DadLife

Time to remind everyone

@sanfran_972 @ConceptualJames Cope you Jew cuck

@DadLifeRulez @ConceptualJames Paki bot

Since going to the Stop Anti-Zionism conference in Toronto last week, I've been thinking. Is Anti-Zionism "just" Anti-Semitism in new clothes, which is Anti-Judaism in new clothes? The answer is a qualified no. Anti-Zionism certainly is Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism dressed up for the post-WWII age. That's not only impossible to deny, it's shockingly accurate. Anti-Zionism disguises and continues those wretched lines and legacies. On the other hand, Anti-Zionism is different because it is more. Anti-Semites hate Jews (and not other Semitic-language peoples, by evil design). Anti-Zionists hate Jews and everyone who supports Jews. It's a broader category of malice. It targets more people, definitely and explicitly: Jews and those who support them. Christian Zionists, whether theologically or eschatologically so or not, are lumped in effectively as Judaized under Anti-Zionism. So it goes for all people who believe the state of Israel ought to be able to defend and secure itself against eradication in Eretz Israel without being held to ridiculous national double-standards. Anti-Zionism, by adopting "politically correct" clothing for unjust Jew criticism, by necessity has to attack those who support Jews as well. In the language of the friend-enemy distinction upon which it runs, the "enemy" category is necessarily broadened to demonize not only Jews but also their broader network of support in the wider world. The logic of this wretched "distinction" upon which it runs is that Jews and those who support them are declared the enemy, and everyone who doesn't join in against this enemy is complicit in supporting the enemy, thus also an enemy. This is the evil logic of the Soviets and the Maoists and the Nazis. It is the logic of Woke. But Anti-Zionism isn't just Anti-Semitism in new "postwar" clothing. It is bigger than that and does greater evil and greater mischief.

@Martels_Hammer @ColonelTowner x.com/dadliferulez/s…

@ColonelTowner Clearly the CIA and the rest of the deep state cabal are much worse.

Where does the CIA fit into your threat assessment?

@ColonelTowner x.com/dadliferulez/s…

ה' לי לא אירא מה יעשה לי אדם. "HaShem is with me; I will not fear. What can man do to me?" — Tehilim 118:6

@scotthortonshow 😂 I mean. Maybe she’s the expert on all the wrong things and could be the perfect example

Lady in front of me on this plane is easily 200 pounds overweight while she explains to the other lady that she’s working on her health care PhD, and all about how you need healthy kinds of nutrients and things.

@josh_hammer @RabbiPW @Israel365News Fuck you ya filthy Jew cuck

An American ally is a country that, when it acts in its own national interest, happens to advance the American national interest too. In short, that’s the “America first” case for the U.S.-Israel alliance. Thanks for having me, @RabbiPW @Israel365News youtu.be/HYaTS2uErlQ?si…

@GenFlynn China. Russia. Israel. Iran. Are all fighting for second place against our own IC apparatus for the number one threat to America

The Chinese Communist Party is the single greatest external threat to the United States of America. That is not a political statement. It is not an opinion offered for effect. It is the operational reality I lived as Director of DIA and National Security Advisor, and it is the conclusion confirmed by every serious threat assessment produced by the United States Intelligence Community in the years since. To understand more about this read one my substack below: genflynn.substack.com/p/a-five-year-…

😂 meltdown mark the great 🐀 👑

@ChaiLife613 Now do this

@MatNuclear You gonna be the best cotton picker ever when this ends

Never apologize for America, EVER!

@HuntersOfNazis Jew

Are we too harsh on Antisemites, or not harsh enough? Vote now:

@RepLuna 👀 @marklevinshow

Very interesting, I post that the White House needs to reopen the FARA office and get attacked by bots. Looks like some of these “groups” are getting paid by foreign governments, and it’s on both sides, left and right. It’s a good thing. The DOJ is getting receipts on all this🕵🏻‍♀️. I don’t care where the money is coming from. It should be disclosed.

