, who, as far as I know, learnt about it also from the public announcement (or is it not so?) and ran to the OTC to dump their allocations, because they were initially given other terms. It's no secret that there were OTC deals on the market not so long ago, where early seed investors transferred their tokens to new owners, and as far as I know it happened under the supervision of the #Scroll team. The vesting spocks in those deals were better than they turned out to be in the end. As a result, those investors who re-bought the rights are disappointed. So are those investors who didn't get out in time and learned of the vesting changes from the public announcement. As a result, the other day I saw an offer to sell $3M worth of $SCR tokens on the OTC market in one transaction, not counting others. This is a prime example of what I'm talking about above. Investors are not happy! There will be problems with retail, investors are already in trouble. And how will the project move forward, alone? That looks controversial and troubling, too.

@AntonProfiT @Scroll_ZKP Right

🚨The @Scroll_ZKP team has published details on the distribution of the drop of the SCR token - scroll.io/blog/scr-token 🤬Just imagine a team that allocates 23% to itself and only 7% to drop for the community that has supported the project for more than a year! 😂That's where the real 💩! I am sure that this greed of the team will definitely bury Scroll! All the best to you! #scroll #scrollairdrop #scrollscam

Here is my RWA (real world apology) for not posting about Plume's testnet campaign earlier. Join me on the journey to become a Plume Goon! miles.plumenetwork.xyz/join?invite=PL… #PlumeTestnet #PlumeGoons #GoonSquad

I am minting the ALIENX Genesis PassCard NFT on the ALIENX Mainnet. This serves as both an ID card and a certificate. Holders who complete the Genesis Voyage tasks will be eligible for $AIX Airdrops. #ALIENX alienxchain.io/quest?ref=opy6…

Another report with false positives commonwealth.im/layerzero/disc… @PrimordialAA @LayerZero_Labs @LayerZero_Fndn His methodology is based on Stargate DAO votes, each of which as we know had a deadline of 3 days. The accounts that performed the transactions that signed the votes were clustered with other wallets that randomly elsewhere on the planet performed exactly the same transactions with a timing of 4 days. LayerZero has 6 million wallets at the time of the snapshot. Don't you admit that voting can be plus minus at the same time, because users are members of different communities, where they are informed about the release of new voting. And here also the scatter in search of 4 days..... discord.com/channels/88198… User is willing to undergo even KYS to prove his humanity. She actively voted for STG management proposals to be an active member of this community, also got the roles of staker and pool 1k. You can see she has assets on her wallet in the minutes. For example she restacks ezETH in Mendi for over $1000, holds liquidity in Stargate for over $1000 and has other assets in different networks. debank.com/profile/0xd1e1… There are a lot of complaints about this report in the discrrd. I've only looked at the ones that were unfair. Here's another example discord.com/channels/88198… As you can see, there are false positives. And the methodology is very questionable! So you can't use this cluster, especially other projects can use these lists later. And the real user will get a tag on his real wallet.

@PrimordialAA @LayerZero_Labs Another example of a report with false positives commonwealth.im/layerzero/disc… It is strange that you accepted it at all, because this report does not meet the condition of 20 wallets to be combined into a cluster. The methodology of this report specifies the minimum cluster size of 10 wallets. Setting EPS to 1 second is also inappropriate in this case. There are 6 million wallets in the protocol, and within one second there can be several transactions unrelated to each other. 1) For example, this cluster has a wallet debank.com/profile/0xcdfd…. It doesn't look like a sybil. The user stores $10,000 worth of liquidity in different protocols and blockchains. He has restake ETH and USDC in Zircuit, Karak, Reya and other protocols for thousands of dollars. The wallet is more than 3 years old. What kind of sybil is he? It is the wallet of a regular user who got into this cluster.

