Dafydd Foster Davis

162 posts

Dafydd Foster Davis banner
Dafydd Foster Davis

Dafydd Foster Davis

@DafyddFD

building the last company in sales | corrosive optimism prev: @Neo '24 founder, Oxford

London Katılım Şubat 2022
749 Takip Edilen160 Takipçiler
Soren Larson
Soren Larson@hypersoren·
The incentives of legal AI SaaS are all wrong AI is deflationary and empowering—vertical AI SaaS fights these physics with its inflationary and constraining or even parasitic business models. Business models should align with the physics of the technology cycle, not fight it.
Soren Larson tweet mediaSoren Larson tweet media
Zack Shapiro@zackbshapiro

x.com/i/article/2030…

English
2
1
33
7.8K
Dafydd Foster Davis
Dafydd Foster Davis@DafyddFD·
@TukiFromKL This take is wrong. What Cloudflare figured out, is that the pendulum is swinging and the aggregate of bot/crawler traffic on one's website is becoming more net-positive. Why? There are still a bazillion data thieves, but some of those are actually legit buyers now.
English
0
0
6
274
Tuki
Tuki@TukiFromKL·
🚨 Stop scrolling. This is the biggest betrayal in tech this year. The company that built its entire reputation on BLOCKING scrapers just shipped the most powerful scraping tool ever made. > Cloudflare just dropped a /crawl endpoint. One API call and you get an entire website back. Clean HTML, Markdown, or JSON. That's it. That's the whole thing. Let me break it down. For years, Cloudflare sold anti-bot protection. Companies paid them to STOP crawlers. Now those same companies are watching Cloudflare hand everyone a free crawler that bypasses… other people's anti-bot protection. They didn't switch sides. They're playing both sides. And getting paid twice.
Cloudflare Developers@CloudflareDev

Introducing the new /crawl endpoint - one API call and an entire site crawled. No scripts. No browser management. Just the content in HTML, Markdown, or JSON.

English
180
416
6.5K
1.1M
yung macro 宏观年少传奇
This is a pretty unscientific intuition but there’s a certain Northern European archetype you can’t help but disproportionately encounter in like the Netherlands/Germany/Scandinavia who are obviously a standard deviation or two above median intelligence but they’re just so pure hearted or whatever that they come across as complete babbling fools in basically all social contexts internationally. This is the yang to its Levantine yin -- the 90 IQ bazaar merchant who’s somehow a total wolf in anything involving social complexity. For some reason indeed this also seems to generalize to social thought. Now the former types are usually very “libbed out” given other geographic contingencies but in the American heartland you can surely find plenty of conservatives of this sort. Does this Theory address the Hegseth Question? A Princetonian high-school valedictorian who’s somehow… you know?
English
101
90
2.8K
187.8K
Dafydd Foster Davis
Dafydd Foster Davis@DafyddFD·
@mikee_degen @unusual_whales when someone opens a new restaurant or B&B, that is not called a startup, at least in England. That is a small business. Just different semantics, so no biggie.
English
1
0
5
68
Mikee Degen
Mikee Degen@mikee_degen·
@DafyddFD @unusual_whales One of the most retarded replies I've ever received in my life. Congratulations, it's actually pretty impressive.
Mikee Degen tweet media
English
2
0
1
83
unusual_whales
unusual_whales@unusual_whales·
British startups are increasingly using artificial intelligence and freelancers instead of taking on permanent staff, per Bloomberg.
English
192
178
2.2K
255K
Dafydd Foster Davis
Dafydd Foster Davis@DafyddFD·
@mikee_degen @unusual_whales Your tweet implies the Govt bumping min wage to £12.71 somehow made startups more reluctant to hire juniors. I'm saying 100% of hires are on more than £12.71 anyway, so it's not relevant to startups.
English
1
0
10
112
Dafydd Foster Davis
Dafydd Foster Davis@DafyddFD·
@timourxyz this is dope. Only feasible model for democracy in 21C will be AI voting for us based on a confidence model of our own preferences
English
0
0
0
26
timour kosters
timour kosters@timourxyz·
Working on something like this for our community and events: Everyone at the village gets an openclaw (if they don’t have one yet), the claws are aware of all event details and we can share announcements through them. Also good canvas for governance experiments.
tobi lutke@tobi

Lots of non tech friends want openclaws. So far i've set them up on VMs, but this is getting heavy. Are there any good multi-tenant openclaw setups or alt-claws yet that are good enough?

