English
brad
331 posts
@DjongoueRyan @air1ex @olta_yalc @EtherionMaster No that’s your head cannon what we do know about sorcerers is that there are con artist. Sukuna doing that is a feint because he knows Gojo doesn’t know about how adaption really works
English
Sukuna durability is way higher than Mahoraga. He survived the same attack that vaporized Mahoraga
Shonen Hero 🥇@7HonensYushI
Some dumbass once told me 15F Sukuna would tank this
English
@olta_yalc @EtherionMaster Dude, do you guys even read the manga? In round 2, both Gojo and Sukuna's output were significantly lower, but still then, Sukuna still protected Maho initially against attacks from Red.
English
@DjongoueRyan @EtherionMaster When was the low output red one shotting mahoraga part shown?
English
@BigBrother_8419 @air1ex @olta_yalc @EtherionMaster Sukuna knows how durable Maharaga is because he has already fought him and it is his Shikigami, and he knows how strong Red is because he has been hit by it. So if Sukuna, instead of letting Maharaga adapt to Red, decide to hide it, shows that it would have one-shotted him.
English
@air1ex @olta_yalc @DjongoueRyan @EtherionMaster Yall are slow just because Gojo was about to use red doesn’t mean it would kill him. He has never fought Maho before he doesn’t know how durable he is. Just like Sukuna never seeing Ryu and being surprised his durablity was high. Gojo doesn’t even know how Mahos adaption works
English
@7HonensYushI Sukuna is significantly more durable than Mahoraga. It’s shown that a low-output Red from Gojo can one-shot an unadapted Mahoraga. In contrast, Sukuna took a direct Red to the face from a full-output Gojo while caught off guard and only got his face burned.
English
Some dumbass once told me 15F Sukuna would tank this
English
@gojoxdabura gojos output was in the gutter at this point my friend and maho had started adapted to read the previous chapter
English
@MedWhiteAcolyte From a Roman Catholic I think you dominated the philosophical part,but you should had focus a bit more on patristic exagesis as Agens case seems to be stronger that yours there, plus it's easier to comprehend for busy laymen unlike deep metaphysical categories!
English
@DjongoueRyan @Cath_SteelMan @sola_chad Such a simple question, yet such a long winded answer.
I feel sorry for you.
English
Yet another reason I’ll never be Catholic. Catholicism’s false gospel can’t even assure believers of their salvation.
Meanwhile, from the mouth of Jesus: “Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life.“ (John 5:24)
TPUSA Rapid Response@TPUSARapidRep
Student: "Do you know for sure where you will go when you die?" @MichaelJKnowles: "I don't. I trust and I have hope in our Lord. I trust in Jesus"
English
@dumbsushi @Cath_SteelMan @sola_chad I mean, if I die now, I will know if I'm in heaven or hell, depending on where my soul goes. I'm already dead, my G.
English
@DjongoueRyan @Cath_SteelMan @sola_chad If you were to die right now would you have 100% certainty that you’ll be in heaven, Brad?
English
@feeling_woke @5Solas2 In my paradigm, the Catholic Church as a divine legate can discern which books are inspired, and I can have the ascent of faith in that decision.
English
@DjongoueRyan @5Solas2 You hold to 73 books then.
Meaning your tradition rejects several of the deuterocanonical books
EO hold to 76-79
Ethiopian hold 81
On what basis do the Catholics reject the deuterocanonical books that they do reject?
English
@dumbsushi @Cath_SteelMan @sola_chad The choice isn't between having a 100% certainty that you'll be in heaven and being constantly in fear on hell. Nah, you can just trust Christ and his grace.
English
@Cath_SteelMan @sola_chad It makes me sad my Catholic friends live in fear of hell everyday.
English
@MikePagano87 The Church judged heresy, but the state enforced punishment. Even when both agreed heresy deserved death, execution was a civil decision. So the distinction between moral and civil authority remained real and meaningful, not merely theoretical.
English
Lila Rose told Gavin Ortlund the Church ONLY HANDED heretics to civil authorities, they didn't kill them. I wonder if she knows Giovanni Battista Bugatti, the Papal States' executioner. He handled civil law not heretics, but it proves the Pope held absolute power over civil auth.
English
@feeling_woke @5Solas2 i am catholic,I believe in the Deuterocanonicals.
English
@DjongoueRyan @5Solas2 Question: On what basis does your your tradition reject the deuterocanonical books?
Or do you suggest all belong in canon?
English
@feeling_woke @5Solas2 ,,,,This becomes more problematic when they reject books historically accepted by many Church Fathers and councils. By what authority, then, do Protestants justify limiting inspiration to these 66? It seems like an epistemic overreach their system can’t fully support.
English
@feeling_woke @5Solas2 ....If they simply said these 66 books are authoritative for the Church due to apostolic origin or received use, that would be coherent. But declaring them uniquely inspired is an act of faith that seems to require a divine, authoritative messenger....
English
@MikePagano87 It's fine, but Cameron's point was specifically that if the Marian apparitions are genuine miracles from God, calling them demonic will be blaspheming the Spirit. That's not controversial. So if you think the the apparitions are demonic, you better have good evidence .
English
@DjongoueRyan Even if they happened. Deut 13, God clearly states he will allow false signs and wonders to test his people. Jesus also speaks of false signs and wonders. So rejecting a sign and wonder that actually happened doesn't mean you are blaspheming the Holy Spirit
English
I just watched this video and I can't believe he is trying to connect blasphemy of the Holy Spirit to rejecting marian apparitions. I think I am going to do a response to this video some time in the next couple days if I can find time in my schedule.
Capturing Christianity@CapturingChrist
New video: "Are Protestants Committing the Unforgivable Sin?" Jesus only named one sin as unforgivable. One. Not murder. Not adultery. Not even denying him — Peter did that and was restored. And a lot of Christians are committing it right now without realizing it. Channel members can watch it right now.
English
@feeling_woke @5Solas2 ..But they went out of their way to say only these 66 books are inspired and the others are not. Then the natural question would be, which authority and which epistemic standard do Protestants have to pronounce such judgment about the inspiration of a particular book?
English
@feeling_woke @5Solas2 I mean, to me, I just think Protestant make too strong of a claim. If Protestants were just saying, these 66 books will be the books that will be read in Protestant churches, that would be fine....
English
@HumongusNoticer @5Solas2 Secondly, I did not say the 66 books need to be enumerated in the scriptures. You again imply things that I never said. All I'm asking you is, within the Protestant system, how can you tell me that these books are divinely inspired while the others are not?
English
@HumongusNoticer @5Solas2 First of all, I didn't bring up solo scriptura. You are the one that brought that up. I just said using sola scriptura alone and you rebutted by saying sola scriptura alone means solo scriptura. This sentence doesn't make any sense. You're saying that A alone means B. chill dude
English