Donald

100 posts

Donald

Donald

@Donald69801874

Katılım Kasım 2022
11 Takip Edilen11 Takipçiler
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@TyrannyStomper @green78499 @iceskatergirl3 Think of the costs to produce graphene. Obtaining the graphite, separating the layers, exfoliation, and processing. Compare that to HG, Levidian, GMG, or other similar methods.
English
0
0
1
32
Metalynx
Metalynx@iceskatergirl3·
$HGRAF $HG Another impressive interview. Kjirsten mentions at around the 15 min mark that they really haven’t had any problems with working towards scaling up (eg with larger reactors or producing at scale). Around 16 minutes+ she says that the gas partner that Hydrograph “will soon be working with” is very positive for the company. She says that the redomiciling process will be coinciding with the Nasdaq listing. It will also allow access to federal funding and a closer relationship to DoD/DoW. Their location in Austin is advantageous for proximity to tech, aerospace, and automotive industries. “… as we scale we’ve only seen improvement in purity and consistency of our product” youtu.be/HKswz33ypgI
YouTube video
YouTube
English
4
26
166
9.8K
Brett Green
Brett Green@green78499·
@TyrannyStomper @iceskatergirl3 In her recent interview, CEO Kjirsten says she forsees major consolidation in graphene sector. Sounds like mergers and acquisitions ahead.
English
2
0
1
59
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@RonaldVolusus @ArneriDesign @DARPA There's a PDF in the sam.gov posting of the DARPA RFI. Read it y'all. HG is submitting data just to cover the educational aspect - DARPA wants the wrong product. Army has been working with graphene for 15+ years with many failures. Lots of work to be done.
English
0
0
0
11
Jeffersonian
Jeffersonian@RonaldVolusus·
Great work as usual Arneri Design. Let me say it in simpler terms what it means for investors. Why the DARPA news is a big deal for HGRAF If the Army has been testing graphene forever, why is DARPA just now getting involved. The army has been under the hood for a couple of years making sure the material actually works. They’ve proven that this stuff makes armor tougher and engines run better. The science part is done. DARPA doesn’t show up until the science is proven. They don't care about lab samples; they care about production. Their new RFI is basically saying: Okay, the Army says this stuff is the real deal. Now, who can build me a thousand tons of it for our next-gen jets? The Bottom Line: The Army proved it. The EPA legalized it. Now DARPA is here to scale it. We’ve moved from "Does this work?" to "How fast can you make it?" That’s a massive shift for HGRAF and the "Hyperion" system because they can scale up faster than just about anyone else. Watch that June 1st deadline. The big money is starting to move
English
2
4
37
803
Arneri Design
Arneri Design@ArneriDesign·
@DARPA just issued an RFI: can graphene be produced at aerospace scale? Response deadline: June 1, 2026. The Pentagon is separating real graphene from lab graphene. $HGRAF #graphene #deeptech 🛡️ 1/
GIF
English
11
10
41
13.2K
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@ArneriDesign @DARPA DARPA is incorrect in their desire of graphene sheets for structures and parts. Larger particles do not perform better. HG is submitting their data. Pretty much every industry is misinformed on the science of graphene. It's going to take time to educate.
English
1
0
7
374
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@erwian7 @green78499 @HydroGraphInc Nah, it's a rural area and likely to be on the gas facilities own property. They took a step (plant manager job posting) the same day as EPA announcement and took another step recently. News will come soon.
English
1
0
0
69
Brett Green
Brett Green@green78499·
$HGRAF @HydroGraphInc Some final thoughts on the Detriot SPE Automotive show. One of my biggest frustrations as a shareholder in $HGRAF has been CEO Kjirsten limiting information due to NDA'S. Well, at the show, I was directly asked by more than one company not to post images or information placing said company or entity at the show. The request was convincing. I have a fresh appreciation for the burden CEO Kjirsten is carrying. Two more points I'd also like to speak to. I mentioned that graphene was not mentioned in any of the sessions I attended. This is true but not exclusive to Hydrograph. No graphene from any graphene company was mentioned. Olivier told me that Dr. Weiner Xu of the University of Tennessee did mention graphene in his session entitled: Functional and Sustainable Polymer Composites & Their Advanced Manufacturing for Automotive Applications. The final point I want to make is the fact Hydrograph was the only graphene company present that I encountered and for sure the only graphene company presenting. Hats off to CEO Kjirsten and her team for boldly going where no other graphene company dares to venture. Hydrograph is the tip of the spear leading the graphene breakthrough into the world.
