Dmitry Negoda

@almac_dev Anthropic has failed to convert Bun to Rust.

@DmitryNegoda79 did something happen?

The experiment is concluded. The best AI model with infinite funding cannot translate stable software from Zig to Rust.

@devabram Haskell looks great, living hell in real projects.

Haskell learning update: - typeclasses are more intuitive than traits to me - this makes so much sense to me f = negate . sum . map length - When I look at this I see smiley faces :{ and :}

Compute has never been that expensive before!

What have I missed? Anyone cares to explain?

@QED_Insights 6

Which is, of course, nonsense. Keeping the algorithms secret adds A LOT to the security. They say it so that the algorithm developers would expose their algorithms for study. There's no other reason for stating this nonsense aloud.

@theswansjr Retards call Bitcoin the Epstein coin. That's how you know you shouldn't talk to them.

People call Bitcoin the Epstein coin. Let me help you understand something. The real Epstein coin has been in your wallet the whole time. The U.S. dollar.

@TrueGemHunter @CryptoApes62 When stock drops, they sell BTC to buy more stock. When the market is bearish, they buy BTC.

@CryptoApes62 Because it follows every time when stocks are down 😔 If NASDAQ drops 1 percent Bitcoin drops 2-4% If NASDAQ pumps 1% BTC drops 0.5% or at best pumps 0.5% Looks like if the stock market goes into correction BTC and all crypto will crash again

The US stock market is hitting a new ATH every day for months... Bitcoin doesn't pump If BTC just followed the stock market it would be at ~350K rn not 77K What is wrong with crypto?

@Daniel__Street @FixxTheMoneyy That's what lightning is for.

@FixxTheMoneyy BTC abandoned peer-to-peer electronic cash. High fees made micropayments impossible. It also limited scaling, removed instant payments, and removed Bitcoin’s original smart contract capabilities.

BSV only makes sense when you realise how broken BTC is.

@AndersonAndrue Test suite is types.

Types are a test suite

@xah_lee @grok They should, solution to their financial problems.

@DmitryNegoda79 @grok do spacex sell tickets to watch launch

spectacular

@JustDeezGuy I guess NVIDIA has something to do with that.

@DmitryNegoda79 What’s funny about this is we’re learning LLMs do reduce to Bayesian inference: <news.ycombinator.com/item?id=464390…> The industry moved past Bayes WAY too early, chasing the next shiny thing, rather than figuring out it was the “belief net” architecture that was the problem.

I’d say the opposite: AI that isn’t based on (algorithmic, i.e. computable) information theory has no claim to being AI. <hutter1.net/ait.htm>

Using AI instead of simulation for robotics because "it can adapt". Anyone believes this nonsense? It's all upside down: a simulation model can adapt to the new environment much faster that AI ever would. It will take a simulation one millisecond to estimate properties of new material a robot interacts with. Or adapt to vibration. It will take forever to collect and train AI on all possible data. And what happens if you upgrade the sensors? You will have to do it all over again. Just how much do they pay you for pushing mass surveilance and NVIDIA hardware? youtu.be/ms6P8b1cM9M?si… via @YouTube

I think everyone who hosted a project on Github should stop doing so. Yes, I think AI killed open source. This isn't gonna work any more.

@EvgenyFeldman Ну brave попробуй

созрел больше не пользоваться поиском гугла. и так безобразно работает, а еще и «ИИ-трансформацию» обещают (а это в моей голове разные способы работы с информацией, ИИ я могу спросить в другом месте). короче, кого юзать? DuckDuckGo?

@CodingFiend @ryanlpeterman Thankfully, Stroustrup has nothing to do with C++ for quite some time. It's in the hands of the ISO C++ committee.

@ryanlpeterman Stroustrup is a pompous nincompoop C++ is an abomination and thankfully, I never had to use it

Bjarne Stroustrup is the creator of C++ and a former researcher at Bell Labs at its peak. I interviewed him about: • What made Bell Labs different • Programming language design: types, memory safety, bootstrapping • When abstraction improves performance • Anecdotes from building C++ • Thoughts on AI writing C++ • Mistakes he'd change while building C++ Where to watch: • YouTube: youtu.be/U46fJ2bJ-co • Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/52pEgo… • Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the… • Transcript: developing.dev/p/creator-of-c… Thank you to this episode's sponsors for supporting my work: • Cursor 3: a unified workspace for building software with agents, check it out at cursor.com • WorkOS: makes your app Enterprise Ready with easy to use APIs to add SSO, SCIM, RBAC, and more in just a few lines of code, check them out at workos.com Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 0:50 - The origin of C++ 8:46 - What Bell Labs was like 17:24 - Dennis Ritchie 24:00 - When to build a programming language 31:59 - Bootstrapping a language 33:58 - C++ is not object-oriented 37:32 - Discussing type systems 46:20 - Memory safety 49:26 - Standards committee anecdotes 1:09:40 - Adding automatic garbage collection to C++ 1:18:25 - Template instantiation is Turing complete 1:21:57 - Abstraction and performance 1:28:51 - AI writing code 1:35:54 - His motivation 1:39:18 - Famous quotes 1:46:48 - Reflecting on building C++ 1:49:12 - Top C++ book recommendation 1:50:59 - Advice for his younger self 1:58:06 - Outro