Current Biology

5.1K posts

Current Biology banner
Current Biology

Current Biology

@CurrentBiology

Scientific journal publishing original research, overview and commentary across all of biology. All of it! @CellPressNews https://t.co/pfSLHA1KDS

London, Cambridge MA et al. Katılım Eylül 2012
393 Takip Edilen47.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Current Biology
Current Biology@CurrentBiology·
We're going hybrid! Current Biology now offers a gold #openaccess option to all authors. #openaccess" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">cell.com/current-biolog… (image: Nipam Patel)
Current Biology tweet media
English
20
55
250
0
Current Biology
Current Biology@CurrentBiology·
Explore a collection of articles from Current Biology, Molecular Plant, Plant Communications, and Trends in Plant Science which showcases cutting-edge tools and approaches for crop improvements hubs.li/Q044m21b0
Current Biology tweet media
English
0
0
1
701
Current Biology
Current Biology@CurrentBiology·
Fixed it for ya, bruh... The study was published in Current Biology cell.com/current-biolog… where, coincidentally, one can also find a very interesting primer on Programmed DNA elimination by Kazufumi Mochizuki cell.com/current-biolog…
Niko McCarty.@NikoMcCarty

We often assume that an organism carries the same genome within all of its cells. But in many cases — from nematodes to hagfish, lampreys to songbirds — the truth is far messier. At least 100 species are known to do something called “programmed DNA elimination,” in which large swaths of the genome is removed from somatic cells during development. Marie Delattre, a cell biologist at the École Normale Supérieure, studies this phenomenon in a worm called M. belari, which belongs to the same family as C. elegans. Her research group “compared the genomes of M. belari’s germline cells — the specialized reproductive cells like sperm and eggs — with the genomes of the worm’s somatic (nonreproductive) cells,” according to reporting in Quanta Magazine. “The somatic genomes were missing long strings of sequences present in germline genomes. Sometime between the embryo’s growth from seven cells to 32, huge chunks of DNA had vanished.” “The scientists then watched nematode embryos develop under a microscope. As the cells grew and replicated their genomes, they broke 20 chromosomes down into fragments and then reassembled them into 40 miniature chromosomes. Most of the fragments rejoined in this new, smaller genome — but a substantial fraction were left out.” Specifically, the worm eliminated about one-third of its own genome from somatic cells. This DNA removal process begins during early embryogenesis, typically during the first few rounds of cell division. Germline cells (those destined to become gametes; eggs or sperm) retain the entire intact genome. The exact amount of eliminated DNA varies widely between species; a parasitic nematode found in cow stomachs, called Parascaris univalens, eliminates 90% of its genome!! The question, of course, is why organisms bother to do this at all. It seems that the eliminated genes are useful in the germline but unnecessary, or even harmful, in somatic cells. The eliminated sequences include transposons, which are "self-replicating DNA sequences that steal the cell’s machinery to copy themselves by the thousands or millions," according to the Quanta article. "This amounts to molecular grand larceny, as well as a waste of the time and energy that the cell must spend to suppress these sequences. Cells routinely curb transposons with epigenetic marks that silence them, or by intercepting and destroying their RNA. But some species, such as M. belari, may remove them entirely through [programmed DNA elimination]." This process, then, is basically a way to partition the genome, keeping the full sequence safely in the germline while paring down somatic DNA for energetic efficiency or stability. If somatic cells contain a bunch of excess genes that are no longer needed, and it takes lots of energy to continuously 'silence' those genes, then it's just more efficient to cut them out entirely. The excision is not random, either. In the best-studied nematode that does this, called Ascaris, the same exact genes and DNA segments are eliminated in every embryo, every time. Eliminated DNA sequences tend to be AT-rich and repetitive. They are usually tagged with methyl groups, which alerts the cell that this DNA should be tightly packed and kept ‘silenced’. Programmed DNA elimination sounds esoteric, but any strange phenomenon is usually a rich source of material for biotechnology discovery. Clearly these organisms have evolved an effective means to silence genes, streamline genomes, and keep transposons from causing trouble. Instead of relying on reversible switches, though, they just cut out the unneeded pieces. If we understood and harnessed this, perhaps we could build smaller synthetic genomes or reprogram chromosomes in useful ways. Thanks for reading.

English
0
0
7
2.9K
Oded Rechavi
Oded Rechavi@OdedRechavi·
Giving a presentation Vs. Publishing a paper
English
4
13
121
13K
Current Biology retweetledi
Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc
Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc@SynBio1·
My favorite kinds of scientists are 1) Crazy enough to publish a paper where you give ecstasy to octopuses and study their social behavior 2) Detail-oriented enough to specify in the figure that 30 minutes is exactly 1800 seconds cell.com/current-biolog…
Jake Wintermute 🧬/acc tweet media
English
20
74
642
44.5K
Current Biology retweetledi
manvir singh
manvir singh@mnvrsngh·
Are dancing and infant-directed song (incl. lullabies) human universals? Like many people, I've long thought so. But in a new paper in @CurrentBiology, Kim Hill & I report that the Northern Aché (Paraguay) lacked both behaviors, likely losing them during cultural declines.
manvir singh tweet media
English
8
74
479
59.2K
Current Biology retweetledi
Chuyi Su, PhD
Chuyi Su, PhD@ChuyiSu·
Excited to share our new paper in @CurrentBiology! 🚀📄 "Retinal direction of motion is reliably transmitted to visual cortex via highly selective thalamocortical connections" cell.com/current-biolog…
English
5
22
66
7.5K
Current Biology retweetledi
Michael Goard
Michael Goard@GoardMichael·
When we enter a new environment, we use visual input to rapidly build an internal model of the local spatial environment. How does our brain do this? We review past literature and suggest some new ways forward in our new review in @CurrentBiology: authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S09…
English
2
11
47
5.3K
Current Biology retweetledi
Arif Ashraf
Arif Ashraf@aribidopsis·
Guard cells count the number of unitary cytosolic Ca2+ signals to regulate stomatal dynamics @CurrentBiology cell.com/current-biolog… Movie: Faster stomata closure in XXM2.0 (ChannelRhodopsin 2 variant. D156H mutant, extra high expression and medium open state)
English
0
20
139
11.5K
Current Biology retweetledi
Cell Press
Cell Press@CellPressNews·
In this #50ScientistsThatInspire Q&A, chemical engineer Dr. Eranda Nikolla underlines the importance of mentoring future engineers and scientists and discusses the lack of representation of women in STEMM. #CP50 Read the full interview: cell.com/news-do/50-ins…
Cell Press tweet media
English
0
1
4
3.6K
Oded Rechavi
Oded Rechavi@OdedRechavi·
When you give a lab meeting presentation sitting down
Oded Rechavi tweet media
English
4
9
140
15.2K