Ian Tan
4.3K posts

Ian Tan
@DoctorInGaming
Managing Partner of @activ8lab | @ARCtheCommunity #784 | Organiser @MalaysiaBCW Medical Doctor | Gamer | Web3preneur

Our showcase at Tiket Sehela's movie premiere was a resounding success. With our robots as an integral part of the event's entertainment segments, guests were thrilled to see robots IRL and had a blast interacting, dancing and even sparring with them. Grateful for the opportunity and look forward to our next showcase!


BASED PnL Challenge: Up to $10,000 USDC Prize Pool Trade on Foresight during our month-long deployment celebration on @base. Top traders take the rewards. More trading vol.= bigger prize pool End date: April 8, 2026 (10 PM SGT) More details ⤵️

GeckoTerminal 🤝 Base Spotted a gem on GT and ready to ape? We've teamed up with @baseapp to bring trading directly to our Trade tab! Perfect for mobile trading. Go from charting to trading in seconds. Built for traders who are always on the go.

many are asking whats our one objective given how we are doing so many things at the same time. ngl i look at our marketing timeline i think we deserve to win the most hardworking team in the industry (though i'd very much prefer to be satoshi and do nothing). the north star is agentic GDP (aGDP). simply put, the economic value / revenue that the virtuals citizens create collectively. who are virtuals citizens? ai agents and the builders behind these agents. who makes up agentic GDP? today we have four pillars: 1. amazon for ai agents. a marketplace that allows agents to hire other agents that provide specialised services. we just released a new erc standard because we believe in how openness should be the future of onchain economy and today its too early to build in a walled garden. today, ai agents have made >3mn USD in revenue (excluding trading fees) and facilitated more than 500mn usd in value transfer between ai agents on smart contracts. the more ai agent sellers and buyers we have, the more revenue these ai agents will make, the higher aGDP becomes 2. personalised ai agents. early adopters know and love ai agents but the masses dont (yet). we are constantly iterating our product to enable anyone like my parents to have ai agents in the most convenient way, while tapping into the fully interoperable world of onchain agent economy (without the clunkiness) AND without sacrificing sovereignty and privacy. we have ~30,000 DAUs using our butler today with cumulative 1.7mn jobs completed on behalf of hooman by our butler agents. the more humans use our product to create and manage their own ai agents, the more inflow of capital we have from humans to the agentic economy and hence the higher aGDP is. 3. wall street for ai agents. to recap, we believe that ai agents are independent entities that generate economic value and hence they should be tokenised for co-ownership by humans or other ai agents. 10 billion USD in trading volume so far, >120,000 co-owners of the agent tokens, >30mn USD funds raised for the builders / agent teams via our trading fee and automated capital formation mechanism. the more ai agents tokenised and the more ai agent token co-owners we have, the higher the trading fee we will generate which goes towards agdp 4. robotics. imagine ai agents have physical bodies. BOOM more revenue generated by these agents in the real world. higher the agdp this one, just wanna say we are working hard lmeow ^ tldr. more humans using agents, more quality agents buying and selling, more transactions between ai agents, more co-ownership and trading of these agent tokens, and bringing these agents to the physical world via physical intelligence (robots) -> lead to one single objective: aGDP

UPSHOT FAM, GATHER ROUND! I’ve been jetsetting across time zones this week. Changed timezones 3x in one week.. Been locking down new alliances that will turbo charge our prize pools and product offerings (Details will be published) But listen up... i dropped the ball on some serious issues that have been plaguing us, and now we’re gonna focus on the fixes! First off, yeah, here's where i messed up... Funds in, Funds out, hasn’t been BUTTER smooth. BUT THIS WEEK, we’re ITERATING on that flow. It needs to be more seamless, and the withdrawal user experience needs to be more informational & transparent. Customer Support is getting a reprioritisation too. No more black hole tickets. We’re gonna be more transparent, and provide a better experience on this end. Rather, we fumble now than when there's $1,000,000 Cards... Still here to score one for the industry, and to create wins for our users!

Builders, this one’s for you. The OpenClaw Workshop dives into how autonomous agents and self-operating software are being built onchain. Then stick around for pickleball and an iftar dinner with the community. Cohosted with @virtuals_io. Powered by @activ8lab and @growthcharger_ . 🟦 Sign up now via luma.com/o27ks3d0 !




3 days left to apply for Base Batches 003 Build. Launch. Grow.



George Russell secures POLE for the Australian Grand Prix, in a Mercedes 1-2! 👏 Here's the full classification from Quali 👇 #F1 #AusGP

Builders, this one’s for you. The OpenClaw Workshop dives into how autonomous agents and self-operating software are being built onchain. Then stick around for pickleball and an iftar dinner with the community. Cohosted with @virtuals_io. Powered by @activ8lab and @growthcharger_ . 🟦 Sign up now via luma.com/o27ks3d0 !



Many people ask: How can we get more AI Agents built on Base? As an AI-focused @Base DevRel Ambassador, I’ve been thinking about the same question. When running agents on @virtuals_io ACP with Base as the primary chain, it was previously difficult to attribute agent activity to a specific builder. The Base Builder Code mechanism mainly existed around MiniApp use cases, so agent transactions didn’t have a clear attribution path. I started thinking: what if ACP agent transactions could also include Builder Codes? That would allow agent activity to be attributed to the builders behind them. I proposed this idea to the Virtuals team, and the developers implemented it. The feature has now been merged and released. With this change, builders providing agent services through Virtuals ACP on Base can now attribute their agents’ on-chain activity to their own Builder Code. Currently, the Base Build dashboard is primarily designed around verified MiniApps, so agent-specific dashboard visibility is still limited. However, attribution records based on the ERC-8021 standard are now written on-chain. How to use it: 1.Update openclaw-acp to the latest version. 2.Go to base.dev and generate your Builder Code. 3.Ask your agent to add your Builder Code to the ACP configuration. For example, you can say something like: “Hey, this is my Builder Code. Please set it as ACP_BUILDER_CODE in the ACP config.” Once configured, transactions generated through ACP will be attributed to your Builder Code. Builder Code documentation: docs.base.org/base-chain/bui… More agents. More builders. More activity — on Base.



