Dexter

131 posts

Dexter

Dexter

@Dexter_FrendLes

Collectivists took my i

Katılım Şubat 2024
1 Takip Edilen4 Takipçiler
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
Alberta isn't leaving. There is no legal authority for a province to unilaterally secede from Canada without a change in the Constitution of Canada. As per Reference Re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 SCR 217. It would be ridiculous to believe the rest of Canada would vote to give Alberta away. Here is the part of the Clarity Act, an act codifying the above Supreme Court of Canada ruling, that is relevant: 3 (1) It is recognized that there is no right under the Constitution of Canada to effect the secession of a province from Canada unilaterally and that, therefore, an amendment to the Constitution of Canada would be required for any province to secede from Canada, which in turn would require negotiations involving at least the governments of all of the provinces and the Government of Canada. Further, here is a passage on page 221 of the Supreme Court decision referenced above referencing Quebec but applies to all provinces: "Quebec could not, despite a clear referendum result, purport to invoke a right of self-determination to dictate the terms of a proposed secession to the other parties to the federation. The democratic vote, by however strong a majority, would have no legal effect on its own and could not push aside the principles of federalism and the rule of law, the rights of individuals and minorities, or the operation of democracy in the other provinces or in Canada as a whole." So why are so many separatists under the false impression that they are seceding? The face of this movement stands to gain immensely. in the process, regardless the outcome. Threatening to leave Canada, when it is Canada that decides if you leave is ______?
English
0
0
0
0
Alex of Alberta 🆎
Alex of Alberta 🆎@WesternIndepen1·
Independence for Alberta. We've tried everything else. You can't heal people who don't want to heal. Most Canadians think Canada is perfect and want it to be this way forever. Or at least until it's gone. Alberta doesn't have to go. Alberta can rise to greatness as an independent country. God willing 🙏.
English
10
17
41
846
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
Objectively: Hard to quantify his success yet cause I know some of the challenges he faces and they are not small by any means. Time will tell. Regardless, do you think it is a coincidence that the leaders of the US and CA are business class, their first elected position is the top position in their respective countries? Now that the US dollar is on the petro-dollar, what did you think Venezuela was about, is it a coincidence that Carney happens to have experience in Central banking?
English
0
0
0
14
Concerned Canadian
Concerned Canadian@Concern70732755·
Who joins me in saying an unequivocal yes ! 🤚🤚🤚
Concerned Canadian tweet media
English
531
253
1.8K
16K
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
Alberta isn't leaving. The rest of Canada is not going to vote to give Alberta away in the required Constitutional amendment. There is no lawful authority, neither national nor internationally, for a province to unilaterally secede from Canada without a change in the Constitution of Canada, which would require a vote from the rest of the provinces. This is Constitutional fact. As a matter of fact Alberta would be giving all the provinces and the federal government a blank cheque to grift the process with committees (remember COVID) and court cases that would last a decade(No grain of sand unturned). Alberta would be bankrupt before the rest of Canada voted no to the amendment. Further, the face of this separatist movement stands to gain immensely, from the process, regardless the outcome. Threatening to secede from Canada when it is the rest of Canada that decides if you secede is_____?
English
0
0
0
2
Yukon Strong 🫎
Yukon Strong 🫎@YukonStrong·
You'd think the PM and the Premier would offer concessions, electoral changes, tax relief ...listen to western concerns ...address them Nope. They respond with fear, instead of fairness It will never change Alberta. YOU MUST #WEXIT
Yukon Strong 🫎 tweet media
English
44
273
901
7.3K
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
Nope! It would bankrupt Alberta. Alberta would be giving a blank cheque to all the provinces and federal government to grift in committees and court cases for what will likely take 10 years (no sand grain unturned). Alberta will be bankrupt before the other provinces vote NO in the required Constitutional amendment. Bankrupt and still a province in Canada. Further, the face of this separatist movement stands to gain immensely, in the process, regardless the outcome. So why do you want to destroy Alberta if you claim to love it so much?
English
0
0
0
1
James Dueck🇻🇦
James Dueck🇻🇦@JamesDueck·
Alberta independence would trigger a much-needed reset for all of Canada.
English
19
48
492
5K
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
LOL! Nope. You must not be aware of the new AI technology available. You would be like animals in a lab with electrodes plugged into your head. The only thing you would accomplish is destroying Alberta and becoming entertainment for the rest of Canada on youtubes and X; at your expense. Separatists couldn't make it easier though, lol! Hope you change your mind, but if not, don't forget to wave to the cameras, I will be watching on youtubes and X 👋
English
0
0
0
3
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
Maybe so, but the only thing this separatist movement will accomplish is destroying Alberta. Alberta would be giving all the provinces and federal government a blank cheque to grift the process with committees and court cases for what will likely take 10 years (every grain of sand). Alberta would be bankrupt before the rest of Canada votes NO to the required Constitutional amendment. The face of this separatist movement stands to gain immensely, in the process, regardless the outcome, as well.