English
9
15
148
9.2K
Erwian7
Erwian7@erwian7·
@green78499 @HydroGraphInc Acetylene partner in not NDA, location of a production facility is not NDA, things are moving too slow.
English
2
0
0
225
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@AdamAstro3 @juniorminingpro @BambroughKevin I've read 100+ scientific studies on graphene(no AI) knew some plans before the community posted(eg Bellville, Plant mgr, permits). Fully invested into HG. The hype was way too early for the HG story. Novice investors think it's a guaranteed success. Mgmt has to prove themselves.
English
0
0
2
29
Adam Astro
Adam Astro@AdamAstro3·
@juniorminingpro @BambroughKevin There's always a lack of knowledge, willingness, or ability to understand the science. Kevin and I understand HGs Turbostratic Fractal Graphene to a level of granularity and depth greater than possibly a handful of people on the planet.. he's missed an obvious elephant.
English
1
0
9
242
Junior Mining Pro
Junior Mining Pro@juniorminingpro·
I spent an hour on the phone with a very smart American fund manager who retired in his 40s (2013) after making a fortune as a buy side manager. He thought what Kevin Bamborough did by hyping $HG.v to the moon was irresponsible and not fair to novice investors. Agree or no?
English
19
0
30
5K
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@green78499 @baseballquixote That's funny. I made similar subject comments last year on CEO - just because you have the best product and it improves other's products....doesn't mean companies will adopt it. I believe a few people blocked me as a "shorter". :) Had the same convo with HG mgmt, they agreed.
English
0
0
2
107
Brett Green
Brett Green@green78499·
That didn't come up directly in conversations. I spoke with a presenter who identified himself as a material scientist. I asked him directly if they had adopted graphene with any of their products. His reply was that many of the material scientist at the event are in agreement that hgraf graphene is unique and worth an effort toward adoption. He said the challenge is convincing those within his company making the business/financial decisions to agree. I did see some adoption of carbon fiber. What was truly impressed upon me is the extraordinary effort invested into the decision regarding current formulations and processes. In his role with Hydrograph, Olivier is 100% focused on encouraging industry adoption. His out reach was as much to the other presenters as it was to attendees. I think the true measure of how well $hgraf graphene is being adopted by industry will be revealed in contract related announcements. I feel this catalyst is possibly more important than the uplist to the NASDAQ.
English
6
1
37
2.3K
Brett Green
Brett Green@green78499·
@BambroughKevin @ArneriDesign @RonaldVolusus @lukester588 @thatkidbigmike @TexasWoodpecker My apologies folks. My attempt to initially attach Kevin went to an impersonating acct. X needs to solve the impersonator problems. Here at SPE Automotive Conference in Detroit. $HGRAF does not have a booth but will be presenting later today. Olivier Verriele will be presenting for $HGRAF. Tye topic will be "How Fractal Graphene Delivers Unprecedented Performance in Thermoplastics at Minimal Addition Rates." Kevin, this effort to further understand and validate $HGRAF is a small way to show my gratitude to you for all you have done for the $HGRAF community. This is also my contribution to the entire $HGRAF community and a token of gratitude for all who have contributed.
Brett Green tweet mediaBrett Green tweet mediaBrett Green tweet mediaBrett Green tweet media
English
12
5
74
6.1K
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@calichebahada @HydroGraphInc The wiring and piping at the new location is set up for three units. Install the two new units, get everything working, then bring down the third. If something goes wrong or delays, they can still produce graphene in Manhattan.
