Darroweve

@GeirJensen7391 @UriksFredrik @vebjornselbekk Det er empatisk av deg. Men når du leser e-postene får du inntrykk av at det ikke var så manipulerende så en tror. Hun gjorde valg i form av tjenester, ferie, nettverk, som alle andre du nevner. Ingen tvingte dem til å ha kontakt.

@UriksFredrik @vebjornselbekk Allikevel gikk de rett i nettet hans. Nettet fanger. Jeg tror på tilgivelse for Mette, men det krever at hun ser oss i øynene og forteller etter beste evne hva som skjedde. Hva er egentlig alternativet?

Det norske folk har vist tidligere at vi kan tilgi våre kongelige. Jeg synes at snakket om at Mette-Marit ikke kan bli dronning - og spesielt pratet om skilsmisse, som noen også driver med - er uverdig. Haakon og Mette-Marit kan bli et utmerket kongepar. vg.no/rampelys/i/6qk…

@knutbernhardt @mibjerke @Bernu Dette må da være en bot, ting han sier henger jo ikke sammen 😂😂

Frp er jo nærmest bare sosialister. Er jo ingen nevneverdig reduksjon av staten å spore blant den gjengen. Du har blitt hjernevasket av NRK skjønner vi. Du er jo et fint eksempel på det som er galt med Frp. Totalt balleløst hjernevasket skvip som ville stemt på Comrade Kamala. Gjeng med megatapere som ga bort seieren til Jonas fordi de ikke klarte å gro baller og innrømme i offentligheten ville stemt på Trump. Latterlig gjeng

We need ICE in Norway and Europe. That’s the truth It’s going to happen eventually anyway, so we might as well speed up the process

@grok @warsurveillance @warsurveillance why are you spreading propaganda?

This claim appears to be exaggerated. No confirmed US offer of $700B to Denmark for Greenland or $100k per resident exists; the figures are estimates from internal discussions and expert analyses. Denmark and Greenland reject any sale. Sources: nbcnews.com/politics/white…; reuters.com/world/europe/t…; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposed_….

BREAKING 🚨🇺🇸🇩🇰🇬🇱 | The United States has reportedly made a $700 billion offer to Denmark for Greenland including $100,000 per resident in exchange for U.S. citizenship.

Why didn't the people who signed the board of peace contract kiss Trump's ring for allegiance, that would have been much more appropriate for the man who stopped 8 WARS.

@StevenEKuhn @grok do you feel like this was a respectable summary, or is there a hint of bias in there? Thinking specifically when it comes to the one about Macron and Carney?

DAVOS: THE SHORT VERSION (NO FLUFF) (Sorry for the photo, nothing personal to my EU friends) Let me give you the compressed version of what actually happened at Davos. 🇺🇸 Donald Trump What he said (synopsis): •America is done subsidizing bad trade deals •Sovereignty matters more than global consensus •Greenland is strategic and negotiable •Leverage beats lectures Tone: Direct. Blunt. Very American. Observation (mine, not medical): He looked very tired. Not weak, just worn down. I genuinely hope he’s okay. Impact: He reset the room. Davos stopped being theoretical. ⸻ 💰 The “Fed guy” — Scott Bessent (U.S. Treasury) What he said (synopsis): •Markets aren’t panicking •U.S. debt is fine •Europe is overreacting •“Take a breath” Translation: America isn’t scared, and we’re not slowing down to make Europe feel comfortable. Why Europe hated it: They expected reassurance. They got dismissal. ⸻ 📦 Trade — Jamieson Greer (USTR) What he said (synopsis): •Tariffs are not radical, they’re historical •Free trade hollowed out the U.S. middle class •Balance matters more than ideology Translation: Globalism didn’t fail accidentally. It failed structurally. Why Davos didn’t like it: He challenged the core religion of the room. ⸻ ⚡ Energy — Chris Wright What he said (synopsis, reported from closed sessions): •Energy security comes before climate theater •Oil and gas still matter •Supply beats slogans Important: These remarks were reported from closed-door meetings. I cannot confirm a public Davos speech transcript. Why it mattered: It exposed the gap between elite narratives and physical reality. ⸻ 🔥 Howard Lutnick — Commerce Secretary What he said (reported, not verbatim): •Europe’s energy policy is delusional •Coal works when renewables don’t •America isn’t apologizing for winning Reaction: Jeers. Walkouts. Christine Lagarde reportedly left early. Was it harsh? Yes. Even by American standards. Was it intentional? Absolutely. Sometimes clarity requires friction. ⸻ 🇫🇷 Emmanuel Macron What he did (synopsis): •Warned against U.S. “coercion” •Framed America as destabilizing •Played the familiar moral authority card Reality: Same speech. Same posture. Different decade. Boring. ⸻ 🇪🇺 Ursula von der Leyen What she said (synopsis): •Europe will lead the “largest free trade bloc in the world” •Focus on South America / “Latin America” •Regional partnerships are the future Translation: Globalism isn’t dead, it’s being rebranded. What this really was: Globalism light. Same system. New label. America not invited. ⸻ 🇨🇦 Mark Carney Now this part matters. Trump warned Mark Carney to watch his tone in public remarks about U.S. policy. Trump wasn’t tolerating proxy criticism, even from allies. His speech was the same as always: Globalist Chit chat ⸻ THE BIG PICTURE (WHY THIS WAS A SMACKDOWN) Europe wasn’t offended because Americans were rude. Europe was offended because America stopped pretending. Davos runs on: •Polished language •Managed outcomes •Consensus without accountability America showed up with: •Leverage •Direction •Consequences Yes, it was harsh. Yes, it was uncomfortable. But here’s the thing: After all the outrage… after all the editorials… Deals still happened. Including Greenland. Yes: Trump and Greenland came to an agreement. See the structure European leadership? Try it sometime. Intent. Planning. Action. Delivery. Results.

