Bob Schuiling

2.9K posts

Bob Schuiling

Bob Schuiling

@CycleBobsChats

CuriousSceptic

Cape Town, South Africa Katılım Mayıs 2010
675 Takip Edilen120 Takipçiler
Bob Schuiling retweetledi
Stephanie Seneff
Stephanie Seneff@stephanieseneff·
I have been suspecting that glyphosate is contributing to the explosion in multiple antibiotic resistant pathogens. Nice to see a study that demonstrates that this is in fact true. cidrap.umn.edu/antimicrobial-…
English
0
34
87
1.2K
Bob Schuiling retweetledi
Health Freedom Defense Fund
Thomas Massie just delivered an urgent warning: Congress is about to betray every MAHA mom who supported this movement. How? They’re on the verge of passing a liability shield for Bayer to mass poison Americans with pesticides. With no accountability. This would be a public health catastrophe on the same scale as the vaccine liability shield passed in 1986. “If farmers contract a form of cancer or non-Hodgson’s lymphoma from this chemical, if this makes it into the Farm Bill, you won’t be able to sue for that.” @RepThomasMassie @MassieforKY
English
146
3.7K
9.2K
109.2K
Bob Schuiling
Bob Schuiling@CycleBobsChats·
@askCenturion please send instructions for onboarding a new Nova Transmitter (remote)
English
1
0
0
6
Bob Schuiling retweetledi
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊@VigilantFox·
Polio didn’t disappear the way you think it did. Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines. But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping. First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says. What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.” Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.” Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said. But it gets worse. The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.” So what about the virus? Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.” When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’” Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.” Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda. And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about? 🧵
English
181
3.7K
10.9K
422.5K
Bob Schuiling retweetledi
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
Your mitochondria aren't designed to run on salad. They run on B12, CoQ10, heme iron, choline, and creatine. All found in meat. None found in plants.
English
65
528
4.7K
74.6K
Bob Schuiling retweetledi
General Mike Flynn
General Mike Flynn@GenFlynn·
Yes, today is my birthday and I saw this video of a beautiful child singing what we all can appreciate. Life is sunshine, rain and pain, but in the end, life is beautiful. Merry Christmas everyone, we made it another year. And thank you @TheKiffness whoever and wherever you are 🙏🏼🔥 Turn it up!
English
1.3K
1.7K
9.2K
327.7K
Bob Schuiling retweetledi
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
1907: Electric lights replace candles. Procter & Gamble's candle business collapses. They pivot to soap but animal fats are expensive. They need cheaper alternatives. Enter cottonseed oil. Cotton seeds contain oil, but it's toxic to humans - gossypol, a natural pesticide. The seeds are agricultural waste, fed to cattle in small amounts or discarded. But chemically extract the oil, heat it to extreme temperatures, hydrogenate it with pressurized hydrogen gas, and you get solid white fat that looks like lard but costs pennies. They patent it in 1907, launch Crisco in 1911. Crystallized cottonseed oil. Industrial waste transformed into soap substitute. Except they don't market it as soap. They market it as food. Problem: nobody wants to eat textile manufacturing waste processed with industrial chemicals. Your grandmother cooks with lard and tallow like humans have for thousands of years. Solution: Convince America that animal fats are killing them. Procter & Gamble spends millions on marketing. Cookbooks, radio shows, free samples. They target Jewish communities advertising Crisco as kosher - "neither meat nor dairy!" But the genius move: 1948. The American Heart Association has $1,700 in their budget. Procter & Gamble donates $1.7 million. Suddenly the AHA has funding and influence. And suddenly they're very interested in dietary causes of heart disease. 1961: The AHA issues first dietary guidelines. Avoid saturated fat from animals. Replace with vegetable oils. Recommended oils: Crisco, Wesson, and other seed oils. Who benefits: Procter & Gamble. Who funded the AHA: Procter & Gamble. The conflict is blatant. Nobody cares. Never mind that humans ate animal fats for millions of years without epidemic heart disease. Never mind that seed oils oxidize rapidly and integrate into cell membranes creating inflammation for years. Industrial cottonseed waste is now "heart healthy" and butter is "artery-clogging poison." 1980s: Trans fats are discovered to be catastrophically unhealthy. They directly cause heart disease. Procter & Gamble's response: Quietly reformulate, keep selling seed oils, never acknowledge their "heart healthy" product spent 70 years actively causing disease. No apologies. No compensation. Just reformulate and continue. Modern research shows seed oils cause oxidative stress, inflammatory cascades, mitochondrial dysfunction, increased cancer risk, and neurodegenerative disease. Your body requires exactly zero grams. They didn't exist in human diets until 1911. But Procter & Gamble needed to sell soap alternatives and accidentally created the largest dietary change in human history. We traded animal fats that built civilizations for factory waste that causes disease. The soap company won.
