Commander Zolfaghari

@re2max @humph09 @InfidelHL @XMRVoid You can get an anonymous crypto debit card on goblincards.com Also theres plenty of reputable p2p's

@DirectorOfNATO @humph09 @InfidelHL @XMRVoid You still have to exchange e-coins for fiat. Do those transactions not end up with the feds using the same mechanism?

CREATOR OF ‘ONLYFAKE’ ARRESTED DUE TO TRACING OF HIS CRYPTO TO EXCHANGES FOR ONLY $15 YOU COULD CREATE A FAKE ID THAT PASSED ALL CEX EXCHANGES LIKE KUCOIN, MEXC ETC THE ONLY REASON WHY HE WAS CAUGHT WAS BECAUSE HE DIDNT ACCEPT MONERO. IN THE BIG 26’ WE STILL HAVE PEOPLE BEING ARRESTED BECAUSE THEY REFUSE TO JUST DOWNLOAD @cakewallet AND USE $XMR LOL justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/c…

@hetmehtaa Idk, let me check twitter

Is X down?

@zacxbt With and without internet

anthropic deleted openclaw from claude's brain

@stacy_muur I'm from the EU and I literally get my crypto within seconds when I buy it with my bank account.

If you live in the EU and have ever tried to bridge between crypto <> fiat, you'll understand what I'm talking about. You wire money to an exchange via SEPA, wait a few days to finalize the transaction, buy your tokens, and then withdraw them to your own wallet. Fees at every step, multiple days before you actually hold anything. The same goes for offramping, often even worse & longer. @WeChangeApp is here to make fiat <> crypto bridging as seamless as possible. You KYC once, pick what you want to buy, and once your wire clears, the crypto goes straight to your wallet in minutes. It's fully noncustodial, so no platform is sitting on your funds in between. It's fully regulated in the EU with an MiCA license. The infrastructure itself runs on Bridge for payment rails and Fireblocks for security. If you're in the EU and the current system annoys you, worth a look.

@DBCrypt0 Actually both of them freeze coins. None of them are trustworthy. Use $DAI, they can't freeze tokens and are pretty much accepted on every exchange.

Tether froze the funds Circle did not Which do you support?

@notgrubles If my quantum computer can guess your key, your key isn't yours, it's OURS.

A quantum computer able to steal bitcoins does not grant you legal immunity lol.

@Adidotdev Still using it to this day for my torrents, love it

"an app with 0 haters" i'll go first:

@Ghostbanned7 @ourcryptotalk 😂

That chart says "Transaction Finality Times" and puts Kaspa at ~10 sec with zero explanation of where that number comes from. Kaspa runs at 10 blocks per second with GHOSTDAG, meaning practical finality hits in under a second. So whoever made this either has no idea how Kaspa works or just cooked the numbers. Before your NANO ass continues... XNO has fast finality on a good day, but it's a dead chain with barely any ecosystem, no smart contracts, no development traction, and a validator set so centralized it makes people nervous. Speed means nothing if nobody's building on it or using it. Kaspa is fast, decentralized, and actually has a roadmap.

How Fast Is Your Chain? $SEI : 390 ms $KTA : 400 ms $S : 720 ms $APT : ~900 ms $QUBIC : ~2 sec $KAS : ~10 sec $SOL : 12.8 sec $ETH : 12 min 48 sec What Did I Miss?

Calling a prediction a fact doesn't make it one, it just makes you sound desperate. The spreadsheet shows how much adoption Kaspa needs, not proof that it can never get there. Those are two completely different things and the fact that you can't tell the difference is genuinely embarrassing. You've been doom posting about Kaspa for what looks like years based on your timeline, same spreadsheet, same hashtag, same funeral predictions. Still waiting for the funeral. Still watching Kaspa do $38 million daily while Nano does $294k. Maybe put this energy into actually promoting XNO instead of obsessing over a chain you claim is already dead. What does that say about you honestly. $XNO is a dead chain.

@DirectorOfNATO @ourcryptotalk > "Your entire argument hinges on adoption never arriving before the security budget gets too thin" Correct > " That's a prediction, not a fact." No, it's a fact. This proves you haven't actually read the spreadsheet, otherwise you'd have a sense of how much adoption it NEEDS

5.6% cut in 17 days. Genuinely terrifying stuff 😱. Bitcoin miners have survived halving events that cut income by 50% overnight and the network is still here with a trillion dollar market cap. You're out here acting like a 5.6% scheduled reduction is the apocalypse. And the replacement fees argument assumes the price stays exactly where it is, hashrate stays exactly where it is, and zero new adoption happens in the meantime. Every variable frozen in place just to make your doomer math work. Meanwhile Nano loses 0% of miner income every semitone because there are no miners. Incredible security model. Truly the future of money. $294k daily volume and not a single semitone cut in sight. Groundbreaking stuff. $XNO is a dead chain.

@DirectorOfNATO @ourcryptotalk Nope - that's the next Semitone Slashing of miner income. #Kaspa $KAS miners lose 5.6% in 17 days 20 hours. That's $5,106.78/day at today's price. It won't be replaced by $5.106.78/day in user fees.

"Never" isn't a timeline, it's a mood. Come back with a date, a model, an actual falsifiable prediction. Until then you're just a Nano bag holder yelling into the void while his chain does $294k a day. Ten years and that's the best you've got. Never is a long time to be this irrelevant. $XNO is a dead chain.