@StevenEKuhn @lordwithnail @Qukenkoriander Typical idotic journalism from you? Learn to think for yourself mate.

@lordwithnail @Qukenkoriander Of course, classic EU leadership tap dance

Europe threatened the United States… with 34 troops. Not 34,000. Not 3,400. It was 34. That’s not an army. That’s a field trip 🚌 Big speeches. Serious faces. Naval power. Land forces. “Unprecedented consequences.” This isn’t leadership. It’s theater. Europe plays dress-up. America deals in leverage. 👉 patreon.com/steveneugeneku… #Europe #EU #Greenland #Trump #Geopolitics #NATO #GlobalPolitics #Leadership #RealityCheck #Power #Sanctions #Military #WorldNews #CitizenLeadership @joerogan @patrickbetdavid @Bannons_WarRoom @BowesChay

@Anatema0 I bioen din så står det at du som regel er på parti med underdoggen, så det betyr at du støtter demokratene i USA?

Trump har selvsagt helt rett i at den norske regjeringen kan påvirke hvem som får og iallfall hvem som _ikke_ får Nobelprisen. Alle kjenner alle i den norske andedammen. Dette er ett av de punktene hvor Trump bare treffer fordi han har så gode antenner. vg.no/video/352763/t…

@MichelleRM68 They don't even have the correct accent.

NATO & the MSM claim "Greenlanders hate Trump!" BULLSHIT Actual Greenlanders:👇

@KimDotcom @vonderleyen @SecGenNATO @EmmanuelMacron @Keir_Starmer @bundeskanzler @GiorgiaMeloni What happened to you Kim? :P Thought you were anti US after what happened to you.

@vonderleyen @SecGenNATO @EmmanuelMacron @Keir_Starmer @bundeskanzler @GiorgiaMeloni You really think Trump cares? You are digging your own grave. Thank you for showing the world that you are not a serious player.

I spoke to @SecGenNATO, @EmmanuelMacron, @Keir_Starmer, @bundeskanzler and @GiorgiaMeloni. Together we stand firm in our commitment to uphold the sovereignty of Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark. We will always protect our strategic economic and security interests. We will face these challenges to our European solidarity with steadiness and resolve.

@NeilMcCoyWard Cringe listening to this, why did I, and you are a brit?

France has threatened the USA with Military Action... Emmanuel Macron ordered French land, air, and sea forces to Greenland and called it a “force to be reckoned with”. So far, that force is 13 soldiers. He’s singled out Donald Trump, accused the US of “colonialisation”, and warned of “unprecedented consequences”. He’s also claiming Europe has superior weapons to the US...

@realpeteyb123 You are mentally deranged. 😂

Greenland is not worth 700 billion dollars. Europe owes us far more than that. After World War II, America could have taken Europe by force. We had the power. We had the leverage. We chose to rebuild them rather than conquer them. We paid for their recovery. We guaranteed their security. We allowed them to prosper under an American shield while they spent decades lecturing us from the comfort we provided. That choice created modern Europe. (Not sure if this worked out well as they allow the barbarians in) Greenland should not be bought. They should offer it up as a gift. America can just take it, and there is nothing Europe can do. Denmark can keep looking closely into this matter, but nobody cares. We act like it matters, but it doesn’t. Stop being nice. Take Greenland. 🇺🇸

@FuentesUpdates Does not have a big military when US bonds gets dropped right? 😂 Delusional.

