re2max

1.5K posts

re2max banner
re2max

re2max

@re2max

Katılım Ekim 2007
177 Takip Edilen33 Takipçiler
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@dirtydeeds100 @chris_komatsu The buildup will be noticeable, true, but that does not mean it will be thwarted or that an invasion will be prevented.
English
1
0
1
6
Jean-Pierre
Jean-Pierre@dirtydeeds100·
@re2max @chris_komatsu That really won't matter much especially in today's day and age, where such troop buildups are highly noticeable, as we saw in 2021 and 2022 with Ukraine.
English
1
0
0
9
Chris Komatsu
Chris Komatsu@chris_komatsu·
Literally the one European country that answered the admin's call to send their own military personnel to the Middle East to help us, and this is how they are treated? Note that when you beg all of Europe to send help while also trashing them, they'll see this and realize there's no reason to help us. We've demontrated this will not change regardless of their actions.
Republicans against Trump@RpsAgainstTrump

JD Vance: Stopping funding for Ukraine is one of the things I’m proudest we’ve done in this administration.

English
32
296
2.5K
95.3K
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@dirtydeeds100 @chris_komatsu It is still ultimately a call of an American serviceman to whack a Russian serviceman. Fundamentally, how is that not direct involvement? A conscious choice has to be made.
English
1
0
2
14
Jean-Pierre
Jean-Pierre@dirtydeeds100·
@re2max @chris_komatsu No, because thats more about what restrictions we have on what ukraine can be targeting, we aren't the ones manning the systems.
English
1
0
0
15
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@dirtydeeds100 @chris_komatsu Then why does the mineral deal's preamble is framed such as that America invested in Ukraine and now expects to get the monetary equivalent of that aid back?
English
1
0
2
15
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@dirtydeeds100 @chris_komatsu Fundamentally, Ukraine received X and now the US want that X back, with a percentage. Sounds like a loan. That the document does not call it that way is not such a big deal.
English
1
0
2
12
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@dirtydeeds100 @chris_komatsu To your second point - I am arguing that NATO will actually lag behind because of the aforementioned psychological self-penalty.
English
1
0
1
14
Jean-Pierre
Jean-Pierre@dirtydeeds100·
@re2max @chris_komatsu Thats not what I said, you completely twisted around what I said. I said it would be expensive for us, not russia although that cost certainly would apply to them as well but the point is we're not going to do that unless russia starts making that significant movement first.
English
1
0
0
13
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@dirtydeeds100 @chris_komatsu Ok, fine. What about a US officer signing off on an ATACMS or HIMARS strike request? Not pressing the buttons, of course, but he is still part of the killchain.
English
1
0
2
14
Jean-Pierre
Jean-Pierre@dirtydeeds100·
@re2max @chris_komatsu Unless that role involves that soldier actually engaging in combat with Russian forces, no and we're very careful to avoid such a thing.
English
1
0
0
19
Commander Zolfaghari
Commander Zolfaghari@DirectorOfNATO·
@humph09 @InfidelHL @XMRVoid Nah, for me it's because I like anonymity. CEX's are required by law to give your data to the government and tax agencies. I prefer my data to stay with me.
English
2
0
6
277
Mav
Mav@XMRVoid·
CREATOR OF ‘ONLYFAKE’ ARRESTED DUE TO TRACING OF HIS CRYPTO TO EXCHANGES FOR ONLY $15 YOU COULD CREATE A FAKE ID THAT PASSED ALL CEX EXCHANGES LIKE KUCOIN, MEXC ETC THE ONLY REASON WHY HE WAS CAUGHT WAS BECAUSE HE DIDNT ACCEPT MONERO. IN THE BIG 26’ WE STILL HAVE PEOPLE BEING ARRESTED BECAUSE THEY REFUSE TO JUST DOWNLOAD @cakewallet AND USE $XMR LOL justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/c…
English
14
33
282
27.1K
Jean-Pierre
Jean-Pierre@dirtydeeds100·
@re2max @chris_komatsu But it wasn't irrelevant when we did do that and it isnt irrelevant when people cry that we stopped doing that.
English
1
0
0
12
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@TwoThousand_17 @BenJohnsonary @mr_scientism No, it has not. KAMAZ and Avtovaz are bleeding money, Avisma moved a part of the workforce to a 4-day week, RZhD is moving less stuff than it used to, Yantar is a bankrupt, Sukhoi Superjet is a failure etc.
English
0
0
0
42
scientism
scientism@mr_scientism·
We’re in WW3 but it‘s just very slow because everyone deindustrialized.
English
95
1.6K
23.2K
1.3M
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@dirtydeeds100 @chris_komatsu It is a repayment mechanism both in the ink and the spirit. That the US will be investing money too is nothing but a quite reasonable understanding that a bankrupt will not pay his debt if he is a bankrupt. Thus, Ukraine needs to be making money somehow.
re2max tweet mediare2max tweet mediare2max tweet media
English
1
0
2
19
Jean-Pierre
Jean-Pierre@dirtydeeds100·
@re2max @chris_komatsu The minerals deal is not an actual loan repayment, its just treated as a replacement of that even though it's really just like any other investment deal that would benefit both countries in the long run.
English
1
0
0
15
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@dirtydeeds100 @chris_komatsu That NATO will be significantly ramping up the amount of forces on the eastern flank of the alliance because Russians are roaming there and that it will be terribly expensive for Russia to station more troops like that for a prolonged period of time.
English
1
0
2
20
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@dirtydeeds100 @chris_komatsu "Fighting" is a very broad term. If a US officer died to a Kh-101 that happened to hit a hotel he was in, while on an official (but covert) mission to help Ukraine defend against Russia, does that meet tour definition? A US serviceman returned home in a casket after all.
English
1
0
2
17
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@dirtydeeds100 @chris_komatsu Because merchandize moved from location A, US, to location B, Ukraine. But that is now irrelevant because of the current US policy.
English
1
0
2
15
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@dirtydeeds100 @chris_komatsu And 30% of the budget for 2026 (15% in 2022). Natsec and law enforcement will take up extra 9%. State debt is 50% larger than in 2024. Totally not a war mode.
English
1
0
2
17
Jean-Pierre
Jean-Pierre@dirtydeeds100·
@re2max @chris_komatsu Russia only spends like 7% of its gdp on the military, the russian economy is increasingly propped up by that spending but only partially geared towards it.
English
1
0
0
31
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@dirtydeeds100 @chris_komatsu I explained why your points do not hold water. You were theorizing, but fundamental inputs were not exactly right.
English
1
0
2
12
re2max
re2max@re2max·
@dirtydeeds100 @chris_komatsu Russia has definitely entered the war mode. But it is 2026 and Putin is infected by certain kinds of brainworms, so... a war is dubbed an SMO, the draft is only partial, the MIC is drowning in money but not so much that the civilian life would collapse etc.
English
1
0
2
27
Jean-Pierre
Jean-Pierre@dirtydeeds100·
@chris_komatsu @re2max Your link doesn't say russia is building up a significant force on the border? And this just proves you dont know wtf youre talking about, russia is not in an actual war economy.
English
4
0
0
41