Jaime Lopez
29.3K posts

Jaime Lopez
@DevWithTheHair
Principal Developer Advocate @JH_Fintech | https://t.co/wbkXnXAASs
Seattle, WA Katılım Kasım 2011
1.4K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Jaime Lopez retweetledi
Jaime Lopez retweetledi

@agingroy 🎯
“While U.S. adults get faster from A to B while using a car studies show that their speed slows down as soon as they stop using cars”
English
Jaime Lopez retweetledi

Stop a statin and your LDL cholesterol rises 30% in four days. Nobody writes a WSJ feature about it. Stop certain blood pressure medications and your BP can spike within hours. Nobody calls it a design flaw.
Levothyroxine, antidepressants, insulin, metformin, antihistamines. Chronic treatments for chronic conditions, and all of them stop working when you stop taking them. None of them generate think-pieces questioning whether patients should have started.
The AMA classified obesity as a disease in 2013. Thirteen years later, it’s still the only chronic condition where “you have to take it forever” is framed as an argument against treatment rather than a description of how medicine works.
The Wall Street Journal@WSJ
While nearly 18% of U.S. adults have taken a GLP-1 drug for weight loss or to treat a chronic condition, about half of people will stop taking it within a year. Often, they don’t understand what is likely to come next. 🔗: on.wsj.com/4dCkbia
English

@GergelyOrosz AI-washing over hiring, plus tokens cost a lot of money which needs to come from somewhere (not the annual new mega yacht fund, of course)
English
Jaime Lopez retweetledi
Jaime Lopez retweetledi

“Every month more than 2 million people ask ChatGPT financial questions” Now it’s powered by @Plaid @zachperret #sponsored
I’m at Plaid #Effects2026 seeing the launch of Plaid’s latest AI powered #IntelligentFinance capabilities
English

The bank W is that the EO doesn’t require them to collect citizenship data. But the banks are gonna have to hold the L of a Republican administration granting new powers to the CFPB via Executive Order, a precedent I’m sure no Democratic President will happily pile on to.
Eleanor Mueller@Eleanor_Mueller
❗️A CFPB spox tells me it’s already moved forward with its portion of the EO — a sign it plans to wield its new authorities as aggressively as possible. Officials today submitted a rule for review called “statement on ability to repay and immigration status,” the spox said. semafor.com/article/05/19/…
English
Jaime Lopez retweetledi

it’s in gemini, just create it in ai studio. oh, that’s for your personal google one account. for workspace you need gemini business. no, not gemini advanced, that’s ai pro now. unless you need ai ultra. oh agents? you do that in spark actually. no, not gemini api managed agents, that’s different. for coding use jules. unless you mean the agentic ide, that’s antigravity. no, that’s the old antigravity, download the new one. actually gemini cli is being deprecated, use antigravity cli. no the flash model is smarter than the pro model. unless you need pro. if it’s video, use flow. no, flow uses veo. no, nano banana is images. actually that’s in gemini now. unless you’re in search, then it’s ai mode. no, research is notebooklm. anyway it’s all very simple.
English

@girlie_mac I didn’t know that seals came in the color green, but my AI assistant says that’s a natural thing to happen until they molt, show their dark coat again, and the cycle begins anew.
English

@maiab Nodding my head in agreement.
Folks don’t understand that ‘smart + hard working’ is just a part of the preparation. It’s table stakes, not a differentiator.
The differentiator is the ‘luck’. Which only matters if the ‘smart’ + ‘hard work’ has been put in already.
English

I’ve talked about this with friends a lot. I’ve made a lot of money in tech — because I am smart, and hard working, but also because I got lucky. There is a fair amount of chance preceding most success and it makes rich people so uncomfortable, so squirmy, because they have more and maybe they don’t deserve to. so they swing towards focusing on “meritocratic” and trying to prove they DESERVE what they have because otherwise it’s too awkward to say look, my house is nicer than yours because I happened to be in the right place at the right time. I don’t worry about opportunities or schooling or care for my kids, I don’t worry about healthcare costs, I don’t look at price tags because the dice shook out in a nice way for me.
It’s a slightly different riff on the long standing complaint that tech millionaires don’t build libraries. they — we I guess — seem to have no sense of obligation or duty in their new roles. perhaps fueled from our society’s broad allergies to obligation.

Will Manidis@WillManidis
English

@AlexH_Johnson What if there was…a system for warning early, which was available for banks?
That would help them…clear the house.
Just my two cents. (I’ll see myself out)
English

Banks want to blame Facebook for their scam problem, arguing that scams originate upstream from where they sit and that “the payment itself is often the final step” and is difficult to stop.
It’s true that it is very difficult to stop a customer from paying a scammer in the moment. However, the argument that this is a problem for Facebook to solve rather than the banks is bullshit.
While Facebook is certainly negligent on scams and needs to clean up its platform, the payment itself is not the first and only opportunity banks have to stop the scam.
You know why?
THE SCAMMERS HAVE BANK ACCOUNTS!
Take Zelle as the example. Zelle is a closed network. It requires that the sender and the receiver both have bank accounts at banks that offer Zelle. This means that the bad guys have Zelle-capable bank accounts. They were KYC’d by Zelle banks. They receive stolen funds, instantly, into their Zelle-capable bank accounts.
There is a lot that the banks and Zelle could do to stop (or at least slow down) these receiving accounts, but the uncomfortable truth is that they don’t really have an incentive to do that. Scammers are customers. They generate fee income. They contribute deposits that the banks lend against.
Until you make banks liable for fraud on authorized transactions resulting from scams, you won’t see what types of scam prevention miracles (including on the receiver side) the banks are truly capable of.
English

@jamesqquick Or, alternatively, not enough?
There’s a sea of faces out there in thumbnails, and this, while good!, *could* be more hyped.
English
Jaime Lopez retweetledi
Jaime Lopez retweetledi
Jaime Lopez retweetledi
Jaime Lopez retweetledi
Jaime Lopez retweetledi
Jaime Lopez retweetledi




