English
0
0
1
20
caliche bahada 🇨🇦
caliche bahada 🇨🇦@calichebahada·
@HydroGraphInc They have the original 10 ton unit at Manhattan. This is one of 2 new ones. Landis said they can build 5 or 10 more in parallel. They have $50 mil in the treasury to get up and running.
English
1
0
7
307
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@iceskatergirl3 @YiuCanDoIt You would think but there are plenty of current situations where leadership changes are affecting massive organizations functionality at every level. Orgs a lot bigger than T2COM. We can only hope for HG's sake that somebody competent is put into position.
English
1
0
1
39
Metalynx
Metalynx@iceskatergirl3·
The recent firing of Gen. David Hodne as the general of the U.S. Army’s Transformation and Training Command (T2COM) won’t likely delay the 2027 timeline for the Army Graphene Innovation Consortium. Because T2COM is a large organization that is entirely about modernization, its core initiatives will be maintained.
English
1
0
1
66
Metalynx
Metalynx@iceskatergirl3·
Could Hydrograph $HG $HGRAF be purposely delaying their Nas uplisting to pair it with military or other significant contracts? Per Grok: Yes! Companies totally do this strategic timing dance all the time, and it’s a smart play for that bigger “splash” effect. It’s like saving the best fireworks for the grand finale. It’s super common in microcaps, defense/tech, and critical materials plays. They bundle the Nasdaq uplist (or full listing) with major catalysts—big contracts, revenue starts, partnerships, or facility ramps—to create hype, attract fresh institutional money, boost liquidity, and ride the momentum wave instead of dribbling news that gets ignored. Nasdaq uplists often bring a pop from visibility + volume (institutions love compliance, easier trading, potential index eligibility). But the real juice comes when you drop it alongside “proof” like a huge DoD contract or production milestone. Solid examples of timing uplist/listing with big catalysts for max splash: • Verses AI (VRSS / VRSSF) — Canadian AI/software play proposed Nasdaq uplist while pushing reverse split + positioning for growth catalysts. The move created early volatility and attention, timed to highlight their “Genius” platform progress—aimed at broader US investor reach exactly when fundamentals were shifting. • Charbone Hydrogen — Microcap hydrogen producer (clean UHP plants) is pre-revenue but timing potential TSX/Nasdaq graduation with first revenue from Sorel-Tracy facility ramp + US Midwest expansion + gov incentives (Canada’s 40% tax credit + US production credits). Analysts note uplist once revenue track record hits = bigger investor splash and valuation re-rate. • Broader trend in defense/critical materials: Canadian firms (like some in space/satcom or materials) often align US shifts or listings with gov contract wins or NATO spending ramps. Firefly Aerospace’s 2025 IPO debut came amid big contracts and space hype—popped on launch with execution news. Sierra Space (not public yet) is eyeing IPO with $3.4B+ in NASA/contracts lined up for similar splash potential. In defense-adjacent spaces (think military contracts like HydroGraph’s Army/ARL collab), this sequencing is extra popular—US domicile or listing + contract announcement = “domestic supplier unlocked” story that resonates big with investors chasing national security tailwinds. Defense/tech names with contract + visibility combos often see the strongest initial surges: • Some OTC-to-Nasdaq stories in hype sectors (cannabis early days or AI) saw 100%+ pops when news hit simultaneously, but long-term winners had real revenue follow-through. • Lesson from history: The splash is biggest when the catalyst is “tangible” (signed contract, first revenue) right around listing—not just paperwork. For $HGRAF, your thesis fits this playbook perfectly: CEO tying big military or other contracts (Army graphene innovation, DoD access) to redomiciling first, then Nasdaq Q3 for the bundled reveal. It’s strategic patience—builds that bigger fireworks moment instead of small pops that fizzle. Signs of progress (Texas ramp, Sparc collab, GEIC/ARL work) make it feel like classic setup. This approach is bullish when it clicks—creates liquidity, hype, and credibility all at once. The 2026 transition year could deliver that hockey-stick revenue if the sequence lands clean. 📈
🧢 Coach SCOTT ! 🏀💰👨🏻‍🦳@NBAJazzChat1

