Tracy Moore

@EthanJenkins09 Of course?

@CustomM_Tracy Would you like some financial assistance?

@RealCandaceO Regretfully back when you said Charlie was asking for the POUS to stop with the Brighett, France inquiries, everything in my gut said you and your advertisers would be attacked, im sorry this is happening. FREEDOM OF SPEECH FOR CANDACE AND EVER US CITIZEN! GO MAX!

First my advertisers, now they want my merch boycotted because… it’s now narcissistic to support your own show so you can stay independent and never be controlled by the media mafia. (This tweet was brought to you by shop.candaceowens.com)

@BitcoinPulseX Me please!

Trump attacks Megan Kelly, Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones? #Trump #TuckerCarlson #Maga

So far this week: Trump threatened to wipe out a civilization on Tuesday. Announced a ceasefire on Wednesday. Israel leveled parts of Beirut on Thursday. Iran shut down the Strait of Hormuz, AGAIN. Gulf states are still intercepting drones. 13 American service members are dead. Over 3,400 Iranians killed. 1,500 dead in Lebanon. And this administration has the nerve to call this a win. They light the world on fire and then take credit for calling the fire department.

@ImMeme0 Yea, I'm a caregiver, and any caregiver that believes you can "TEACH" an elderly person in obvious mental decline "A LESSON" is not someone he needs to be around, call Adult Protective Services

🚨BREAKING: Shocking footage from Wilmington, NC shows a man attempting to return his elderly neighbor, dressed only in a soiled diaper and T-shirt, back to his home. He was stopped by the caregiver, who forced the older man to turn around and walk in the opposite direction. When asked why, she claimed she was “teaching” him a lesson. In a follow-up video, the man explained that he contacted authorities. His sole goal is to ensure his elderly neighbor can spend his days with dignity and comfort.

@TheOfficerTatum Well then, Officer Tatum, you're an ex-cop, Tell us all what evidence they have cause we don't see it, and we have QUESTIONS?

I want Justice for Charlie more than most. Justice isn't spreading conspiracies. Justice is rooted in Facts. Not speculation. Speculation leaves you in a never ending spiral. FACTS will lead you to the truth. The Truth will lead you to the finality of true Justice.

Charlie Kirk, in June of 2025, explaining why a massive US war against Iran, and an attempt to facilitate regime change, as pushed by people like Lindsey Graham, is "pathologically insane":

People are upset I said Israel committed genocide in Gaza… cool, I still love ya, but I won’t ignore the blatant obvious truth about what happened —— On October 7, the Israeli Government gave a stand down order. It’s a fact. They wanted the slaughter. They wanted it to justify their actions. They could have stopped what happened, but chose not to. It took 6 hours to respond to an invasive terror attack within a nation the size of New Jersey. So go ahead.. try to justify or rationalize that. DRIVING Israel's length (north to south) is ~470 km, ~5-6 hours. Width (west to east) is ~120 km, ~1.5-2 hours. Helicopter is 45 minutes. Again, why did it take 6+ hours to respond to the attack? That alone will never sit right with me. Sorry. Why did IDF soldiers testify they were told to stand down? Why some people don’t understand this is beyond me. Charlie understood it. He questioned it. And just when he said he’d no longer be morally blackmailed by Jewish mega-donors, and that he was leaving the Israeli cause, he ended up dead the next day. It hurts… what happened to him still hurts. rumble.com/v6zytt0-charli…

@RealCandaceO February eleventh, twenty twenty-six. Trump says "move on." That's the day America's faith in our government died. When the history books get written, That line is the one they'll quote, that's the line that killed the country. Not with a bullet. With a shrug.

@TorrinWinmill @saras76 @TheOnlyDSC I believe he put a question mark at the end of his sentence, why all the name-calling and attitude? To answer your question, no, he did not shoot at all or even pull his gun, from the videos we have seen, he was shot after the gun was removed.

@saras76 @TheOnlyDSC Pretti also shot fist did he not?

“He was unarmed and they killed him anyway!” We said the same thing and you guys laughed.

@johnnymaga Agreed…and I dub him “MAGA TYSON”…I needed to add some music for this hero.

🚨 We Exposed Tim Walz Billion Dollar Fraud Scheme: In this sit-down interview I interview "David" a man who helped expose Minnesotas billion dollar fraud scheme in our viral video that led to Tim Walz dropping out of re-election and federal investigations launching inside Minnesota to stop the fraud In this interview David reveals: - His estimate of $100 Billion dollars in fraud - Minnesotas corrupt voting system - Walz & Omar's alleged involvement with the fraud - How Somalians have defrauded the system - How political correctness let the fraud happen Watch and share this interview everywhere, time for everyone to hear whats happening from start to finish!