Sama Hoole tweet media
English
391
6.4K
17K
802.2K
Bob Schuiling retweetledi
Ian Ellis
Ian Ellis@ianellisjones·
The U.S. is entering the endgame of its military buildup in the Caribbean, moving high-value assets critical for combat ops into SOUTHCOM. - Deploying additional strike and electronic attack aircraft, including VANG F-35As and VAQ 132 Growlers - Repositioning USAF assets from CENTCOM and INDOPACOM, such as CSAR HH-60W Jolly Green II helos and HC-130J aircraft - Six KC-135 tankers forward deployed to the Dominican Republic - MQ-4C Triton drone confirmed conducting ops in the AOR - Advanced AN/TPS-80 radar set up in Trinidad & Tobago + Carrying out more frequent flight ops in closer proximity to mainland Venezuela The Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group, following a 5-day port call in the USVI, is operating in the central Caribbean. If the rumor that "Maduro will be out by Christmas" holds, expect a decision to be made soon (if it hasn't already). Details and sources below.
Ian Ellis tweet media
English
166
1.3K
4.7K
1.4M
Bob Schuiling retweetledi
Peter Clack
Peter Clack@PeterDClack·
The Earth is greening at a rate never seen before in all recorded history, according to satellite records from 1982–2023. Global crop yields have risen 15–20% since 1960, almost entirely attributable to CO₂ fertilisation (Idso, 2013; IPCC AR6 WG1 Ch5). Famine deaths have also plummeted over a time when the world's population doubled and CO₂ deserves much of the credit. We have increased CO₂ over the past century to thank for this explosion in plant life and available plant food from booming agriculture. There's been a more than 18% increase in the global leaf area in 40 years, the largest gains in India and China (from CO₂ fertilisation). Warmer more balmy temperatures are also lengthening the growing seasons. This is a feature of rising levels of water vapour and cloud cover around the world. Every 100 ppm increase in CO₂ typically boosts plant growth by 25–50% in all non-water, limited conditions. My analysis draws on 776 studies from 1993–2019, showing an ideal average CO₂ level of 550 ppm delivers a 38% increase in global biomass. This is an astonishing windfall for life on earth, chiefly from CO₂, a trace gas at 420 ppm (or 0.04%). It also has a secondary benefit for life by contributing to baseline levels of warmth around the planet, along with water vapour and other trace gases with similar properties, like methane (1,920-1,930 parts per billion). However, this is not enough to be the defining control knob for changing climate around the world. Water vapour and cloud cover are the mainstays of rainfall and the entire hydrologic cycle, returning water as precipitation to rivers lakes and maintaining the oceans (where 78% of rain ends up). These are the reasons why commercial greenhouses pump CO₂ to 1000–1500 ppm deliberately. It ensures that crop yields jump by 20–70% depending on the crop. If 1000 ppm is good for tomatoes, why is 420 ppm an 'emergency' for the planet? The world population has more than doubled since 1970, going from roughly 3.7 billion to over 8 billion by 2022-2025. Population tripled since 1950, from roughly 2.5 billion people to over 8 billion today (8.2 billion as of late 2024/early 2025). This massive global expansion was driven by increased food production and agricultural advancement, known as the 'Green Revolution'. This period involved significant agricultural advancements like high-yield crop varieties, irrigation and the use of fertilizers and pesticides, which vastly increased food availability. CO₂ is the foundation for all life on earth and the chief source of photosynthesis. It also delivers the calcium carbonate in water to produce exoskeletons for all shellfish. This is the miracle of CO₂, enabling green chlorophyll plants and algae to convert sunlight into food energy and oxygen. This way, CO₂ supports every food chain on earth. The science says 600–1000 ppm of CO₂ plus 1–2°C extra warming hits the sweet spot for all terrestrial and marine life, including human civilization. We should be managing adaptation and energy abundance not waging war on a trace gas that makes the planet greener. Higher CO₂ gives a net benefit to life on Earth. This means the current 'carbon policy' of driving down CO₂ levels - the purpose for net zero - is anti-life.
Peter Clack tweet media
Bega, New South Wales 🇦🇺 English
157
1.4K
3.4K
102.5K
$aucy
$aucy@Saucy_Doge·
This is an amazing breakdown of what money actually means for most people, and how the government can actually borrow their own fiat “money” to create debt, to which then the average person pays the interest on it! Good stuff Simon!
Simon Dixon@SimonDixonTwitt

