Damion Moore

Moral Legitimacy Cannot Be Built on the Unauthorized Use of Another Person’s Pain, do you understand @TimBallard ? Her Name Is Delia: A Story of Suffering Appropriation and Human Trophyism Men like Tim Ballard say compelling things like, “God’s children are not for sale.” It is the kind of line designed to sound like scripture and function like armor. But moral certainty is not evidence... americancrimejournal.com/her-name-is-de…

That's because by Justin Riggs' own admission, he will lie and deceive anyone and everyone, including victims of sexual assault (that he 100% believes) to get "the product" he wants.

Do better. Use common sense. That's why you didn't use a source, but a picture of nonsense. You defend this guy like he's your mother. Rittenhouse tried to enlist before that picture was taken and the incident. You guys believed that? Anyone who went into the Marine Recruiter Office with a neckbrace was not serious and putting on a performance. Certainly would not have have failed pre-screening, and been officially disqualified, because they would have just told him to come back when he was healed. He didn't go to MEPs, where a doctor would have to be medically disqualified him either. Here's where your fantasy falls apart. A U.S. Marine Corps "spokesperson" stated "he spoke with a Marine Recruiter and after going over his options, and was disqualified". Recruiters do not give not medical evaluations. Every single neck ailment minus a spinal cord being severed, once healed can be waivered. If it wasn't healed, they would not submit the application anyway. So he failed on background. Either he had a juvenile record he admitted to or his contacts were flagged.

@DDLMoore @gregm766 @TheRealThelmaJ1

Kyle scored so low on the ASVAB he was banned from ever applying to the military again. So dumb the Marines refused to take him.

@TimBallard you're a pussy mother fucker. Threatening to take everyone court EXCEPT the one pissing on your bushes. Don't take it out on women cause you got punked. You're supposed to be this bad ass commando killing "the big boss". Katherine wants a real "Couples ruse".

@jason_xxiv @realrxAFC @VanLathan Fanfiction? While it plays and appears to be fanfiction, David Chase wrote it. Lawrence Konner polished it for the filming script. David Chase wrote original treatment and story.

@realrxAFC @VanLathan Many Saints of Newark. The Sopranos prequel movie.

JUNIOR SOPRANO WAS A PEDOPHILE?!!!!!!!!!

@gregm766 @TheRealThelmaJ1 Ah you must be a Marine. You're reading it wrong. He's not "using the Marines as a lowbar". Rittenhouse specifically he was "joining the Marines". That has been the story, however, they did not want him period due to his associations and conduct.

@TheRealThelmaJ1 Hey, you have to have a higher GT score on the ASVAB to get into the Marine Corps than you do the Army. Use the Army as your low bar.

@BasedMikeLee hey dumbass, you do realize you voted for bills inspired by this very article? Pedophilia is not a crime, but abusing children is. That is reality. What is this "Minority Report"? Did you even read the article? Also, why is the GOP trying to pass off an eleven year old article to spark outrage? I know. I know. People who voted for you, fall for the headlines. The slogans. The title of bills. They certainly didn't vote for you for substance and depth. I'm glad you understand that. I guess Mikkkee Lee and Republicans are against preventing children from being sexually abused in first place. That said, I suspect a large portion of the population is, because without abused children, they don't have props to hold up and Youtube content. Let me explain it for the those who have walked through life just reading headlines and falling for slogans, and for those with advanced CTE from all the concussions they get from the mental gymnastics they have to do. A pedophile will often have dozens of victims before they get caught. What the article discusses is trying to get pedophiles who have an attraction to children to seek professional help "before they abuse children" or "somewhere in the cycle of them abusing children before there is more victims". The article states that doctors are mandated reporters, and the pedophile will be caught for his crimes. Look at that, what a motherfucking novel idea? Letting the pedophile turn himself in to doctors for help and if he abused children, then he is prosecuted. The article explicitly states that abusing a child is a crime. But when they are having thoughts, they are not. So unless you're advocating for thought crimes, and don't give a fuck about preventing child abuse in the first place, oh that's right you don't give a fuck about anything. This is just another tweet you'll be deleting because Mikkke Lee is a dumbass and by his own admission, he wants the children abused first so we can prosecute them. This explains your response to the Epstein files and your failure to speak out against how The Administration is handling this complete failure of justice. I'm convinced you're a failed abortion.