@rhoman1996 @TheSqeakyMouse US Military contracts require re-domicilation to US. HydroGraph likely wants DOD announcement to coincide with the NASDAQ entry. According to Kjirsten… Sounds like mid to late summer. Always expect headwinds before the tailwinds. 😁 $HGRAF | #HG

English
13
9
63
9.6K
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@YiuCanDoIt @iceskatergirl3 And then the military relationship gets delayed too. Which delays more things. Everybody focused on the stock price and shorts, not reading the news. Not one mention of the T2COM general being fired.
English
1
0
0
51
Nerf Nuke
Nerf Nuke@YiuCanDoIt·
@iceskatergirl3 I think it's definitely a choice. They are prioritizing redomiciling and military contracts above NASDAQ uplisting. I just wish this was articulated as a strategic decision instead of something that kind of 'happened' to the company outside of their control. Optics matter.
English
2
0
2
124
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@DSzollarD @BambroughKevin The US military has been studying graphene for over 15 years, the studies and PR are out there. 3rd parties have shown graphene has significant military use. She ain't lying.
English
1
0
0
80
dszollar
dszollar@DSzollarD·
Joffrey Simonet made a really fair point about this in his recent Seeking Alpha article: "HydroGraph is now a billion-dollar market cap company with the hopes of NASDAQ uplisting, and Ms. Breure would surely expose herself to severe legal repercussions if the statements she made in this interview were materially misleading or false." Even if it's not official it's just such shows the confidence that she mentions this basically each time
English
4
0
24
2.9K
Kevin Bambrough
Kevin Bambrough@BambroughKevin·
“HydroGraph….is working closely with the United States Armed Forces on military applications for its graphene technology.” ept.ca/features/explo…
English
11
34
244
24.5K
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@KeatonnBrownn @commodityrsr @BambroughKevin We were so lucky to have 15+ years of research done on graphene. The science and its capabilities are already known and proven. Truly a once in a lifetime investment opportunity.
English
0
0
1
27
Keaton Brown
Keaton Brown@KeatonnBrownn·
@commodityrsr @BambroughKevin I truly believe this. I have spent hundreds of hours looking at graphene research and general sentiment in market research as well. This does not behave like normal. Nothing is normal about this company. I think if we’re saying POSSIBLE I’m at breaking into the trillions. 2030’s
English
2
0
0
224
Coach Investments
Coach Investments@commodityrsr·
$hgraf $hg wow. Great @BambroughKevin lets get this MC up so no one can take us out easily!! I fear Elon Musk might be one of the biggest threats for a take-out. He will see the value and offer tens of billions if not more!
Coach Investments tweet media
English
10
18
135
17.7K
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@jonnyarchie @knedoycap @BambroughKevin I know somebody who lives in the area of the gas plant who gave me a tip. Plus some research. Won't post details but just happy to say progress is being made since the 24th.
English
2
0
1
47
KD 🇦🇺
KD 🇦🇺@knedoycap·
🚀🚀 $HGRAF 🚀🚀 The potential here is enormous. @BambroughKevin calling for a valuation 20x from here ($2.3bn —> 23bn USD) when (not if) a military relationship is announced - they’ve already alluded to such a relationship…. 🤯 + 75 customer conversations in place as we speak. If they win 10% of these and announce contracts this will explode. + new Texas plant HQ and Hyperion build out + gas deal We are still so very early. 🔥
Kevin Bambrough@BambroughKevin

Note all the people saying find the next one. Completely unwilling to do the due diligence to understand that $hg is the next $hg Pattern recognition system see chart says ‘I missed it’ Meanwhile, if/when they close a series of big orders and get a large military partnership the stock will be another 20x higher. The bias / laziness combo is a huge detriment to 100x returns. We can put all the information out in plain site… but people seem to find every reason possible to not read and think.

