Davison 🧠👈

Another episode of me reading ai erotica generated by grok and then acting it out. I call it grokrotica! ☺️

@JebraFaushay I am more concerned about her singing.

Someone needs to tell Debbie Gibson that the cut-off age for wearing a onesie is two years old. (CharmaineAdams)

"Preferred fuel" is a red herring here. It's a technical term meaning it has oxidative priority. Being "preferred" would not imply that the body tries to make sure it always has ketone bodies (KBs) under any macro context. But is it the best fuel? Is it at least as good as glucose? Yes, it's absolutely true that glucose is in a fundamental and cross-species way a basic fuel for brains in maintenance, while developing brains even in many other species, but especially in humans, normally require KBs. Hence their elevation in placenta, and late pregnancy transfer, and the ketogenic state of newborns, the ketogenic propensity of breastfeeding, and the role of adipose tissue in human babies. Hence their presence even overnight in many cases up through adulthood. Hence their ability to help repair neurodegeneration. KBs are important for neuroplasticity, and humans are unique in having a brain development trajectory that spans decades after birth. I don't understand how anyone could make a serious argument that it's "not clear whether our ancestors had experience with ketogenic diets", and then implicitly cite modern HGs as evidence. First of all, all modern subsistence strategies, from very high carb to very low, are solutions to the problem of (likely self induced) loss of megafauna. For the majority of the 2 million years of homo erectus and early modern humans, we lived primarily on fatty meat with little to no regular digestible carbohydrates. What choice would there be but to be in ketosis much of that time? It simply would not have been possible to support the human brain on the combination of available digestible carbohydrate and the limited gluconeogenic capacity we have due to our specific provenance. And this long exposure to this subsistence situation is reflected in many of our physiological adaptations—adaptations that reflect high reliance on a fat-based metabolism, many of which I've written about elsewhere. As to the specific modern HGs mentioned, it is nothing short of disingenuous to mention that Arctic genetic variants "suppress ketogenesis". As I've written about before, the genetic variant that somewhat *inhibits* ketogenesis was only possible because the traditional food environment was so high in HUFAs that it drastically increases ketogenesis, such that lower ketogenesis was possible while still being in significant ketosis. The adaptation had the advantage of actually allowing ketosis to persist on the face of higher protein intake. Critically, the same genetic change equally inhibits gluconeogenesis, so if you argue that these populations had no ketosis on their traditional diet then you must also imply they had no significant GNG. So how did they fuel their brains!? No. Traditional diet permitted plenty of ketosis. That myth has to die. As to Maasai, there is contention around their diet. I have personal friends who visited a few decades ago and insisted the diet was essentially plant free for everyone. I have not been there and there is not consensus and it's probably different now, so I will not insist a particular story about it. Nonetheless, I must reiterate that modern HGs are *not* a suitable proxy for our evolutionary past. Wild game today is not high enough in fat to support the modern human physiological architecture and so we do what we can to maximize fat yield from domesticated animals and supplement with digestible carbohydrate that we've learned to grow as well. This works. But none of this means that we can't survive and thrive perfectly well in long term ketosis when food sources allow. It is our heritage.

@ElinorZ @NoFilterSkin Have YOU looked in the mirror lately? LMAO!!!

@NoFilterSkin Girl if you have a wine for the 1st time in 2 months and you are ugly 3 days later.. I hate to break it to you but it’s not the wine.

Alcohol is the worse drug on the planet. I wish it never existed. We live in a generation of functioning alcoholics. Drinking multiple times a week. It’s sad. Alcohol literally makes you ugly.. I drank alcohol last weekend for the first time in 2months and i looked ugly for 3days after that. I felt ugly too btw.

@CTVNews This is the worst medical article I have read all year.

Doctors warn against ‘overwhelming’ surge of online disinformation on menopause ctvnews.ca/health/article…

@FischerChr96042 @Ani_Cameo @CTVNews Your doctor is wrong and doing you a disservice! HRT is usually ideal!

@Ani_Cameo @CTVNews when I asked my doctor, what to take she told me to take vitamin D and calcium that’s it. And my bones and joints don’t hurt anymore.