@Matt_Pinner Truck break

What is this for? Correct answer deserves $950

POV: You Try Watching Somalian News But The Anchors Keep Noticing

I’ve been deep diving into the claims made by Valhalla VFT regarding Mitch Snow because several things he said didn't match up to my memories of Candace's podcasts regarding him. To be clear, I have zero ill will toward @Valhallachannel. I respect the passion for protecting the veteran community from stolen valor. But facts have to matter more than narratives. I did a strict line-by-line comparison of Valhalla’s recent "debunking" stream against the actual transcripts from @RealCandaceO (Episodes 277 & 282). The results were concerning. I found a consistent pattern where Valhalla "debunks" claims that Mitch Snow never actually made on the show. If we want the truth, we have to look at the receipts. Here is the breakdown: ❌ The "Medically Retired" Accusation: Valhalla claims Mitch lied about being "Medically Retired." The Truth: In Ep 282, Mitch never claimed to be retired. He explicitly told Candace: "They gave me a medical discharge... They gave me a severance pay." His statement aligns 100% with the DD214 Valhalla used to attack him. ❌ The "Special Forces Medic" Accusation: Valhalla claims Mitch lied and told people he was a Special Forces Medic (18D). The Truth: Mitch explicitly identified himself as an 18 Charlie (Demo). He even distinguished himself from the medics in his unit, stating: "Two Charlies, which is demo, which is what I was." Valhalla is debunking a claim Mitch never made. ❌ The "Combat Injury" Accusation: Valhalla claims Mitch lied about being injured in a "vicious deployment accident" or combat. The Truth: Mitch clearly stated his injury happened during training at Fort Bragg (free climbing), not in combat or overseas. Valhalla is attacking a "stolen valor" narrative that isn't in the interview. ❌ The 1990 Timeline Accusation: Valhalla argues Mitch is lying because he claimed he "left the military in 1990" to run from cartels. The Truth: Mitch told Candace he reenlisted after the 1990 incidents and stayed in until November of 1996. His timeline actually matches the records Valhalla is using to "expose" him. ❌ The Name Change Accusation: Valhalla asserts Mitch claimed he changed his name "in the early 90s" to hide. The Truth: Candace mentions this in her intro (Ep 277), but Mitch never says it in his interview (Ep 282). Valhalla is using the host's summary to attack the guest's credibility, even though the guest never made the claim on air. In addition to all of these clear "inaccuracies" in Valhalla's "investigative reporting", we also need to remember that Candace has always been very open and extremely clear about what she has been able to verify versus what relies on Mitch's memory. She never presented his recollections as absolute, verified data points without qualification. To attack inconsistencies in memory as malicious "lies" ignores the transparency she established from the start. I also watched Valhalla's announcement video. To his credit, he did exactly what he said he would do: he produced some documents. But that leads to a much darker question. We know that the government was aware Candace had spoken with a source who claimed to have been on the base, etc, before she ever brought Mitch on air. If this truly is a high-level cover-up, are we really supposed to believe the government isn't capable of planting evidence? They have the power to alter military records, file false police reports, and create a paper trail to discredit a whistleblower. They also have the resources to bribe victims or family members to speak out. Even if Mitch is everything Valhalla says he is—a liar, a con artist, a "monster"—does that automatically make him a less credible witness when not one person he claims to have seen has presented a legitimate alibi? If these people weren't there, it should be the easiest thing in the world to prove. Instead, people are losing their minds simply because the meeting was exposed. Furthermore, if Mitch Snow is such a "career con artist" with a trail of mugshots and restraining orders, why would he go on national television? He would know that going on Candace Owens’ show is the fastest way to get exposed. Con artists usually run from the spotlight; they don't walk directly into it. Candace Owens isn’t new to this. She has sources we don’t even know about. I find it hard to believe she didn't vet him thoroughly. There is more to this than just a DD214 that the government could have easily typed up themselves. Let’s stick to the evidence, but let's also remain skeptical of the "official" record.

This guy gave a great message to this committee

🚨 Here is the full 42 minutes of my crew and I exposing Minnesota fraud, this might be my most important work yet. We uncovered over $110,000,000 in ONE day. Like it and share it around like wildfire! Its time to hold these corrupt politicians and fraudsters accountable We ALL work way too hard and pay too much in taxes for this to be happening, the fraud must be stopped.

@Matt_Pinner Idris Elba, PLEASE!!!!

Who would you pick to play the next James Bond?