Airdrop failure from @zkSync or where is the decentralization? Blockchain is a transparent territory. Traces remain, even if someone leaves an airstream for maneuvering. The @zksync team has made a sensation in the crypto community with the most opaque distribution possible. Some points are simply absurd. @gluk64 @frogmonkee @Ozhar @Yogi13031997 @stonecoldpat0 @TrustlessState @Caneleo55 @heycape_ @0x_Lens @gluk64 @TheZKNatiou #zksyncscam 1) 13,000 wallets with 0 tx in the zkSync network received an allocation. And what use are these users to the project if they haven't even come in contact with it? dune.com/realpeha/zksyn…

🚨Today the @zksync team announced an airdrop distribution and a story about what exactly this distribution will be for. ✅ Criteria: 📍You are an active user and hold liquidity in some projects (pools, lendigs) 📍Your wallet has been active on the ZkSync Era network for more than 3 months ☑️ There are also additional multipliers that increase the distribution: 🔵 Interaction with 10 smart contracts 🔵 5 or more transactions in Paymaster 🔵 Trade 10 or more tokens in ZkSync 🔵 Be a holder of Omnibus NFT 🔵 Donations to Gitcoin (zkSync Lite) 🔵 Transactions on the Ethereum main network ‼️ And all this seems normal, but I have one important question: why are users who fully meet this criterion ultimately not eligible to receive awards? I'm just sure that the ZkSync team made a mistake during the distribution and many eligible users end up with an "not eligible" status. 🫂I speak for the majority of your community, your real users, and I ask you to at least give people the opportunity to appeal. You simply have to look at many wallets. They clearly deserve awards and it is not clear why their wallets are not eligible for an award when they meet absolutely all the requirements and criteria. ‼️I ask you to describe in more detail the criteria for receiving awards, so that everyone can understand why he is not worthy of receiving them. Because so far it all looks like those who have suffered are those who fully meet all the requirements. ⛔️I believe that you are not another @Starknet or @PolyhedraZK who treated their community like garbage and as a result are now receiving a response from their community. I will never use Starknet again and recommend everyone to do the same. 🤚Personally, I have always considered ZkSync one of those projects that can replicate the guys from @arbitrum , which everyone loves and always remembers with warmth. I would be very upset if Twitter was littered with hashtags #zksyncscam or #zkscam and I hope that doesn't happen. No one will judge you if you make strict criteria and someone doesn't pass them. But the community will not be able to forgive the fact that many of the people fit all the criteria that you described, but in the end they will not receive the drop. I tried to explain in as much detail as possible the problem that exists now. We look forward to your response and hope for the best!✊

@AntonProfiT @overprotocol Согласен

🚨 Today we will note another fraudulent project that has deceived its community - @overprotocol. Its developers and team used the community for more than a year, tested their systems and applications and promised rewards for this. When the time came to distribute rewards, they came to the decision to ban a huge number of countries in order to simply not distribute drops to them. 🔴 Just so you understand, not a single normal, decent project ever does this. If he plans to limit access to his products or the privileges of using them for any part of the world's population, then he says so initially in his technical documentation, or communicates this on the website or in the terms of the agreement. In this case, there was none of this and the team actively invited everyone to use their application, they held AMA sessions at which they said that there would be no restrictions. 🔴 As a result, the team deceived their community and limited access to a very large part of people at the moment when it was time to pay for the fact that the community had been helping them build Over Protocol all this time. 🔴 This is typical behavior from scam teams that promise rewards for helping them build a product every day, and then years later simply throw you out as unwanted, used trash. 📱 Be sure to write them a real and high-quality review in the AppStore and GooglePlay, so that people know that by downloading their application they will become free slaves who will never receive the rewards that the team of scammers will promise them. 🔴 Let's forget about this garbage and move on, next in line we will have the @taikoxyz project, if its developers continue to consider their community idiots who do not understand that the team gave out all the awards to themselves. ‼️ Be sure to distribute this post and share it with your friends. Such projects should definitely be punished and shown that they are worthless without the community and no one will allow them to deceive people. The community very quickly forgets about such projects and never uses them again. How's @Starknet doing? Is the community not the main thing?