
Drizzy.base.eth
4.1K posts

Drizzy.base.eth
@Deepakjoshi751
Early tester | Gas spender | @peaq believer



Every swap on Pact has a judge. It's called the Penalty Adjudicator. It collects cryptographic proof from both chains and checks the swap to decide the outcome. Fulfill? LP collateral returned. Fail? LP collateral seized. Cross-chain coordination without cross-chain trust.






Flares S1 registration is extended to Apr 24th. More time for eligible wallets to lock in their SLX allocation ahead of TGE. For those who do register, the unclaimed SLX redistributes to our core users.






$200,000 in rewards for Jupiter Users! If you've traded on Jupiter in the last 12 months, we got something for you. $200K in Mystery rewards. Tokens, surprises, ecosystem rewards randomised, claimable right now. - Import your wallet to Jupiter Mobile or Extension - Go to Rewards Hub - Check if you got any rewards Rewards distributed until fully claimed or after 31 days. Just Use Jupiter.











📢 @solsticefi Airdrop Registration is now live or more like Scamming Version of registration is live Register here: registration.solstice.finance 💰Registration fee: 0.075 SOL ($6.5) 📅Deadline: April 21, 2026 Only registered users will receive Season 1 SLX allocation. If you don’t register, your Flares + SLX will be forfeited. - Now let’s talk about the real issue. This move is extremely disappointing. Charging 0.075 SOL for “registration” is one of the highest fees I’ve seen in any airdrop, especially on Solana a chain known for low fees and scalability. This raises serious concerns: • Airdrops are meant to reward users, not extract money from them • Pay to claim mechanics break trust with the community • It creates a barrier where only paying users benefit • It sets a bad precedent for future projects The justification given by Solstice Finance “covering network and processing costs” doesn’t hold up. Let’s be real: • Solana transactions cost fractions of a cent • Many large-scale airdrops have happened without such high fees • “Processing cost” is vague and lacks transparency This isn’t the first airdrop on Solana. We’ve seen multiple projects distribute rewards fairly without asking users to pay this much just to claim. Tagging the team because this needs attention: @ben_solstice @RyanDay This decision makes the project look greedy and disconnected from its own community. If the goal is long-term trust and growth, this needs to be reconsidered. At the very least: • Provide full transparency on where this fee goes • Reduce the cost significantly • Or remove it entirely Because right now, it doesn’t feel like a reward it feels like a cash grab.






