Humongous Melonhead

@DjongoueRyan @5Solas2 you refuse to acknowledge what solo scriptura is, and how they are different. this is because youre a papist beadrattling dimwit. Sola Scriptura does not need a canon list to be written in scripture to have a defined canon. if you cant comprehend this, you cannot be intelligent

@HumongusNoticer @5Solas2 I give up. At this point, your either cannot read, cannot think, or cannot do both. Read my comment. I literally defined what sola scriptura is.

It's crazy that all the churches who claim to be the one true church and have apostolic succession can't agree on what the canon is.

@DjongoueRyan @5Solas2 letmegooglethat.com/?q=sola+script…

@HumongusNoticer @5Solas2 I know sola scriptura means the Bible is the sole infallible rule of faith and it doesn't negate church authority. But you rebutted by saying sola scriptura alone is solo scriptura. That makes no sense.sola scriptura alone is still sola scriptura dude, alone is jut for emphasis

@DjongoueRyan @5Solas2 sola scriptura and solo scriptura are not the same thing. if you cannot understand that, then you dont even understand the fundementals of what sola scriptura even is. That makes sense because you are catholic and cannot be trusted to read or understand written words on your own

@HumongusNoticer @5Solas2 Did you read what you said? How is sola scriptura alone solo scriptura? Sola scriptura alone is whatever you define sola scriptura as. Or do Protestants now believe in something aded to Sola Scriptura,

@DjongoueRyan @5Solas2 "sola scriptura alone" would be solo scriptura. Discourse with a Catholic is truly impossible because they cannot read

@5Solas2 Canon debate isn’t about which books, but by what authority Protestants affirm the 66. Catholics appeal to the Church; Orthodox/Coptic treat canon as liturgical tradition. From sola scriptura alone, how do Protestants justify a 66 fixed canon

@Italian347 as the old world continues its descent into atheism, the papist beadrattlers will continue to select figureheads from the Americas. They are losing ground. Their future hope rests entirely on hispanics and cultural Creasters

The Birthplace of every Pope in History

@J17apologetics @5Solas2 Bro doesn’t know about the aorist tense

@5Solas2 So to summarize Calvinism you have to pretend that PAST events actually occur in the future? How ridiculous.

Pretty simple.

@EricSmithJr357 @5Solas2 what do you even think this verse is disproving?

@5Solas2 Calvinism is a false religion Rom 9:33  As it is written: "BEHOLD, I LAY IN ZION A STUMBLING STONE AND ROCK OF OFFENSE, AND WHOEVER BELIEVES ON HIM WILL NOT BE PUT TO SHAME."

@guhankns @IGN this cannot be a serious question

@IGN how tf is the movie more expensive than the game

A24 is reportedly pumping more money into the live-action Elden Ring film than any project it’s ever worked on before, with a budget well over $100 million, this is their “largest and most ambitious” project ever. bit.ly/4cp5Mqy

@DSarcasticfuckr @thronesupdates why would he write his own obituary

George R.R. Martin's publisher has debunked ‘The Winds of Winter’ leak revealing the release date “The online chatter you are seeing regarding a supposed leak is false,” (via: ew.com/the-winds-of-w…)

@rgcounts @___mithrandir_ I still say that God giving David the wives isnt commanding or blessing polygamy. Id also say there are explicit examples of God blessing conflict in the Old Testament (Jericho, amalekites, David/goliath, the judges, etc). The pope should be more intentional with his words.

@HumongusNoticer @___mithrandir_ It's the same for war. God can command a war, and it would be moral and just to wage it. That does not mean God blessed the crusades, or World War 2, or any war that you personally think was moral and just.

A reminder that the Roman Catholic church literally has a saint - Joan of Arc - whose whole thing was that God was telling her to go to war to save France. I mean, they did try her in a kangaroo court and murder her, but still.

@rgcounts @___mithrandir_ Also, as clarification, I am against the current war. I am also against the pope’s blanket statement on all wars

@rgcounts @___mithrandir_ Except God never commanded polygamy- even in the Old Testament; however, there are plenty of examples of God outright commanding conflict / war

@rgcounts @___mithrandir_ Do you think he’s explicitly only speaking of the war today? Do you think the pope believes they are using swords over there?

@___mithrandir_ Do you think the Pope is ignorant of wars, for example, that God commanded? Or do you think that maybe his statement requires some contextual interpretation?

@SCHIZO_FREQ And the women love this story because they are jealous of the teacher who got to live out their fantasies of being with the popular football player and happy that she looks so stupid so that they can join in on degrading the girl that did what they never could

If female teachers don’t have friends of their own they will literally just fully regress back into the teenage girls they’re surrounded by and start having sex with 16 year olds This has been more of an issue recently because increasingly nobody has friends

@Urgyurgy @NickJFreitas Not hard to do

@NickJFreitas Yeah, you know more about the Bible than the pope

God doesn't bless any conflict? Let me check this with Pharaoh's Army real quick…oh wait…how about the Canaanites…oh dang…Amelikites? Oops…Assyrians…crap…

@Aelthemplaer @Pasghetti45 I am against the war in Iran, but can also confidently say the Pope is wrong that God never blesses conflict. I can also say you are wrong in that it is only defense. Did the city of Jericho initiate the conflict in Joshua chapter 6?

@Pasghetti45 Just defense. There is no just conflict where you start the war

The Pope is completely wrong here. God has and can and will bless Just conflicts.

The leader of the Catholic Church is a marcionite heretic

@TexasPreacher @realtimbrooks This looks exactly like the opening sequence of Bible Man

@realtimbrooks Here it is -

Ironically, Rome/EO & the happy-clappy megachurch are two sides of the same coin. One uses incense, icons, vestments, and repetitive chant. The other uses lights, loud music, and polished production. Strip it all down, and they both run on the same juice: aesthetics and atmosphere used to generate a false sense of encounter with God, and galling eisegesis. One calls it mystery, the other a “move of the Spirit.” Either way, people are carried along by something carnal & external. The one side kisses wooden pictures and bows down to statues; the other sways to technicolor lights & music. But both deploy pragmatism & both bank on the laity not knowing their Bibles when it comes to proper worship. Both appeal to the flesh. Both are centers of pomp, glitter, & idolatry. Two sides of the same coin.

@FreeIrishman7 @OGBURGKATHOLIK @HoldenCCole Next time, read the source you're quoting. you would recognize the use of "straw" in reference to Paul's usage in 1 Cor. It is straw in comparison to the other NT writings in that it was not one of the chief books recognized by the early Fathers. However, cathoilcs cannot read.

@HumongusNoticer @OGBURGKATHOLIK @HoldenCCole

Luther was influenced by demons.

@FreeIrishman7 @OGBURGKATHOLIK @HoldenCCole "Though this epistle of St. James was rejected by the ancients, I praise it and consider it a good book, because it sets up no doctrines of men but vigorously promulgates the law of God" -Luther in Word and Sacrament I

@OGBURGKATHOLIK @HoldenCCole He tried to remove James cause it contradicted his new doctrine of sola fide. The reprobate said: “I feel like throwing Jimmy into the stove.” When challenged on what authority same reprobate replied, “Doctor Martin Lutheran wants it that way.” He then fornictaed with a nun.