English
8
4
49
6.8K
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@BambroughKevin @LoneyZachariah The big orders will come in due course. But if their initial contract announcements are small, I wouldn't be surprised by a big pullback of the stock due to not meeting the hyped numbers (officially from mgmt and here on X). But we are entering meme territory so maybe not...
English
1
0
2
438
Kevin Bambrough
Kevin Bambrough@BambroughKevin·
Might have a 50% drop. After the shorts are blown out at $40/sh and it drops back to $20/sh. lol. Point is I don’t care about how we get there. I’m saying in due course there will be over 5000 tonnes of orders which will translate into $50 bln cap which is $125-150 or so a share etc. Cdn/usd round about. Give or take. But. I think they will end up getting 10k tonnes then 20k tonnes and license piles of patents. So.. do I sell there? probably some. But, I think the institutions and ETFs will have to buy. Holding out for that might be the best call of all… The squeeze potential here can’t be denied. Shorts are on the run. And I say.. let’em burn. 🔥
English
10
10
193
7.9K
Zachariah Loney
Zachariah Loney@LoneyZachariah·
A precautionary note for $hg $hgraf investors: in the coming days and weeks we will have -20% days and even greater intraday drops just based on regular volailty. Excepting this before it happens WILL make it easier to stomach. There most likely won't be any reason for it, besides regular volailty and stop losses cascading into a deep washout to reset sentiment. I'm ready for it and waiting. I'm not gonna try to trade it. I'm just ready to be an observer. Don't sell on fear. If you are going to sell, sell when you feel greedy, even just a few shares to develop the right mindset
Zachariah Loney tweet media
English
21
7
139
26.8K
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@BambroughKevin @MacNeillPatrick Timing is everything. We had 10+ years of graphene research to validate what it could do before HG came about. It really doesn't get much better than that.
English
0
0
0
50
Kevin Bambrough
Kevin Bambrough@BambroughKevin·
Thanks Pat… I think this one is going down as one of the greatest called shots in stock picking history. Right place, Right time, Right historical research before. But 100% I got lucky that my son just happened to be the right age and had the interest to work with me for a summer job and working on writing a book about father teaching son to invest. Lucky that he also worked with Power One the summer prior and they had financed Hydrograph. One thing we must never forget… success comes with a lot of good fortune. Where you’re born, the politics, the education system. The teacher you happen to get a given year who inspires. The accident you had or the one you just avoided Don’t be ‘fooled by randomness’ @nntaleb FYI. Great book.
English
4
1
26
703
Pat MacNeill
Pat MacNeill@MacNeillPatrick·
@BambroughKevin big congratulations to Kevin Bambrough for one of the greatest public market investments ever made. Also appreciate your due diligence that was available to all who followed!
Pat MacNeill tweet media
English
1
0
16
518
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@crux_capital_ How is NVIDIA not pumping 2 billion into Aeluma instead? This whole situation of InP wafers is just nuts.
English
1
0
0
317
Gaetano
Gaetano@crux_capital_·
$LITE CEO just dropped a major signal If you follow $AXTI you need to read this It speaks directly to the InP constraint. The new interview with Lumentum and Morgan Stanley provides a fascinating look at the exact same supply chain crisis AXT described, but from the perspective of a major buyer actively maneuvering around the geopolitical risks. When you put together what both management teams said, they completely agree on the extreme scarcity of the market, but Lumentum’s strategy reveals exactly why AXT is suddenly seeing such panicked demand from the rest of the industry. Both companies are in absolute agreement that the industry is facing a severe structural bottleneck for Indium Phosphide, forcing buyers into unprecedented, decade-long commitments. During AXT's earnings call, CFO Fischer highlighted just how narrow this market is, asking , "...how many suppliers are there? You know the answer to that. two, and we're one of them". Lumentum's CEO, Michael Hurlston, validated this exact constraint, stating that NVIDIA's recent investment in Lumentum was driven precisely because they saw "a massive scarcity in indium phosphide" and needed to strategically secure their supply chain. Because of this scarcity, both companies confirm the industry is locking in capacity for the next decade. AXT's VP of BD noted they are "seeing forecasts out beyond 2030 for many of these customers". Matching this perfectly on the purchasing side, Lumentum confirmed they just executed a "7-year deal... that we think covers us out through mid-2030s that assures us of supply". However, the crucial divergence between the two companies lies in how they are handling China. AXT relies on its Chinese subsidiary, Tongmei, for manufacturing, which makes Chinese export permits the "single most significant gating factor" for their growth. Lumentum, which operates two of its own fabs in Japan, explicitly decided to bypass this geopolitical risk entirely. When asked how Lumentum is dealing with China's export restrictions to Japan, Hurlston said, "We buy indium phosphide substrates from a third party. Fortunately for us, that third party is not in China...". This is where Lumentum's actions directly impact AXT's market environment. Hurlston detailed the nature of their 7-year agreement with that non-Chinese vendor, stating, "We sort of work with them to kind of corner the supply of their indium phosphide substrates, which certainly mitigates, I think, a lot of the concerns that existed previously around China and the Chinese substrates coming into a Japanese fab". If we take both executives strictly at their words, that there are only two major suppliers (we know there are a few others, but not as big), and Lumentum just signed a 7-year agreement to "corner the supply" of the one that isn't located in China, it perfectly explains the intense pressure AXT is currently experiencing. Even without assuming Lumentum bought every single available wafer, their aggressive move to lock down the alternative supplier inherently tightens an already starved global market. This directly validates why AXT's CFO noted that "every customer is worried about getting enough for their needs" and why they are suddenly fielding urgent meetings with "CEOs and general managers" who "all wanna talk to Morris about capacity and about future growth". Lumentum successfully insulated itself from the China export risk, but in doing so, they restricted the alternative supply, leaving the rest of the capacity-starved market to scramble for whatever AXT can currently manufacture and legally export. Found this all interesting and wanted to share. When I first heard this my initial thought was that this is damaging to AXT long term. Because Lumentum is actively seeking non-China exposure for the long term. But then I thought more about it and starting to think from the perspective of the other companies wanting to secure substrates. Anyway, this was alot of thinking outloud. Hopefully you find it valuable!
Gaetano@crux_capital_

