dmarz ⚡️🤖

3.7K posts

dmarz ⚡️🤖 banner
dmarz ⚡️🤖

dmarz ⚡️🤖

@DistributedMarz

exploring the infinite frontier @ Flashbots

nyc Katılım Mayıs 2016
4.6K Takip Edilen3.9K Takipçiler
dmarz ⚡️🤖 retweetledi
dmarz ⚡️🤖 retweetledi
Liam Zebedee
Liam Zebedee@liamzebedee·
this might not look like much but I'm trying to program a plant to grow cigarettes
Liam Zebedee tweet media
English
3
1
27
794
dmarz ⚡️🤖
dmarz ⚡️🤖@DistributedMarz·
Nature inspires markets inspires nature
Liam Zebedee@liamzebedee

Cells can do distributed computation via hormone diffusion, in which the concentration of a hormone at a cell is a proxy for distance in 3D space from a source emitting it Every cell is basically a 3D shape with these 3D binding sites. A molecule that has a particular 3D structure can fit into this site like lego. We call the molecules that do this hormones. They are signalling molecules - meaning their structure is their only function - they are not little machines like enzymes/proteins that build things. They are just unique shapes that can be used to transmit 1 bit of information. For example, insulin is a hormone. It has a particular shape that can only bind to a insulin receptor on a cell. When it travels along the blood stream, and encounters a cell, it might bind to the site. When that site is bound, the cell now has a value of 1 in that area. When it doesn't, it is 0. It can use that value to conditionally start certain internal processes, like the uptake of glucose. Cells have hundreds of thousands of receptors. For example, a human blood cell has around 100k insulin receptors. This means it can receive 100,000 bits of signal for the single "insulin" value, since a receptor can either have a molecule bound (1) or it can be free (0). They call this a concentration, and over time, a hormonal gradient. In a sense, abstractly you can think of the concentration as a single value ie. a cell has 100k insulin receptors, each a 1 or a 0. log2(100_000)=16.6 bits uint16 insulinConcentration; The geometry of a vascular network is interesting. Imagine a leaf. You have the tissue of the leaf, and then you have the veins running down it. The veins are the transport system for the molecules/hormones. When a cell at the part of the leaf closest to the plant emits hormones, it travels along the vascular network. Each hormone is a molecule. When it travels down the vascular system, it may bump into a cell that binds it. After that point, it is taken up and no longer travels. The binding is not guaranteed - these are little particles in 3D space. This emitter of hormones might emit 1M hormone molecules. Imagine each cell in the network only has 100k receptors. That means those 1M hormone molecules might "fill up" the receptors of 10 cells at best. Which cells will get filled up first? The ones closest to the emitter. The ones furthest away have no chance, since those hormone molecules were already taken up. What's interesting to me - and this is what I learnt from building the Origami paper yesterday (x.com/liamzebedee/st…) - is that this hormonal gradient mechanism is sufficient enough for cells to coordinate distributed computation The hormone concentration + a vascular network means that a hormonal concentration can act as a distance metric from an emitting cell, where the concentration's precision/quantization is determined by number of the cell's receptors for that hormone. It is more easily understandable if I show you code, which I don't have, because I only just figured out how this works ;) hahahhaha The example I think is pertinent is "grow a cylinder of fixed height" by writing code that runs the same on every cell, where each cell has a small scratch space for internal state, and the ability to send/receive hormones The code might look like: divide() But that grows an infinitely expanding 3d thing. You want it to only grow to a maximum height. How do you measure height, when every cell runs the same program? You could emit a hormone at the "top cell" in a concentration that effectively "runs out" by the time it reaches the bottom cell of the cylinder. I'm still working on figuring what the code looks like out. But I sort of have the shape in my head now. Insulin isn't really one of the hormones used for signalling distance. I think those are morphogens but I've still got to properly look at them. That and all of this is an approximate mental model - but roughly speaking it's all very new and fundamentally interesting to me as a way of distributed computation.