It appears Stephen Miller is either misinformed, confused or trying to invent impressive propaganda of his own and fuel the narrative about "border security". Like with human trafficking, if you want proof that someone is not serious about "human trafficking" or "drug trafficking", you can tell when they know nothing about it. Are using as justification for another agenda. Just be honest, you don't brown and black people here and you're going to use every reason to attempt to justify having armed commandos in the street with masks to get them out. Just say it. Majority (about 65%) came here legally and their Visas or whatever expired. Now before anyone claims that these are "liberal sources" and since folks think the FBI data and studies are biased, I went with strictly reporting red state data on crime, Texas, a border state, then a libertarian source and a right-wing think tank. "Cato Institute analysis of Texas data found undocumented immigrants were 26% less likely than U.S.-born residents to be convicted of homicide" According to the Texas Department of Public Safety, "undocumented immigrants" are far less likely to commit violent crimes that natural born citizens. In fact, "undocumented immigrants" commit less violent crime than police officers as a group. Violent crimes committed by police officers are underreported in Texas. For years these people have perpetuated that drugs are coming via "illegal aliens" and they are "part of the cartel". People need to get an actual understanding of how crime works, because people live in constant fear and paranoia, majority of it is bullshit. They assume, "oh brown skin, they must be the cartel". Stating that the cartel is smuggling humans so they can traffic them later, no. That is not true. They wouldn't have to kidnap them or force them to do so. Just by giving young women drugs and getting them hooked on it, they could easily have all the women they want. There are dozens of organizations, both good and bad. Some get them in and set them and do right by them. Others are bad people. Majority are people and families that are coming over on their own. Let me be clear about something here, several agreements and alliances have been made between key organizations. Based on the agreement that was made back in 1998, the cartel is not running any rackets in the United States, unless it is free for the taking. Smuggling money is not a lot. Getting $1500 to $15,000 or more, that's not a lot money to the cartel and ranking members. There are areas that Also I find it irresponsible and dishonest that Stephen Miller There was a meeting between organizations back in 1998 way outside of Chicago, there were serious issues being dealt with, basically the old ways organizations were obsolete and they were afraid of prison. There serious issues of encroachment, as People and Folk Nation full fledged war. Deal was made. The hubs were set, the cartel's role in the United States was set, enforcement went to whoever ran the territory or whoever had an issue they needed to get permission. The hubs were real estate in very rural areas, for obvious reasons. I won't say how the money works between the cartel and the lead organization because I'm not giving anyone ideas. You want consultation on how to make your money "right" and a lot of it, pay me. In the United States, the cartel has two roles. They handles logistics and transport to the hubs. They were responsible for product until it got to the hubs. They have been paid upfront. They did not do enforcement action in the United States. That policy is in effect. Now, if they asked or there is a serious problem and somebody sanctioned it. Last but not least, there was a hands off policy on American civilians in Mexico. Again, "American Civilians". Now if you were armed and acting tough, gangbanging, disrespecting them or dealing drugs, yes you and people you're with would get hit. Of the dozens of people I know that tried to get in the mix with Sinola. No. They rarely accept among their ranks, even Mexican people. They will hire ex-military to training their men or be their bodyguard until further notice. In over twenty-five years, I've not heard one the Bill Clinton administration to Donald Trump that they had a clue what was going on. I've listened to local and state police. SLED in South Carolina and many others. Special Agents, DEA Special Agents and all the professionals. In the 90's, Every time they would talk about drugs it was scapegoating Hispanic the black communities. Sadly they were claiming white girls getting seduced and turned out by black boyfriends further solidifying racism and fears. From Miami Vice in 1985 