Mr Kaplan

@IsraelMFA You invaded their country and slaughtered 13 civilians, burning the flag alone is not enough. Delusional genocidal maniacs.

As long as the Langley agent has disapproval on this, I'll take it as fact.

Palestine is the litmus test, and passing it includes taking a clear stance against Zionism and against Jewish Supremacy. No time for half-assed liberal normalizers during an active genocide. Israel IS the genocide.

A swarm of left wing accounts on this platform are fiercely attacking the legendary scholar Norman Finkelstein over his recent interview, where he rightly rebuked Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens by exposing that the deceptive nature of their criticism of Israel is actually not helping the Palestinian struggle, but is instead actively protecting the transatlantic corporate and state power structures that are squarely responsible for their subjugation. Anyone who actually has the intellectual capacity to follow my geopolitical analyses and essays on this platform can confirm that I have always maintained that this delusional, backwards conspiracy theory that Israel or Bibi Netanyahu is controlling the American empire is completely baseless, and I am highly satisfied to see another seasoned, world-renowned expert finally step out publicly to call out this absolute garbage. According to Finkelstein, the true, material reason that Europe and America unilaterally pledge blind military support and diplomatic allegiance to Israel is Western imperialism and corporate capitalism, not some mystical foreign lobby pulling the strings of Washington. By merely shifting the blame towards "the Jews," "Bibi Netanyahu," or "Jeffrey Epstein" for supposedly manipulating American foreign policy, you are not helping the human rights struggle in Palestine at all. Instead, you are providing a massive ideological shield to American imperialism and the Western oligarchs, who are the active, driving aggressors here, shielding them entirely from legitimate public rage. Now, this is exactly what I have continuously pointed out in my deep analyses of the ongoing US-Iran war. This childish "Israel controls America" narrative does absolutely nothing to help the Palestinian struggle. If anything, you are twisting a genuine, blood-drenched struggle for human rights and territorial dignity into a sick, tabloid conspiracy theory for which neither Tucker Carlson nor Candace Owens has provided a single shred of material proof outside of hearsay and collective delusions. If you truly want to genuinely help the Palestinian struggle, then you must aggressively focus on the US oil majors, the predatory Wall Street asset management firms, and the transatlantic defense contractors. These are the actual corporate cartels that draft the lethal policy papers of American imperialism across the globe. By merely creating crazy, distracting conspiracy theories around the political human meat shields they installed in public offices to absorb the public insults and rage, you are merely protecting their trillion-dollar financial interests, and providing them with the exact diplomatic immunity they need to continue their imperial conquests undisturbed. It seems to me that these internet activists have completely forgotten their own history. When the American journalist Joan Peters wrote her highly celebrated book "From Time Immemorial," she fraudulently claimed that the people living in Palestine today are actually not the indigenous population. Instead, she argued they were merely economic migrants from neighboring Arab states who flowed into the region looking for jobs created by the economic and infrastructural boom of Zionist settlement. This fraudulent book was written specifically to justify Israeli land-grabbing, to delegitimize the Palestinian national identity, and to provide intellectual cover for ethnic cleansing, and it was widely popular among the Western political elite at the time. It was this exact Norman Finkelstein, whom everyone is childishly attacking today, who dedicated years of his life to meticulously reviewing, verifying, and researching over 2,000 footnotes in that book, cross-checking census data from Ottoman and British mandate archives, exposing the fabricated demographic tables, and finally proving beyond a shadow of doubt that all the historical facts and quotations in the book were either outright lies or intentionally taken out of context. It was entirely through his scholarly sacrifice that the book was exposed as an absolute sham, and was later officially acknowledged as a monumental academic fraud even by prominent Israeli historians. In fact, it is practically impossible to find any individual alive today who has sacrificed as much for the Palestinian cause as Norman Finkelstein, yet today he is being foolishly paraded as a sellout simply because he is trying to warn the public against falling for the controlled opposition of figures like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson.

@Rixpoet Even missionaries. David Mulwa writes of children being beaten in Ukambani for school related things( lateness, making a mistake etc) till the parents complained. Asking why they as Africans could discipline their kids without violence but whites couldn't

Knowing what I know now about history and geopolitics, I am amazed at the audacity of Jaramogi and Kaggia. They really tried to undo the damage of colonialism. They were operating in a hostile environment, and that hostility has gone nowhere. It's in the water we drink.

@yningts You got this ❤️

It has now attacked my eyes and my bday is four days away, giving up lowkeyyy

Incase you're having a bad day just rem that Kenya recorded 1,952 child abduct:on and 1,636 missing kids cases from Jan 2025 to March, this year... Jameni, SAVE THE CHILDREN!! 😭

@otile_the_one @Kvaati Brainless cunt, wewe ndio ulipewa uwagawie ama

@Kvaati He sponsored today maandamano

What has he done that has made the president not work?

This is precisely why Bolivia isn't on mainstream news anywhere right now

@OnWingsOfCrazy @TheAgentNDN Low IQ judeo-natzi demon

@TheAgentNDN You’re low IQ.

