Doug
516 posts

Doug
@Dougb2a
Anti liberal, pro traditional American values, God bless Charlie Kirk, pro Trump, pro Elon, pro freedom,pro Texas, proud dad and husband of 20+ years
Katılım Kasım 2022
95 Takip Edilen32 Takipçiler

@Zeeeee_xx @ChudTheBuilder No word is justification for violence. Only threatening someone should provoke a violent and expected response. 1st amendment is there to protect speech you don't agree with. Today we can't say nig. Tomorrow, we can't say merry Christmas because it offends muslims.
English

@QuickestTempa Why would he die? Think someone is going to get violent over a word? Bunch of pussies, chimps
English

When this dude dies they’re going to tell us that he was actually a very good person and we should feel very sad that a human life was lost
Taurin@Taurock
Someone is going to get hurt very soon smh. Shit ain't worth it fr.
English

@BeaveTenInch @dijoni Chimping out i see. Try debating with me. Explain why someone should be arrested for words they speak? "Axing" for someone's free speech to be censored. Its ok to do it when someone says something you don't like but what about when you say something I don't like?
English

This white supremacist animal goes around the country, terrorizing Black people, and using racist language, and the police and politician let him continue to do it. I guarantee you if he was targeted in Jewish people he would’ve been locked by the justice department for racism and human rights abuse.
Taurin@Taurock
Security told Chud to move. He calls them Nig**** & walks off. White woman hears him and asks to walk him back over to say it to there face. "You don't wanna say it to there face, scary ass"
English

@johnpavlovitz Ya, that's why you people had to kill him.. because he wasn't good enough. Pathetic liars. Not sure how anyone identifies with trash people like you.
English

He wasn't even a great podcaster.
LadyValor@lady_valor_07
He would have been a great president.
English

@FBIDirectorKash @RealAlexJones Is anyone actually going to be held accountable?? Millions of Americans patience is running thin.
English

The money doesn’t lie.
The evidence shows the charity who supposedly fought the Klan - FUNDED the Klan.
The charity who supposedly fought Neo-nazis - FUNDED Neo-nazis.
The SPLC engaged in a massive fraud operation to deceive their donors, funded the very hate groups they claim to oppose, and then hid their operations from the public through shell companies and fake entities.
This @FBI and @DAGToddBlanche won’t let them get away with it any longer.
English

@bonchieredstate Its time for Americans to find their balls and do something about it. We are all sitting around waiting for government to hold itself accountable. That is the job for "we the people "
English

@GuntherEagleman @SenateGOP Just think about it. There's a reason they are not doing it. We were right about everything up to this point! The truth will come out one day I just hope it's not to late.
English

I’m not going to lie, when the @SenateGOP won the majority, I thought we would get a couple wins.
Instead we have a Senate GOP that refuses to pass secure election laws.
English

So is the DOJ going to arrest members of congress for insider trading? Because if not this seems awfully hypocritical. Just saying.
Bill Melugin@BillMelugin_
BREAKING: DOJ announces it has arrested a US Special Forces soldier who took part in the raid that captured Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro after the soldier allegedly pocketed $400,000 by betting more than $30,000 on Maduro’s removal on Polymarket. Name: GANNON KEN VAN DYKE
English

If anyone of us peasants were accused of the same crimes as these politicians, we'd be in prison.
Why is there a double standard? Most importantly, why do we sit back and allow it?
Tim Walz
Ilhan Omar
Keith Ellison
All accused of facilitating billions in fraud.
Not a thing is done about it. Why?
Massive election fraud.
Not a thing is done about it. Why?
English

@CJGRISHAM @Savsays @WeldingMacooch I had a potential juror say if a cop said you did it, you're guilty period. People really are that dumb
English

@Savsays @WeldingMacooch This is why I'll never understand why people blindly support cops.
English

UNFORTUNATE UPDATE: I found out that Deyanna Ostroushko, the woman who you see assaulting me in the video below, will NOT be charged for assaulting me on Saturday.
The Hennepin County Sheriffs department stated to me that they feel they do not have sufficient evidence to recommend charges against her.
English

@TheDavidHasbun @DisrespectedThe Because the company still has to directly pay this. Then has to deal with the push back from the customer. Then fight people operating illegally and charging less because the playing field is not level. But yes, the consumer will pay in the end. Still hard on business owner
English

@DisrespectedThe Why do companies complain about rising costs as if it's not going to be passed completely to the consumer?
This is not going to raise costs on trucking companies.
This is going to raise costs on consumers after the trucking companies raise trucking prices in response.
English

I pay 15k a year already for 1 million dollars in coverage. This would break me and many others.
A newly introduced bill in the U.S. House of Representatives could dramatically increase the financial requirements for trucking companies, sparking major debate across the industry.
On April 9, 2026, lawmakers reintroduced the Fair Compensation for Truck Crash Victims Act, which proposes raising the minimum insurance requirement for interstate motor carriers from $750,000 to $5,000,000.
If passed, the legislation would also require insurance limits to be regularly adjusted for inflation and rising healthcare costs, ensuring coverage keeps pace with modern expenses.
Supporters of the bill argue that the current $750,000 minimum, unchanged since 1980, is no longer sufficient to cover the true cost of serious crashes, especially with increasing medical expenses and the growing size and weight of commercial vehicles.
They say the change would ensure that victims of truck crashes receive fair compensation without facing overwhelming financial burdens.
However, the proposal is expected to face strong opposition from parts of the trucking industry, as such a significant increase in insurance requirements could raise operating costs, particularly for small carriers and owner-operators.
The bill is backed by multiple highway safety advocacy groups and continues a push by lawmakers who have introduced similar proposals in previous years.
As the legislation moves forward, it is likely to become a key topic in ongoing discussions about safety, accountability, and financial responsibility in the trucking industry.
Source: U.S. House of Representatives / Official release
English