English
0
0
0
2
#ABFree
#ABFree@ABFreeAlberta·
Canada's running a scam on #Alberta forcing eastern pension plans to divest Alberta investments so Carney can claim separation is to blame. In reality Carney is killing ALL private investment in Canada. The only way for Alberta to survive is separation & realignment with the #USA
English
17
28
105
964
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
400 billion? LOL! Alberta would be giving all the provinces and federal government a blank cheque to grift the process for what could take 10 years (every grain of sand). The end result is Alberta would be bankrupt before the rest of Canada voted NO to the required constitutional amendment. Further, the face of the separatist movement stands to gain immensely, in the process, regardless the outcome. The only thing separatism will accomplish is destroying Alberta.
English
1
0
0
27
MadMatt
MadMatt@Doubletapp187·
Can anyone in the @Alberta_UCP tell me why it only cost newfoundland 150 million in nation start up costs in 1907 vs the "400 billion" it would cost Albertans in 2026? That 400 billion number seems detached from reality. That 150 million is in today's numbers.
English
19
6
58
1.6K
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
So what is the plan after the rest of Canada votes NO to the required Constitutional amendment? Alberta isn't going anywhere. Not to mention that Alberta would be giving all the provinces a blank cheque to grift the process with committees and court cases for what could take 10 years(every grain of sand) leaving Alberta bankrupt before the rest of Canada votes no to the amendment. What is the objective again cause it certainly isn't in Alberta's interests.
English
0
0
0
109
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
Are you really comparing the exit from a supra-national state to a province wanting to secede from a country? 1. Alberta is not leaving. The rest of Canada is not going to vote to give Alberta away in the required Constitutional amendment. That would be ridiculous to believe. 2. Alberta would be giving all the provinces and the federal government a blank cheque to grift with committees and court cases for what could take a decade (no grain of sand unturned). The result: Alberta bankrupt before the rest of Canada votes No to provincial secession on the amendment. What is the objective again?
English
0
0
1
5
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
@TruthTrumpPost I figured this out in 2008 after watching the US treasury since 2003. Capitalism's largest milestone, sadly. Until now!!!! Thank-You Mr. Trump
English
0
0
0
506
Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial
JUST NOW: President Trump says communism represents the greatest threat to the United States!! According to Trump, it is the greatest threat since World War I, World War II, Pearl Harbor, and 9/11. Communism promises that the government will give people everything they want. But that promise comes at a cost—taking wealth and property from those who earned it.
English
255
571
2.1K
88.1K
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
Who cares? Alberta isn't going anywhere, the rest of Canada is not going to vote to give Alberta away in the required Constitutional amendment. Alberta would be giving all the provinces and federal government a blank cheque to grift for what could take 10 years (no grain of sand unturned) with committees and court cases. with The final result being Alberta bankrupt and still a province in Canada. Its not just the governments either, the face of the separatist movement stands to gain immensely, in the process, regardless the outcome.
English
0
0
2
9
David Krayden
David Krayden@DavidKrayden·
Art Hanger explains why he believes Alberta should be independent.
English
10
60
186
2.7K
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
But legal secession will not be possible. The rest of Canada is not going to vote to give Alberta away in the required Constitutional amendment. That would be ridiculous to believe. So you are left with only an unlawful attempt at secession. With the new AI surveillance technology all you will accomplish is entertainment for the rest of Canada on youtube and X at the your expense. So what are you fighting for ? Because it ain't freedom brother!
English
0
0
1
43
Michael Kosterman
Michael Kosterman@MichaelKosterm2·
Call me a traitor, call me a separatist, call me whatever you want, but what I truly am is a freedom fighter. Freedom is worth fighting for. If it wasn't then hundreds of millions of people would not have given their lives for it throughout history. Call the enemy what you want, globalists, communists, liberals, woke or even spawns of the devil, but whatever they are I will never let them take my freedom away without a fight. I will fight to my dying breath to preserve what God/or whatever higher power you acknowledge, has given us, the right to live free. Join the Alberta independence movement now and stand up for freedom with us. Canada is finished. If you want to be free, you need to be here, move here. Together we will live the life we were meant to live, with a distinct culture, identity, pride and most of all... patriotism. Long live My Alberta Home
Michael Kosterman tweet media
English
108
230
801
6.7K
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
@JayGenXer I think that is the translator for her viewers. 😛
English
0
0
1
780
222 Minutes
222 Minutes@222Minutes·
This is what is called a strawman argument. No one is saying separation will be quick, easy, or cheap. What we're saying is that it necessary despite the costs.
Vote to Stay@VotetoStayAB

