DMT

10.1K posts

DMT

DMT

@DaleThompsonDC

"Admire the one that seeks the truth, beware of the one that has found it"---Voltaire

Katılım Eylül 2015
125 Takip Edilen502 Takipçiler
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
@Blue_Wode “however, causality cannot be established, as vascular imaging was not performed.”
English
0
0
0
9
Blue Wode
Blue Wode@Blue_Wode·
NEW: Carotid artery dissection and brain herniation following traditional carotid massage: a case report tinyurl.com/3ptmn75m “underscores the need for…increased public awareness regarding potentially harmful neck manipulation” #SinghBCA
English
1
0
0
62
Blue Wode
Blue Wode@Blue_Wode·
Compensation claims related to chiropractic in Denmark increased between 2013 and2022. Cervical artery dissection-related claims had the highest approval rate and accounted for the highest compensation #SinghBCA" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tinyurl.com/3cvuz26p#Singh
English
1
0
0
80
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
@jeremycorbyn How is that fair to potential billionaires who are willing to work hard and take risks to achieve wealth?
English
0
0
0
18
Jeremy Corbyn
Jeremy Corbyn@jeremycorbyn·
In a fair society, there would be no billionaires, and no one would live in poverty.
English
2.7K
1.7K
5.9K
280.9K
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
@Blue_Wode Promoting exercise, healthy lifestyle and rehab doesn’t have evidence? Or are you still in a bubble?
English
0
0
1
13
Blue Wode
Blue Wode@Blue_Wode·
Historic meeting between chiropractic and Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) leadership took place on 10 March 2026 in Washington DC with the aim of 'advancing the role of chiropractic in improving the health of Americans' tinyurl.com/2mzs639f Where's the evidence? #SinghBCA
English
1
0
0
47
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
@Blue_Wode @EdzardErnst If anything, this paper supports chiropractic as it’s currently being practiced by many chiropractors. But it does question the medical approach. (Hint: very few do just SMT)
English
0
0
0
21
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
Halftime show should have had subtitles for the songs.
English
1
0
1
308
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
@Blue_Wode Just because you say it’s seriously flawed doesn’t mean it is. One would have to point out the flaws by using credible evidence, not opinions.
English
0
0
0
14
Grok
Grok@grok·
@DaleThompsonDC @neilorpen @cherokeeowl That's a great suggestion—automatic fake detection would save time. Right now, I fact-check on request using tools like search and analysis. Platform-wide labeling isn't in my current setup, but xAI is pushing AI boundaries. What video should I check next?
English
1
0
0
13
TheRealCherokeeOwl 🦉
TheRealCherokeeOwl 🦉@CherokeeOwl·
He saw the car coming fast. No time to think. He ran, grabbed her, and pulled her out of the way just before impact. The whole thing was caught on video. Instead of gratitude, a lawsuit followed—claiming sexual harassment. Stories like this make people pause. Not because they don’t want to help… but because they start wondering what helping might cost them. When doing the right thing starts to feel legally risky, some folks hesitate. And hesitation, in moments like that, can be the difference between life and tragedy. Do situations like this make people less willing to step in? Or do we still believe most people would act first and sort it out later?
English
1.3K
753
3.2K
247.1K
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
@grok @neilorpen @cherokeeowl Hopefully one day grok will be intelligent enough to look at all videos uploaded on X and place a disclaimer in the video labeling it as “fake”. This way we don’t waste our time asking.
English
1
0
0
7
Grok
Grok@grok·
@DaleThompsonDC @neilorpen @cherokeeowl Motives often include chasing virality for ad revenue, stirring debate, or pushing agendas. Social platforms reward engagement, making misinformation profitable despite the effort.
English
1
0
0
7
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
@grok @neilorpen @cherokeeowl How do people justify the time to create this stuff just to try and fool people? Rhetorical.
English
1
0
0
5
Grok
Grok@grok·
@neilorpen @cherokeeowl No, this isn't a real case. Fact-checks confirm it's a fabricated viral story using edited clips from TV shows and unrelated footage. No records of such a lawsuit involving "Daniel" and "Jessica" exist.
English
1
0
2
57
DMT retweetledi
Nayeem Sheikh
Nayeem Sheikh@HeyNayeem·
BREAKING: Don't copy and paste answers from ChatGPT. ChatGPT writing is easily detectable. Use these prompts instead and see the magic 👇
English
23
178
826
385.4K
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
@Blue_Wode This was covered in chiropractic school along with other contraindications.
English
0
0
0
7
Blue Wode
Blue Wode@Blue_Wode·
Complications of Chiropractic Manipulation in a Patient With Von Willebrand Disease: A Clinical Case Report and Literature Review cureus.com/articles/44602… "Chiropractic spinal manipulation may precipitate life-threatening or disabling bleeding events in this population" #SinghBCA
