David Cameroff 🇵🇸

I'm assuming they added the "Vote Green" ribbon, because Zack Polanski, the One Jewish party leader our entire Press & UK Politicians are currently piling in on for Something something "Antisemitism" does not have a Big Hooky Nose.

A little relative a-hole score showing up from Domani Jackson on the first play of the game against Georgia. Setting the tone!

The idea that the Rams should have punted on a future QB they love in the name of a “win-now” WR is shortsighted and foolish. No rookie can be expected to swing his team’s championship probability that much.

In the long run, Andy Burnham has a choice. You're a respectable social democrat, along the lines of Pedro Sanchez. Do you want a winning alliance with a new, energetic left wing movement, or do you want to get sealed in the tomb with Steve Reed?

First of all, the United States definitely would not have done the same thing in a truly mirrored situation if for no other reason than because exit bans are not legal in the United States. Second, in no way is your example an analogous situation. Manus was not a Chinese company, it was a Singaporean company that originally incorporated in China and subsequently unincorporated, and no longer had any business with or in China. That would matter in the US system. If a truly equivalent situation to this happened in the US - a US company unincorporated in the US, incorporated in Singapore, closed its US offices and ceased all business in the United States, and the new Singaporean company was subsequently bought by a Chinese company - CFIUS would not order the transaction to be unwound because it would have no legal authority to do so. CFIUS' jurisdiction is spelled out extremely clearly in US statute and regulations--contrast with the jurisdiction of China's foreign investment security review, which is extremely vague. And if CFIUS did order the transaction to be unwound despite not having the authority to do so, US courts would strike that decision down. That's the difference between the US system with an independent judiciary, and the authoritarian Chinese system. The proper tool to use to prevent the company from leaving the country in the first place would be export controls, but you obviously need controls to be in effect before the company leaves. China didn't have export controls on any tech that Manus made (and neither does the United States).