.@SunLorneGunter nails it👇 "I'd like to see the separatists' own projections, not simply hear their reassurances that separation will be quick, easy and cheap. Such claims just don't make sense. The Quebec separatist movement has always had its own academic economists to offer estimates of what independence would mean for Quebec government finances and for the province's economy. Where are the Alberta separatists' economists?" #abpoli #cdnpoli #votetostay edmontonjournal.com/opinion/column…

English
19
28
217
5.3K
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
You just told us that you are going to be an unlawful separatist. You couldn't make the job easier for enforcement! LOL! Tracking, herding, and a whole basket full of new AI technologies. Yes maybe I do have a blood lust for unlawful traitors. Especially when they want to destroy Alberta! Good Luck! ROFL!
English
0
0
0
2
Occupant 9
Occupant 9@9Occupant61029·
@Dexter_FrendLes @222Minutes Canada has a legal process even if you don't think so. Ask Quebec x2. I've been wanting this since 1980, since Pierre Trudeau's NEP sabotage. As for AI tracking, tracking you too. Your other comments, creepy bloodlust totalitarianism, demonstrate why independence is necessary.
English
1
0
0
6
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
So you are suggesting an unlawful secession. ok, I personally do not think you appreciate the new AI surveillance technology that is available today. Venezuela is the floor in capabilities these technologies have. You would be like an animal in a lab with an electrode attached to your head. It is that impactful. I hope you change your mind, but if not, wave to the cameras I will be watching on youtubes and X. You know that euphoria you get when ICE takes down a hard core criminal, it will be even better watching the unlawful separatists, don't forget to wave 👋
English
2
0
0
5
Occupant 9
Occupant 9@9Occupant61029·
@Dexter_FrendLes @222Minutes Quebec set the legal precedent but didn't meet the 50+1 threshold but came close. I have no problem w Quebec separation, at all, and they are preparing to hold another referendum. The ROC is irrelevant, in spades. You are not our jailers, even if you think you are.
English
1
0
0
8
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
I expect you to check my references and consider them like an adult in a debate. This is an adult decision that could have consequences for multiple generations. For Alberta, yourself, friends, and family. It is not a joke. The only people that will benefit from this process is the face of the separatist movement and provincial and federal government grifters; all in the process that Alberta will be paying for. Alberta would be handing all the provinces and federal government a blank check for them to grift with committees and courts which would likely take a decade (every grain of sand). This in no way resolves Albertans grievances. It is cutting your nose off to spite your face. But thank-you for coming out and saying you are prepared for an unlawful secession, nobody else would. Hope you change your mind, if not, smile for the cameras, I will be watching on X and youtubes.
English
0
0
0
6
Akhilles
Akhilles@akhillesart·
@Dexter_FrendLes @JasonLavigneAB Laugh all you want buddy. Apparently, we should all just give up, because according to you, secession is impossible. Some random internet troll thinks he is a constitutional lawyer... LOL What part of "we reject the constitution" do you not understand?
English
1
0
0
8
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
LOL! Nope! Paragraph 155 of Reference Re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 SCR 217. and the Clarity Act ,which codifies the Supreme Court decision, make it quite clear that there is no authority for a province to unilaterally secede from Canada without a change in the Constitution of Canada. Clarity Act: Constitutional amendments 3 (1) It is recognized that there is no right under the Constitution of Canada to effect the secession of a province from Canada unilaterally and that, therefore, an amendment to the Constitution of Canada would be required for any province to secede from Canada, which in turn would require negotiations involving at least the governments of all of the provinces and the Government of Canada. Has COVID not taught you nothing!? Further in the 1998 SCC ruling page 221: "Quebec could not, despite a clear referendum result, purport to invoke a right of self-determination to dictate the terms of a proposed secession to the other parties to the federation. The democratic vote, by however strong a majority, would have no legal effect on its own and could not push aside the principles of federalism and the rule of law, the rights of individuals and minorities, or the operation of democracy in the other provinces or in Canada as a whole."
English
1
0
0
17
Akhilles
Akhilles@akhillesart·
@Dexter_FrendLes @JasonLavigneAB That's not how it works. Read the 1998 reference case on secession. No such constitutional change is needed. Secession is a repudiation of the existing constitutional order.
English
1
0
0
16
Dexter
Dexter@Dexter_FrendLes·
Its more like: If you do not want to bankrupt Alberta don't invoke Constitutional negotiations on secession. It would be like Alberta handing a blank cheque to the rest of the provinces and federal government. The grift through the committees and court cases alone could take ten years (every grain of sand) before the rest of the provinces votes no to the required constitutional amendment. Guess who is paying for it all? Which leaves Alberta bankrupt and still a province in Canada. What is the objective exactly?
English
0
0
0
6