@isaacrrr7 Stfu Jew

“Judíos, váyanse de Israel, es una ocupación.” Si ser “ocupante” significa vivir en una tierra conquistada alguna vez, entonces: Si eres estadounidense, deberías irte porque EE.UU. se expandió sobre tierras nativas y mexicanas. Si eres canadiense, deberías irte porque Canadá se levantó sobre tierras de pueblos originarios. Si eres mexicano, deberías irte porque el Imperio azteca conquistó otros pueblos antes de la llegada española. Si eres brasileño, deberías irte porque Brasil nació de la colonización portuguesa. Si eres chileno, deberías irte porque Chile ocupó territorios mapuches y anexó tierras tras guerras. Si eres peruano, deberías irte porque el Imperio inca conquistó decenas de pueblos. Si eres argentino, deberías irte porque Argentina fue construida sobre territorios indígenas. Si eres colombiano, deberías irte porque Colombia existe sobre antiguas tierras indígenas conquistadas. Si eres australiano, deberías irte porque Australia fue colonizada sobre territorios aborígenes. Si eres neozelandés, deberías irte porque Nueva Zelanda fue colonizada sobre tierras maoríes. Si eres turco, deberías irte porque Turquía ocupa históricamente territorios griegos, armenios y kurdos. Si eres árabe, deberías irte de Medio Oriente, Norte de África y España, porque las conquistas árabes expandieron el islam por la espada desde el siglo VII. Si eres británico, deberías irte porque el Reino Unido construyó el mayor imperio colonial de la historia. Si eres francés, deberías irte porque Francia colonizó África, Medio Oriente y Asia. Si eres español, deberías irte porque España conquistó medio continente americano. Si eres alemán, deberías irte porque Prusia y Alemania expandieron fronteras por guerras durante siglos. Si eres ruso, deberías irte porque Rusia conquistó Siberia, el Cáucaso y partes de Europa Oriental. Si eres chino, deberías irte porque China anexó el Tíbet, Xinjiang y otros territorios históricos. La historia del mundo está llena de conquistas, migraciones y guerras. Exigirle solo al pueblo judío que abandone su tierra ancestral no es “anticolonialismo”: es aplicar una regla exclusiva contra los judíos.

@goddek @FINALLEVEL We going ER or A or AR??

@FINALLEVEL N

FYI: If you say ANYTHING on my page Negative I Block you.. Quick fast Gone.. Just sayin. ☝🏽

@jonathanplumb @sportstarded @Slangalangutang @Pontifex 😂 MAC!! Mormons aren’t Christians

@sportstarded @Slangalangutang @Pontifex Not even remotely. Tell a Protestant that. They’d knock you out.

Humanity, created by God in all its grandeur, is today facing a pivotal choice: either to construct a new Tower of Babel or to build the city in which God and humanity dwell together. In Jesus Christ, this humanity in its grandeur becomes the Way, the Truth and the Life, opening the path for each of us to grow toward fullness. #MagnificaHumanitas vatican.va/content/leo-xi…

