David L. Gray, ThM

David L. Gray in the Morning - LIVE | 9 AM ET - Every Mon, Wed & Fri David L. Gray in the Morning delivers a sharp, faith‑centered take on the day’s biggest stories. Each episode blends Catholic insight with cultural awareness, offering listeners a clear and grounded perspective on the news cycle. David breaks open the Mass readings, highlights the Saint of the Day, and examines the headlines shaping politics, society, and the Church. From questions about manufactured crises and media narratives to reflections on liturgical life and Catholic tradition, this show invites listeners to think deeply, pray faithfully, and stay informed. If you want a morning companion who connects Scripture, culture, and current events with clarity and conviction, this is your daily stop. ______________________________ 🔴WEBSITE: davidlgray.info 🔴 SPOTIFY: open.spotify.com/show/5bcm6Ps9N… 🔴 RUMBLE: rumble.com/c/c-7837890?e9… 🔴 FB: facebook.com/DavidLGray.INFO 🔴 IG: instagram.com/davidlgray.inf… 🔴 X: x.com/DavidLGray_INFO

@EternalLifePlan 🤣

That’s what happens when you’ve been a Catholic for a full second. She is not only a theologian but a professor in religious studies all without a degree .. just bc she converted. I see so many of these new converts lecturing us, the Bishops and the Pope about Catholicism and mixing it up with politics. Is there a new form of Catholicism call Catholicpoli?

How are you Catholic when you go on Tucker Carlson and reject Vatican II - agreeing with Tucker that they changed Christian doctrine?

LINK: youtube.com/live/H6aC1Ydqg… Learn all about Fr. Chad Ripperger's Demon Gossip Demonology. Defined, Analyzed, Compared to Catholic Demonology, and Given a Final Verdict. Why is Fr. Chad Building a Personal, Gnostic, and Heretical Demonology from Sourced Demon Gossip?

@EternalLifePlan I imagine demons lie on the shrink chair and he intensively interviews them with a legal pad and pencil, with his legs crossed.

@DavidLGray_INFO What’s disturbing about the one clip you played..Ripperger stated he wrote two books on psychology. How does one do that without a psychology degree and license?

Inside Fr. Chad Ripperger's 'Demon Gossip' Demonology | David L. Gray in the Morning x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@EternalLifePlan You nailed it! He can't see it... Sad!

I agree with you David. I see in the comments people making fun of Catholics. Conversion happens by talking about Jesus is the path to salvation..not telling the secrets of demons to millions of viewers or gosh .. satan has infiltrated the Vatican. Satan has infiltrated Father Ripperger but he’s too proud to see it.

Now these shorts are coming out with Fr. Chad's mouth vomit about how the Church has been infiltrated, and blah blah blah - and you read the comments, and you see how Satan works. He uses the vanity of priests like this to destroy the little faith people have and keep people from coming into the Church. The comment section is full of people talking about THIS is why they can't become Catholic. THIS is why they are second-guessing converting. THIS is why they remain Protestant. It disgusts me how this priest lacks any of any level of discretion or discernment to know how Satan will use his vanity and pride and mouth vomit to destroy souls.

I wrote this about this some years ago. I think it was a grad school paper. War isn't what it used to be. It used to be organic, in a sense. People fought for land. In that context, I could understand a theory of war being just. However, today, wars are decided in corporate boardrooms. There are three hedge funds that decide whether war can be profitable. A war industry that makes vehicles and munitions arms the whole world and profits from death, and that money goes back to those three hedge funds. The profits from oil prices go back to those three hedge funds. War is no longer organic; it's orchestrated. It's not about land, it's about the 1% driving the world into poverty. We are all just being played - so the idea that getting played is 'just' is weird.

@DavidLGray_INFO @mfjlewis @pedrogabwriter Well yeah that’s why St. Augustine and St. Aquinas stated war should be a last resort…that kinda implies it should only be an option after love, compassion, and respect have failed.

Recent popes have increasingly spoken against war in stronger terms—sometimes even saying that there is no such thing as a just war. Has the Church abandoned its traditional teaching? Or is something deeper happening? @pedrogabwriter explores. wherepeteris.com/is-just-war-st…

It starts much earlier than that. You're pointing to evidence of the failure to love. Yeah, if love fails, then 'what do you do'? That's our cycle. For the same reason the Jews killed the imago Dei, we too feel like we have to kill the imago Dei. What do you do when you have failed to love sacrificially? The answer is ALWAYS to kill the consequence of that failure.

@DavidLGray_INFO @mfjlewis @pedrogabwriter But what more could you have realistically done if you were Poland or England or France in 1939?

@CarriePrejean1 Ma'am, you can't say you trust the magisterium AND go on @TuckerCarlson and affirm his lie that Vatican II allowed outsiders to change Christian doctrine. Was Vatican II a valid ecumenical council or not?

