Reprogramming Mind

What I would say if I had six minutes with a sympathetic billionaire.

@realOrlokkNoxx @AreOhEssEyeEe there might be a huge difference, especially if familiar with 'The Hidden Message in Water' x.com/AustConserva/s…

@AreOhEssEyeEe There’s no difference between halal and non halal food once it’s cooked I still like bacon though I mean will they still make the Baconator

If you needed a reason to stop eating at Wendys (besides the fact that their food is toxic garbage). Here's another one... They are now halal.

@AreOhEssEyeEe how much for a 9 pack of goat nuggets

lol

@goddek @LeoTerrellDOJ as if terrell can learn

@LeoTerrellDOJ “You hates jews”? LOL. This rabbi here might be onto something.

Correct Nick: I love Jews and you hates Jews!

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts. So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world. What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable. Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations. The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead. Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described. The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding. The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months. Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight. Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now. She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

@RyLiberty apprenticing as a carpenter.

Why are the billionaires all evil. Where is the rich guy on our side?

@marclou rebrand as Mcfart, adjust the audio accordingly, $2.99 /yr

I got bored working on my 34th & 35th startups 😵‍💫 so I built an app that plays a creepy sound whenever I open or close my laptop. It’s called McCreep, and it’s useless. github.com/marclou/McCreep

@Leonardaisfunny @goddek Gucci backpack

Remember when I told you he’s controlled op meant to corral the antisemites into a castrated corner of the internet? So the 2020 presidential election could be rigged but not a congressional primary with a record number of mail-in ballots?

Elon Musk predicts that in the very near future, humans will have chips implanted directly into their brains, creating a brain-machine interface capable of giving people cybernetic superpowers. Musk says the technology could restore eyesight, allow paralyzed people to walk again, and even help the mute speak. He described the coming breakthrough as “Jesus-level technology.” “These are kind of Jesus-level things.”

.@benshapiro "Nobody cares about Epstein"...... Except for your former subscribers....

@faridafirst21 anyways, thanks for the superchat...

My all-time favorite clip of Nick

@govt_corrupt True

@forestpilled you're too smart for a 96 month loan at 3x book value. But if you're a brown retard, there's RBC.

once again i’m in the city and i don’t understand how all these fat blacks and browns are driving audis and bmws. the entire auto market is a mystery.

@deaflibertarian Votes are needed as placeholders for second place and to give the illusion of democracy.

Do our votes matter?

@DohnJaniel @LogFitz6 Bill Gates likes to play God by dumping ticks on us, what's the holy solution now?

@LogFitz6 God does not create a problem without creating a solution

we need an autist on our side to create our own bioweapon to eliminate the ticks the stuff online has me tweaked, for baby / dogs / myself outside or in woods doing stuff like cedarwood, etc but there’s gotta be something they can cook up

@LogFitz6 DMSO works but you'll stink like garlic. Also lavender and echinacea for the garden helps. mcgill.ca/oss/article/me…

@Twang1776LZ do mosquitos make you allergic to meat?

@SanfiElderberry @clif_high does that also work for mosquitos?

sulfur dust. Tractor Supply. Put a cup in an old sock. Tie sock off and beat your clothes and shoes and socks with it. To create a tick-free area, use sulfur dust in a shaker bottle. Hold close to ground and shake. You will see the ticks leave. No joke. Been using this method since 1963 when fishing in tick infested areas.

@TheDeepSouth_ how much did mentioning AIPAC in this post pay?

Anyone who takes money from AIPAC must be hanged.

@HarmeetKDhillon prices were normal before we were invaded by star wars named mongrels, harmeeeeeet

Someone just tried to charge me $25.60 for a cold, refrigerated turkey sandwich at Burbank Airport. Have people no shame?! Luckily I had tangerines and trail mix in my bag. I’ll survive …