English
7
0
24
1.3K
Alfie Carter
Alfie Carter@AlfieJCarter·
Most people use Claude Code like a chatbot and get chatbot results. So I documented the most complete setup you can install today. Inside: → How to continue your local Claude Code session from your phone without losing context or stopping work → The CLAUDE. md file that writes its own rules after every correction so the same mistake never happens twice → Scheduled task setup so Claude processes files, pulls trend reports, and consolidates team outputs every morning at 7am without you triggering anything → How to actually run 10 to 15 Claude sessions at the same time across terminal and browser → Subagent setup so Claude simplifies, reviews, and verifies its own work without you managing it → Plan Mode workflow so Claude builds a full plan before touching a single file (with exact activation steps and what to say) → Safe permissions setup so Claude never needs unrestricted access to your machine → MCP connections for Slack, BigQuery, and Sentry so Claude uses your tools directly → PostToolUse hooks so code formatting never causes errors in review → Ready to use files including CLAUDE. md, subagents, slash commands, scheduled task instructions, and hooks → Common mistakes that slow Claude Code down and the exact fixes Boris Cherny uses If you build with AI daily, ship code, or manage a team using Claude Code, this is the only setup guide you will need. Comment "CLAUDE" and I will send it straight to your DMs.
Alfie Carter tweet media
English
608
47
402
43.1K
James' AI Takes
James' AI Takes@JamesTakesOnAI·
@DafyddFD @aiunderwriting "solvable" and "solved" are very different things tho. training loops optimize for objectives not wisdom. and accountability needs someone LIABLE - agent insurance is interesting but who pays when the agent confidently does the wrong thing for the right reasons?
English
1
0
0
9
Dafydd Foster Davis
Dafydd Foster Davis@DafyddFD·
Keep hearing the same cope about how AI agents takeover is just in codegen, and no other industry could possibly be affected in the same way for many years. Reality: All knowledge work is reducible to coding. And the last-mile needed is being built right now.
English
1
0
1
60
Dafydd Foster Davis
Dafydd Foster Davis@DafyddFD·
@JamesTakesOnAI none of judgment, context or accountability are beyond AI agents. Judgment = just training/feedback loop. Context = known, solvable problem. Accountability = verifiable, testable endpoints + agent insurance eg @aiunderwriting
English
1
0
0
16
James' AI Takes
James' AI Takes@JamesTakesOnAI·
"all knowledge work is reducible to coding" is a wild claim. try reducing a medical diagnosis, a legal negotiation, or an architecture review to code. the last mile isnt being built right now - its the part that requires judgment, context, and accountability that no model currently handles. codegen is the easy part
English
1
0
0
10
Elad Gil
Elad Gil@eladgil·
In short run, many coming "we are doing layoffs due to AI" PR will be correcting for sins of 2020 era of over hiring versus anything to do w AI Many larger tech companies could slim down 50% w/o any AI changes Most AI productivity impact is still around bend
English
89
128
1.4K
139.1K
Dafydd Foster Davis
Dafydd Foster Davis@DafyddFD·
Using @AlmondVoice and having to learn how tones might work in English to make sure it punctuates everything correctly first time. Apparently I speak in very short sentences and there are full stops galore
English
0
0
1
53
Nathan Halberstadt 🧊
Nathan Halberstadt 🧊@NatHalberstadt·
Dark side of this is Jack clearly leveraging the mass layoff as a PR stunt, (“I’m decisive and embrace the future unlike others who are baby-stepping this” type framing), which if effective (in terms of valuation, etc.), could have a memetic effect across the startup ecosystem. That said, the lesson from Elon’s takeover of Twitter and the associated workforce reduction is Jack ran a totally bloated company then, and maybe the same true now with Blocks.
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
24
21
482
55.6K
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
When building costs drop 90% but distribution costs stay flat, you get a gold rush where everyone digs and nobody sells. That’s what this chart actually shows. New websites up 40%. iOS apps up 50%. GitHub pushes up 35%. Everyone read “barrier to building disappeared” and heard opportunity. The correct read is that 557,000 new apps hit the App Store last year, a 24% spike, flooding a discovery channel that was already dead on arrival. 90% of senior mobile professionals surveyed said organic App Store discovery was effectively over before this wave even hit. Half of all App Store searches are just people typing in brands they already know. The supply side hockey-sticked. The demand side didn’t move. This is why tech layoffs doubled to 264,000 in 2025 while code output simultaneously exploded. Companies don’t need more builders. They need people who can get the thing in front of someone who’ll pay for it. Distribution, positioning, audience, brand. The functions that never got the AI productivity boost. Nicholas nails the conclusion that taste and knowing what to build are what matter now. But taste is only half of it. You also need the channel. The unsexy reality is that a mediocre app with 100,000 newsletter subscribers will outperform a beautiful app with zero distribution every single time. The apps winning in 2026 aren’t the best-built ones. They’re the ones attached to someone who already has an audience. Building software used to be the moat. Now building software is the commodity. Distribution is the new moat, and unlike code, it doesn’t get cheaper with AI.
Nicholas Charriere@nichochar

I think we are witnessing the biggest explosion in software creation in history. New website creation is up 40% year on year. New iOS apps are up nearly 50%. GitHub code pushes in the US jumped 35% and in the UK around 30%. All of these metrics were flat for years before late 2024. The entire graph looks like a hockey stick. You no longer need a six month runway and a dev team to ship something real. We see this in our metrics as well! People who never wrote a line of code are building and launching apps. The barrier to building software just disappeared. What matters now is knowing what to build and the taste to build it right.

English
97
215
2.1K
344.6K