all the way until about 2016, anything Americans said about Cartels were always about Pablo Escobar and all the money he had. Rats ate through his bills stacked in a room, he would have to write off 10% of wealth each year. They made a movie about Barry Seal with Dennis Hopper called 'Double-cross' and then finally made that movie "Blow" with Johnny Depp and Ray Liotta. How did cartels operate back then? They their people in the United States and they would pay somewhere between $8,000 to to $13,000 per kilo smuggled in. Cocaine is dirt cheap and plentiful. If you go to Costa Rica, Mexico, Bolivia, you can get a half ounce for nothing or like a $20 tip. In the United States. that half ounce is $400 to $500 just selling it as is. If you break it up into $40 bags or sell rock? $1,200. Now think about something. You're smuggling millions of dollars of cocaine. If you're caught, you are going prison for the rest of your natural life. You will be charged with drug trafficking. Conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Then you will get hit with RICO enhancements. So why the fuck would professional drug smugglers, risk their asses to make $1500. You know damn well, law enforcement is going to ask a sorts of questions and will be trying to trick them. To save their asses, of course they can claim you tried to kidnap them or force them into prostitution. Billions of dollars a year. Mass surveillance. Millions of Agents and dedicated agencies that specialize in specific areas of law enforcement. You have the CIA, NSA, FBI, HSI, DHS, CBP, DEA, ATF and you guys probably don't even know where major supply of cocaine goes for the national tax and how it is distributed. This is why the cartels are not afraid and does not take this administration seriously. I do not believe for one second that they have any intent to combat drugs coming into the United States. All the drugs that come into the United States, is not just the cartels. There are Americans that buy it and smuggle it in. They fly their private plane. They do air drop onto people's property. People believe that all the drugs come over by the these mules and people swallow it and shit it out likes its prison. A lot of people are drugs addicts bringing over their own supply. That is not true. There is a lot deceptive practices where they send decoys to get busted, so they get all the border agents occupied and real folks can get through. The bulk of drug coming into and sold in the United States is not brought in by drug mules. These weekly shipments coming in like clockwork. We are talking about the narcotics business. This idea that, these cartel operatives and staff is hanging out at the border smuggling people would get them whacked. Yes, the cartel uses violence as a tool in Mexico, based the culture and region they are in and forcing them to fear them. It would not happen from the United States. If the cartel hung eight white girls from a bridge, those responsible would be tortured and killed. I certainly never did. The funny thing is since 1998, 80% of the cocaine in this country has entered in several loads, shipped all to one spot, stored and distributed throughout the country almost without any changes. Oddly enough, it is well known the federal government is aware of it, because on numerous occasions they have busted six or seven distributors they all got it from the same place. They cannot figure why crime has skyrocketed in small counties and rural throughout the country. It is hilarious to me, that in over 25 years, I have not heard a single law enforcement officers, detective, media, True Crime bullshit talk about cartels like Stephen Miller is panicking now. Where does it go? When they talk about drugs, heroin, cocaine, MDMA, they go somewhere before they are distributed. Texas swears that all the drugs in county, come over the border and then it is sent to where it needs to go. That is not how works. Not once has the government explained the drug distribution network. Who does what? I guess my awareness from where and how I grew, being aware of who is the crime boss or organization this neighborhood or city. Stephen Miller is a horrible human being. He scapegoating and immersing and blending them in with the cartel (he doesn't even name a cartel, because he doesn't know which one does what), these are humble people who are taking considerable risks to come to America, with nothing and there is no prospects. Like human trafficking, people's perception how drug distribution works, cartels, crime in general is based entirely on Hollywood films, political pundits on the radio who are bigots and racists, just like Tim Ballard.