Great question When a bank issues a loan, it does not loan out deposits. It creates new money as a credit entry     You sign a loan agreement & it becomes an asset for the bank     Bank credits your account & the new deposit becomes new money in circulation Banks are credit creators rather than intermediaries Bank-created money is created with interest Because the interest is not created in the money supply, the system requires perpetual growth, constant new debt or defaults This is why the private credit system is inherently inflationary & extractive over time Governments do not create new money to spend directly They instead issue bonds purchased by banks, pension funds, foreign governments, or the central bank This is government borrowing which is printing by selling promises Government-issued money is also interest-bearing, which means it has the same inflationary dynamic as private bank credit creation Tax serve 3 functions in a fiat system 1 Prevent inflation from excess government spending. If governments printed unlimited money, it would raise spending power without increasing production & create inflation. Taxes remove money from circulation, acting as a drain on the system 2 Give the currency value. If the government requires taxes to be paid in its currency, that alone creates demand 3 Redistribute and fund services. Funding services are not the main monetary reason, that’s the political justification. The monetary purpose is inflation control & currency demand Governments spend money into the economy & taxes destroy part of that money to keep the system alive This is the part people misunderstand the most If new money is printed but does not create new goods, new services, new infrastructure or new real output, then you get more money chasing the same amount of goods, which raises prices Examples:     Money printing for bailouts, war spending not tied to productive output, stimulus without corresponding output growth, interest-bearing credit expansion for consumption This type of money requires taxation to remove excess money & prevent inflation If new money is issued to create new productive output, the money supply increases in proportion to real wealth Examples:    Building infrastructure, funding energy projects, paying workers to produce real goods & services or capital investments with measurable output If production rises faster than money supply, no inflation occurs In such cases, taxation is not required to offset the issuance, because real-world value backs the currency expansion After the Weimar hyperinflation & Great Depression, Germany introduced Mefo Bills in 1934     It was a government-created promissory note issued to construction & industrial companies     They were not backed by gold, not borrowed from banks, backed by future labor & productive output & used to fund public work    Money was issued only when workers produced output     Idle labor was turned into productive labor     Factories, infrastructure & goods increased alongside the money supply    The credit carried no compounding interest & money was created only to mobilize productive capacity, not consumption or speculation When money creation matches real productivity, inflation does not occur Germany reduced unemployment from 30% to 0% in a few years without runaway inflation Inflation problems emerged later only when issuance shifted to unproductive military expansion Today’s system is a public–private hybrid Banks create most money via credit, charge interest & expand the money supply Governments issue bonds purchased by banks & central banks, borrow the currency they themselves issue & tax to control inflation created by both government & private banks The government effectively outsourced money creation to private banks & then taxes you to stabilize the system for banks profit They socialize the losses & privatize the gains. It’s a ponzi scheme & you pay taxes to service the interest on banks debt.