I am the Director of Iran Programs at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. I have held this position for nineteen years. In that time, Iran has been six months from a nuclear weapon on four hundred and fifty-six separate occasions. A business model with a shelf life that renews itself. Our budget was $17 million in 2021. It is $32.5 million today. It doubled during the period in which Iran was, according to our reports, perpetually six months from a bomb that never arrived. I want to be clear: the bomb not arriving is the product. The bomb arriving would be a catastrophic loss event. We are not in the prevention business. We are in the imminence business. Imminence is a renewable resource if you manage it correctly. There is a number. The number is six months. Not three. Three months means war is imminent, war resolves the issue, resolved issues don't require a think tank. Not twelve. Twelve months means the threat has receded, receded threats lose donors, donors who leave don't come back. Six months is the Goldilocks zone. Six months means the bomb is always coming but never arrives. Six months means permanent funding. Netanyahu said Iran was three to five years away in 1992. He said three to five years again in 1995. He told Congress one to two years in 2009. He told the United Nations "by next spring, at most by next summer" in 2012. It is now 2026. The bomb has been coming for thirty-four years. We have been paid for every single one of them. The morning after the Bibi-Trump call leaked, Bernie Marcus called at 6:47 AM. He gave us $19 million last year. That is more than half our operating budget from one man. The Home Depot co-founder did not ask whether America was safe. He asked what happens to his naming rights if the deal holds. I told him naming rights survive any geopolitical outcome. This is technically true. The Marcus Family Foundation Conference Suite will remain the Marcus Family Foundation Conference Suite whether Iran has a nuclear weapon or not. The distinction is whether anyone books it for panels. Our original IRS filing in 2001 described our mission as "providing education to enhance Israel's image in North America." We have since updated the language to "nonpartisan policy research." The product did not change. The packaging did. We found that policy is just PR with footnotes. The margins are better and you get to brief senators instead of reporters. We employ fourteen full-time Iran analysts. Their job is to produce reports concluding that Iran is six months from a nuclear weapon. If an analyst concludes fifteen months, that analyst is counseled on methodology. If an analyst concludes three months, that analyst is counseled on tone. We had one analyst in 2019 who concluded Iran had functionally abandoned its weapons program. He teaches political science at a community college in Delaware. We still cite his earlier work. The earlier work said six months. Richard Goldberg left our office in 2019 to join the National Security Council as Director for Countering Iranian Weapons of Mass Destruction. He implemented our recommendations as government policy. He then returned to our office in 2020 as a senior advisor. He now evaluates the effectiveness of the policies he implemented based on the research he conducted before he implemented them. We call this a secondment. Government calls it the revolving door. We don't see a door. We see a hallway with our name on both ends. Mark Dubowitz goes on television four times a week. He cites our reports. He wrote the reports. The viewer sees an expert citing independent research. The expert and the research are the same person wearing different lanyards. We call this vertical integration. Fox calls it analysis. Our booking calendar calls it Tuesday. In 2007 we held a strategic planning retreat in the Bahamas. The title was "Confronting the Iranian Threat: The Way Forward." Twenty-four people attended. The way forward, we determined from our beach chairs, was maximum pressure, escalating sanctions, and the eventual elimination of Iran's enrichment capacity. We have not revisited the conclusion. We have only revisited the Bahamas. We killed the JCPOA in thirty-seven months. Op-eds, congressional briefings, a sanctions architecture so complex it became its own constituency. Mark Dubowitz personally placed forty-six op-eds arguing the deal was flawed. Reuel Marc Gerecht wrote the doctrinal framework. Clifford May did nine hundred broadcast appearances in two years selling the conclusion. It was our finest work. The president who signed the withdrawal thanked us from the Rose Garden. That same president is now building a replacement deal. Using our infrastructure. Without asking. Like designing a prison and watching the architect move in voluntarily. When Trump said the deal was "largely negotiated," our development team held an emergency meeting. Not about policy. About the fall fundraising letter. The letter currently opens with "Iran is six months from a nuclear weapon." Someone suggested "Iran is six months from violating the deal." The room applauded. The structure survives. The number survives. Only the preposition changes. I have a drawer in my desk. In the drawer are