Israelis do shit like this and when you are horrified they go "just say you hate Jews"

@ratwithglock @SaadInCyber Fuck off with your stupid hypotheticals retarded dumbfuck

@SaadInCyber I said "if" there were you fucking retard. Keep up. Don't avoid answering that heater of a question now.

Correct. You believe Palestinians are oppressed but don't believe in their right to resist by any means necessary, then you are a bigot who supports that oppression.

@ratwithglock @SaadInCyber Hamas has never gone for a mass rape campaign neither is there evidence to support that.

@SaadInCyber If Hamas went on a mass rape campaign like they are accused of do you support that?

@Unimportanz @SaadInCyber Hamas is the only reason Palestinians exist today otherwise demons like Ben Gvir would have bombed them into oblivion and imprisoned the rest.

@SaadInCyber Please explain how Hamas has gotten the Palestinians any closer to any of their stated goals.

@Unimportanz @SaadInCyber They are under the worst brutal occupation possible aided by the world's super powers, how else are they supposed to resist?

@SaadInCyber "any means necessary" and it's the worst possible means to achieve that end.

@Touareg1467794 @Joe__Bassey Bloody idiot spreading your ass cheeks for terrorists and colonizers

@Joe__Bassey C'est la propagande qui a bité votre ministre de défense 🤣

The Western media won’t tell you that these Western, mainly French and Arab-sponsored terrorists below laid down their weapons in Mali 🇲🇱 today. All they do is spread propaganda.

Stop paying attention to that lady. She works for foreign intelligence. Despite her cover story being the alleged owner of some vague business in Senegal that nobody has ever heard of, she's on first name terms with every major tech CEO and defense contractor in America, and she's married to one of those weird Libertarian culture war finance bros. Also she has lived and worked in Israel. She's not ignorant or stupid - she's dangerous. Stop arguing with dangerous people whose clear and obvious mission is ideological subversion. Block and shun aggressively!