English
0
0
3
598
Sherry
Sherry@SchrodingrsBrat·
I think this is why sf earnestness doesn’t get nyc irony: The idealist, who’s rigidly fixed on innovating a better future, sees gritty irony as evil and mean when it’s actually the will to win in a radically flawed world and an exuberant defiance of despair, which, compared to an earnestness that insists on “goodness”, is actually a deeper authentic optimism
maddie@0xmadisonn

nyc isn’t evil. its just the only city honest enough to admit everyone wants money, love, status, God, a better table, and to be chosen by someone with taste. other cities call that toxic because theyre uglier and dress worse

English
25
36
778
92K
Defileo🔮
Defileo🔮@defileo·
Apple spent 7 years and $3,500 per unit building Vision Pro, this guy did something better with a webcam in his bedroom. And no, this isn't a render, it's running live on his laptop right now with a webcam pointed at his hands. The webcam tracks 21 points on each of his hands in real time, every fingertip, every knuckle, every joint, mapped to a 3D skeleton at 60 frames per second. A piece of digital silk is rigged to that skeleton, so when he opens his palm the fabric drapes across his fingers, when he closes his hand it crumples in his fist, when he tilts his wrist the cloth slides off and folds with real physics, light reflecting off it like actual material. He can grab it, stretch it, throw it, catch it, all with his bare hands and zero hardware on his body. No headset, no gloves, no $3,500 face computer, no 600 gram brick on his skull, no 2 hour battery, no Apple ID, no App Store. Just a webcam, TouchDesigner and a kid who saw the Vision Pro keynote and thought, I can do that for free. Apple has 3,000 engineers, $200 billion in cash and 7 years of development time, they built a face computer most people will never own. This guy has a laptop, a webcam and a weekend, he built a future most people can actually use. The mixed reality industry just got embarrassed by a guy in a white t-shirt.
Defileo🔮@defileo

x.com/i/article/2048…

English
87
184
3.1K
3M
dmarz ⚡️🤖 retweetledi
frezabek
frezabek@rezabfil·
Data provenance from space? We have it. The next challenge is making it usable across the entire space stack. SpaceComputer is building the secure fabric for deployments in orbit: helping data move, prove its origin, interoperate across systems, and stay secure from satellite to ground to application. Excited for this next on-orbit milestone. Stay tuned!
SpaceNews@SpaceNews_Inc

SpaceComputer to conduct on-orbit test of secure computing infrastructure spacenews.com/spacecomputer-…

English
1
6
21
1.5K
dmarz ⚡️🤖 retweetledi
There.Is.Now.Alternative⚡🤖
whoa I definitely didn't expect waking up to see two ⚡🤖 teammates mentioned on a Fortune article lol fortune.com/2026/04/28/ten…
Ari Juels@AriJuels

An excellent account of hack of The DAO, authored by my former colleague @el33th4xor, recounting the key roles he and @phildaian played. Happily, it ended in champagne with plastic forks at an @initc3org bootcamp. Or did it end? fortune.com/2026/04/28/ten…