As a convert from Evangelical Protestantism, one of the things I treasure most about the Catholic Church is the authority of her Magisterium. The Second Vatican Council teaches in Lumen Gentium 25 “Bishops, teaching in communion with the Roman Pontiff… are to be respected as witnesses to divine and Catholic truth… and the faithful are to adhere to their teaching with religious submission of mind and will.” I accept the documents of Vatican II with that religious submission of mind and will. But the same passage makes something very clear. Individual bishops do not enjoy the prerogative of infallibility every time they issue a statement. Catholics are bound to the Magisterium of the Church, not to every memo or public accusation from a particular bishop. This matters because Bishop Bambera @BishopBambera has now decided to get involved in something he obviously didn’t watch or listen to. He misrepresents what I actually said. At the hearing I raised a straightforward question about free speech and modern definitions of antisemitism. According to the IHRA definition of antisemitism this is included: Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis Could one of the IHRA definitions be used to label parts of the New Testament itself as antisemitic? For example, St. Paul writes: “The Jews who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets…” - 1 Thessalonians 2:14–15 That is Sacred Scripture. Quoting the Bible is not antisemitism. Even Nostra Aetate states:“True, the Jewish authorities and those who followed their lead pressed for the death of Christ.” The same document also teaches that this guilt cannot be charged against all Jews then alive or against Jews today. I accept that teaching fully, but it doesn’t take away from the historical fact of the Jews at the time who sentenced our Lord to death. Now here is the part of Bishop Bambera’s letter that makes this even more remarkable. He writes: “Catholics can appreciate the religious attachment that the Jewish people have to the land of Israel, but interpret the re-emergence in 1948 of a Jewish state in a historical rather than theological context.” That is precisely the point I made at the hearing. The Catholic Church does not teach that the modern State of Israel fulfills biblical prophecy. This is exactly what I said at stage at the hearing. The Holy See consistently interprets 1948 historically and politically, not theologically. In other words, the bishop’s own citation confirms the point he accused me of making improperly. Catholic doctrine is clear: The promises made to Abraham reach their fulfillment in Jesus Christ and the New Covenant. St. Paul writes: “The promises were made to Abraham… and to his offspring… and that offspring is Christ.” -Galatians 3:16 @BishopBambera You write this letter behind my back to the bishops and say “If God’s covenant with the Jewish people has not been revoked, what, then, of God’s promises to Abraham concerning, not only descendants, but land?” Are you following the post Vatican II like Pope Saint John Paul II? In Redemptoris Mater: According to Gal 4:4 and its context, “it is the coming of the Son of God that reveals that time has, so to speak, reached its limit. That is to say, the period marked by the promise made to Abraham and by the Law mediated by Moses has now reached its climax, in the sense that Christ fulfills the divine promise and supersedes the old law." So my question is, Your Excellency, are you following the Catholic magisterium? And would @Pontifex affirm the interpretation you are presenting to the bishops? 🧵⬇️

No one is saying to be a pacifist. I'm saying do what Jesus said and what the Mass empowers you to do. Baptizing the world and teaching them what Jesus taught isn't pacifism, it's martyrdom. It's better that we die for Christ than they die in sin. This is just a higher calling that most people are ready to do. Killing problems is easy. Liberals do it with babies in the womb all day.

@DavidLGray_INFO @mfjlewis @pedrogabwriter Absolutely yes. Turning the other cheek does not mean a police officer or soldier or even a common citizen should watch innocent people being raped/robbed/killed and do nothing. That’s the heresy of pacifism and not a single pope has endorsed that view as the new standard.

@Dr_zato317 @mfjlewis @pedrogabwriter So you are advocating that we kill the imago Dei to stop sin? Is that how Jesus advocated as the solution to stop sin?

@DavidLGray_INFO @mfjlewis @pedrogabwriter Yeah well NOT using violence when needed to occasionally defend the innocent from being raped, robbed, or murdered is already considered a mortal sin of omission…and potentially the sins of cowardice, imprudence, and neglect by the state as well.

Ever since, the Holy Spirit has led the Church to accept that all human lives have sacred and inalienable dignity; therefore, the death penalty is inadmissible - the so-called 'Just War Theory' was put on the clock. Now, this Zionist War against an equally evil country has probably sped up that clock on the Church, declaring that there is no such thing as a Just War, as all wars (secular and corporate) are just an outcome of failed love and hardened hearts. I predict we'll see that change in the magisterial teaching within the next 10 years.

@HoldenCCole Why feel bad for them? Divine emotions are a valid and wonderful place to begin. Now, go evangelize them and help them mature in their faith journey.

I feel bad for Protestants because this is the summit of their “worship”. Imagine if they had the Eucharist.

"In the course of history and of the development of civilization, the Church too, meditating on the Scriptures, has refined her moral stance on the death penalty and on war, which is now becoming more and more absolute." Pontifical Biblical Commission 11 May 2008

@JoeinUptown Non-dogmatic magisterial teachings have changed and been forgotten about very often in Church history. No dogmatic magisterial teaching has ever changed, nor can it.

Wow you mean doctrine can change?

LINK: @davidlgray" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@davidlgray Here are the shows for the rest of the Week. On Wednesday, I'll completely deconstruct Fr. Ripperger's 'Demon Gossip' Demonology and prove how it is not Catholic. On Friday, I'll have E. Michael Jones on to answer my questions about this Wave of Anti-Catholic Zionism. I have a suspicion this whole thing is about pre-imploding a 'Catholic' J.D. Vance/Marco Rubio ticket in 2028, and perhaps this is the end of America as we know it.

The Magisterium makes a clear distinction between the Covenant God made with Abraham and his descendants from the political state called Israel. That's the distinction Prejean is not very articulate at explaining. READ: Pontifical Biblical Commission, The Jewish People and Their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible (2001)

The Catholic Church does NOT have a doctrine denying Jewish self-determination or Israel’s right to exist. In fact: - Since Nostra Aetate, the Church formally rejected antisemitism and affirmed respect for the Jewish people. - The Holy See officially recognised the State of Israel in 1993 and maintains full diplomatic relations. - Pope John Paul II, widely regarded as one of the most influential and respected popes of the past century and later canonised as a saint, became the first pope to visit the Holy Land, prayed at the Western Wall, apologised for the Church’s mistreatment of Jews, and explicitly acknowledged Israel and its right to exist. - More recently, Pope Francis has also affirmed Israel’s right to exist in peace and security. So please @CarriePrejean1, stop talking out of the ass you have for a mouth. You’re as much of a real Catholic as Piers Morgan is a Hindu. Your bottom-barrel IQ is embarrassing, and that’s putting it mildly. Stick to making porn.