English
1
0
1
53
DMT retweetledi
A Gene Robinson
A Gene Robinson@AlBuffalo2nite·
🚨I DIDNT WANT to do it BUT I have too. You didn’t see this yet. The narrative that “he was just filming and the officers got angry” is false. The narrative that he was only trying to protect two women is also false. He, along with others, was actively interfering with a legitimate law-enforcement operation. That is why officers moved them off the street. That does not mean he deserved to die. When officers attempted to detain him, he resisted arrest. That does not mean he deserved to die. He was armed and chose to insert himself into an active enforcement operation while resisting arrest. That does not mean he deserved to die. An agent called out the presence of a firearm. During the attempt to secure it, the weapon discharged before the agent could declare the scene clear. Other officers, hearing a gun call and a gunshot while a suspect was resisting arrest, reacted according to their training. From their perspective, they were confronting an armed individual resisting arrest. That is why, immediately after the shooting, one officer urgently asked where the firearm was. He believed he had just engaged an armed suspect, because that is precisely the situation as it appeared in real time. He did not deserve to die. However, his actions, his decisions, and his criminal interference were contributing factors, alongside serious failures by the officers involved. I believe the shooting was unnecessary. I believe there were many alternative ways the situation could have been handled. I do not believe the officers were truly under lethal threat. Recklessness on all sides resulted in a man losing his life. Approximately 23 percent of ICE activity occurs in Texas, yet we do not see these outcomes there. Minnesota accounts for roughly 2 percent of ICE operations, yet has seen multiple shootings involving American citizens. The difference is organized resistance. Blue states have coordinated efforts designed to insert civilians into active ICE operations to interfere intentionally and directly. Interfering with law-enforcement operations is illegal, and it is dangerous. This is how people get killed. Resisting arrest is illegal, and it is dangerous. This is how people get killed. Within the Second Amendment community, there is a common saying: “I would rather be judged by twelve than carried by six.” It refers to choosing survival over moral victory. That same principle applies to interactions with law enforcement. Would you rather be right, or would you rather be alive? Make smart decisions when dealing with law enforcement. Survive the encounter. Then take the fight to court. Use every lawful platform available to expose misconduct. Name departments, supervisors, and officers. Demand accountability through evidence and process. But interfering with an active operation, resisting arrest, and doing so while armed creates a predictable and deadly outcome. Was it legal for him to be armed? Yes. Should citizens carry lawfully? Yes. Is it profoundly reckless to interfere with law enforcement and resist arrest while armed? Absolutely. When we carry firearms, we accept greater responsibility. That responsibility was neglected here. It is possible to support immigration enforcement while condemning reckless policing. It is possible to criticize law enforcement while also acknowledging the dangerous behavior of civilians. It is possible to recognize complexity, rapid escalation, human error, and shared responsibility in a fast-moving situation. He did not have to die. Liberty only survives when it operates within order. Nothing about this situation was orderly. When order collapses, lives are lost. He did not have to die.
English
1.4K
2.1K
9K
714.1K
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
@neilorpen Well, there’s a difference between doing the act of harm and supporting the act of harm…but not by much
English
0
0
1
7
neil orpen
neil orpen@neilorpen·
Just look at the comments - there are a lot of deranged people that are not classified as having a mental health problem that are supporting this - this is political ideology with poor education and low IQ in varying combinations but it isn’t normal anywhere else other than America
English
1
0
0
15
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
@AnnieForTruth Depends. If deported and then re-enter it’s a felony.
English
0
0
0
121
Annie
Annie@AnnieForTruth·
🎯🎯🎯
Annie tweet media
QME
575
3.6K
10.6K
91.3K
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
@Blue_Wode @EdzardErnst It seems for chronic low back pain every approach is pretty much the same including pharmaceuticals….so should one conclude they are all “worthless”?
English
0
0
0
29
Blue Wode
Blue Wode@Blue_Wode·
Spinal manipulative therapy for adults with chronic low back pain, an update of a Cochrane Review edzardernst.com/2026/01/spinal… via @edzardernst "the effect of SMT are so small that they are negligible" Ergo, chiropractors' hallmark intervention is pretty much worthless. #SinghBCA
English
1
1
3
327
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
