Phil DeCelles

@Babywwir 20. My job

I have been to 3. You?

@jakegordon_md @Platypuss_10 If I had to guess, I'd say the first officer was flying and did not reduce thrust at the appropriate time or in the appropriate amount. Note that the jet stopped descending. Not good. Looks like the captain took over and forced the plane onto the runway. Rattled some teeth tho.

@jakegordon_md @Platypuss_10 All modern swept wing turbojet passenger planes fly the approach at Vref + 10 kts. The flaps are set to full extension. This includes the leading edge slats. The body angle is pronounced. The actual landing requires a slight increase in pitch and a reduction in thrust.

A Kuwait Airways Boeing 777-300ER came dangerously close to a stall during landing at Amsterdam Schiphol. 
An excessive flare initiated too high led to airspeed loss and sink, with the tail-strike protection system stepping in to prevent further pitch-up.

@perego86 @Airaasayss @grok Correctomento! 52

@Airaasayss @grok is it 22 the correct answer?

How many people are still in the room🤔🤔🤔 Solve honestly in 10 seconds..!!!

@Themule59 @Airaasayss Bingo! 52

@Airaasayss 52. Dead people are still people

@Philipp_Straehl @airmainengineer All true but he also zeroed out all crosswind correction after touchdown. I see that a lot in these videos. Back to basics please.

@airmainengineer Decrabbed a bit early. Unstabilised. Go around.

Go-around without nose landing gear touching the ground . What do you think went wrong here?

@Aerovances Incorrect aileron and rudder during takeoff roll. No corrective rudder and aileron during rotation and climb out. That caused the big roll to the right at liftoff. Should have had aileron and rudder set before rotation. This is taught in primary flight training. Miss that?

B737 struggling to takeoff with strong cross wind. What do you think of this takeoff?

@JEFESINCORBATA The pilots of the 737 wish they were in the two F15s. And yes, the F15 pilots wish they were flying the 737.

¡El avión de pasajeros aprendió quién tiene el derecho de paso: ¡Siempre es el Avión de Caza! ¡Mira cómo estos F-15 suben sin restricciones al final, ¡es glorioso!

@Pinarello_Pete @Platypuss_10 Took the words from my mouth.

@Platypuss_10 It’s not ‘remarkable control’. It’s a very simple BUT INCORRECT technique - aerodynamic braking is NOT a recognised technique and NOT recommended by the manufacturer Boeing. It is SPECIFICALLY mentioned NOT to do it in the FCTM.🤷‍♂️

A Boeing 747 pilot displaying remarkable control by keeping the nose up just a little longer after touchdown!

Hope you're right

IVERMECTIN AND FENBENDAZOL END CANCER 🎯CONFIRMED: Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher states that complete remissions of stage IV cancers using antiparasitic drugs are already documented in peer-reviewed scientific literature. According to him, hundreds of studies show that ivermectin and fenbendazole activate more than 12 different anticancer mechanisms and act against more than a dozen types of cancer. Among the most impactful works cited by Hulscher is a case report published in Case Reports in Oncology. There, three patients with metastatic stage IV cancer are described who achieved complete remission documented by imaging and tumor markers: 📌An 83-year-old woman with breast cancer that had metastasized to the liver, lungs, and bones. After treatment, the PET scan showed complete remission, and she has shown no recurrence in nearly three years. 📌A 75-year-old man with metastatic bone prostate cancer. His PSA dropped to undetectable levels, and the metastases disappeared completely. 📌A 63-year-old man with highly advanced BRAFV600+ melanoma. His circulating tumor DNA went from 123 to 0 in less than two months, with confirmed remission. Additionally, a recent systematic review analyzed 26 studies with 36 real patients treated with ivermectin. No serious adverse effects were reported, and clinical improvements were observed even in cases of leukemias and lymphomas, many of them while continuing to receive conventional chemotherapy. Alternative scientists explain that these drugs attack cancer in multiple ways: they destabilize microtubules, induce programmed apoptosis, block the mTOR pathway, cut off the glucose supply to tumor cells, inhibit the formation of new blood vessels, and eliminate cancer stem cells. All this with medications that cost pennies and have been used in humans and animals for decades. While conventional medicine invests billions in high-cost therapies, on social media thousands of patients are already sharing personal testimonials: tumors that shrink or disappear, markers that normalize, and surgeries that end up being canceled. The question sweeping the world is whether this represents the greatest medical suppression in history or the most important discovery of the 21st century. The dissenting scientific community demands controlled clinical trials with urgency. For many terminal cancer patients, time has simply run out. What do you think? Give it an RT and share this information before it disappears, as it could save many lives. Your friends or family fighting cancer need to read this today. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING

@planesanity The pilots did not "mess up". The new airplane had a state of the art fly-by-wire system that "thought" the plane was landing and would not let the pilots add power during the pull up. Unbelievable that so many people survived the crash.

Pilots mess up and crash an Airbus A320 with 136 people on board during a low flyover, killing 3.

