Daniel Steinberg Singer

41.7K posts

Daniel Steinberg Singer banner
Daniel Steinberg Singer

Daniel Steinberg Singer

@DanielSingerS

Sportsbetting, Stonks, Sphere, Neoliberal, Metal, Poker, Derren Brown Enthusiast. Positive vibes only! Partner @SaberSim

Petaluma, CA Katılım Mayıs 2013
2.1K Takip Edilen2.7K Takipçiler
dart
dart@poordart·
Oh absolutely, there is no benefit in keeping it closed if there is no threat to their country I'm more concerned about the US's willingness to effectively surrender to Iran's terms, and about israel's willingness to stop war at all cost and their ability to keep the US engaged in war
English
1
0
1
18
Daniel Steinberg Singer
Daniel Steinberg Singer@DanielSingerS·
@poordart I completely agree I think though if US deescalates they will let normal traffic resume, it's going to be a huge money maker for them.
English
1
0
1
8
dart
dart@poordart·
@DanielSingerS They will unequivocally keep the strait under their control At the very least until all war damages have been compensated for - seems fair to get reparations - but likely forever
English
1
0
2
35
Daniel Steinberg Singer retweetledi
Gregory Brew
Gregory Brew@gbrew24·
Folks shouldn't get ahead of themselves. Iran's ability to keep the strait closed by force will weaken once there's a deal in place. Yes, they will extract *something* from *someone* to signify the "new status quo." I'm not confident it will deliver much of a windfall for the regime, not when compared to the billions it is about to access in frozen funds or what it will earn from non-sanctioned trade. What matters--the credibility of the threat to close the strait, and keep it closed, if they are attacked--is not something anyone can take away from them, and therefore doesn't need to be codified.
Gregory Brew@gbrew24

Good news: Iran MFA spox explicitly says there won't be any tolls on ships in the strait. Bad news: there will be, he says, a "fee" for services provided by Iran (and Oman) in the management of the strait. Working out what this means, how much it will cost, and who will play it is likely to take a while.

English
27
25
140
42.8K
Daniel Steinberg Singer
Daniel Steinberg Singer@DanielSingerS·
@CRUDEOIL231 I think there actually is substance to the deal and that's why he has to put out garbage like this to distract from total capitulation to Iran.
English
2
0
3
1.6K
Daniel Steinberg Singer
Daniel Steinberg Singer@DanielSingerS·
"Iran is not getting money for nothing" "Iran is not getting money up front" So you agree we're giving Iran money??
Scott Jennings@ScottJenningsKY

🚨After receiving a briefing from a Senior TRUMP Administration Official on the status of the Iran negotiations (someone in the know & not just speculating), I can tell you the following: -USA IS NOT GIVING IRANIANS MONEY FOR NOTHING. All speculation and propaganda to the contrary is false. Some hardline elements of Iran’s govt (IRGC) have pushed fake stories & propaganda to try to kill this negotiation. -Iran deal is NOT done (95%, but still haggling over some language). No deal being signed today. May be a few more days before this is done. -Iran will NOT get any money or sanctions relief up front. -Iran must turn over nuclear stockpile to get anything. USA position is that failure to meet deal commitments means Iran gets nothing. -Long term USA objective is preventing Iran from having nuclear weapon. -Initial deal point is to re-establish free flow of commerce by reopening Strait of Hormuz. Deal should have 2 phases: Step 1 - Open Strait of Hormuz. Give world economy breathing room. Iran agrees to give up enriched uranium. Step 2 - Get the nuclear material turned over. Only then can Iran get sanctions relief. Bottom line: goal is to make a deal that lowers costs for Americans, calms world energy markets, and guarantees that Iranians cannot have a nuclear weapon over the long term. We aren’t there yet. Iran takes forever to get you a response on even small things. But we are close although it still could be a few days. “If we get what we are demanding, this is going to be a historic deal,” SAO says. SAO sounds prepared to do no deal at all if all Iran will do is a “bad deal.” SAO admits deal could fall apart yet. But if a deal is reached, SAO expects very senior USA admin officials to take part in a signing ceremony of some sort. Iran has agreed in principle to the framework but there are still a couple points USA isn’t satisfied with. 95% done. But literally changing words sometimes requires days in Iran’s system. Haggling over language. But USA feels like we have a commitment on nuclear stockpile and on opening Strait of Hormuz. If IRAN doesn’t deliver on commitments, they get nothing. “Iran’s ability to project power is a lot more limited than it was two months ago,” SAO says. “Their industrial base for building ballistic missiles has been substantially destroyed.”