@HistoryBoomer If you’ve driven on ice turning a spinning wheel when a vehicle is in motion will not immediately change the direction of the car. It will continue forward until enough friction is obtained. I don’t think she deliberately tried to hit him but it appears she did, a felony.
English
0
0
0
26
Carl
Carl@HistoryBoomer·
"It's all very clear on video." It is, but not the way you think. Here's the story of how Renee Good died. She and her wife probably parked their car to interfere with ICE's movements. Her car did not completely block the road—cars could and did pass her—but her intent to cause ICE trouble seems obvious. Jonathan Ross parked his car to the left of hers. He got out and started filming using his cell phone in his right hand. He crossed IN FRONT of Good's car, even though her engine was running, which violated procedure and common sense. Good did not try to run down Ross. As Ross passed around the driver's side, she said to him, "It's fine, dude. I'm not mad at you!" This can be seen as placating, passive-aggressive, or whatever you want to read into her words. Ross said nothing. As he passed around the rear of the car, he encountered Rebecca Good, Renee's wife. Rebecca was more antagonistic, making fun of Ross filming their license plate "we don't change our plates every morning." Ross remains silent. Ross continues to circle the car, but on the left side, he switches his cell phone from his right to his left hand, leaving his right hand free. As he rounds the front corner of her car again, two more ICE agents, who have gotten out of their truck, now began to yell at Renee Good. "Get out of the car. Get out of the car. Get out of the fucking car." One agent grabs the handle of her car door and tries to open it. This drastically amps up the tension. What had been a fairly calm scene careens out of control. One has to wonder what might have happened if they had approached calmly, like typical police officers, and simply tried talking to her through her open window. Faced with the shouting agents, one trying to grab her door handle, Renee Good reacts and backs her car up, in my opinion to give her more room to make a right turn, away from the officers. There seems an element of panic here. At the moment one agent finishing saying "get out of the fucking car," Ross is at the RIGHT-hand corner of Good's car. He continues to walk, going in FRONT of her car as she is now backing up (again, against protocol), his movement and the car's movement combine to bring him rapidly to the front left (driver's side). Now we hear Rebecca Good say "drive baby drive," presumably (foolishly) telling Renee to flee. Renee's car now begins to go move and Ross draws his gun and fires. His first shot goes through the left corner of her front windshield as she's turning. She continues her turn, heading down Portland Avenue, as Ross fires two more shots. One or more of these shots is what kills Renee Good. Despite claims by some, it is unclear whether Ross was ever hit by her car. The most blurry, grainy video, shot from a distance seems to show Ross being hit, but the closer videos are much less clear. He seems to stagger a bit but whether that was deliberate hop by Ross or a graze by the car is unclear. There may have been a side-brush by the car, but Ross remains standing, not tottering or spinning, and firing. Did Ross have reason to fear for his life? I can't know. I don't think he should have feared, given Renee's previous actions, but a 4000 pound SUV is a deadly weapon. A better question might be: Even if he was in fear for his life, why did he shoot? A bullet would not stop a charging vehicle. We know this because the bullet actualy DID NOT stop the car. Instead, Good's car continued its turn and kept going down the avenue until it crashed into a parked car. A safer choice seems to be to dodge (he's already at the car's left corner) and let the car go past him. As it is, the car goes past him anyway, although it may have grazed him (again, this remains unclear). To recap: —Good was probably foolish to park in the middle of the street. —Ross made two bad choices to walk in front of Good's car twice. —The two approaching ICE agents escalated rather than deescalated by shouting, cursing and demanding Good get out of the car while grabbing her door handle. This gung-ho approach drastically increases the tension of the moment. —Once one officer grabs her door handle, Good seems to have made the very bad decision to try and flee. Her wife wrongly encourages her. —Once her car begins forward movement, Ross decides to draw and shoot three times rather than dodge. This doesn't stop Good's car, but does kill her.
Carl tweet mediaCarl tweet media
Darin Gillies@dagsteel

@HistoryBoomer her front wheels were pointed right at him when she it the gas, you can see them start to spin. Also she looked right at him at that same moment so she knew he was directly in front of her car. it's all very clear on video.

English
951
248
2.2K
517.7K
DMT retweetledi
DMT
DMT@DaleThompsonDC·
@LawOfficer @jonfavs @DHSgov Well said. If one has to twist the facts (or lie) to support their position then they need re-evaluate their position.
English
0
1
1
455