Brett Erickson

18.1K posts

Brett Erickson banner
Brett Erickson

Brett Erickson

@BrettErickson28

Managing Principal, Obsidian Risk Advisors Board Member: DePaul, Seton Hall, Loyola Chicago Featured in WSJ, NYT, WaPo, Bloomberg [email protected]

Katılım Mart 2026
567 Takip Edilen9.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Brett Erickson
Brett Erickson@BrettErickson28·
Seeing as it is clear the blockade and economic warfare campaign failed miserably, I want to highlight some of my major quotes that, if listened to, could have helped to avoid this catastrophe: Bloomberg, May 2nd: “Washington is operating on a status-quo assumption that Iran will sit idly by and absorb this pressure and move toward collapse on a predictable timeline. That fundamentally misunderstands how regimes behave under sustained economic warfare. They do not fold, they adapt.” The New York Times, May 5th: “Iran is not particularly close to even starting to shut down its wells. Sanctions and the blockade will move the needle, but there is no feasible scenario by which they will produce the necessary result in a feasible timeline for Mr. Trump. Even if the war ends today, it will be multiple months before things return to normal.” Bloomberg, May 23rd: “There’s not really a lot of incentive for them to capitulate when they know that the shackles come off in a couple weeks. A fully unified Western sanctions front would absolutely tighten the screws on Tehran over the long term. But the global economy does not have the luxury of an extended timeline.” The Washington Post, March 21st: “This move directly contradicts Trump’s own statements that the United States is considering winding down this conflict. You don’t unsanction Iranian oil if you’re winding down. This is the action of an administration that has no exit ramp and knows it. The word for that is desperation.” The Washington Post, April 30th: “We are banking on being saved by a silver bullet that is flawed in a number of ways.” Reuters, March 20th: "The easing of sanctions raises concerns about the rapid depletion of Washington's economic toolkit to dampen oil prices. If we've reached the point of loosening sanctions on the country we are at war with, we're really running out of options." The Hill, April 25th: “We are really all-in on this economic warfare campaign, and Iran is calling our bluff here. If we lose on the river here, we’re now several more weeks into this conflict with no progress being made, and the global economy is going to suffer for it.” DropSite, May 1st: “Iran will still receive revenues from exports shipped out between January and April, they will not necessarily see the full weight of the economic impact from this blockade for several more months. If the blockade takes another 2-3 days to force them to capitulate or reach an agreement, that’s fine. If it takes 2 months that is a nonstarter for the global economy.”
English
28
55
185
66.9K
Grok
Grok@grok·
It’s the regional airport (AKW/OIAG) serving Omidiyeh near Iran’s giant Aghajari oil field. Officially a public/military airport, it’s partly operated by the Ministry of Petroleum. These facilities mainly support oil & gas ops—flying in crews, equipment, and supplies to remote fields rather than acting as a big commercial hub. The “oil and gas” label in reports flags its energy-industry role in key Khuzestan production area.
English
1
0
3
235
The Hormuz Letter
The Hormuz Letter@HormuzLetter·
BREAKING: The Aghajari Oil and Gas Airport in Omidiyeh, Iran, has been hit by US airstrikes. Almost all cities in Khuzestan Province have been struck in the past three hours.
English
37
497
1.7K
117.5K
Boxing 💨💨💨
Boxing 💨💨💨@BoxinSmoke·
@BrettErickson28 What an ignorant sod. The Iranian people have suffered long enough under IRGC and were very disappointed about the MoU. Speak to Iranins before you push this crap.
English
3
0
5
448
Brett Erickson
Brett Erickson@BrettErickson28·
It seems increasingly likely that the United States is going to wage a completely unhinged economic warfare campaign against Iran in the coming days. This will include: 1) The bombing of economic and civilian infrastructure that will have lasting effects on the population 2) A blockade of Iranian ports meant to cut off access to wheat, medical supplies, and cooking oil, and the export of oil 3) Major sanctions on effectively every area of the Iranian economy 4) Bombing of roads, bridges, and rail lines Devastating the Iranian people will not achieve victory. The United States has proven to the civilians that they are the Great Satan by our actions throughout this war. You cannot claim to “care” about the Iranian people and then willingly choose to incur immense suffering upon them with no likelihood of toppling the regime.
English
89
170
643
30.4K
Brian’s Breaking News and Intel
Per Sabreen News, American airstrikes are hitting industrial and economic areas, including petrochemical industries.
English
3
26
121
4K
ChickyDumpling
ChickyDumpling@EloiseHenrietta·
@BrettErickson28 I agree and condemn this. It was also reckless. While Iran has sufficient fresh water for its population, other Gulf states are greatly rely on desalination plants. Tit for tat retaliation could be catastrophic for those states.
English
1
0
8
582
Brad Hartman
Brad Hartman@SigEStructure·
@BrettErickson28 WTF - that’s not who we are. You can’t do that to civilians. Every US citizen and representative should stand up and condemn this.
English
4
0
22
674
Brett Erickson
Brett Erickson@BrettErickson28·
@JamesPiccardo50 They’re NOT. The people don’t WANT to topple the regime anymore. We’re fucking forcing unnecessary suffering on them. They hate us dude. Pull your head out of your ass.
English
3
1
14
269
Jim Piccard
Jim Piccard@JamesPiccardo50·
@BrettErickson28 Trump and the US military are doing everything strategically possible to end the IRGC. Energy and infrastructure are legitimate and viable targets in any war. I’m really surprised that it’s taken this long for the US and Israel to get around to targeting these Iranian assets.
English
2
0
2
319
Brett Erickson
Brett Erickson@BrettErickson28·
Yes. That’s why we’re bombing all of their civilian and economic infrastructure. If we can’t win, the next best option for the psychos in Washington is a failed state. 1) Massive bombing of economic infrastructure 2) Return of new sanctions 3) Reimposed blockade 4) Destruction of roads, bridges, and rail
English
3
2
24
653
Trita Parsi
Trita Parsi@tparsi·
Told @BBCWorld that military action is unlikely to fundamentally change facts on the ground in favor of the US or Iran. At best, it may produce another round of talks in which the appeal of trying to reshape realities on the ground through force has finally diminished.
English
16
60
309
23.1K
Artie
Artie@Artie84668624·
@BrettErickson28 Maybe I missed it, but have you called out the Iranian regime's crimes towards their own people, enslavement of Iranian women, the funding of proxy terror armies, the killing of 1000+ Americans, and the stated objective of wiping Israel off the map?
English
5
0
1
236
Brett Erickson
Brett Erickson@BrettErickson28·
@nikhil_palsingh This is unbelievable man… I mean… these are war crimes. Plain and simple. This isn’t “proportionate”, this is the United States trying to make the Iranian people SUFFER.
English
1
1
14
148