🚨Photonics investors! Read this post about $AXTI Demand. Demand. Demand. That's the story over and over. No one can supply enough to meet the demand needed The substrate layer can't provide enough wafers and the companies using the wafers can't manufacture enough chips for the hyperscalers For those of you that aren't familiar with the supply chain and process, here is a very simple breakdown: - Companies source raw materials like indium and phosphorus - These materials get refined, synthesized into InP crystal, and sliced into wafers - These wafers are sold to companies like Coherent and Lumentum - These companies grow epitaxial layers on the wafers and fabricate laser chips - Those chips either get packaged into transceivers by the laser companies themselves, or sold to pure-play module makers like Luxshare and Innolight who build their own - These transceivers get deployed into data centers So if the raw material/substrate layer is constrained, everyone downstream feels it. And that's where AXT sits. They can't supply enough to meet demand. But here's what makes this even more interesting. AXT's constraint right now isn't just manufacturing capacity. They have finished goods sitting in their cleanroom ready to ship. The problem is Chinese export permits. AXT manufactures through their Chinese subsidiary Tongmei, which means every shipment out of the country requires a license from China's Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM). That process has become unpredictable. They received permit denials in Q4. This is a geopolitical chokepoint sitting right in the middle of the global AI infrastructure buildout. And when AXT can't ship, there's no easy fix. Sumitomo Electric and JX are the main alternatives, but both are running constrained and fully booked. There is no spare capacity sitting on a shelf somewhere waiting to be allocated. The constraint is real and structural. I think it's easy to think the photonics trade is overextended because of some stock charts. But the photonics trade is really under supplied. Those are very different things. Don't take my word for it, let's look at what AXT management is saying: "...we definitely have more orders than we can actually... manufacture now. As we add the capacity, we're counting on who we can supply to." "people are telling us that their demand's gonna be going up three, four, five over the next four or five years. And, you know, there's not – how many [qualified] suppliers are there? You know the answer to that." (For context: Sumitomo Electric and AXT are the two main players. The point isn't the exact number, it's that the number of suppliers who can meet Tier One quality and volume requirements is extremely small) "...every customer is worried about getting enough for their needs. There's a general concern where the meetings we've had this week, we're not meeting with the purchasing manager, we're meeting with CEOs and general managers. They all wanna talk to Morris about capacity and about future growth." "...we are definitely talking about long-term supply agreements with a number of customers right now, and we are planning our business according to those long-term supply agreements. We're seeing forecasts out beyond 2030 for many of these customers." AXT is in a very powerful position. If they ramp capacity like they say they can, and permits get eased up, there is a lot of money on the table. There are also two other companies worth watching closely in the context of everything above. $COHR Coherent's 6-inch InP transition, completed a full year ahead of schedule, means they get roughly 4x the devices per wafer, dramatically reducing how much substrate they need per unit of output. At the exact moment substrate supply is most constrained and most geopolitically uncertain, they've systematically reduced their exposure to it. Full post coming soon. And then there's $ALMU Aeluma, who is building InGaAs on 300mm silicon wafers, an approach that sidesteps the InP substrate dependency entirely. The worse this constraint gets industry-wide, the more interesting their platform becomes. Full post coming on that one too. The stack is constrained top to bottom. The demand isn't slowing. And the companies that saw this coming are already positioned.

English
16
26
202
42.1K
Donald
Donald@Donald69801874·
@Derek7490 @BambroughKevin @knedoycap They are all fixing it. GEIC, HG, and all the other graphene companies that make real graphene. They'll get there, it's a process!
English
0
0
1
29
KD 🇦🇺
KD 🇦🇺@knedoycap·
Took 1.5 trading sessions to $HG $HGRAF to recover from a small dip after a $30m raise. Love to see it. Customer contracts on the way 🔥🚀
English
4
2
81
5.3K