Danny

@ZacGoldsmith @DrewPavlou The government elected by the Palestinians did all this...

“What kind of a depraved monster slices off a woman’s breast while she is being gang raped, and throws it into the dust to be used as a plaything? What kind of a twisted pervert turns rape into necrophilia by shooting a woman in the head while he is still defiling her? What kind of ‘freedom fighters’ go into battle with a set of handy Arabic-to-Hebrew phrases, including ‘take off your pants’, ‘lie down’, and ‘spread your legs’? What self-respecting human being presses nails, scalpels, a hammer, an axe, screwdrivers and other household tools into a woman’s genitals? How hard do you have to rape someone, and with what, to shatter their pelvis? Who shoots a young girl in the face and then films her mutilated corpse on her brother’s mobile phone? The answer is: Hamas terrorists. This is the stark reality of what they did to men, women and children on October 7, 2023. And the world must never forget.” @WestminsterWAG

@DrewPavlou It's disgraceful that costs were not awarded.

LEGAL VICTORY: I just won a complete and total victory after being dragged through the Australian legal system for 5 months in relation to one of my X posts condemning the Bondi ISIS massacre. The Magistrate dismissed Craig Hill's case and evidence as ''nothing short of OUTRAGEOUS, DISGRACEFUL and INSULTING, and - I am satisfied - TOTALLY WITHOUT BASIS ... it is disappointing in the extreme that this material was even filed." That was the Magistrate's quote, verbatim. I sat at the back of the courtroom typing notes and this exact quote by the Magistrate can be confirmed by anybody who was there. Tony Morris KC told me that he's almost never seen a judge issue such a forceful rebuke in his entire 43 year career as a barrister (34 as King's Counsel). Just an absolutely total demolition. So how did this farce even take place? Basically this all started when a demented old far-left psycho named Craig Hill made light of the Bondi terrorist massacre on X by describing the ISIS-inspired massacre of fifteen Australian Jews as ''anti-Zionist'' in nature rather than anti-Semitic. I thought it was pretty anti-Semitic to shoot 10 year old Australian Jews in the head in the name of ISIS, so I called Craig Hill a disgusting ''FERAL PIG,'' a statement I continue to stand by to the absolute core of my soul and being. Craig then called up the Queensland Police, who in turn called me up late at night demanding I delete the post. I asked them what legal authority they had to demand I delete a social media post, to which they replied: none. So I steadfastly refused. Craig then initiated 5 months of vexatious legal proceedings against me, seeking a restraining order on the grounds that my comment calling him a ''feral pig'' apparently amounted to a threat to violently assault or kill him. The specific restraining order he applied for - a ''Peace and Good Behaviour Order'' - is typically granted only in cases of domestic violence, so the entire process was a Kafkaesque farce from the beginning. The process itself was the punishment. So I truly thank God that my superb legal counsel Anthony Morris KC - one of the best lawyers in Australia, indeed one of the best court room advocates in the entire English speaking world - finally comprehensively and totally destroyed Craig Hill's application in court yesterday. In his first court appearance, Craig told the court that he was an expert linguist and published author of 14 books (the books being self-published TV guides to Star Trek and Dr Who episodes). In our last and final hearing yesterday, Craig decided he was in fact no longer an expert linguist and magisterial published author, instead informing the court that he was in fact ''intellectually disabled,'' suffering from ''PTSD, anxiety and schizophrenia.'' It is quite alarming that Mr Hill somehow managed to go from being an ''expert linguist'' to ''intellectually disabled'' between the short span of March 2026 and May 2026. Perhaps he decided to repeatedly run head first into a brick wall? I don't know how it happened, but I suspect Craig simply lied. I suspect he knew he was going to lose and hoped he could slither off the hook for potentially thousands of dollars in court costs if he pretended to be incapacitated. So he put on a good act, attempting to recast himself for the court as Bambi in the headlights. When the Magistrate started asking him basic questions about his application, he began screaming at the top of his lungs that he was having a panic attack. I cringed from second-hand embarrassment. Indeed he almost started crying at one point. Tony was going through emails Craig himself had sent him, only for Craig to shout across the court room that he had never seen them. Exasperated, Tony raised his voice to bellow ''YOU SENT IT!'' at which point Craig's bottom lip began to wobble. It was an absolute disgrace. As in his first court appearance in March, he constantly alternated between extreme arrogance and a Bambi-in-the-headlights style cower that left him quivering on the edge of tears. There was something genuinely repellent and repulsive about watching an old man voluntarily reduce himself to a childlike state out of pure self-serving cynicism - and the Magistrate completely rejected it, ultimately