Satoshi Stockpiler 🟧 #BIP-110

Gabe Newell: Valve doesn’t really worry about piracy.

For anyone interested about the truth: Adam Back is absolutely, overtly and veritably lying about me *ever* supporting BIP110, or even being "a fence sitter" about it. I have always strongly, clearly and unequivocally opposed any similar fork proposal since the very earliest suggestions. I have always been, and remain, consistently opposed to: - using consensus rules to tackle specific types of onchain spam, - defensively addressing any kind of "illegal data" moral panic in any possible way (mempool policies included), - enforcing any controversial consensus change (including the ones I agree with, unlike this one) without clear full-ecosystem agreement. It's a bit unfortunate that a very influential voice in the industry is lying about me, since I have a smaller reach to debunk him. Maybe some of you can help me by spreading the correction. Thanks.

This jackass doesn't understand that you can do both. Matter of fact I just bought some more to put it towards more hash.

"Trust me Mechanic — I knew BIP110 would lead to a chainsplit. Now watch me adjust the difficulty and make the Bitaxes go... *pounds his chest* thump thump next block." BIP110 is a Fugazi.