DivyQueen 🇺🇸
11.9K posts

DivyQueen 🇺🇸
@DivysQueen
James 1:17 ✝️ | Proud Military Wife | Passive Income Investor | Frenchie Lover | BTC HODLer

🚨 PAY ATTENTION Bitcoin’s next cycle bottom won’t be defined by price. The only thing that matters now: Time. Every Bitcoin cycle follows the same structure: 35 bars expansion + 12 bars contraction. 2015–2017: expansion 2018: contraction 2018–2021: expansion 2022: contraction Now look at where we are. The expansion phase is complete. The contraction has just begun. And this phase always takes time. Days from cycle top → final low: 2012: ~400 days 2016: ~360 days 2020: ~370 days We are not there yet. Based on historical timing, the highest-probability window for the real bottom is: July–November 2026. That matters more than any price level people are watching. Most traders think like this: “I’ll buy when it hits X.” But real bottoms don’t form at obvious levels. Below $50,000 I’m a buyer. Regardless of when it happens. July–November 2026 I’m a buyer. Regardless of price. If one of those conditions is met, I buy. No hesitation. Yes, I started accumulating in the $60k range already. Even though the timing window isn’t here yet. Back in October, around $120k, I said I’d be a strong buyer near $60k. People ignored it. “BTC will never go below $100k again.” Now we’re here. And there’s still one signal missing: NUPL. Every major bottom: - 2018 - COVID - 2022 Formed when NUPL entered the blue zone. We haven’t seen that yet. Remember: For the record, I was the only one publicly calling the exact bottom at $16,000 three years ago and the top at $126,000 in October. If you missed those calls, don’t worry. I’ll call the next one too. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.








🚨UPDATE: Banking Representatives Are REVIEWING CLARITY Act COMPROMISE TEXT TODAY 🇺🇸🔥 White House correspondent @sander_lutz says the latest CLARITY Act compromise language is now being reviewed by banking representatives on Capitol Hill TODAY. 👀 The new language would reportedly still allow yield on STAKED stablecoins — which sources say could be a potentially “SIGNIFICANT WIN FOR CRYPTO.” 😳 ⚠️However, there’s a major catch: That same idea could TRIGGER a HUGE BACKLASH from the banking lobby, which may see staking rewards as too close to a THREAT to their own deposit business. 🤯 “The banking industry would be crazy to accept that as any sort of compromise.” 👀🔥 More to come. I'll keep updating.
