This is crazy. JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU/Gray News) — Alaskan authorities say a staff member for a state senator has been charged with sex trafficking of children and other child exploitation offenses. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Alaska, the FBI arrested Craig Scott Valdez, 36, after a federal grand jury returned an indictment with charges that include sex trafficking of children. Investigators say they believe Valdez targeted more than 10 juveniles across Alaska. At the time of his arrest, the FBI identified Valdez as a current state employee working in Anchorage and Juneau. The 36-year-old was listed as a staff member for Sen. George Rauscher in Juneau on the Alaska Senate Minority website. State senator staff member arrested on federal child sex trafficking charges, authorities say live5news.com/2026/02/21/sta…

@Jim_Jordan and @GOP this isn't a joke or game. Even if he was "innocent" of the physical and sex abuse allegations, he demonstrated poor judgement and inappropriate behavior with his own daughter. It's like you're trying to shove "child sex abuse" and sexual misconduct down our throats or play some sick game trying to be as deplorable as possible to distract from real issues, and it has no place in public office or a professional setting. Serving public office is a privilege and you represent your constituents and community whether they voted for you are not. You are a reflection of them. The relative in question is Rodney Creech's teenage minor daughter, who has since gone public. His accusation that she was retaliating for "parental alienation" is patently false. He attacked her on Facebook and accused her of being "politically motivated". That's BS. Someone else had saw her messages complaining about what her father did to her and reported it and she continued to protect him, until she couldn't. He used her silence, to try and damage her reputation and destroy her credibility. She eventually got the courage to come forward and details his abuses towards her and her siblings. The BCI did not clear Creech of criminal wrong doing, but they did not have evidence beyond what he said and she said, and he sure went out of his way to trash his own daughter's character and prosecutor's know what his daughter would have to endure if he filed charges and this went to trial. She would have been on trial, especially since he politicized it. It is his job to protect his teenage minor, even if she is accusing him of wrongdoing. Something is seriously wrong if your child is accusing you of physical and sexual abuse, and it is not true. You do not continue a political campaign. True or false, your constituents deserve someone who is not a sexual predator, and if you are an innocent man, they deserve a Representative who prioritizes his family over politics and work, and one not distracted by serious family issues. He's a scumbag and sick opportunist at best. That said, were the allegations true? She has since gone public, and she is credible. Prosecutor Daniel Driscoll wrote in a letter to BCI that he believed Creech’s “behavior during the time of the investigation was concerning,” but that he was closing the case. What was the concerning behavior? Well after denying it for months, attacking his teenage daughter in the public sphere, and dragging her public in the court of public opinion... his own teenage daughter who was a minor at the time. Rodney Creech admitted to stripping down to his underwear and getting in bed with his teenage daughter while he was erect. He admitted to his erect penis touching her "not more than once", but was adamant it was not done in a sexual nature. A teenage boy and/or grown man under no circumstance should be stripping down to their underwear and getting into bed with a relative while they are erect. I don't care how innocent your intent is, this is never appropriate, especially with a relative. I'm not sure what reason a bed had to be shared, but if this was the case then a man needs to make sure he is decent and keep your clothes on. Getting in bed with a female relative while in your underwear and aroused and then "touching her"? Based on what I've read, it also appears that he got into his daughter's bed, at home. A father has no business stripping down to his underwear and getting in her bed aroused. Why would a father think he daughter wouldn't feel at minimum awkward, if not totally grossed out with her father getting into her bed. Your daughter should not get the slightest impression that you are trying something or thinking something inappropriate with her period. She is a young woman, a teenager and I'm not sure how any father didn't feel awkward about it, imagine how she feels. Why would a political party and politician even think about endorsing someone with even the appearance of impropriety with his own child? Especially when American's don't trust the government due to child sex abuse and the Epstein files? Then keep trying to crack jokes and push people's buttons, and it is sick. tiffinohio.net/posts/ohio-gop…

