Despot mini

@Anton__BTC @btcefe Yes, nicely said.

Elon is likely aware of things most of us aren't. I replied to @btcefe earlier, but didn't have time to elaborate, why I think universal income isn't socialist shit. It's actually much worse, IMO. Banking cartel and their Wall Street thugs will try to establish a modern style feudalism IMO. The new world order has been in making for a long time. UN likely a failed attempt. The banking cartel changed with people leading it, thus the concepts of how to establish the New World Order changed with them and with advances in technology. This book explains that they have been preparing to take the whole world for decades: thegreattaking.com My take is that they know that fiat is done and will initiate a planned destruction of current financial system, in form of cascading events, causing the most severe financial crisis ever. All with single intent, to legally take the whole world as a collateral and install feudalism 2.0. Feudalism 2.0 will further allow them to install CBDCs and a total control over anybody. So people will basically have to comply, to eat. Once the CBDCs are fully in place, the universal income becomes reality and will likely be low, as low UBI allows for better control. There's only one way to fight that: Bitcoin, as money! All attempts to coopt Bitcoin via miners, devs and spammers, are just part of the plan. No problem for them if coopting Bitcoin fails, as CBDCs will allow them to end all Bitcoin exchanges (on/off ramps). Bitcoin will become black market money, and will allow plebs to resist the feudalism 2.0... ... if Bitcoin remains money ! Run BIP110, run Datum, mine like there's no tomorrow.

@mattkratter And we despise them!

Shitcoin Core despises its own users

@Babygravy9 Ruthlessly.... dispatched.

A black criminal who livestreamed the three-day torture of a disabled 17-year-old white boy has been arrested again for another attack targeting a white person. Tesfaye Cooper, 30, served seven years for the 2017 attack. Animals like this should be ruthlessly locked away.

@oomahq @moonbootspleb @allenf32 Nice post mortem...not that it deserved any, but still

@moonbootspleb @DespotMini86110 @allenf32 Allen was joking when he called me a distributed authoritarian. I got the joke but Despot didn't and he thought I was dunking on Allen. I didn't get that Despot thought I was dunking on Allen, and I replied to him as if he meant GMax.

bip110 strikes me as the nuclear option fallout of this absolutely batshit insane exchange, which everybody seems to have forgotten about and I think deserves more critical attention: groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c…

@oomahq @allenf32 My god, you completely obliterated the guy.

@allenf32 Why, thank you 🫡

Since 2025 we learned, that coretards: - don't run nodes, - don't hash, - don't mine, - can't tell the difference between hashing and mining, - have zero clue where the mining pools get hashrate from. A complete and utter coretard ignorance on full display.

@BTCBreadMan Sit down, imbecile. Nobody needs your shit for brains opinion.

Watching the pro-BIP 110 retards and the pro-BIP 361 retards arguing with each other about who is more retarded while they both try to fuck up Bitcoin in different ways is a truly bizarre experience.

@BitcoinArchive That guy is just a punk. Not to be taken seriously, just like todd and back. All compromised.

Cypherpunk Jameson Lopp and other Bitcoin developers propose BIP-361 to freeze quantum vulnerable wallets. This could lock dormant BTC like Satoshi Nakamoto’s 1.1M coins, now worth $74B, before quantum computers can steal them.

@GrassFedBitcoin They try so hard, don't they?

Day 9 of me laughing at people attempting to conflate cloud mining with paying a third party to point hashrate to your mining node.

@eemi666 @dathon_ohm @BlueDavid Clown opinion.

@dathon_ohm @BlueDavid Support without reflecting deep economic commitment or miner buy-in. It's a form of astroturf. Real consensus should come from hash power, miners who secure the chain, and economic nodes, users/businesses with skin in the game, not just a surge of hobbyist signalling nodes.

Congratulations once again to 234 Alberta and @BlueDavid! BIP-110 signaling continues heating up...

@moonbootspleb He is here to destroy bitcoin as we know it. Never listen to that lowlife.

This tweet alone disqualifies me from ever caring about what Peter Todd has to say.

@rodpalmerhodl You utter clown xD

bitaxe runners have earned their seat at the table. they have equity in bitcoin consensus. hash renting plebs do not.

