Christine Harrington 🙏🏼

Today, Pope Leo XIV published a message celebrating the 10th anniversary of Amoris Laetitia. While some have been trying to spin the narrative that Leo is trying to overturn the document, the Holy Father's message actually reinforces his continuity with the late Pope Francis' vision. ************************** PAPAL INTERVENTIONS: - Pope Leo XIV's Message on the Occasion of the 10th Anniversary of Amoris Laetitia: vatican.va/content/leo-xi… - Pope Francis' Amoris Laetitia: vatican.va/content/france… ************************** MY BOOK MENTIONED IN THIS VIDEO - The Orthodoxy of Amoris Laetitia: amazon.com/Orthodoxy-Amor… ************************** Picture credits: - Pope Leo XIV: Lula Oficial , Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa… - Pope Francis: Ricardo Stuckert/PR, Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa… Background Music | "Heavenly Gates (Instrumental Version)" by Hector Gabriel | EpidemicSound

AURES HABENT ET NON AUDIUNT “I listen to everyone!” youtu.be/ok0eZ2L7xqM I would have expected Leo, following the example of the Good Shepherd, to come looking for the lost sheep and bring it back to the fold from which his predecessor had expelled it. This did not happen. Although I am convinced that my “excommunication” is an unjust and evil action that for this reason had not actual juridical effect, I cannot help but point out that it constitutes, for those who inflicted it on me, a sort of aquae et ignis interdictio, the penalty in ancient Roman law equivalent to a form of perpetual exile, which required the condemned person to abandon Roman territory, with a prohibition against anyone providing him with water, fire, or any form of assistance, including hospitality or shelter, under penalty of severe punishment. In practice, this made the condemned an outlaw, depriving him of the essentials of survival and isolating him from society. And so, in defiance of the fine words about welcome and inclusiveness, I see myself condemned to a “spiritual death penalty,” deprived of the Sacraments and supposedly destined for eternal damnation. For Bergoglio and Prevost, capital punishment, which kills only the body, would be inadmissible, but excommunication, which kills the soul and condemns it to eternal death, is permissible. For this reason, wanting to leave no stone unturned, I felt it my duty to write to Leo and request an audience. Here is the chronology of the entire affair: - On June 4, 2025, I sent a personal letter of extremely sensitive content via the Vatican Post, in which I also requested an audience. - On August 28, 2025, having received no response to my previous letter, I resubmitted my request to be received in a private audience with Leo, through the Prefecture of the Pontifical Household, by sending an email to the Regent, Msgr. Leonardo Sapienza. - On September 20, 2025, I received a reply from Msgr. Sapienza, confirming that the audience had been granted, and that it was scheduled for December 11, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. at the Library of the Apostolic Palace. - On December 9, 2025, at 8:08 a.m., two days before the meeting, Msgr. Sapienza informed me by an email that the audience had been canceled. - However, less than two hours later, at 9:53 a.m., the Secretariat of the Prefecture of the Pontifical Household forwarded me the ticket for the audience. - Shortly thereafter, at 10:14 a.m., the same Secretariat informed me that the audience had been canceled. - Following these contradictory communications, I called Msgr. Sapienza to understand the reason for the cancellation. Ostensibly embarrassed, he offered unbelievable excuses but assured me that he would communicate a new date as soon as possible, quoting Leo’s words: “We have to reschedule the audience: I listen to everyone!” 1/2

Investigations find ritual human sacrifices and burials connected to the Pachamama cult. lifesitenews.com/news/pachamama…

Yes, @TuckerCarlson, please read Infiltration and interview @TaylorRMarshall. Book here: sophiainstitute.com/product/infilt… YouTube here (1.79M subs): @drtaylormarshall" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@drtaylormarsh…

As I have already stated; Catholic teaching, including Vatican II, directly counters anti-Israel stances like Carrie Prejean's that delegitimize the State of Israel, call it genocidal, or frame opposition to it as non-antisemitic while rejecting Zionism outright. All positions that often veer into bigotry or born from it. Vatican II's Nostra Aetate (1965), section 4, condemns antisemitism unequivocally, "the Church... decries hatred, persecutions, displays of anti-Semitism, directed against Jews at any time and by anyone." It rejects portraying Jews as rejected or accursed by God and affirms the shared spiritual patrimony between Christians and Jews. Full text: vatican.va/archive/hist_c… In 1993, St. John Paul II established full diplomatic relations via the Fundamental Agreement between the Holy See and the State of Israel, recognizing Israel's sovereignty and committing to combat antisemitism, racism, and intolerance together. It affirms cooperation and respect for both parties' rights. Full text: vatican.va/roman_curia/se… The Church upholds the irrevocable covenant with the Jewish people (Romans 11) and calls antisemitism a sin. While not endorsing theological Zionism (I don’t either), it has never taught that Jews lack a right to a homeland or that Israel should be erased - that is opposite to rhetoric singling out the Jewish state for delegitimization. Prejean's claims misalign with all this binding Magisterium. The Catholic Church demands rejection of hatred in all forms, truth, and reconciliation with our Jewish elder brothers. I don’t believe I needed to spell this out for you because you claim to be Catholic. What evidence do you have that the Catholic Church has changed its teachings and positioning with Israel or Jews since these were posited?