@Ani_Cameo @CTVNews THIS IS FALSE

@CTVNews The disinformation is woman being prescribed Estrodial & HRT which increases risk of cancer among other side effects . Menopause sucks but with some natural supplements & correct diet it’s manageable .

@newstart_2024 This is the opinion of ONE white, male psychiatrist. It is NOT this stark nor is having higher emotional sensitivity a hindrance to all kinds of accomplishments.

Dr. Daniel Amen just dropped a fascinating brain scan insight on Chris Williamson’s podcast. Women overall have healthier brains with stronger frontal lobes. But their emotional centers (limbic system) run hotter — leading to more rumination and a higher tendency toward depression. This one made me stop and think. That extra emotional wiring makes perfect sense for bonding and caretaking, yet it comes with real costs. No society has flipped the primary caretaker role, which says something deep about biology. Understanding these natural differences could help us approach mental health, relationships, and expectations with more compassion instead of pretending we’re all wired the same. Do you think we talk enough about these brain differences between men and women, or does it still feel too taboo?

This is false; you both have to like each other enough. Few people get that the majority of dissatisfying relationships are when there's a discrepancy between who likes the other more. I'm not gonna pretend that there aren't difficult seasons in long-term relationships but it's not that he has to like you more or she has to like you more, you both have to like each other enough.

@DrewVento False. It's that both people have to like each other enough.

For relationships to work the girl has to like you more than you like her

@matt96h @cremieuxrecueil Enough of you! You are a minimizer. Being flippant about GLP-1 inhibitors is ill-advised! Goodbye.

@DavisonVideo @cremieuxrecueil Perhaps you ought to look it up, NAION blindness has been disproven as per 2025 meta-analyses.

Increasingly many studies are showing that GLP-1RAs seem to slow down cancer growth!

@matt96h @cremieuxrecueil That is NOT true. Look up gastroparesis and NAION blindness.

@DavisonVideo @cremieuxrecueil Totally irrelevant unless you've got something specific to point to. All of the current side effects are short term and minor. As for the lung term side effects, they only keep discovering unintended protective properties.

@matt96h @cremieuxrecueil Few drugs are all good or all bad and most drugs have side effects. Both dosage and length of exposure determine deleterious effects.

@cremieuxrecueil Wow, are these the "unknown long term side effects" I've heard everyone fear monger over? Truely horrifying stuff. These people are FOOLS.

@internetuserf12 Not only was it oppression in the case of Covid, it was unnecessary punishment for the unvaccinated. Ebola isn't the same virus.

If Ebola becomes a pandemic, it will be in no small part because millions of people now view public health measures as oppression rather than the most basic infrastructure of a functioning and sustainable civilization.

@MaziAneke @BBCNews This article is medically inaccurate: academic.oup.com/bjd/article/19…

@BBCNews Rising cases like this show how lifestyle and environmental exposure are quietly shaping long-term health trends.

Riskiest skin cancer cases hit UK record high bbc.in/4fGtP62

@LuluMcCull @BBCNews academic.oup.com/bjd/article/19…

@BBCNews Deadly but preventable by simple measures - slip, slap, slop

@BBCNews This is inaccurate medical reporting because they have proven that melanoma is closer to a leukaemia than a traditional UV driven skin cancer like a basal cell carcinoma. Melanoma isn't caused UV light exposure and they've proven it: academic.oup.com/bjd/article/19…

@MonicaMAlmaguer You are out of your melon if you think the written word is more explicit than videos. Please!!! 😂😂😂

Is this porn? Because society can't simply point the finger at guys, without also calling out women who happen to consume erotic content through different means. Personally I think it's "worse"..it involves ACTIVELY creating the scene with her imagination. While men passively consume.

Most men don’t need to become more masculine. They need to become more emotionally integrated.

@marroni_again @JezziiB You.

@DavisonVideo @JezziiB Who's problem?

It's been awful watching some of my former guy friends become men who prey on younger women. Saying things like women in their 40s are angry & bitter so they "have" to date women 28-32, or younger, because they have less trauma. And I'm like: Dude, YOU are the trauma.

@marroni_again @JezziiB You're the problem. Bahaha!! 😂

@JezziiB You sound kinda jealous, not to mention angry and bitter. Why not just shut up and age gracefully?