CubanMang

2.3K posts

CubanMang banner
CubanMang

CubanMang

@CubanMang

In this life the low road sometimes takes you a more interesting route.

1982 Katılım Nisan 2024
270 Takip Edilen88 Takipçiler
Hunter H. Hedge
Hunter H. Hedge@hunterhhedge·
@ABlinken this thread is embarrassing for you. fucking disgraceful you’re considered a foreign policy expert. Clown.
English
1
0
0
2
CubanMang
CubanMang@CubanMang·
@Bin101st Zoo visitors talk more than the baboons in the baboon cage. Sad ha!
English
0
0
1
7
BinWmoe
BinWmoe@Bin101st·
$MMTLP the people with no shares talk more about MMTLP than people with shares.
BinWmoe tweet media
English
9
7
27
1.2K
Katie Miller
Katie Miller@KatieMiller·
Justice isn’t impartial. A Delaware judge who previously ruled against @elonmusk and still oversees all of his Delaware cases was caught openly celebrating the trial attorneys against him in another case. Kate McCormick should be disbarred & thrown off the bench. Also, why is anyone still using LinkedIn?
Katie Miller tweet media
Financial Times@FT

The billionaire’s legal team said that because Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick had liked a post celebrating his recent legal defeat and thereby created ‘a perception of bias against Mr. Musk in these cases, recusal is necessary and warranted’. ft.trib.al/6h9vFAH?