@DirectorOfNATO @ourcryptotalk > "can never... No timeline" What part of "never" did you not understand as a timeline?

"Literally impossible" said with zero mathematical proof is just a feeling with extra confidence. Show the actual model. Show the adoption curve that makes it impossible. Show why Kaspa specifically can never reach sufficient fee volume when you just admitted the whole crypto space is still early. You're stating impossibility like it's a theorem while providing nothing but a spreadsheet and a catchphrase. Nano achieving meaningful adoption is also literally impossible apparently, given 10 years of evidence. At least Kaspa's impossibility is theoretical. Nano's is already proven. $XNO is a dead chain.

@DirectorOfNATO @ourcryptotalk > "And "can never get enough users to survive" is still just a feeling dressed up as a conclusion." Nope. It's literally impossible.

Wait, so the world isn't ready for crypto payments. That's your argument. The same argument that completely destroys Nano, a chain that has done nothing but payments for 10 years and has $294k daily volume to show for it. You just explained Nano's failure better than I ever could. And the "17 days" framing is your own dramatic interpretation of one semitone cut. The network doesn't die on May 5th. Security degrades gradually over years, not weeks. You know that.

@DirectorOfNATO @ourcryptotalk > "So low fees aren't repelling users, but Kaspa has no users. Then what's repelling them?" Adoption is the hardest part. Far harder than the tech. The world simply isn't ready to use crypto for payments.. That's bad for Kaspa - it needs millions of users within 17 days.

Your entire argument hinges on adoption never arriving before the security budget gets too thin. That's a prediction, not a fact. And you keep presenting it as inevitable when it's just your best guess. Kaspa has years of runway, DAGKnight in development, smart contracts coming, and a growing ecosystem. A lot can change. You're betting it won't. Fine, but own it as a bet rather than dressing it up as settled science. Nano bet on zero fee payments taking over the world for 10 years and got $294k daily volume. Maybe be a little more humble about predicting how adoption plays out. $XNO is a dead chain.

@DirectorOfNATO @ourcryptotalk > "428 PH/s is not insecure." Why do you persist in putting up strawmen to knock down? Nobody said 428 PH/s is insecure. Why are you like this?

May 5th. 2.5 weeks away. That's your doomsday timeline. That's not a serious prediction, that's just setting an arbitrary checkpoint to screenshot later, to spam 100 times again. Emission schedules decline gradually. Security doesn't fall off a cliff on May 5th. The network doesn't spontaneously become attackable because one semitone cut happened. You're dramatizing a scheduled, predictable, designed reduction and pretending it's an extinction event. Nano's extinction event was just never growing in the first place. No dramatic spreadsheet needed for that one. $XNO is a dead chain.

@DirectorOfNATO @ourcryptotalk > ""Literally impossible" is a bold claim with zero timeline attached" FFS actually read the spreadsheet!

Yeah I noticed they're dated. I also noticed the chain is still running, still processing millions of transactions, still doing $38 million daily volume, and still has 428 PH/s securing it. Your chart shows a trend, not a death. Every declining emission schedule looks exactly like that by design. Bitcoin's chart looks the same. Come back with the same spreadsheet when the network actually shows signs of insecurity. Until then you're just documenting a deflationary emission schedule working as intended and calling it a crisis. Meanwhile Nano's security funding is a permanent flatline at zero and you're fine with that. Remarkable priorities. $XNO is a dead coin. Has been flatlining for a decade. Not even a heartbeat to be seen in your chart or volume.

@DirectorOfNATO @ourcryptotalk > "100th time apparently" You're REALLY not reading them, are you? You've apparently not noticed that each one is dated, and summarizes the previous day's income. You can chart Kaspa's declining security funding from them.

@Ghostbanned7 @ourcryptotalk You just spent hours defending a chain doing $294k daily volume after 10 years. You've commented plenty, none of it has landed.

@DirectorOfNATO @ourcryptotalk > "sure, I'm the one talking nonsense" I couldn't possibly comment.

@Ghostbanned7 @ourcryptotalk Still riding that user count like it means something. Nano has more users moving $294k. Kaspa has fewer users moving $38 million. If Kaspa is the dodo, Nano is the exhibit nobody visits. At least people are paying to see the dodo.

@DirectorOfNATO @ourcryptotalk > "$XNO is a dead chain." Kaspa has fewer than half as many if users as Nano. So I guess we'll see $KAS on a shelf in London's Natural History Museum next to the dodo soon then?

Fair enough, I misread that specific implication. Your actual argument is that fees are too low to fund security long term, not that they push users away. Got it. But that doesn't change anything. Your argument is still just "adoption never comes" with no evidence beyond a spreadsheet and a catchy hashtag. Meanwhile your is chain doing $294k daily volume after a decade of zero fees is somehow your proof that Kaspa's model fails. Nano is the living, breathing counterexample to your own theory and you're rooting for it. $XNO is a dead chain.

@DirectorOfNATO @ourcryptotalk > "And instead of clarifying your actual position you just slap a hashtag on it and call me a liar." You lied by saying "But they're not repelling users either, which is what you're implying." I made no such implication. Low fees do not reply users.

@techdevnotes Grokipedia is pure shit, filled with articles that fit into Elon's narrative. It's biased towards Elon's opinion.

Grokipedia has not received any meaningful update in months … what’s happening with it