David Merrill

11.8K posts

David Merrill banner
David Merrill

David Merrill

@DavidMerrill21

economic justice, public finance, Hegel’s philosophy

Oxford, UK Katılım Eylül 2013
905 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
David Merrill retweetledi
Joe Guinan
Joe Guinan@joecguinan·
Burnham is speed-running the Starmer arc of fake saviour to obvious fraud in record time, completing it before he’s even been selected for the Makerfield seat, let alone run for Labour leader.
English
5
184
896
10.2K
David Merrill
David Merrill@DavidMerrill21·
Excellent report on how Burnham is just another iteration of the neoliberal play book. Murphy doing a great service here in revealing this unpleasant truth. 'Why Andy Burnham’s economics are deeply neoloiberal and will fail him an...' youtu.be/7pBgR1Mvyh4?si… via @YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
2
3
127
David Merrill
David Merrill@DavidMerrill21·
@AusMMT I encourage you not to make such a big thing about presumed theoretical differences. Far better to look for and amplify common ground.
English
0
0
0
13
David Merrill retweetledi
Daniela Gabor
Daniela Gabor@DanielaGabor·
financier getting all poetic about the secret ingredient in China's successful industrial policy, financial repression.
Daniela Gabor tweet media
English
5
26
131
10.4K
David Merrill retweetledi
MMT101.ORG
MMT101.ORG@MMT101DotORG·
"The oil price belongs in every macroeconomics textbook. Theory must describe and explain reality. With the old models that explain inflation through changes in the money supply (however defined), this is not possible." Dirk Ehnts
Dirk Ehnts@DEhnts

Der Ölpreis gehört in jedes Lehrbuch zur Makroökonomik. Theorie muss Wirklichkeit beschreiben und erklären. Mit den alten Modellen, die Inflation durch Veränderungen der Geldmenge (wie auch immer definiert) erklären, ist das nicht möglich. link.springer.com/chapter/10.100…

English
0
10
35
3.7K
Patricia
Patricia@PatriciaNPino·
Wait, there are people out there who still think banks lend savings?
English
49
39
214
40.5K
David Merrill retweetledi
QINTELPRO
QINTELPRO@QINTELPRO_·
When the Civil War began in 1861, Abraham Lincoln needed money to fight it. He approached the private banks. They offered loans at 24–36% interest - terms designed to bankrupt the government and hand the bankers permanent leverage over the republic. Lincoln refused. Instead, he did something no American president had done before: he had Congress authorize the Treasury to print $450 million in government-issued currency - the greenbacks. No private bank involvement. No interest payments. No debt. The greenback was a direct threat to every private banking interest on earth. If a government could fund itself without borrowing, private bankers become unnecessary. The London Times responded with an editorial that read like a declaration of war: “If that mischievous financial policy should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without debt. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.” This is a primary source document. The London Times, 1865. 🧵
QINTELPRO tweet media
English
56
605
1.5K
71.5K
David McNab @mcfab@home.social
David McNab @[email protected]@DavidMcNab17·
Japan proved for decades that high levels of public investment don’t cause inflation; China binned Thatcher’s ‘balanced books’ and transformed 100s of millions of lives for the better - yet our stupid politicians still cling to Thatcher’s failed neoliberal ‘rules’ like idiots.
Alison S Taylor, MP - Paisley & Renfrewshire North@Alison_S_Taylor

I back the Prime Minster who was elected on a five year mandate to change, protect, defend, enrich our United Kingdom which suffered a pandemic hot on the heels of a divorce from our biggest trading partners. It’s wrong not to back the Leader. Just wrong. This is not the way to go about such matters. Keir needs supported by his team. Not have the knives turned on him.

English
5
42
111
2K
David Merrill retweetledi
Prem Sikka
Prem Sikka@premnsikka·
Worker's share of UK income 1955, 71.7%. 2025, 59.7%. Includes fat-cats. Headline corporation tax rate 1974, 52%. Now, 25%. Last 30 yrs, UK at/near bottom of the OECD league for investment in productive assets. Wealth went to shareholders, capital. ons.gov.uk/employmentandl…
English
9
225
306
4.8K
David Merrill retweetledi
Prof. Steve Keen
Prof. Steve Keen@ProfSteveKeen·
To avoid economic stagnation: 1) Stop equating government budgets with household budgets. 2) Focus on reducing private debt, not public debt. 3) Implement policies that increase the money supply in the economy. Ignoring these steps leads to economic downturns and crises.
English
57
348
757
41K
David Merrill
David Merrill@DavidMerrill21·
@premnsikka How would you go about tackling new social housing? Would you need a new department of housing planning and an industrial policy set up to meet your new social housing goals? Also are you assuming a context of money scarcity or absence of same?
English
0
0
0
44
Prem Sikka
Prem Sikka@premnsikka·
Challenge Starmer by Monday or I will, Labour MP tells cabinet. Why delay the inevitable? Must change policies. Immediate £1,000 rise in personal allowance. Decouple energy price from gas, nationalise energy. Nationalize water. Build social housing. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
English
50
318
604
11.1K
David Merrill
David Merrill@DavidMerrill21·
Sheridan Kates, Sophia Anderson and Devon Osborne get their seats in the Town Hall.
David Merrill tweet media
English
1
0
1
90
David Merrill retweetledi
Matt Stoller
Matt Stoller@matthewstoller·
Virtually all modern technology America operates on today was created prior to the age of billionaires. The computer, the internet, AI, the semiconductor, plastics, software, et al. These guys just captured the value politically, they didn't create much at all.
English
162
294
1.5K
71.6K