Daniel Taylor

4.4K posts

Daniel Taylor

Daniel Taylor

@DanielT46640724

Katılım Haziran 2025
14 Takip Edilen45 Takipçiler
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor@DanielT46640724·
@shane_pruitt78 Endless arguments about the same thing can be so boring. It’s obvious that baptism saves. Move onto something else
English
0
0
5
110
Shane Pruitt
Shane Pruitt@shane_pruitt78·
Water Baptism does not make you a Christian. Only Jesus can save you. You can be dunked every day and not know Jesus. New Testament Baptism is a public testimony that Jesus has already saved you, and the Holy Spirit lives inside of you.
English
164
57
671
44.9K
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍@SoundXdoctrine·
@DanielT46640724 @5solas You see. “Does yes mean yes and no mean no or does it mean something else” I told you about hypocrisy, but anyways, you keep working for your salvation see how far it takes you or stay within the biblical boundaries and get saved.
English
1
0
0
11
5 Solas
5 Solas@5Solas·
It's not in there.
5 Solas tweet media
English
11
1
128
10.1K
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor@DanielT46640724·
@SoundXdoctrine @5solas Quick answer is: Jesus said that he will be with us ‘until’ the end of the age. Does that mean he won’t be with us at the end of the age?
English
1
0
0
17
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍@SoundXdoctrine·
@DanielT46640724 @5solas Ok sure. Matt 1:25 says “But he did not have sexual relations with her until her son was born. And Joseph named him Jesus” Yet you claim perpetual virginity right?
English
1
0
1
21
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor@DanielT46640724·
@SoundXdoctrine @5solas I love how you change definitions of words to suit your dogma 😆 please tell me more. Does yes mean yes and no mean no or does it mean something else
English
1
0
0
20
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍@SoundXdoctrine·
@DanielT46640724 @5solas James is not teaching justification by works He’s addressing a false,dead faith that produces no fruit,In James 2 “justify” means vindicate or demonstrate not “be declared righteous before God”Abraham was already justified by faith in Genesis 15 years before Isaac.
English
2
0
0
41
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor@DanielT46640724·
@SoundXdoctrine @5solas Don’t you think it’s curious that James talks about Abraham in the same way? Almost as if he’s correcting a heresy?
English
1
0
0
33
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍@SoundXdoctrine·
@DanielT46640724 @5solas Paul didn’t say“does not do works of the Law.” He said does not work. Abraham wasn’t justified by Torah sacraments or “good works”but by faith alone before circumcision “to the one who does not work but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteo”
English
1
0
0
29
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor@DanielT46640724·
@SoundXdoctrine @5solas What are you on about now? Paul teaches that faith works. As does James. As does Jude. As does Peter. As does Jesus. We are justified by faith and not by works, that is the beginning of the journey. Paul is denying works of the law, not good works in faith
English
1
0
0
37
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍@SoundXdoctrine·
@DanielT46640724 @5solas And there it is, we’re talking about a different church and a different gospel. What works did Paul have before salvation? Or any of the apostles? None. And let’s not pretend “saved by grace, through faith, working in love” isn’t works based salvation.
English
1
0
0
22
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor@DanielT46640724·
@SoundXdoctrine @5solas The Catholic Church teaches that faith works. Not that we believe in a works based salvation. What you call idol veneration is ridiculous. You can very easily find justification for asking saints to pray for us. Same with icon veneration.
English
1
0
0
21
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor@DanielT46640724·
@SoundXdoctrine @5solas You are not speaking biblically. God never abandoned Israel. And he won’t abandon his church. The Chirch has never left the gospel, we just haven’t minimised it like Protestants do. You can keep kicking against the goads but the Church will remain forever
English
1
0
0
32
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍@SoundXdoctrine·
@DanielT46640724 @5solas No,this collapses under Scripture.God did judge &“forsake”Israel repeatedly before Christ,Covenant faithfulness never meant unconditional national favor,faith did.Only the remnant was preserved,not the institution & the Reformers didnt “leave the Church” Rome left from the gospel
English
1
0
0
21
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor@DanielT46640724·
@taco_talks I’m glad that faith aloners and Catholics basically agree now. All we need to do is disprove the obvious myth of once saved always saved and we’re onto a winner!
English
0
0
0
55
Taco_Talks
Taco_Talks@taco_talks·
Trent Didn’t Like Me Pointing Out 1 to 1 Hypocrisy In Catholicism
English
86
11
122
7.6K
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor@DanielT46640724·
@SoundXdoctrine @5solas You mustn’t have read the Old Testament if you think he somehow abandoned Israel before they rejected his Son. That is not how God operates. He is loyal to his bride. The reformers left the Church because they had a theological disagreement. Not good at all
English
1
0
0
22
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍@SoundXdoctrine·
@DanielT46640724 @5solas God’s faithfulness was never tied to an infallible institution but to His Word. He didn’t abandon Israel He corrected it,often against its religious leaders. The Reformers didn’t leave the Church they refused to submit to doctrines that contradicted Scripture.
English
1
0
0
18
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor@DanielT46640724·
@SoundXdoctrine @5solas Thank you and I appreciate that Protestantism can do that within the church. However - God never abandoned his people even when those prophets were raised. He still worked through his people which today is us. This is an argument for remaining in the Church, not abandoning it
English
1
0
0
24
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍
PapistHammer ⚒️🦍@SoundXdoctrine·
@DanielT46640724 @5solas Moses,Joshua,Samuel,Elijah,Jehoiada,Hezekiah,Ezra,Nehemiah again and again God raised up reformers when His people went astray, practiced paganism, and departed from the Word of the Lord. Every time corruption took hold, reform followed. But you love falsehood. You love papism.
English
1
0
0
27
Gabriel Hughes
Gabriel Hughes@Pastor_Gabe·
I'm not a Calvinist because I read John Calvin. I'm a Calvinist because I read the Bible.
English
254
42
735
97.4K
Danny
Danny@Truth_matters20·
The Bible has a lot to say about abusing God's grace: "What then? Shall we sin because we are not under the law but under grace? By no means!" — Romans 6:15 "Live as free people, but do not use your freedom as a cover-up for evil; live as God’s slaves." —1 Peter 2:16 'You, my brothers and sisters, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge the flesh; rather, serve one another humbly in love." —Galatians 5:13
Danny tweet media
English
8
13
92
2.2K
Chris Staley
Chris Staley@staleyexpress·
@denise_gil12468 @5solas Which has nothing to do with salvation or the actual Bible story. Many greatly deceived thinking asserting this is relevant.
English
1
0
0
4
5 Solas
5 Solas@5Solas·
When Roman Catholics say they gave Protestants the Bible.
5 Solas tweet media
English
30
15
176
9.1K
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor@DanielT46640724·
@5solas We’ve read it buddy. It’s just that we’ve read beyond Romans 4 and Ephesians 2:8-9
English
0
0
0
8
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor@DanielT46640724·
@BeanofChrist @5solas It’s the opposite. You mock Christ by saying the bible is the ultimate authority not him. We see through your twisting Pharisee
English
0
0
0
7
5 Solas
5 Solas@5Solas·
When you reject scripture as the ultimate authority, you become the ultimate authority.
5 Solas tweet media
English
23
4
82
2.4K
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor@DanielT46640724·
@5solas Yes of course Romans 4 negates Romans 1-3 as well as chapters 5 and 6. It also negates James, 1 John, Hebrews, revelation and all of the gospels 😆
English
0
0
0
20
5 Solas
5 Solas@5Solas·
Quick! Run to James 2 without explaining Romans 4!
5 Solas tweet media
English
27
5
89
2.7K