@marsspitsbarz Fuck off, clown.

It takes 32.4 GB of data to cause plebs to crash out. We’ve become so weak.

@marsspitsbarz Pussy ass fgt crying about hash. Great stuff.

Renting hash is homo

@_BitcoinCapital @mattkratter Dumbass much?

According to the grifter @Mattkratter telling plebs to cloudmine at a loss; "Spammers & scammers are focused on taking other people's money. Real Bitcoiners are willing to use their own money to help secure the Bitcoin network" Me-" Luke & Mechanic are not willing to... " 🤔🤣

@JohnCarreyrou Clown show.

The mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous inventor of Bitcoin, has remained unsolved for 17 years. Not anymore. Read my 18-month investigation to find out who Satoshi really is. nytimes.com/2026/04/08/bus…

@boomer_btc @BarefootMining Great stuff. Kudos for doing the good work.

A new BIP-110 signaling block for @BarefootMining. This is our third and the fifth overall.

@Anton__BTC Karma indeed.

Karma is a bitch.

@Anton__BTC None whatsoever. Can wait to rug all of them fools.

Maple below thinks, limiting spam with BIP110, while not enabling anyone to profit on it, is the worst thing that can happen to Bitcoin. Do you still have any doubts about running a BIP110 node?

@namcios @BitcoinBeachBR @bitcoincoreorg @BitcoinConfed Another clown with a shitty opinion. Get lost, fool.

I’m sorry Fernando. I love you and everything that you’re doing in CE, but this is NOT correct. I’m happy to chat with you about this anytime offline, but this is based on false information which has been propagated tirelessly via unfounded, opinionated claims. Do NOT listen to Mechanic.

Hello @bitcoincoreorg, We live Bitcoin. We dedicate our lives to it, full time, nonstop. On the ground, we work as part of Bitcoin’s invisible team, often without salaries, simply because we believe in its power to fix money and defend society from injustice and authoritarianism. Bitcoin is beautiful. But it can also become fragile, outdated, or even corrupted, if we do not care for it with the seriousness it deserves. The white paper begins with the words: “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.” Not a decentralized database. That distinction matters. Developers must lower their time preference and think in terms of centuries, not release cycles. Bitcoin is a cash system designed for global adoption in commerce. That was Satoshi’s vision. Originally, in 2014 Bitcoin Core introduced OP_RETURN with a 40-byte limit. In 2015 this was raised to 80 bytes, and in 2016 clarified as an 83-byte script length. For nearly a decade the rule stayed unchanged. Then, in 2024 with Core v29, the policy was relaxed to allow multiple OP_RETURN outputs per transaction, although each remained capped at 80 bytes. Now, with Core v30 (2025), the long-standing cap itself has been removed entirely: OP_RETURN outputs are no longer bound to 80 bytes, and multiple OP_RETURNs per transaction are allowed, bounded only by general transaction-weight (~100,000 vbytes) and block-weight (4 MB) limits. This is extremely risky. By first allowing multiple OP_RETURNs (v29) and now eliminating the explicit size cap (v30), Core normalizes and facilitates behavior that was once discouraged. It opens the door to spam, bloat, and malicious use cases. It allows attackers to inject unwanted or even illegal content directly on-chain, potentially exposing node operators to liability. Users should have the freedom to filter what they host, but Core should not encourage practices that turn Bitcoin into a data-storage network. Yes, arbitrary data can already be forced onto the blockchain in different ways. But these policy changes transform a fringe misuse into a legitimized practice, encouraging precisely the kind of abuse that poses systemic risks. A public-opinion crisis, triggered by toxic or illegal content, could cause catastrophic damage to adoption and market confidence. Bitcoin is money. Just as you can scribble a short note on a banknote but not publish a book on it, Bitcoin transactions can carry limited messages but should not be hijacked for unrelated purposes. If protocol development drifts toward use cases that weaken Bitcoin as cash, the consequences will be severe. The network is already signaling concern: voices like @BitcoinKnots resonate because Bitcoiners are smart, technical, and willing to act when needed to protect the network. We have already built important advancements to secure Bitcoin’s long-term future. Let us not undo this progress. Let us stay true to the vision: Bitcoin as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system.