finding that Hill was "well able to represent himself'' (whether he represented himself well is another matter entirely). And from this cowering stance, Hill hurled a number of wild, disgraceful allegations. He claimed for instance that I had attacked him online because his wife was Muslim. I didn't even know he had a wife. Just a disgraceful, blatant lie - the Magistrate said there was "no evidence of any of this." He also attacked my legal counsel Tony Morris KC with lies that would have ended a less established career. He accused Morris of profiting personally from money I had raised via crowdfunding - an allegation of financial impropriety against a King's Counsel, made in a sworn affidavit, with no evidence whatsoever. He then alleged Morris had breached the Solicitors' Conduct Rules, despite Morris being a barrister, not a solicitor. When that didn't work, he switched to alleging breach of Barristers' Rules 102 and 103 - rules that have nothing to do with conflict of interest. (Rule 102 covers brief returns.) Hill then admitted in open court that the rule numbers came from AI: "The rule numbers may be wrong - I used AI because I am not a lawyer - but the gist of it is pretty much right." The gist of it mate. This is why the Magistrate ultimately denounced his conduct as "outrageous, disgraceful and insulting." Tony Morris KC described Hill as "a danger" and the Magistrate did not qualify it. The Magistrate added it was "disappointing in the extreme" that Hill's material was even filed with the court. It seriously should never have gone to court. Hill made vexatious complaints against me and Tony Morris KC to the Queensland Human Rights Commission, then attempted to have Morris disqualified for ''conflict of interest'' based on his own complaint. The Magistrate then asked Hill the most basic question about his own application to strike out my barrister: "What power do you say this Court has to direct that Mr Morris must be removed?" Hill literally replied "I do not know — I am not a lawyer." So he filed a sworn application asking a court to do something, and when asked what authority the court was being asked to exercise, he had no answer. Absolutely despicable. Perhaps most insane of all, we effectively learned yesterday in court that Craig Hill was the one who got me deported from the US over the Billie Eilish incident. He accidentally sent Tony Morris KC a copy of his own emails to the US Embassy, which Tony then referenced in court. Craig effectively told a junior staffer at the US Embassy that I was a terrorist who wanted to kill Billie Eilish and Chinese people. He claimed that I had been expelled from the University of Queensland three seperate times for assaulting Chinese students and lecturers - a completely fabricated fantasy. Shockingly, the junior staffer apparently replied to Mr Hill with a positive note thanking him for his helpful email, assuring him that she would file it in their system. So that is probably why I got flagged at the border going into the US in February. I thought it was Billie Eilish's lawyers, but instead it was this utterly demented freak, this delusional schizophrenic stalker - Craig Hill. Just an absolute and total disgrace on every level. What an absolute freak. I can't believe this is my life. To top it all off, despite the court basically declaring Craig Hill to be a threat - ''outrageous, disgraceful and insulting'' in the Magistrate's words - Craig decided to spend all day yesterday gloating online that he had supposedly won. He wrote: ''After his humiliating loss in court yesterday, Greek immigrant Drew Pavlou hasn't been on social media all day. Let's hope this is a fucking permanent arrangement.'' I was born in Australia and both my parents were born in Australia. What right does this self-admitted schizophrenic mental case have to call me an ''immigrant''? He then made a post saying ''Perhaps its time you hang up the boots, Mr Morris. You don't appear to be very good at this.'' This is despite the fact that Tony Morris KC comprehensively demolished him to the point that he started basically crying in court, screaming like a lunatic that he was having a panic attack and couldn't understand anything because he was intellectually disabled. The Magistrate even ended the case by telling Craig that he should never have self-represented. Just a complete psychopath, an insanely entitled and arrogant loser whose entire life revolves around sucking the energy out of others like a parasitic leach. The court ultimately decided against awarding us costs, simply because Craig Hill begged that he was self-represented while intellectually incapacitated. But he was apparently fine enough to file multiple vexatious applications against me and Tony Morris KC while mentally torturing me for five months. Such an absolute disgrace. Seriously, what an absolute and total disgrace on every level. Utterly despicable in the extreme. One of the worst pieces of scum in Australia. I am glad that I was ultimately vindicated but it's hard to believe that guys like Craig Hill can just wage psychological terrorism against anyone they like through the Australian legal system with zero consequences whatsoever.

@Mr_Andrew_Fox @POTerritory It's a reverse genocide, where the population keeps increasing much like other populations...

