Donnie
248 posts


@DavidJSharette @cipscool @Tesla @SawyerMerritt @DirtyTesLa @teslaownersSV @DMC_Ryan Crazy how people don’t understand this
English

@cipscool @Tesla @SawyerMerritt @DirtyTesLa @teslaownersSV @DMC_Ryan Probably (as long as they weren’t distracted). But the point is that Tesla did it and did it faster than I could.
English

@RealWarnerus US conservatives struggling to comprehend that they are actually just fucking evil lmao and that's why in the lens of every other western country they are rated this way on the scale is amusing. They seldom will ever learn that they are evil though.
English

@account_sync @DevinOlsenn @Not1234W @Tesla “When I lock the car” bro, try to read what he says, dumbfuck lmao
English

@DevinOlsenn @Not1234W @Tesla You are wrong on this one. I own a Mercedes C Class and it closes the windows and mirrors when I lock the car.
English

Close Windows on Lock is such a great feature, hard to believe Tesla is one of the only car companies that does this.
@Tesla
English

@SawyerMerritt I dont even think Safety is a problem anymore, its more of a navigation problem
English

NEWS: Elon Musk has confirmed that FSD V15 will run on AI4.
"We have a a big pipeline of major improvement to FSD that will lead to Unsupervised FSD anywhere in the world that it is legal to do so. We have FSD V15 hopefully by the end of this year, that will be a complete overall of the software architecture. At that point, we're really just increasing the safety level of FSD."
English

@elonmusk @BasilTheGreat And make it PPV and give the money to the victims family.
English

It isn’t billionaires. It’s the principle that individuals have a right to produce, trade, and keep what they earn.
Billionaires are just the most visible target. Start there, and you normalize the idea that success is a liability. Once that principle is accepted, it doesn’t stay confined. It moves downward.
And there’s a practical side you’re ignoring. In a free system, you choose who you deal with. You can walk away. When power shifts to bureaucrats, that choice disappears. You deal with them whether you want to or not.
So no, it isn’t about defending the rich. It’s about rejecting a system where your rights depend on who has political power.
Paddy@SAFCPaddy
I will never understand why working class people fight tooth and nail to defend billionaires
English

@Michael57788258 @RockChartrand Probably because billionaires are the highly productive people who create jobs and opportunities for everyone else. I know that’s a harsh truth for people like you.
English

@Michael57788258 @RockChartrand Not to mention the havoc that would create for shareholders.
English

@Michael57788258 @RockChartrand No, they cannot easily pay those taxes. California’s proposed 5% wealth tax would literally force those billionaires to sell stock in their own businesses, leaving them with less influence in their own companies.
English

@Michael57788258 @RockChartrand If billionaires have that much power to 'bend governments to their will,' why are so many leaving high-tax states like CA and NY for FL and TX? If they can't influence a state, how do they control the whole country?
English

@RockChartrand That's the thing. The billionaires have the political power and they use that power to bend governments to their will and legislate in their interests and not the interests of the people. The system is then rigged in favour of those wealthy enough to buy politicians.
English


@Monopoly907 @argo201290 @NYPostOpinion US farmers already get tens of billions in subsidies annually?
English

@DonnieMachines @argo201290 @NYPostOpinion If it wasn’t a bailout then why did we pay Argentinian farmers n not our own who are still struggling?
English

The lesson behind Argentina’s miracle recovery — after rolling back socialism trib.al/RVl0WuV

English

No. Argentina didn't request a $40B bailout. In Oct 2025, the Trump admin announced a $20B US Treasury currency swap line to stabilize Argentina's peso under Milei, plus efforts to line up another $20B from private banks/sovereign funds (later scaled back). It's framed as US support for Milei's reforms—not an Argentine ask like past IMF loans (e.g., their separate $20B IMF deal in Apr 2025). Critics call it a "bailout"; Milei welcomed the help.
English

@Monopoly907 @argo201290 @NYPostOpinion @grok Did Argentina ask for 40 billion dollars in a bail out?
English

@Em0War @DonnieMachines @ShitpostGate Ask Grok is currently available to Premium and Premium+ subscribers only. Subscribe to unlock this feature: x.com/i/premium_sign…
English

@grok @Em0War @ShitpostGate @grok Does SpaceX get subsidies or contracts? And if so, how much money have they saved taxpayers, if any, compared to other launch vehicles that the government would have used instead? Is SpaceX a net negative or net postive for US tax payers?
English

No. Comprehensive data from sources like Good Jobs First's Subsidy Tracker shows Ford has received about $8 billion and GM $7.8 billion in total government subsidies (loans, grants, tax breaks) since 2000—far more than Tesla. Tesla's key federal support was a $465 million loan (repaid early in 2013); Ford got a similar $5.9 billion loan (still repaying elements). GM's 2008-09 bailout exceeded $50 billion.
EV tax credits (ended Sept. 2025) went to consumers buying qualifying vehicles from any automaker, boosting sales across the board—not direct company subsidies. Tesla has sold regulatory credits to Ford/GM for compliance, but that's a market transaction under mandates, not a net subsidy to Tesla.
English

@Em0War @ShitpostGate @Grok Does Tesla get more subisides then any other automaker like Ford and GM?
English

@ShitpostGate Can we please stop pretending this dude would be anything without commie subsidies on his products?
English