@itamarbengvir Hezbollah smoked another terrorist pig. Inshallah 🤲

You claim that Walter Rodney was wrong, but the reasons you provided are completely out of alignment with what Rodney actually described in his pioneering, historically rigorous book, "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa". This intellectual failure clearly proves that you did not even bother to read the very book you are vehemently condemning. Rodney never analyzed the modern African post-colonial state to make the claim that Africa's current poverty can be blamed entirely on them. His analytical focus was strictly on pre-colonial and colonial Africa, documenting how the structures of European capitalism actively dismantled African societies. Before the white colonizers stepped onto the shores of Africa with their gunboats and missionary bibles, Africa was home to powerful, highly organized kingdoms and empires like Mali, Songhai, the Kingdom of Benin, Great Zimbabwe, the Ashanti Empire, and the Kingdom of Kongo. All of these were sovereign African states that functioned with the complexity of modern metropolitan hubs. They had paved roads, highly advanced systems of metallurgy, complex trans-Saharan trade routes, established legal codes, and monumental architecture that stunned early European travelers. These kingdoms made it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for early European traders to engage freely in the slave trade on their own terms. These empires possessed powerful, disciplined armies that routinely captured and killed invading colonial forces because they understood the harsh terrains of the African forests and mountains. This meant the Europeans had to physically break these kingdoms before they could extract the human labor required to meet the quotas set by their corporate shareholders overseas. To this end, European powers began flooding rival, smaller kingdoms and disgruntled provincial vassals with firearms, deliberately instigating civil wars and forcing these smaller factions to invade neighboring empires to capture prisoners of war to sell to the colonizers. The Kingdom of Kongo, for example, had six major provinces governed by vassals under the Manikongo, the central king. But the Portuguese deliberately flooded these provincial governors with guns and military advisors, giving them the weaponry and the incentive to refuse taxes, deny their traditional allegiance to the central crown, and bypass the tributary duties that allowed the Kingdom of Kongo to function as a cohesive, sovereign state. All of this reduced thriving African kingdoms into a manufactured bedrock of continuous violence, destabilization, and civil war. The Kingdom of Kongo, for instance, was systematically carved up and shattered, eventually being reduced to what we know today as Congo and Angola. Europe did not merely dismantle these empires in the name of the Atlantic slave trade; they also systematically destroyed local African industries. They singlehandedly dismantled the highly competitive West African textile mills by flooding the markets with cheap, heavily subsidized fabrics from Manchester, they banned the domestic processing of raw agricultural goods, and they outlawed local iron-smelting to make the entire continent dependent on imported European manufactured wares. Your mention of Singapore as a colony that grew richer than Britain is also fundamentally false and intellectually dishonest on several levels. First, Singapore’s Gross Domestic Product is roughly 500 billion dollars, which is a drop in the ocean compared to Britain’s 3 trillion dollar economy. Secondly, you cannot compare Singapore to the African nations that were colonized, because the structural model of imperialism used by the British Empire to govern these two territories was entirely different. In Africa, the primary, non-negotiable goal of colonization was pure raw material extraction. The British invaded to loot physical resources, such as gold, copper, rubber, cocoa, and cotton, and ship them back to the British metropole. This model stripped the African colonies of their natural wealth, leaving behind absolutely no domestic processing industries, no universal education systems, and no transport networks other than the railway lines built specifically to move raw materials from the interior mines straight to the coast. On the other hand, the British did not colonize Singapore to extract rubber or minerals from its soil, because the island had no natural resources to speak of. Instead, they colonized Singapore to serve as a strategic commercial and naval gateway. They needed a duty-free port to secure vital trade routes between India and China, and to counter Dutch naval dominance in the Malacca Strait. Because of this specific imperial role, the British built a massive, deepwater port, established English common law, and created a centralized administrative and financial infrastructure. Consequently, upon independence, Singapore did not inherit a depleted landscape of empty mines; instead, it inherited a highly functional, globally connected maritime trade hub. When the British formally withdrew, they merely handed the keys of this strategic outpost to the United States. The Americans aggressively used Singapore to support their imperialist war of aggression against the people of Vietnam. They used the island to refuel fighter jets, repair warships, stockpile heavy munitions, and house military personnel. Because of this strategic role, the US military and its corporate allies built a massive, state-of-the-art petroleum refining infrastructure in Singapore to process Middle Eastern crude into the jet fuel, diesel, and napalm required to sustain the relentless devastation of Vietnam. Even after the United States was humiliated and forced out of Vietnam, they did not abandon the Singapore project. American and Western multinational corporations happily transferred high-tech manufacturing technologies to Singapore, built massive skyscrapers, and integrated the island into the global supply chain. This is because Singapore is precious to Western capitalists as a premier tax haven, where they can set up shell companies, launder illicit corporate wealth, and dodge billions of dollars in taxes. Your mention of Switzerland is equally fraudulent. It is historically true that the Swiss did not formally send military gunboats to Africa, and they never held official overseas colonies under a Swiss flag. But even without a formal colonial office, Swiss banks, city-states, elite merchants, and mercenary soldiers were deeply embedded in, and profited immensely from, the European colonial system. Swiss financial institutions and local cantons invested heavily in joint-stock colonial enterprises like the South Sea Company, which held the absolute monopoly on transporting enslaved Africans to Spanish America. Furthermore, when enslaved people in Haiti rose up in a glorious revolution against French colonial rule in 1800, Napoleon Bonaparte deployed hundreds of Swiss mercenaries to brutally suppress the rebellion and attempt to re-enslave the population. So during the slave trade, the Swiss happily pocketed massive profits from chattel slavery by serving as the quiet financial and logistical backbone of the trade. And even after brave African revolutionaries fought hard and made the slave trade too expensive for Europeans to manage, forcing the formal abolition of slavery, the Swiss continued to line their pockets with wealth extracted from Africa. Today, Switzerland is where Western oil and mining conglomerates set up complex networks of shell companies. They hire armies of elite corporate lawyers and ruthless accountants to draft fraudulent transfer-pricing reports that allow them to conceal their massive African profits, ensuring they pay little to no taxes to their host African nations. Meanwhile, secretive Swiss banking vaults serve as the ultimate safe havens for billions of dollars in looted public funds smuggled out by corrupt African comprador elites, and Swiss trading houses in Zug and Geneva dominate the global trade of African gold, oil, and cocoa without ever physically touching a single gram of the raw material. The fact remains that you did not read the book, and this is precisely why you rushed to unleash such an embarrassing, historically ignorant statement on the development of Africa. I am equally certain that you have never bothered to read about visionary revolutionary leaders like Thomas Sankara, Kwame Nkrumah, and Patrice Lumumba, who fought relentlessly against Western imperialism but were systematically assassinated, betrayed, or forced out of power by Western-backed operatives. You clearly ignore how Patrice Lumumba’s body was literally dissolved in acid by Belgian agents to erase his physical memory, how Thomas Sankara was betrayed and brutally murdered under French supervision to halt the Burkinabé agrarian revolution, and how Kwame Nkrumah was overthrown in a meticulously planned, CIA-funded coup just as he was unifying the African continent against neo-colonialism. Furthermore, I am positive you have never analyzed the predatory terms of trade enforced by the World Trade Organisation, which systematically penalizes African nations with crushing tariffs, trade barriers, and economic sanctions if they dare to process their own raw materials locally. Under this highly engineered tariff escalation model, the WTO ensures that raw African cocoa, unprocessed gold, and crude oil enter Western markets with zero import duties, but the moment an African nation attempts to refine that oil, process that cocoa into chocolate, or smelt that gold into jewelry, they are hit with astronomical, protectionist tariffs designed to keep African economies permanently locked at the bottom of the global value chain as cheap, disposable suppliers for European and American corporations. They punish industrialization while rewarding raw material dependency, forcing Africa to export its wealth for peanuts only to buy it back at a thousand times the price. If you had ever bothered to educate yourself on these historical realities, your heavy colonial chains would have been shattered, you would have been liberated from this pathetic state of mental slavery, and you would not be spending your limited intellectual energy undermining the very book that exposed the genocidal, systemic crimes of the empires that traded your own ancestors like mere commodities on a global balance sheet.