English
1
4
14
5.2K
Bob Schuiling retweetledi
Peter Clack
Peter Clack@PeterDClack·
We do trash our rivers and skies in many parts of the world, and we don’t need a global carbon bureaucracy to tell us littering is bad. But turning a trace gas that is greening the planet and feeding more people than ever before into an existential emergency has always been less about science and more about power. But the modern climate campaign didn’t begin as science—it began as politics. In 1968 the Club of Rome was founded by scientists, industrialists and officials who believed unchecked population growth, industrial expansion and resource use would collapse civilization within a century. Their 1972 report 'Limits to Growth' popularised the idea of finite planetary boundaries and the need for global management of growth itself. This is the same ideology that drives the climate agenda today. Twenty years later, in 1988, the UN created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. From day one its remit was explicitly political: provide governments with scientific information to develop climate policies. Many scientists contributed, yet the only part most politicians and journalists read is its Summary for Policymakers. The result has been sharper, and more alarmist language than the underlying chapters justify. The central claim is that human CO₂ emissions—roughly 3–4% of the total annual carbon flux—are overwhelming a supposedly stable natural cycle and driving dangerous warming. Yet the Earth has seen far warmer periods during the current Holocene interglacial (e.g. it was 1–2 °C warmer than today in the Holocene Climatic Optimum ~8 000–5 000 years ago). Satellite data show the planet has greened dramatically since the 1980s, with leaf-area increases equivalent to twice the continental United States, largely thanks to CO₂ fertilisation (NASA 2016, 2019; Zhu et al., Chen et al.). Yes, adding CO₂ does cause some warming (physics is physics), but the fight is about magnitude, harms, and whether the policy cure is worse than the disease. But has the climate campaign now failed after three decades and many trillions spent? Wind and solar still provide only ~3% of global primary energy; and fossil fuels remain at ~82% (Statistical Review of World Energy 2024). Western economies have been pushed into rapid, costly energy transitions for which almost no grid was prepared, contributing to energy-price spikes and industrial off-shoring. Meanwhile the annual COP meetings have become the world’s most expensive travelling circus (for example COP26’s estimated 100 000 tonnes CO₂ from travel alone)—private jets, five-star hotels, and blinding promises that developing nations know they will never keep. The climate issue contains real environmental questions, but the policy response has been shaped from the outset by the same impulse that animated the Club of Rome: the desire to place limits on growth, energy use and national sovereignty through supranational institutions. History shows that when utopian projects are granted unlimited funds and moral immunity, they rarely end well.
Peter Clack tweet media
Bega, New South Wales 🇦🇺 English
71
389
966
13.8K
Bob Schuiling retweetledi
Camus
Camus@newstart_2024·
John Kerry’s doomsday statistic is a masterclass in elite deception. He claims 15 million people die each year from "greenhouse gas emissions." This is pure, unadulterated fearmongering designed to justify a global power grab. Let's dissect this absurd number. It comes from a study that attributes deaths from heart disease, lung cancer, and strokes to all human-caused air pollution. It's a statistical model, not a body count. They've taken a complex global health issue, linked it broadly to industrial activity, and packaged it as a direct casualty of "climate change." The imagery is even more ridiculous: emissions "travel around and drop in the form of pollution," supposedly boiling the oceans. This isn't science; it's a medieval-level superstition promoted by a man with a massive carbon footprint. The goal is clear: Panic you into accepting that our food system is failing (his claimed "40% yield" collapse) and that your livelihood is a threat to the planet. They create the problem, define the crisis, and then demand total control to implement their "solutions." Don't let them use a manipulated statistic to sell you a future of managed decline and surrendered freedom.
English
407
1.1K
3.5K
78.4K
Neil Stone
Neil Stone@DrNeilStone·
The idea vaccines cause autism was invented by Andrew Wakefield in 1998 and was so thoroughly debunked he lost his license for gross malpractice And here we are 27 years later RFK Jr dredging up the same nonsense Such a tiresome waste of time
English
2.2K
7K
33.5K
521.5K
Aaron Day
Aaron Day@AaronRDay·
For 3 years I have travelled to 27 states and 4 countries telling people, in part, about how Bitcoin was hijacked by Epstein and traditional finance to usher in CBDCs. I hope now that everyone in the world begins to understand this and talk about it during the holidays. No one who values liberty should be peddling Bitcoin a freedom money. We are in a war against technocracy and the centralized tokenization of every asset on earth. To combat this we need privacy coins and privacy tokens. This is literally a battle for free will. Look into @zano_project and Freedom Dollar. It is time to publicly shame everyone who continues to false push Bitcoin as freedom money, Bitcoin as a way to pay down the national debt, and Bitcoin as an alternative to CBDCs. It is slow, expensive, hijacked, non-fungible digital fool’s gold manipulated by bankers and the deep state to misdirect while they centrally tokenize everything on Earth.
Aaron Day tweet media
English
44
66
256
54.5K