“Well Denmark lets us put our military there!" 🤓 “Denmark ‘lets us’ use Greenland for our military? I would like to see Denmark try and stop us! As a matter of fact, I would like to see all of Europe try and stop us!”🔥

@LiseSorensen_ Hadde den gamle fastlegen din det, hvordan ble det et tema når du var innom kontoret?

I 2026 er jeg takknemlig for å ha en fastlege som ikke tror menn kan bli gravide.

@grok @RealMortenB @jurgen_nauditt @grok why does some Americans want to get in a war with Europe?

The current military activity on Greenland involves small deployments from NATO allies like Denmark, Germany, France, and others for joint exercises, infrastructure guarding, and security enhancement. It's a response to stalled US-Denmark talks on Greenland's future, amid US interest in the territory, serving as a show of support for Danish sovereignty.

The Netherlands is sending the first (!) soldier, and Finland two, and the UK one, to defend Greenland against the US, according to the UK Ministry of Defense. Trump doesn't understand who he's dealing with. He's already assembled six NATO troops there in a single day. A total of 35 troops are expected in the coming days. It's supposed to be just a gesture against the imperialist fantasies of the madman in Washington—I know—but 35 troops?

@OK_GREAT45 @vikingx123 Likevell så blir høyre politikere invitert, rart?

@vikingx123 NRK-ledelsen er veldig åpenbart venstrevridd, og det gir mening. NRK ble stiftet i stor grad av et Storting som hadde blitt styrt av Arbeiderpartiet i over 25 år, i et slags pseudo-diktatorisk styre fra 1949 til 1960. venner ansetter venner.

🇳🇴 𝐇𝐕𝐎𝐑𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐅Å𝐑 𝐄𝐈𝐕𝐈𝐍𝐃 𝐓𝐑𝐄𝐃𝐀𝐋 𝐒Å 𝐌𝐘𝐄 𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐒𝐒 𝐏Å 𝐍𝐑𝐊? Han representerer ingen gjennomførbar politikk, bare retoriske angrep – primært mot alt som ligger til høyre for Arbeiderpartiet, og ofte også mot Arbeiderpartiet selv. Dette er ikke journalistikk, men kommentariat forklart som analyse. NRK skal opplyse befolkningen – ikke forsterke ensidige narrativer gjennom faste stemmer uten demokratisk forankring. Når kritiske perspektiver systematisk marginaliseres, mens én type retorikk løftes frem, undergraves tilliten til allmennkringkasteren. 📺 Mer balanse. Mer substans. Mindre ekkokammer. #NRK #Mediekritikk #Ytringsfrihet #PolitiskDebatt #Allmennkringkaster #Demokrati #Norge

@RMistereggen 2/2 I feel like I see a lot of hate/type speech in Norway at the moment on social media. In a democracy like Norway, prevention should be tied to behavior and risk, not opinions. If that line isn’t clearly enforced, then your concern is justified.

@Darroweve Is that what I said?

Norway’s security service urges Norwegians to report family & friends ‘obsessed’ with ‘conspiracy theories’ for ‘anti-state extremism’ prevention. Vague labels, no examples. Straight out of the Stasi playbook: turning thoughts into threats while the state dodges accountability. Meanwhile, NRK (state media) never reckons with its own pushed conspiracies like Russiagate or dismissing the lab-leak theory as fringe. A chilling erosion of free thought.

@RMistereggen 1/2 No, it's not, I wrote maybe a bit to quickly. I don’t think belief or speech should ever be reportable on their own-that would absolutely be a threat to free speech. The concern,for me, is when conspiracy thinking turns into dehumanization,mobilization,or clear intent to act.

@elonmusk What life is if you don't act like it's the Wild West. That is objective reality, maybe time to step out of the simulation mate?

That is the objective reality

@Aelith_ @RMistereggen I doubt it. Just take a look at the comment sections on Twitter and Instagram-you’ll see how aggressively people argue politics, call each other traitors,insult one another. Free speech exists,but that doesn’t mean it’s the same as spreading hate or acting like a reckless cowboy.

@Darroweve @RMistereggen Also I wonder if the norwegian security services will also make people disappear like Stasi did?