Frédéric-Alexandre Decelles
3.2K posts
This is not the wilderness of Sir John A’s time. And we have rail and highways already. And things called planes. Steeling peoples land for a train that will always lose money, that will cost at least twice what they are projecting, through hundreds of level crossings that will require bridges, and municipalities with rail speed limits is about as far from conservative as you can get.
Weird how Pierre Poilievre's Conservatives want to "protect private property" from high-speed rail, but they don't care to "protect private property" if it belongs to Indigenous people vs. a pipeline... What's different, I wonder? 🤔
@PAstynome if your aggressor and your end goal is "status quo prior to the war" then you have lost that war
Ottawa wants to spend $90 Billion on high-speed rail between Toronto and Quebec City. That's $4000 out of the pocket of every Canadian taxpayer to fund something that 99% will never use. As usual, Western Canadians will be paying to subsidize Ontario and Quebec. Insanity.
