

Dan Dewsnap
38.4K posts














Please don't just be angry and outraged. Please take the time to request a Sentencing Review and try to help get these sentences overturned: gov.uk/ask-crown-cour… It will ask you for some case details as you go through the submission, I will put the necessary answers below. It takes less than 5 minutes — we need to do this for the sake of these poor children. Answers needed... Names of the convicted: "Have been withheld from the public. Sentencing Judge is Judge Nicholas Rowland. Date of sentence: "21 / 05 / 2026" and "within the past 28 days" Crown Court where this sentence was issued: "Southampton" Which offence(s) was the sentence given for?: "Rape, and Taking and Possessing Indecent Images" Why do you think the sentence is unduly lenient?: Insert your own answer, and do not use profanity no matter how upset you are. Mine was: The crimes here are violent crimes that have destroyed the lives of the victims, at least one of which is now suicidal and the sentence is not remotely proportional to the severity of the crime. Additionally, the Judge's comments seem to indicate a bias in favour of the convicted, as he offers up justifications for their behaviour such as being low IQ. These crimes were not spontaneous, they were premeditated and planned. They were also filmed. So we know what happened, and we know that they were intelligent enough to plan and execute the luring and entrapment of their victims, which does not indicate that they were the kind of simpletons the Judge suggests. If they had the capacity to plan the crimes in advance, then they have the capacity to be held criminally responsible for those actions.

The U.K. now prosecutes the parents of murdered kids if they say they want the murderer to die. We are a silly nation with pathetic pussies everywhere. Some are in for a shock when the reckoning comes.






Teenage gang who lured schoolgirl, 15, to underpass and laughed as they filmed themselves raping her handed youth rehabilitation orders trib.al/RkAJsUQ

Remember Henry Nowak. An 18-year-old English lad from Essex, one of our own, walking home from a night out with university friends in Southampton. Stabbed repeatedly with a 21cm Sikh ceremonial blade (“shastar”) by Vickrum Digwa, 23, a man who shouldn’t have been here carrying that weapon in the first place. As Henry lay bleeding out from wounds to his chest, back and legs, his attacker cried “racism.” So what did our police, guardians of the native English people, (supposedly) do? They handcuffed the dying boy. Prioritised the foreigner’s sob story over a British teenager choking on his own blood in the street. He gasped “I can’t breathe” while they delayed aid. By the time they realised, it was too late. This is not a tragic accident. This is the inevitable result of mass immigration from incompatible cultures, the cult of anti-racism that protects the invader and punishes the native, and a state that has forgotten whose country this is. England for the English. Blood and soil. Not this dystopian nightmare where our young men are slaughtered and then arrested for existing. Justice for Henry Nowak. Never forget. Demand answers. Demand deportations. Demand an end to the replacement. The natives of these isles will not be sacrificed on the altar of diversity any longer.