Denpasar, Bali 🇮🇩 English
0
1
8
1.4K
dmarz ⚡️🤖 retweetledi
frezabek
frezabek@rezabfil·
1/ “Just put it in a TEE” sounds convincing, until you ask: where is this actually running? TEE attestations can prove what code is running and on which CPU. They don’t prove where that machine is running. That missing piece is the physical-access gap. 🧵
English
1
15
31
6.2K
dmarz ⚡️🤖
dmarz ⚡️🤖@DistributedMarz·
Flashbots incident report on copy.fail (Linux Kernel LPE Vulnerability) TL;DR: - Risk from this vulnerability is only critical in our experimental Flashboxes and we have taken immediate action - In a worst-case scenario, this vulnerability would reduce isolation guarantees to those of standard (non-TEE) infrastructure - It does not introduce new capabilities beyond what exists in conventional trust-based systems collective.flashbots.net/t/flashbox-inc…
English
2
4
38
3.3K
dmarz ⚡️🤖 retweetledi
stochasm
stochasm@stochasticchasm·
hey can you launch 4 sub-goblins to investigate each of these issues
English
17
63
1.6K
30.7K
Amber Liu
Amber Liu@JIACHENLIU8·
My bet: in the near future, 80%⬆️ of CS research will be done by AI in collaboration with humans. However, today's research ecosystem is still built around the human, not the AI scientist. For example, the 8-page paper PDF is a lossy compression of months of branching exploration into a linear story, optimized for a human reviewer to skim in 30 minutes. It hides two structural taxes: 📖 Storytelling Tax — failures, rejected hypotheses, and dead ends get stripped. On RE-Bench (24,008 runs, 21 frontier models), failed runs = 90.2% of total compute cost, with a 113× median failed-to-success token ratio. Every lab independently rediscovers the same dead ends. 🔧 Engineering Tax — the gap between reviewer-sufficient prose and agent-sufficient spec. Across 8,921 PaperBench requirements (23 ICML'24 papers), only 45.4% are fully specified in the PDF. The rest is tacit lab knowledge. Tolerable when readers were human. Critical now that agents read, reproduce, and extend. We propose ARA: the Agent-Native Research Artifact — replace the narrative PDF with an agent-executable package, in 4 layers: 🧠 structured scientific logic ⚙️ executable code w/ full specs 🌳 exploration graph (every failure preserved) 📊 evidence grounding every claim
English
28
85
541
93.1K
dmarz ⚡️🤖
dmarz ⚡️🤖@DistributedMarz·
whoa super cool! I started to use a primitive version of this in my research swarm as I started to notice a lot of my collaborators were interpreting these big research swarm dumps as meant to be read by humans! #research-traces" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">github.com/dmarzzz/resear… the design goals of my primitive version were: probabilistic in nature (confidence intervals), graph-based, and extremely detailed source provenance
English
0
0
1
82
dmarz ⚡️🤖 retweetledi
dataalways ⚡️🤖
dataalways ⚡️🤖@dataalways·
Meet 0x841: a fresh sandwich bot lurking in the dark forest--currently attacking about 1500 users per day, while going almost unnoticed. What's particularly scary: most of the victims are using private mempools and should be protected.
dataalways ⚡️🤖 tweet media
English
21
37
257
45.7K
dmarz ⚡️🤖
dmarz ⚡️🤖@DistributedMarz·
synesthesia is the new autism
English
1
0
7
419
Andrew Côté
Andrew Côté@Andercot·
Intelligence is a system level description of emergent coordinated action in response to the environment, and it does not require any 'embodied self'
English
138
358
3K
224.3K
dmarz ⚡️🤖
dmarz ⚡️🤖@DistributedMarz·
@larsencc For the “0.2x orchestration fee”, are you querying the user’s LLM provider with extra queries, or is that charged through a monthly bill or something? Interesting way to charge either way!
English
1
0
1
232
Larsen Cundric
Larsen Cundric@larsencc·
The #1 request lately: "let me use my own API keys." Ok, done. Bring your LLMs to Browser Use: > Anthropic > OpenAI > Google You pay provider rates + a 0.2x orchestration fee. We handle the infrastructure, you control the cost. Live now for all paid plans.
English
3
2
30
14.6K
dmarz ⚡️🤖 retweetledi
Adib Hanna
Adib Hanna@adibhanna·
Had an interview with a “crypto” recruiter. We talked for about 40 minutes, and then they asked me to look at some code. Their first instruction was to clone the repo. I didn’t. They seemed surprised, so I told them I wanted a moment to check whether it was safe first. I ran a quick analysis with Claude. Turns out the code had a backdoor. It would copy my environment variables and send them to a remote server. The recruiter went speechless and ended the call pretty quickly. Be careful who you talk to. Scammers are real.
English
183
1.1K
13.3K
948.9K