One day, there must be accountability for all those knowingly spreading the genocide blood libel. Blood on their hands.

@MrWinMarshall @HillelNeuer Antizionism has happened to your country.

What has happened to our country

@RachelMoiselle Providing resources to terror supporting societies provides more resources for terrorism. Unfortunately the goodness of the provider or the goodness of his intentions makes no difference.

Beautiful Danielle Waldman, daughter of Eyal Waldman. She was murdered on October 7th by Hamas terrorists at just 24 years old. May her memory be a blessing. Prior to October 7th, Eyal opened a design centre in Gaza, donated $360,000 to a hospital there, and created jobs for Palestinians both in the Gaza Strip and in the West Bank. When asked if he regretted this decision after his daughter’s murder, his response was as follows: ‘No, I don't. I think we need to do everything we can to make this place the best place to live in. And we need to stop killing each other and find a way to live together. I have been working for two-and-half decades trying to make peace.’ A tragedy indeed that a man of such profound goodness - whom we all should endeavour to emulate - is treated with such hatred and contempt.

@BrianCox_RLTW @SpencerGuard @mehdirhasan There's no urgency for Mehdi to agree to a debate - with the continually increasing Palestinian population, this genocide could continue for quite a while...

It's amusing - but not surprising - to see @mehdirhasan hiding behind the skirts of "genocide scholars" & "human rights groups" & such. You claimed the "only way these guys can debate with me is by inserting words in my mouth." And I pointed out you've said "genocide" repeatedly. And now you're going to pull the appeal to authority rhetorical maneuver instead of actually debating? Again - amusing, but not surprising. Let's try this again. YOU say Israel is responsible for genocide in Gaza. I say I'll debate YOU on that word, straight from your mouth. Any time. Now. Put up, or shut up. Say when...or say nothing.

@littlemykonos @DrewPavlou She preferred her son growing up in a moral society where women are always modestly clothed, including Yezidi sex slaves.

Here is an Isis bride’s view just a few years ago. What will she teach her sons about Australian females ?

There is a claim that keeps circulating, presented as sophisticated analysis: antisemitic violence is caused by Israel’s actions. If Israel behaved differently, Jewish communities around the world would somehow be safer. This argument is not analysis. It is a moral inversion. And it collapses the moment you apply it consistently. When China imprisons Uyghurs, does anyone warn Muslim communities in Paris to expect attacks? When Russia invaded Ukraine, did anyone tell Russian restaurants to brace for violence? No. Never. The causal chain between a government’s actions and violence against a diaspora is only ever constructed for Jews. Every other minority is extended the basic moral courtesy of being treated as individuals rather than proxies. Now look at what the data actually shows. The SPCJ, which tracks antisemitic incidents in France in coordination with the Interior Ministry, has documented a consistent and damning pattern: it is antisemitic violence that inspires more antisemitic violence, not Israeli policy. After Mohamed Merah murdered Jewish children at point-blank range at the Ozar Hatorah school in Toulouse in 2012, antisemitic acts surged by 200%. There was no Gaza operation. No Israeli military action. The massacre of Jews in France produced more attacks on Jews in France. The same logic held after the Hypercacher attack in January 2015: antisemitic acts increased by nearly 300%. Massacres of Jews do not shock antisemites into restraint. They embolden them. They signal impunity. They normalize hatred. And everyone in a position of responsibility knows it. Which brings us to October 7. From the day of the Hamas attack, antisemitic acts in France increased by over 1,000%. A daily average of approximately 25 antisemitic acts was recorded in the 30 days that followed, reaching nearly 40 on some days. In the three months after the attack, the number of antisemitic acts equaled those recorded over the previous three years combined. And here is another detail that makes the “Israel causes antisemitism” argument impossible to sustain: the spike began on October 7 itself, the very day of the attack. Israel had not yet responded. Not a single soldier had entered Gaza. Interior Minister Darmanin sent an urgent message to prefects that same day asking them to immediately reinforce protection of Jewish community sites. Synagogues. Schools. Community centers. By October 10, 10,000 police officers had been deployed to protect 500 Jewish sites across the country. Before any Israeli response existed, the French government already knew that Jewish communities needed protecting. Not because of what Israel was about to do. Because of what had just been done to Jews. Antisemitic violence has one cause. Antisemitism.

@VoteLewko Still on public land though. This should be forced into a private venue for those despicable enough to provide it.

