Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Devi
6.3K posts

Devi
@DefiantDevii
In-house Legal Counsel. Indian. Atheist. Democracy, Human Rights and Civil Liberties. LLM - King’s London.
Bengaluru/Singapore Katılım Ekim 2023
347 Takip Edilen12.3K Takipçiler

@lalitgrateful In the UK they probably buying in the suburbs. Your jaws will drop if you see the prices inside London.
Bangalore infra and transport is so bad that people cannot buy in the suburbs. Its probably in the interest of the elite class since they own most of the prime property.
English
Devi retweetledi

There will be no AI jobpocalypse.
The story that AI will lead to massive unemployment is stoking unnecessary fear. AI — like any other technology — does affect jobs, but telling overblown stories of large-scale unemployment is irresponsible and damaging. Let’s put a stop to it.
I’ve expressed skepticism about the jobpocalypse in previous posts. I’m glad to see that the popular press is now pushing back on this narrative. The image below features some recent headlines.
Software engineering is the sector most affected by AI tools, as coding agents race ahead. Yet hiring of software engineers remains strong! So while there are examples of AI taking away jobs, the trends strongly suggest the net job creation is vastly greater than the job destruction — just like earlier waves of technology. Further, despite all the exciting progress in AI, the U.S. unemployment rate remains a healthy 4.3%.
Why is the AI jobpocalypse narrative so popular? For one thing, frontier AI labs have a strong incentive to tell stories that make AI technology sound more powerful. At their most extreme, they promote science-fiction scenarios of AI “taking over” and causing human extinction. If a technology can replace many employees, surely that technology must be very valuable!
Also, a lot of SaaS software companies charge around $100-$1000 per user/year. But if an AI company can replace an employee who makes $100,000 — or make them 50% more productive — then charging even $10,000 starts to look reasonable. By anchoring not to typical SaaS prices but to salaries of employees, AI companies can charge a lot more.
Additionally, businesses have a strong incentive to talk about layoffs as if they were caused by AI. After all, talking about how they’re using AI to be far more productive with fewer staff makes them look smart. This is a better message than admitting they overhired during the pandemic when capital was abundant due to low interest rates and a massive government financial stimulus.
To be clear, I recognize that AI is causing a lot of people’s work to change. This is hard. This is stressful. (And to some, it can be fun.) I empathize with everyone affected. At the same time, this is very different from predicting a collapse of the job market.
Societies are capable of telling themselves stories for years that have little basis in reality and lead to poor society-wide decision making. For example, fears over nuclear plant safety led to under-investment in nuclear power. Fears of the “population bomb” in the 1960s led countries to implement harsh policies to reduce their populations. And worries about dietary fat led governments to promote unhealthy high-sugar diets for decades.
Now that mainstream media is openly skeptical about the jobpocalypse, I hope these stories will start to lose their teeth (much like fears of AI-driven human extinction have).
Contrary to the predictions of an AI jobpocalypse, I predict the opposite: There will be an AI jobapalooza! AI will lead to a lot more good AI engineering jobs, and I’m also optimistic about the future of the overall job market. What AI engineers do will be different from traditional software engineering, and many of these jobs will be in businesses other than traditional large employers of developers. In non-AI roles, too, the skills needed will change because of AI. That makes this a good time to encourage more people to become proficient in AI, and make sure they’re ready for the different but plentiful jobs of the future!
[Original text in The Batch newsletter.]

English

@sumitkbehal India fabricates numbers.
Most data coming out of India seems fabricated and disassociated with the reality.
English

People were looted on petrol prices for the last decade, the price was hiked to a high price and kept there so that there is no change in price, thereby fabricating inflation data.
White collar workers need to understand that artificial low inflation data leads to low hikes.
RedboxGlobal India@REDBOXINDIA
INDIA CPI (YOY) (APRIL): ACTUAL 3.48% VS 3.40% PREVIOUS EST 3.80%
English

@mxtaverse A government whose only strategy is to tax will make any high flying economy collapse.
But you cant expect more from someone whose main strategy is to divide the people in the name of religion.
English

FIIs sold a billion dollars today on the Indian stock market.
Have you seen the barrage of “mutual fund sahi h” ads on TV?
They want domestic funds so bad.
So bad.
If DIIs inflow stops, then India is headed for a disaster.
FIIs is smart money, they dont care about nationalism
CNBC-TV18@CNBCTV18Live
#FundFlow | FIIs Net Sell ₹8,437.56 Cr While DIIs Net Buy ₹5,939.65 Cr In Equities Today (Provisional)
English

@lawrencekingyo It depends from person to person. Some people like using formal language and mannerisms and some dont, it depends on their upbringing, education, their convenience and personality; has nothing to do with intelligence or success.
English