@mattdecelles 2 hours well spent.

@deelo190 @Turbinetraveler Also airline here. I agree, the go around would have been a good choice. It wasn't just "the truck". He and other vehicles were cleared to cross that runway together. If you watch the video, the #2 truck stopped and reversed clear of the runway giving truck #1 room to do the same

Airline pilot here: I’ve made a few posts, for posterity it seems I should combine them so here goes: I guess I should lead with the fact that I know LGA really, really well - And having 1 controller working both ground and tower; late… on a Sunday is straight up normal. Anything you’re hearing about a controller shortage is BS. Should there be 1 guy working? No - But it’s been that way as long as I can remember. Second, if you listen to the audio. You can hear the controller try to stop the truck. Which means a few things. The truck took too long to cross after the initial clearance was issued. In LGA shit happens quickly. If you can’t execute you’re immediately stopped. So looking at the truck. He took too long to cross.. which means that he was either in the wrong position when he first called, or he was going too slow. BOTH are wrong. That’s problematic. So if you listen to the guy IN the truck.. he’s nervous. Classic low confidence read back. What that says to me? He was in training. Let’s investigate that a little further? If the fire department was going to train someone… you’d do it when it’s “quiet” right? Well, LGA is never more quiet than late, on a Sunday - You starting to see it yet? Now, the controller. Was task heavy already (being by himself) working two frequencies in low weather. But again, nothing new there. Especially that guy. I recognize his voice. He’s a rockstar. He can handle it if anyone can. Now… BEFORE the incident with the truck. It’s important to understand the truck was rolling in response to an emergency. There was already a United flight that had supposedly aborted a takeoff due to a fume event on the other side of the field. Usually not something they roll CFR for, BUT if you listen to the earlier audio it’s pretty apparent the United flight crew was basically losing control of the cabin. The flight attendants were running that show. The United pilots, then respond by (incorrectly) pressing the Controller for a gate - That’s important to recognize the United crew was pressing the GROUND controller. Because it’s important to recognize that ground IS NOT in charge of gate assignments… so the United crew was pressing the wrong controller, which then put him (the controller) into a spot of trying to coordinate FOR THEM because apparently they don’t know how to do their jobs. The controller. Went from task heavy to what we call “task saturated.” Add that little fiasco into the truck moving slower than it should’ve been… poor radio discipline on the truck… We’re starting to create a scenario, yeah? Now finally the flight crew. Could they have gone around? Should they have gone around? Now we’re getting into Monday night quarterbacking. Yes to both… in hindsight. The reality is. The weather was low. So maybe they couldn’t visually verify that the truck had crossed. I will say, defacto; a go-around is always an option. Until It’s not. And it’s not once the reversers are out. So to be at 100kts ground speed… the reversers were out. To see what they saw, you’d have to be in the plane with them or re-create it in a sim. I will also say.. the truck. DEFINTELY SAW THE LIGHTS COMING DOWN THE RUNWAY. So, as usual. Multiple things played into it. …it’s never just one thing, right? But… There’s gonna be a lot of focus on the truck -

Here’s CCTV footage capturing the exact moment Air Canada Express Flight AC8646, a Bombardier CRJ-900, collided with a Port Authority fire truck at LaGuardia Airport last night.

@nicksortor @HarmeetKDhillon

🚨 BREAKING: Pam Bondi is being moved to a NEW position within the Trump administration, with DAG Todd Blanche stepping in as Interim Attorney General, President Trump tells Fox Who should take over the AG role PERMANENTLY?

@jarthur47 @xAviation @BigJetTVLIVE ANC?

@xAviation @BigJetTVLIVE What airport? Doesn't look like Denver.

No go-around? No problem Originally cleared for landing on Runway 7, a DC-9 freighter was suddenly re-routed to Runway 33 following a last minute runway change from ATC due to close trailing traffic from a 747. 📹: @BigJetTVLIVE

@Rabisaed1 96

IQ Test Only 2% can solve this

@RuksanaAnsar 109

Can you solve this in 5 seconds?

@david_palx @OnDisasters If the captain is convinced the jet will not fly, an RTO acceptable. Going off the runway at 50 kts is better than crashing at 200 kts.

@OnDisasters 178 knots... must be something real wrong with it. Great that didn't end in the mud.

Update on the LATAM B-777 rejected take-off at Guarulhos, yesterday. Shortly after stopping the aircraft, Captain indicated to pax that during take-off, there was a warning of "engine overheat", leading crew to abort the maneuver. (This dismisses initial rumors that there were drones in the area) Meanwhile, one of the passengers filmed the rejection maneuver from the cabin - this is an extract only, the full video is in the comments below 📹 Viajante Sincero (IG), Info by ℹ️ Aero_In (their complete entries are on the links below)

@VellingaJoel @aynii_00 Nicely done

@aynii_00 4+3*3= 21 2+5*5=35 7+7*4= 44