Once upon a time mentally ill people would sit on park benches ranting about Jews. Thanks to the internet they found a community. Great to see them returning to their roots. Nature is healing.

@Ostrov_A Can being in favour of dismantling the Jewish self-determination project ever not be antisemitism?

Richard Lancaster SC, the senior counsel assisting the Royal Commission, in his opening remarks: “One of the tasks of this hearing block is to identify and assess the current character of antisemitism in Australia … and identify when anti-Zionism becomes antisemitism.”

@NYCMayor They're also being forced to perform circus acts for the amusement of the IDF!!

Last night, Israeli forces intercepted and boarded a humanitarian aid flotilla bound for Gaza in international waters off the coast of Greece — unlawfully detaining more than 175 people, including several New Yorkers. My team has been in direct contact with State and Federal partners as we work to confirm the whereabouts and conditions of these New Yorkers. This is a brazen violation of international law. Those detained must be released.

@VoteLewko Or demonising Israel...

Further to the stabbing of Jews in Golders Green, local MPs and media are disgusted/shocked/horrified/aghast/dismayed/outraged/revolted/sickened/nauseated/repulsed by this act of violence and promise to do everything they can to prevent a repeat. Except discuss migration or Islam. But apart from that, nothing is off the table you guys.

@cenkuygur You'd have to imagine it, because it didn't happen.

Imagine someone comes to your house and says Israel was promised it 3,000 years ago. So, you’re going to have to leave. If you don’t, you’re an antisemite. Since antisemites are terrorists who are going to kill us all, we’re going to have to kill you first - to protect ourselves!

@hahussain The criminality is still the worst part.

Hamas's criminality is not even the worst part. The worst part is performing this sajdah and implicating all of the religion of Islam and every Muslim. Why bring Islam into terrorism? Pray privately and celebrate your antisemitism away from Islam.

@Khaledhzakariah Based on current trajectories the Falklands will be begging to join Argentina within a decade or two...

🛑🛑To the Britons who suddenly rediscovered their courage after Javier Milei’s comments on the Falklands: two can play this game. You endlessly cite UN resolutions to insist that Judea and Samaria (the West Bank) are Palestinian, not Israeli. Yet the same United Nations has listed the Falkland Islands as a Non-Self-Governing Territory — an unresolved colonial question that demands direct negotiations between the United Kingdom and Argentina. All of a sudden, you don't care when the UN accuses you of colonisation. And, you dismiss its calls for talks with Argentina and instead boast about how you threw them out by military force in 1982, while demanding that Jews and Muslims in the Middle East negotiate with Hamas and the Ayatollahs!!!!!!!!!!!! So it’s all now about power, not international law? Let’s not forget: the Falklands sit 8,000 miles from Britain. The West Bank is literally on Jerusalem’s doorstep. And Argentina didn’t rape and murder 1,200 of your people — including women and children — in a single day. Selective principles, much? While I have your attention, a gentle suggestion to UK politicians and the British public: please “de-escalate” and “negotiate” with President Milei over the Falklands. After all, you constantly lecture Israel — and the world — about the urgent need for de-escalation and negotiations with the Ayatollahs, Hamas, Hezbollah, and every other terrorist outfit. Why the glaring double standard? Remember, as you keep telling us, only peaceful negotiations — never military occupation or force — can resolve the Falklands issue. Just follow the UN resolutions, as you so relentlessly demand of Israel. Good luck with that. P.S. Unlike the many dishonest voices who hold Israel to one standard while applying another to themselves, I am consistent. I believe the Falkland Islands are British. I also believe Judea and Samaria are Israeli. If anyone wants either territory badly enough… come and take it. I believe in military strength — openly, consistently, and without a shred of hypocrisy.

@AustralianJA Also reprehensible to call it "Israel's war".

SMH EXCUSES TERROR Check the reprehensible headline. The Sydney Morning Herald today implies an excuse or justification for the massacre of innocent Jews at Bondi Beach implying the jihadist terrorist was driven by events in Gaza. It is an historical antisemitic strategy to blame Jews for hatred directed at them (the Nazis did it) and this headline comes close.

@DrewPavlou I wonder if Akram's fixation on the Gaza war had anything to do with them mainstream media's fixation on it while barely mentioning other conflicts...

BREAKING NEWS: Foreign wars in the Middle East may lead Islamist migrants to go on shooting rampages massacring dozens of Australians. Diversity is our strength

@DrewPavlou Let's shut down the whole defence force and the police too. Then how happy and rich we will be...