English
130
962
4.3K
347.9K
CubanMang
CubanMang@CubanMang·
@tclaugus2 Blue Prism isn't really an AI risk. No bank is going to let an LLM execute trades on legacy code. Street is confusing the brain with the hands.
English
1
0
0
40
Thomas Claugus II
Thomas Claugus II@tclaugus2·
The market is killing both $ETSY and $SSNC today in an AI selloff again. I really don't think $ETSY has exposure to this. It is a shopping destination like $AMZN etc, that offers reasonably differentiated products. We will see. For it to sell at less than 9x forward earnings seems a bit harsh but the market is the judge in the near term. Not me. $SSNC is higher risk than $ETSY in terms of AI. I still think it is ok. But the Blue Prism part of the business is the easiest observable risk imo. Fun.
English
1
0
5
791
Turbine Traveller
Turbine Traveller@Turbinetraveler·
Here’s CCTV footage capturing the exact moment Air Canada Express Flight AC8646, a Bombardier CRJ-900, collided with a Port Authority fire truck at LaGuardia Airport last night.
English
454
1.5K
9.8K
2.2M
CubanMang
CubanMang@CubanMang·
@Shrimplicker You know when baggies are fighting other baggies it's getting close to everyone realizing they aren't getting a refund for their 2022 shitty stock picks. Sad ha!
English
2
0
0
79
Cody Wheelis
Cody Wheelis@Shrimplicker·
No sir . I’m nobody, but I have a wife and 4 wonderful kids and 17 amazing grandkids. Your douchebag bullshit attacking people trying to help is getting old. I sit in the shadows but my name is there for all to see. I’m not chasing clout. Get bent. Bless your heart.
Cody Wheelis tweet media
English
4
1
25
2.4K
CubanMang
CubanMang@CubanMang·
@thatgirltrader @Clay2Kramer @MmtlpD2627 I'm actually surprised at the discipline Tradestation showed by not suing peope, even professionals that should know better, that posted very questionable things about them on Twitter.
English
0
0
1
32
CubanMang
CubanMang@CubanMang·
@thatgirltrader @Clay2Kramer @MmtlpD2627 stock lending program, I mean. And the second it ever trades again, the plaintiff can recall those shares. So has the same ability to trade as anyone else, but has collected interest income too. All legal and normal per the agreement the plaintiff signed.
English
1
0
1
30
chicken🐥nugget
chicken🐥nugget@MmtlpD2627·
DO NOT LISTEN to anyone's FEELINGS about your MMTLP investment. READ. All your questions will be answered in this LEGAL DOCUMENT marked EFFECTIVE in 2022. Anything not WRITTEN in this document is SPECULATION. That includes the speculation that NBH will trade on blockchain to resolve the MMTLP overage. This is MISLEADING and FALSE. I encourage SERIOUS and COMMITTED shareholders to transfer. But good luck. Hopefully, your broker hasn't run out of NBH common stock certs. sec.gov/Archives/edgar…
English
2
8
27
1.5K
Dan Poore
Dan Poore@DanPooreX·
This isn’t about chips. It’s about recursion. And recursion only works if the system can coordinate itself as it scales. Terafab → Starship → Optimus → satellites → replication That loop doesn’t break because of compute. It breaks because of orchestration. At that scale you’re not managing: • machines • factories • supply chains You’re coordinating: • autonomous agents • distributed compute systems • resource extraction • manufacturing loops • energy allocation • decision systems operating without human latency That’s not a hardware problem. That’s an execution layer problem. Because once the system leaves Earth, you lose: • centralized control • human oversight • real-time intervention The only thing that matters is whether the system can: • coordinate itself • preserve context across nodes • enforce constraints • adapt without breaking the loop In other words: Whether intelligence can operate as a system. That’s the missing piece in almost every discussion about this. Not chips. Not rockets. Not robots. Execution infrastructure. The layer that allows distributed intelligence to act coherently across environments, systems, and time. That’s exactly where BeacenAI sits. Not building the machines. Making the system actually work as it scales. #AIInfrastructure #AgentEconomy #AI
English
1
0
0
84
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
Everyone is covering Terafab as a chip factory. It is not a chip factory. Last night in Austin, Elon unveiled a facility that makes masks, fabricates chips, and tests them inside a single building with a nine-month recursive improvement cadence. No such loop exists anywhere else on Earth. Then he told you 80% of the output goes to space. Then he showed you a 100-kilowatt AI satellite with solar panels and radiators, scaling to megawatt range. Then he said Optimus plus photovoltaics will be the first von Neumann probe, a machine capable of replicating itself from raw materials found in space. Nobody connected the sequence. Terafab produces 1 terawatt per year of compute. The entire United States consumes 0.5 terawatts of electricity. Musk is building a single factory whose output in AI silicon exceeds twice the power consumption of the country it sits in. And he is sending 80% of it off-planet because Earth literally cannot power what he is building. Follow the mechanism. Terafab seeds the chips. Starship launches Optimus robots and solar arrays at 100 million tons per year. The robots mine lunar and asteroid regolith for silicon, iron, and nickel. They 3D-print more robots. They fabricate more solar panels. They assemble more AI satellites. Each satellite runs hotter-burning D3 chips designed specifically for vacuum, where free radiative cooling eliminates the thermal constraints that strangle every terrestrial data center on the planet. The nodes replicate. The replication is exponential. This is a Dyson Swarm bootstrap hidden inside a semiconductor announcement. The math is public. The Sun outputs 3.828 times 10 to the 26th watts. A 2022 paper in Physica Scripta calculated that 5.5 billion satellites at 290 kilograms each, robotically manufactured from Mars resources, capture enough solar energy to meet all of Earth’s power needs within 50 years. A 2025 paper in Solar Energy Materials calculated a partial swarm capturing 4% of solar output yields 15.6 yottawatts, roughly a billion times current human civilization’s total energy budget. Musk just announced the factory that builds the chips that go inside the satellites that replicate themselves forever. 92% of advanced logic chips are fabricated in Taiwan. One factory in Austin does not fix that. But one self-replicating system seeded by that factory, launched by the only company with reusable heavy-lift rockets, assembled by the only humanoid robot in mass production, and powered by the only star within reach, does not fix a supply chain. It obsoletes the concept of supply chains entirely. The market priced this as a $20 billion capex story about semiconductor independence. The actual announcement was the engineering blueprint for Kardashev Type II. Humanity sits at 0.73 on the Kardashev scale. 18 terawatts. The distance between here and harnessing a star is not a technology gap. It is a recursion gap. And recursion is exactly what a single building in Austin that makes its own masks, builds its own chips, tests its own chips, and launches the output into orbit on its own rockets was designed to close. Every civilization that makes it past this point never looks back.
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet media
SpaceX@SpaceX

TERAFAB: the next step to becoming a galactic civilization Together with @Tesla & @xAI, we're building the largest chip manufacturing facility ever (1TW/year) – combining logic, memory & advanced packaging under one roof