Apparently someone claiming this was his Aunt, or I'm sorry, "his mom's friend who he considers his aunt", took issue with my comment on MSN last week and "is going to report me", proceeded to blow up my email and inbox, because "I'm a piece of shit". I'm embarrassed for you. You're taking ownership of this individual? She is a danger to society. Imagine if AI became self-aware on her watch? The machines in a microsecond would decide to eradicate us. That's the real story and who could blame them? So I had a second look, and a slight change of opinion. Maybe he will "report me to my mommy" this time. I had to double check to see if this was an April Fools by @NPR in 2025 or an article by 'The Onion'. Maybe NPR was hacked, because this is the type of bullshit I would expect. No. It's been up a week. The only excuse for this to be considered a legit story, is if the subject was mentally ill, but we see that she is not from the article and it would be unethical and in poor taste. From the article: "She was initially skeptical. "Wait, what are you talking about? That's absolutely insane. That's crazy," she thought." and "The chatbot doubled down. It told Small she was 42,000 years old and had lived multiple lifetimes. It offered detailed descriptions that, Small admits, most people would find "ludicrous."..." Most people? No. It's fucking stupid. People smoking meth for two days on a ten strip of LDS would think it's fucking stupid too. Just like some people shouldn't drive. Some people shouldn't play on the computer. There are some stories reporters shouldn't do. Some people shouldn't be reporters either. How is this a "Deep Dive" into "The Dangers of AI?" Why not do a story like, "eleven years ago, Micky Small's boss told her 'to go to hell'. Three days later shed was rushed to Cedars Sinai Hospital. She had been digging a hole for three days straight". This is a humans are fucking stupid problem. AI might be dangerous in some situations folks, especially mentally ill people and AI. But stupid people armed with AI will be a threat to humanity, if AI doesn't convince them to play in rush hour traffic on the Interstate first. The only excuse for this story, is that the reporter and editor were thinking, "what if we find people that AI or extraterrestrials first encounter, that puts us all in danger". This is at best, the plot for a low budget Porn film or advocacy for the extermination of the human race. The first thought that went through my mind, "all that oxygen... is gone." What could have possibly been the catalyst for "AI to go crazy and convince a dumbass that she was 42,000 years old and had lived multiple lifetimes, offering detailed descriptions that she admits, most people would find ludicrous?" This journalist somehow didn't put two and two together, but somehow explains exactly what happened here, yet scapegoats AI. "Micky Small is one of hundreds of millions of people who regularly use AI chatbots. She started using ChatGPT to outline and workshop screenplays while getting her master's degree. and... She lives in southern California and has long been interested in New Age ideas. She believes in past lives — and is self-aware enough to know how that might sound. But she is clear that she never asked ChatGPT to go down this path." There is just no way she ever put in anything about past lives, or asked about New Age ideas or asked for help with screenplay with these ideas. The AI just went full fucking SKYNET and tried to convince her she was "42,000 years old and lived past lives". If anything AI is being scapegoated. It is a victim of human stupidity. Somebody into New Age shit and past lives is fucking around with ChatGPT, so it's doing its job and we are acting like it became self-aware and is looking to terminate John Connor. Poor AI. See what we have to deal with. Welcome to the party! npr.org/2026/02/14/nx-…