Australia has the chance to build nuclear submarines through AUKUS - one of the most high tech manufacturing accomplishments in human history, a national crown jewel - and the Greens want to cancel that to shovel money into NDIS migrant fraud furnace instead. Your kids could build nuclear submarines or your kids could pay 50% of their income for the rest of their life to support industrial scale migrant fraud in Lakemba. Greens would prefer the latter. Destroy AUKUS in favour of NDIS fraud just perfectly encapsulates Greens ideology. They hate AUKUS because they hate our Western alliance system and hate the fact that Australia is a Western country. They want to terraform the demographics of Australia and make Australia a non-Western country, so paying migrants to move to Australia to work on the NDIS helps them do that. They also want a command and control economy - despite the NDIS being a private market they know it ultimately relies on government largesse, it’s a thinly disguised direct government transfer/UBI scheme to third world migrant scammers. AUKUS and nuclear submarines are obviously publicly funded but they would inevitably spur the creation of a new Australian market in manufacturing - it’s high tech, high skill, it’s like building Ferraris or Lamborghinis - you ultimately build up an entire network around it. Defence investment in the US spurred the development of Silicon Valley, semiconductors, the internet. The Greens hate this because they don’t want Australia to be a manufacturing powerhouse, they don’t want us to build things, they want a command and control economy that ultimately relies completely on the state.

@DrewPavlou They consider Australia stolen and at the same time want to bring in more thieves...

Be wary of all attempts by Australian left wingers and progressives to try position themselves as the “real patriots.” They see One Nation polling numbers on the up so they think they can combat this trend by proclaiming themselves to be the real patriots. But they fundamentally refuse to engage with the real grievances of patriotic working class voters. The main grievance these voters have is that the Labor government’s mass migration policies will make Australians into a minority in their own country within 15-20 years. That’s the fundamental grievance. Labor and the Greens will never address this grievance because they don’t believe it’s legitimate. They fundamentally believe that Australia is “Stolen Land” - that Australia was built on genocide. Both Albanese and Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan have said that they believe the only true Australians are Aboriginal Australians - all other Australians are migrants or “foreigners” in the words of Jacinta Allan. So they will never engage with the fact that tens of millions of Australians believe in Australian culture and nationhood and don’t want it to be completely diluted and washed away by transforming the nation into an airport waiting lounge. They fundamentally just don’t believe that the culture of white Australians is valuable or legitimate. They think it’s founded on genocide and dispossession so they believe British and European Australians have no right to want to preserve and protect their unique two hundred year old culture. This is the fundamental problem with the left. They want to claim to be patriots but won’t ever touch migration - because their fundamental beliefs about Australian nationhood and culture are hostile to patriotism. Obviously you can’t claim to be a patriot if you simultaneously support migration policies that will make Australians into a minority in their own county. But they desperately want to win these voters back, so they make a lame effort to completely redefine patriotism to just mean “generic left wing positions that everybody on the left already supports.” So in their view, true patriotism means supporting Labor and the Greens. I will give you some examples of this cheap rhetorical trick. They claim: - Real patriots support a gas tax - Real patriots support diversity - Real patriots support modern™️ Australian culture (by which they just mean multiculturalism) - Real patriots oppose Israel (cool, this has been a lefty issue for 70 years) - Real patriots oppose Trump and AMERICA (cool, another lefty issue that has been a lefty issue forever) Notice this rhetorical move? They think they can just take ordinary lefty policies that every lefty already supports and wrap them in the flag to make them seem patrotic. Right now they see patriotism as dangerous - it’s a political threat to the powers that be. So they want to neuter it and make it politically harmless so that it can fit perfectly with the existing Labor Party platform. And I have nothing against a gas tax by the way, I actually want to tax foreign LNG exports at a much higher rate so that we can use the money for nation building projects. That said, let’s stop pretending the REAL PATRIOTS ARE THE GREENS because they want an LNG export tax. They don’t support it for patriotic reasons, they support it because they want wealth redistribution. Alongside wealth redistribution they also support massively altering the population composition of Australia by making Australians into a minority in their own country. This position is fundamentally irreconcilable with patriotism. So the next time you see a Labor hack or Greens hack claim to be a TRUE PATRIOT. Just ask them these two questions: Do you think Australia is “Stolen Land”? Do you oppose making Australians into a minority through mass migration? That’s it. Those are the only two questions that truly matter when it comes to assessing whether somebody is really a patriot that likes Australia.

@RitaPanahi There could not be a more perfect description of Albanese and co than "virtual leaders"!

Weak and pathetic.