English
487
1.8K
9.1K
995.3K
CubanMang
CubanMang@CubanMang·
@SantoroSystems No what they need to do is go back in time about 10 years and realize they needed to use LIDAR and radar in addition to cameras.
English
0
0
0
20
Matthew Santoro 🇨🇦
Matthew Santoro 🇨🇦@SantoroSystems·
Almost quote tweeted his first message but I definitely need to quote tweet the second one.... Tesla's ability to scale unsupervised FSD has nothing to do with the fact that they can make a lot of cars, the thing they need to do is get the software to the point that you can install it on a lot of cars....
Martin Muldoon@MuldoonMartin

@SantoroSystems Oh no... You said: "Four cars don't matter.. we need to see proof that they can actually increase the number of vehicles in the direction of millions" I think Tesla can manufacture cars. Don't you? Duh...

English
2
0
6
1.1K
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
The media is running a story today about how a Cybertruck “allegedly” crashed on a Texas highway. Spoiler alert, the crash happened while the human driver was in control. The law firm, which is seeking $1 million, says that last summer Justine Saint Amour was driving her Cybertruck with Autopilot engaged. There’s just one problem — Autopilot is a legacy lane keeping system that never shipped on Cybertruck. The driver then admits that before the crash they disengaged the system and started driving manually. Indeed, the video shows the truck starting to turn before the driver disengaged and drove into the wall. Tesla hasn’t officially responded to the lawsuit yet, but available telemetry indicates the driver probably wasn’t paying attention, got startled, and crashed. There doesn’t seem to be any attempt to steer back towards the on-ramp in the video, rather you see the trajectory change from turning with the ramp to driving straight into it. When you crash your car, people tend to put blame on anyone but themselves. A high profile company like Tesla, with a CEO who is the wealthiest man on Earth? Yeah, they kinds of BS lawsuits happen often. Let’s wait for more data and discovery to take place, but based on the evidence i’m seeing so far that doesn’t look like something FSD — even an older V13 — would do.
Whole Mars Catalog tweet mediaWhole Mars Catalog tweet media
English
86
191
2.4K
271.2K
shiz labriz
shiz labriz@ShizLabriz7·
@SECGov How many Darkpools to the hedgefunds need to stop any price discovery on Gme? Absolute market manipulation.
shiz labriz tweet media
English
1
0
1
62
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
INVESTOR ALERT 🚨: Investors should never rely solely on information from group chats in making investment decisions. Be wary of any group chat where you receive investment advice from someone you don’t know – this is often how scams begin. ow.ly/upFW50Ytysa
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission tweet media
English
414
212
1.8K
788.3K
Nathan Hedges
Nathan Hedges@NathanHedges19·
@SECGov You dont care about us. Come on. Dark pools and illegal naked shorts
English
1
0
1
42
CubanMang
CubanMang@CubanMang·
@whisskier @SECPaulSAtkins Here it is for Apple. It seems you people just bumble from one thing to another every week for years thinking you’ll find some big “gotcha”. There isn’t one. Had to sell by the deadline or be stuck in private stock. Simple as that.
CubanMang tweet media
English
0
0
1
22
CubanMang
CubanMang@CubanMang·
@whisskier @SECPaulSAtkins These aren’t OTC Markets trades. OTC(Non-ATS) just means off-exchange trading. These aren’t even dark pools (they are ATS). This is how internal trades are reported by market makers when they match a trade out of inventory. You keep grasping at nonsense.
English
1
0
2
75
Whisskier
Whisskier@whisskier·
When will you answer these questions @SECPaulSAtkins HOW does a NASDAQ listed MMAT trade concurrently on the Wild West of OTC Markets?? I’m sure that it’s all above board ~49K different trades in one week can’t all be “legitimate dark pool” can it? NOTE THE DATE😉
Whisskier tweet media
Whisskier@whisskier

@palikaras “Relationship” driven OTCM That sounds about right doesn’t it @FINRA While we’re discussing “relationship driven” Tell me again how a NASDAQ listed MMAT trades on OTC?

English
4
89
150
16.7K
Glenn Kim
Glenn Kim@glenntkim·
@jakhawv Put your money where your mouth is like the rest of us on the long side
English
2
0
4
674
Jon
Jon@Jon83989650·
@jakhawv Every single one of your points is easily refuted by anyone who is even partially paying attention. Short at your own peril.
English
2
0
3
459