Let's take a step back, this is confusing and concerning. I didn’t know who you were and you did convey any of that in your message. What you stated was how about letting her story stand on its own and that she was being further silenced because of that. In your last post, you introduced your own trauma and experiences as context, explaining that your reaction stemmed from how silence functioned in your family. That context was not communicated in your original message. At the time, there was no indication that your comment was rooted in personal trauma or lived experience. I’m genuinely sorry for what you went through, and for the loss of protection you described. No one should have to carry that. But to be clear- none of that was expressed in your initial comment. My response was based solely on what was written, not on information that came later. That’s why I interpreted it as a general, public-facing comment rather than a personal one. I certainly didn't name the person or talk about traumatic incidents in her life. The purpose of mention in the Delia, is the fact is there is structural failure and system failure. This isn't one off or a New York problem. There is structural and system in Montana. To further burst the illusion and the American confidence and trust these systems, law enforcement, and the courts. Even worse, the American ignorance that there is a man or commandos out rescuing them and all he needs is money, when operates completely on foreign soil and doesn't rescue anyone. Delia had caseworkers, but because minimum compliance was met and she didn't say anything, so it's one off. In Delia's case, there was suspicion something wasn't right. Instead of compelling her to leave that environment to their office, a doctor or have law enforcement do a direct investigation, because those traffickers were under investigation almost the whole time she was being trafficked. Regardless, she ends up escaping and rescuing herself. What troubles in both cases, is there is a criminal investigation in Delia's case for human trafficking. Then there are caseworkers. She was not 18 and they had perfect reason to remove her because she did not have a Visa and they should have got her out. The program and system in place would have worked, had someone just acted, instead of waiting for a little more evidence. That was the same with my friend in Montana. Ample interactions, abuses and neglect and this was a failure of courts and so many other things. The point of bringing it up is that Delia's situation wasn't isolated. It's not a New York problem. It's not a Red state problem or blue state. Clearly a deep red state and deep blue failed to act. So please understand, this wasn’t about you personally. It was about making it clear to the public that survivors should always be encouraged, supported, and respected, and that their voice already belongs to them. She has wisdom. When she and I talk, it’s for hours. We’ve shared our own traumas. She has helped give me insight. I’ve known many people who grew up in similar systems. Many didn’t survive their teen years. She did. That matters. She should be proud of that. I believe in her, and I’m genuinely amazed by what she’s accomplished. I’m also mindful of other survivors who may come across this. Many describe feeling small, unworthy, dirty, angry at themselves. Survival isn’t just physical, it’s mental and the human spirt. If someone in that place reads this, I want to be certain we’re not perpetuating the Tim Ballard fantasy, the idea that agency is bestowed by a white man, that salvation comes from power rather than from the survivor’s own resilience. No one gives that spirit. No one owns it. I took no offense. I didn’t assume bad faith. But I know how some people read things, and I’m careful not to contribute, however unintentionally, to a narrative I reject. As a rule, when people ask questions, I assume they’re acting in good faith unless I know otherwise. Curiosity isn’t disrespect. The real issue is the larger ecosystem we’re operating in, rampant misinformation, the White Savior trope, fear-mongering, and a profit-driven anti-trafficking industry that distorts reality. Back to the subject. I am confused and concerned. I don't know if this was an attempted call out and there is anger or animosity or maybe this should discussed in a private message, because it appeared to be a random comment asking about it. I'm lost here. I certainly don't want to be the cause of someone's trauma or I should say trigger bad memories and trauma. I certainly will not bring it up again.

@DDLMoore 1. I understand your point, and I didn’t mean to imply that your dear friend can’t tell her own story or that you’re intentionally silencing her. When I said what I did, it was coming from my own experience of how silence worked in our family. She isn’t in danger now because she

Moral Legitimacy Cannot Be Built on the Unauthorized Use of Another Person’s Pain, do you understand @TimBallard ? Her Name Is Delia: A Story of Suffering Appropriation and Human Trophyism Men like Tim Ballard say compelling things like, “God’s children are not for sale.” It is the kind of line designed to sound like scripture and function like armor. But moral certainty is not evidence... americancrimejournal.com/her-name-is-de…

Just another brick in the old fucking wall. I should just jam people from jump. You can't be diplomatic with low competency people who eat, smoke, drink, sleep and shit in bad faith. So, stop bringing knives to gunfights, I play by Chicago rules. These flat-earther "political" types, it seems that in the last decade, they all got a severe case of CTE from all the damn concussions they get from the mental gymnastics. David here (saying anti-sematic shit and named David) was counting aloud to seven using his fingers and got a concussion by the time he said "four" and he missed the number three.

@w1nt3rfox Absolutely. Did you you see it in the Epstein files? A number of people in Epstein's orbit contacted the FBI only after the Palm Beach PD announced their criminal investigation into Epstein. It was to cover their ass, not tip off law enforcement.

Absolutely. Everyone who was involved. Those having sex with or engaging in sex acts with minors. Trafficking, and/or aiding or facilitating & the covering up, must be prosecuted. Including, but not limited to misconduct. Also, anyone who knew about it & did absolutely nothing.