forty-three op-eds I have placed in the Wall Street Journal since 2009. Every single one contains the phrase "six months." Forty-three times I told America the bomb was coming. Forty-three times it didn't come. And forty-three times they published the next one anyway. A subscription. Renewable annually. Auto-draft. Lindsey Graham called last Tuesday. He wanted talking points for his Fox hit. I gave him the phrase "zero enrichment or no deal." He knows Iran will never accept zero enrichment. I know he knows. He knows I know he knows. In February he told Axios the president's aides were preventing him from striking Iran. Now the president is making a deal with Iran. Graham cannot oppose the deal without opposing the president. He cannot support the deal without invalidating twenty years of "bomb Iran" positioning. So I gave him a phrase that sounds like support and works like sabotage. A kill switch shaped like a compliment. We charge $650,000 a year for this service. Graham has never asked for a receipt. Mark Levin went on the radio and said Iran "cheats, lies, and hides." He said enforcement is impossible. He said the deal will be violated. He did not name the president. He cannot name the president. He named Iran six times and the president zero times. This is the syntax of a man who knows where his audience lives. We provided the talking points. The talking points are designed to attack the deal without attacking the man who made it. This is a very specific skill. We have been refining it since 2018. Ben Shapiro called the deal "concerning" and said he was "generally against" certain provisions. He did not say which provisions. He did not name the president either. Shapiro's audience is the same audience that will primary you if you break with Trump. He knows this because we showed him what we did to Thomas Massie. Thomas Massie opposed unconditional support for Israel. He co-sponsored the Epstein Files Transparency Act. He criticized the June 2025 Iran strikes. So we spent $32.6 million removing him from Congress. AIPAC's super PAC put in $4 million. A Trump-aligned group funded by our donors added $5.6 million. It became the most expensive House primary in American history. For one congressman from Kentucky. He lost 54.4 to 45.6. A price list. Every sitting member of Congress saw that number. Every sitting member of Congress understood what it means. You don't need to threaten 435 people. You need to destroy one, publicly, and let the rest do math. Loomer has been useful. She enforces in spaces we cannot reach directly. When anti-war voices gain traction inside Trump's orbit, she applies pressure through channels that don't trace back to a think tank letterhead. We don't coordinate. We don't need to coordinate. We share donors. Shared donors are shared incentives. Shared incentives produce aligned behavior without a single email. The most beautiful part is the architecture. Bolton built Maximum Pressure as a ratchet. Each turn. JCPOA withdrawal. Sanctions. IRGC designation. Soleimani. Each designed so the next was inevitable and reversal was impossible. We published nine hundred pages of policy papers supporting each turn. The papers were cement. You pour cement so the next administration cannot dig it up. Except the man who ordered the cement poured is now jackhammering his own sidewalk. The ratchet assumed institutional continuity. It got a man who doesn't read our papers and doesn't return Mark's calls. Someone once asked me what happens to ordinary Iranians when we recommend secondary sanctions on their banking system. I said that was outside our research mandate. Our mandate is the nuclear program. How people eat is a different department. We do not have that department. No one has ever funded that department. I have been asked this question four times in nineteen years. It has never appeared in a donor report. It has never come up at the Bahamas retreat. It is, as far as I can determine, a question that exists outside our model. Tomorrow I have a call with our board. The agenda has one item: "Scenario Planning for a Post-Deal Landscape." The actual item is "How Do We Survive Peace." I have one slide. It says "Iran Will Violate This Deal." Nineteen years of work and one slide is all I have ever needed. The rest is formatting. The countdown clock in the Bolton Strategic Clarity Suite still says six months. Netanyahu said six months in 1992 and it said six months. Netanyahu said six months in 2012 and it said six months. Goldberg went to the NSC and it said six months. Goldberg came back and it said six months. The JCPOA was signed and it said six months. The JCPOA was killed and it said six months. Trump made a deal and it will say six months. Our 501(c)(3) status depends on Iran remaining a crisis. I don't mean that metaphorically. I mean that if peace holds, our Form 990 becomes a work of fiction. Our general counsel has mentioned this once. The room did not laugh. The room looked at the clock. Six months is not a prediction. It is a prayer. Prayers don't expire. They get renewed.

🤔 x.com/i/grok/share/d…

@HuntersOfNazis Hey Jew remember

Today more than ever: FUCK PALESTINE. And fuck all of their Nazi supporters attacking Jews worldwide.