David Norrish

18.9K posts

David Norrish

David Norrish

@DavidNorrish

Hopefully reasonable.

Katılım Ocak 2018
1.6K Takip Edilen213 Takipçiler
David Norrish
David Norrish@DavidNorrish·
@EmmaMAshford ignoring the moral and political implications i imagine that a very minimal naval presence would deter unarmed ships
English
0
0
0
49
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
Everyone has stripes known as Blaschko's lines. These are normally not visible and are generally only present if there's an issue, chimerism, etc. But some birds can see them!
Crémieux tweet media
English
455
845
18.5K
11.8M
NFL Researcher
NFL Researcher@NFL_Researcher·
Most QB pressures when blocked 1-on-1 in 2025, per @NextGenStats: 1. Aidan Hutchinson - 70 2. Will Anderson Jr. - 65 3. Nik Bonitto - 61 4. Josh Hines-Allen - 60 5. Micah Parsons - 52 6. YaYa Diaby - 51 7. Jared Verse - 50 8. Jaelan Phillips - 49 9. Zach Allen - 46 9. Dre’Mont Jones - 46
English
16
45
506
98.2K
Meg
Meg@megannn_lynne·
Other twentysomethings still finding their way are doing so in a charming, funny, bittersweet, cinematic way….I’m doing it in a grotesque & disgusting fashion
English
5
52
541
7.5K
Dillion 🇺🇸
Dillion 🇺🇸@bencroyderived·
@MattofMystery Why would you want your CAS platform to “soak up” anti-aircraft threats that is a defeatist attitude. You’re wrong on all points.
English
2
0
6
232
David Norrish
David Norrish@DavidNorrish·
@BrettKollmann Price discrimination is great: happy hours matinees winter shopping in the summer summer shopping in the winter
English
0
0
0
92
Doug Barr
Doug Barr@DougBar00546674·
@GaryWinslett A 24hr waiver doesn’t prove anything. Of course foreign ships are cheaper, that’s the whole tradeoff. The Jones Act isn’t 100% about lowest cost, it’s about not depending on other countries for shipping when it actually matters. Is the national security aspect bullshit then?
English
5
0
0
235
Gary Winslett 🌐🇺🇸
Gary Winslett 🌐🇺🇸@GaryWinslett·
When the Trump admin pays ZERO political price for waiving the Jones Act, that will be very helpful in showing both parties it’s been a paper tiger this whole time. Not only is there no substantive reason to have the Jones Act, there’s no *political* reason to have it either.
Colin Grabow@cpgrabow

Waiver less than 24 hours old and foreign ships are already being chartered. Each of these voyages represents a cost savings. If cheaper Jones Act-compliant alternatives were available, they would have been used. Shows the existence of demand the JA fleet couldn't meet.

English
7
47
357
16.3K
Forgotten Weapons
Forgotten Weapons@ForgotWeapons·
I don't know what the solution to this is, but people treating AI bots as omniscient oracles is extremely dangerous.
English
38
55
1.3K
10.8K
Forgotten Weapons
Forgotten Weapons@ForgotWeapons·
It's one thing when people fabricate fake historical photos with AI because they put zero value on truth instead of clicks. But it's another whole issue when people depend on AI to tell them if things are real. AI does not know. Here is Grok insisting the real image is fake.
Forgotten Weapons tweet media
English
55
301
3.2K
65.6K
Black Phillip
Black Phillip@poe_collector·
hey you got any games on your phone
Black Phillip tweet media
English
57
16
1.5K
10.9K
David Norrish
David Norrish@DavidNorrish·
@JRHunTx It's more fundamental than that. It's about a consistent demand signal with clear well articulated unchanging requirements.
English
0
0
0
11
Jonathan R. Hunt
Jonathan R. Hunt@JRHunTx·
In any conversation about defense procurement, and in particular of exquisite capabilities and shipbuilding, the limiting factor constantly cited is not $$$ but rather the availability of sufficiently skilled and sober labor. So, maybe some added cash for technical education.
James Raab 🇺🇸🇺🇦@JamesRaxz

Some things I would spend $200B on. -Opening a second B-21 production line. $4.5B -Plan a second F-47 line $4.5B -Restart C-17 production. $8B -Buy 48 US-2s from Japan. $7.5B -Max the lines of F-35, F-15EX and F-16V, all to the USAF. $28B -Grow the Army to 680,000. $42B

English
1
0
3
196
James Raab 🇺🇸🇺🇦
Some things I would spend $200B on. -Opening a second B-21 production line. $4.5B -Plan a second F-47 line $4.5B -Restart C-17 production. $8B -Buy 48 US-2s from Japan. $7.5B -Max the lines of F-35, F-15EX and F-16V, all to the USAF. $28B -Grow the Army to 680,000. $42B
English
68
60
1.4K
85.3K
Checkman
Checkman@elpasser1·
@PhillipsPOBrien Only TDS can cause a person to reframe a great victory against the evil Iranian regime into a disaster. The oil shock will quickly pass, and then you'll have to find another fly in the ointment.
English
14
0
14
535
Phillips P. OBrien
Phillips P. OBrien@PhillipsPOBrien·
Watching Trump teeter on the edge of blowing up the world economy because of a combination of hubris, strategic incoherence, mendacity and outright stupidity, might be the most extraordinarily depressing thing I have observed in my entire life, or read about in any other period.
English
415
2.5K
10.7K
264.5K
Luan
Luan@Luan75937152·
@JeremiahDJohns Why you only criticize leftists Jeremias... Liberals fascists can be free from accountability ?
Luan tweet media
English
3
0
11
698
Dinkledash
Dinkledash@Dinkeldash·
@glcarlstrom @yashar There is the published ordinance supply level and there is the actual ordinance supply level that we’d break out if there was a major threat or do you think screwdrivers really cost $600?
English
2
0
6
2.9K
Gregg Carlstrom
Gregg Carlstrom@glcarlstrom·
"The cost of replacing the first four days' worth of munitions would be $20bn-26bn. The problem, however, is more to do with scarcity than cost. America is thought to have used more than 300 Tomahawk cruise missiles in the opening days of the war, but the Pentagon had planned to buy just 57 new ones in the current fiscal year. There have been no deliveries of THAAD interceptors since 2023 and the Pentagon has not placed any new orders this year. A puny 39 interceptors are slated for delivery in 2027—six years after they were ordered." economist.com/briefing/2026/…
English
82
663
1.9K
334.1K
Chris Shipping 🚢🚢
Chris Shipping 🚢🚢@christankerfund·
A number of countries issue a statement saying they are ready to help ensure safe passage through Hormuz. They obviously see this getting very close to spiraling completely out of control. But let’s see what actually comes from this ….
British Embassy Washington@UKinUSA

NEW: The UK alongside France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Japan expresses readiness to contribute to appropriate efforts to ensure safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz 👇 gov.uk/government/new…

English
13
5
60
10.1K