English
0
0
1
148
Daniel Steinberg Singer retweetledi
Evis Drenova
Evis Drenova@evisdrenova·
One fascinating consequence of GLP-1s/Ozempic: For decades, people said that big pharma would never release actually effective obesity drugs because they’d lose too much money from downstream chronic disease treatment. We’re seeing almost the exact opposite.
English
134
310
7.8K
1.2M
Daniel Steinberg Singer retweetledi
Ryan Brune
Ryan Brune@BruneElections·
Basically Venezuela went perfectly for trump. A daring, complex operation that went without a hitch. Actually flawless. This made Trump that foreign military involvement would produce easy wins. Textbook hubris.
English
60
152
3.1K
279.1K
Daniel Steinberg Singer retweetledi
Daniel Steinberg Singer retweetledi
Peppy Bismilk
Peppy Bismilk@Peppy_Bismilk·
I can't believe Trump missed his son's wedding to caputulate to Iran.
English
46
329
2.9K
41.7K
Daniel Steinberg Singer retweetledi
Saeed Ghasseminejad
Saeed Ghasseminejad@SGhasseminejad·
According to Iranian and Arab sources Trump agreed to -compensate Tehran by releasing blocked funds (at least $6 billion) -lift sanctions -remove American forces from around Iran (Iranian sources more specifically mention the naval assets in the region) -lift the blockade -ceasefire in all fronts including in Lebanon (basically allowing Tehran to rearm its proxy network and help Hizballah reasserts its control in Lebanon) In exchange for -gradual reopening of Strait of Hormuz with the transit remaining under Tehran’s management and control -negotiations over other issues with no hard deadline (the 30-day negotiation window can be extended) Washington has not denied any of these claims. This is a total surrender, pretty symbolic if it is announced on Memorial Day.
English
758
1.2K
4.6K
348.3K
Daniel Steinberg Singer retweetledi
Daniel Steinberg Singer retweetledi
Brett Erickson
Brett Erickson@BrettErickson28·
One thing appears to be abundantly clear as it relates to a possible peace deal: Iran will receive some form of immediate sanctions relief. If this is done, it is a complete and total capitulation by the United States. Over the past 40 days, the U.S. has attempted to wage an economic warfare campaign to bring the Iranian regime to their knees. It failed… but it did hurt. Iran has had their economic arm severed at the elbow. And we’re about to hand them a tourniquet and race them to the economic emergency room. Once that happens, all hopes of success, however slim, are gone. This is what happens when a country gets so disastrously outplayed. Implements horrible strategies. And listens to people not pursuing the best interests of the United States of America. The blockade failed. The economic warfare campaign failed. Iran’s oil infrastructure did not “explode”. And we’re about to hand them concessions that will dramatically change the landscape of the Middle East forever. We are witnessing the most disastrous foreign policy failure in United States history.
English
72
64
358
59.7K
Daniel Steinberg Singer retweetledi
Alicia Smith
Alicia Smith@Alicia_Smith19·
I’m an Iran hawk and I think the nuclear facility bombing last summer was effective. But this seems war seems not well thought out and I’m unconvinced more bombing would somehow bring victory, Iran has had more firepower than expected and regime has remained largely entrenched
English
2
1
14
718